Skip to main content

Full text of "I Testify Against The Jews"

See other formats




Robert Edward Edmondson 

Third Edition 

Sons of Liberty 
P.O. Box 214 
Metairie, LA 70004 

First Printing 1953 
Second Printing 1954 



The Mighty Force that gave— 

To Greece its Eternal Beauty and Imperishable Glory 
To Rome its Imperial Power and Sublime Grandeur 
To America its Immortal Constitution 
Is not dead! 

It still lives 

To Save The Republic of Washington-Franklin-Lincoln, 

At the inception of the patriotic crusade for Unde Sam herein described, 
face to face with devastating horror—and the Road to the Right—these elemental 
questions posed themselves: 

Since the "Men of 76'’ patriotically risked "their lives, their fortunes and 
their sacred honor” for this Republic, can true citizens endowed with so royal 
a birthright do less in time of National Peril? 

Should not every American on whom it bestowed surplus wealth, hold 
such in trust and devote it to needed defence when danger threatens the 

The only answer to each question was an emphatic "Yes!” 



This book is humbly dedicated to 

Marian Louise Edmondson, who, defying dual terror, faithfully stood 
besrdf herhusband^o die before her tune February 22. 1952, a heart attack 
victim. I bear testimony that she justified her existence by word and deed. 

To "The Twenty Immortals." that inspired band of fearless Amertcan 

lawyers, who. embattled in a _ courtr0 °y c^LturiCvemus the New 

far beyond the Cali of Duty m e _ak t D WON' And 

Deal might, and in drfei ^f ^ maintained the 

received the deserved judicial high-honor tri&ute. 

highest traditions of your profession. 

And to that magnificently courageous company of "" men and 
-ciVnllv smeared by New Dealer dominated newspapers of the 

™“ ., r,i... ■ -h.. .*.»«,.11, h...,l,c.« .11 

dl “le Sit, gJ bach blow for blow-I tahe off my hat m reverent,al 
salute to rare individualistic valor. 

*-■* is rsr&rAty; sas 

" e V r of direful fociabLc shyers, ons, which those heroic unsung militant 
Christian soldiers then envis.oned and, cherishing oo "passion for anonym,tv 
m ■ "invisible enemy") they patriotically broadcast signed warnings, to 

» l —«-«— ^ 

menacing The Republic. 

1 would not be true to them nor to myself were I to fail, in the current 
crisis, to "stand up and be counted" publicly—For The Repub ,c. 



"Inspection of the alleged libelous documents in this case will show the 
court that they are the result of mature study of the literature and press of the 
world. The defendant will have the right to occupy the time of the jury to 
read into the record a mass of material without end. There is no telling how- 
many months trial might consume. It would develop racial and religious antagon¬ 
isms chat would rock the foundations of the community. 

The foregoing court argument was made May 2, 1938, by Defence Counsel 
Wise for Robert Edward Edmondson following backdown dismissal pleas by 
five amicus curiae, whose leadership is credited with having instigated a com¬ 
munistic misleading sectarian indictment, a violation of state and national 
guarantees of freedom of the press, and which petitions were succeeded on 
May 10, 1938, by an unconditional formal dismissal of the case by N. Y. 
Judge Wallace. 

With whatever authority he may have been equipped by more than half a 
century of specialization in the publicity fields of politico-economic and affili¬ 
ated problems, this author, editor, lecturer and publisher has no hesitancy in 
emphatically stating if that New York group-libel case had progressed normally 
to a logical end the enormous cumulative explosive power generated would have 
smashed any news suppression-dam ever erected, and "rocked the foundations” 
of The Republic from coast to coast. The tremendous import of factual ex¬ 
posures of appalling high treason by the Roosevelt New Deal would have 
inescapably elevated righteous citizen-rage to transcendental heights, and boiling 
passions might well have produced civil commotion of great intensity, with 
ramifications to the National boundaries—and beyond. 

The Fire of Truth widely broadcast then would have been later swept into 
a prairie conflagration through the confirming sequel in 1942-7 of the Roose¬ 
velt mass-case travesty on justice at Washington, D. C., dismissed in 1947, for 
the high news value of the first would have been revivified and expanded by the 
overt acts laid bare by the second persecution, as to the treacherous New' Deal 
conspiracy with its perversion of tolerance. 

Weak Legal Evidence Unmasked 

The premature dismissals in both the New York and Washington plot- 
cases were due to early unmasking of the irrelevant and weak legal "evidence’’ 
presented by the Roosevelt prosecutions, defence counsel having been able to 
prove that there was no state law covering the absurd, intolerant and proven 
false N. Y. City prejudiced indictment. The Department of Justice not only 
failed to establish trial jurisdiction in the District of Columbia, but the defense 
so effectively cited U. S. Supreme Court precedent-decisions invalidating the 
prosecution that finally the prosecutor himself admitted he "had no case" in 
the Washington Communistic action. 


The 1952-3 puzzling spectacle of "Anti-Semitism purges in Russia s 
"Semitic'-created Communist Government has revived and endowed with new 
life the collateral subject matter of the mass-documentation herein. That alone 
would have justified this presentation as a result-sequel of the American 
Peoples repudiation of the New Deal, Nov. 4, 1952, very closely related to 
"Anti-Semitism," calling for a public explanation of this multi-meaning mystery 
term, which is analyzed herein. 

"President Eisenhower has appointed Lewis L. Strauss, a Special Assistant, 
to serve as liaison advisor on atomic energy matters.”—Washington special to 
N. Y. Times, March 10, 1953. 

Advice from such a source would be as unacceptable to this writer as would 
counsel from U. S. Ambassador Dillon to France. Both are prominent jews. 
Strauss was not only a partner of the international banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb 
& Co but served che Truman regime as a member of the Atomic Energy Com¬ 
mission. Dillon was head of the Wall St. banking firm of Dillon, Reed & Co. 

Individuals referred to herein who appear to this reporter to be m un- 
American associations, are, so far as he knows, entirely true to their convictions; 
but HIS DUTY to The Republic and the Fourth Estate requires him to put his 
findings before the Bar of American Public Opinion for its enlightenment and 


The writer has dared to hope that this up-to-date reproduction of vitally 
important and hitherto unpublished material will do the job of effectually educat¬ 
ing his fellow countrymen as to the tremendous menace of a still operating 
'"clear and present danger" to the existence of The Republic, which danger 
has merely been driven "underground” temporarily by the Anti-New Deal man¬ 
date of last November, and continues to invisibly carry on its plans for the 
destruction of national governments and religions. 

And he sincerely believes that the aforesaid Anti-New Deal repudiation 
(Only Liberation Step No. 1) would have occurred many years prior to 1952 
but for the inadvertent judicial suppression of the "real issue” testimony in¬ 
herent in the evidence contained in the two dismissed Edmondson cases hereto¬ 
fore mentioned. 

While publicity per se is obviously no treat for a news reporter veteran, 
being human he would naturally welcome the accolade of general public vindi¬ 
cation denied by free speech suppression; but his chief reward and great hap¬ 
piness lie in the conviction that he has performed to the best of the ability with 
which he has been endowed, the worthwhile task of exposing Wrong to his 
blinded fellow-countrymen by holding high the Torch of Right without fear or 
favor, in a firm belief that faith without works is sterile, and that "Pitiless 
Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils.” 


Above all, the author felt it would be dereliction in high duty not to 
promptly distribute this invaluable legacy throughout The Republic—and be¬ 
yond—considering the vital intra-national import of its exclusive, extensive and 
unique confessional-documentation, which he had been privileged to compile. 
Complimentary first copies of this book were therefore placed in '‘key quarters." 

The author has elaborated The Real Issue in the formally filed Petition to 
Congress (made under oath) quoted herein and made a part hereof; for through 
only such a publicity channel can it be adequately placed before the "Court of 
Last Resort"—the American Bar of Public Opinion—and final decision had as 
to whether or not our Republic is to be destroyed by alienism. 

With such American tribunal I rest my case supremely confident that the 
unimpeachable guilt-confessions "from the horse’s mouth" herein documented, 
will bring conviction and emancipation action before it is too late. 

Practically all the Petition evidence passed the court libel test with a 
judicial precedent-pronouncement that under American law no large group 
"defamation" broadcast is actionable if publication is motivated by concern for 
the public welfare and circulated in good faith. In this connection it is under¬ 
stood that the N. Y. judge’s 1938 dismissal of the Edmondson group libel case 
was in response to the 1936 annual meeting dictum issued by the American 
Institute of Law at Washington, D. C.. reported by the N. Y. Times of May 9, 
1936, saying that "where the circumstances are such as to induce a reasonable 
belief that factors exist which affect a sufficiently important public interest," 
existing laws should be changed. 

Under the influence of the high quality of the Petition evidence the new 
Congress, which is already responding to constituency pressure for exhaustive 
investigation of New Deal subversions, should welcome this hitherto un- 
published-and-broadcast revealing documentation-identification. 

Communist ideology ever howls for "academic freedom” in its "pull¬ 
down" propaganda of destruction. How can you even practice academic freedom 
until you have a base on and from which to operate? To what do American 
citizens owe first allegiance, to academic freedom or constitutional freedom of 
speech and press! Without the latter vantage point academic freedom cannot 
even exist. You may work to improve that base, not to destroy it. The U. S. 
Constitution does not authorize its citizens to subvert it—that is treason to it and 
also to academic freedom. As a matter of simple self-preservation the Constitu¬ 
tion must impose on its citizenship the high DUTY of defending it. And you 
can’t dodge the consequences of dodging your responsibilities. 

The exposure seems so apt and well-deserved that I cannot refrain from 
paraphrasing below against these academic fanatics a philippic delivered to 
anf i-assimilationists some years'ago by a once great American citizen, viz.: More 
and more of late do we see the very foundations of that majestic and beneficent 
structure of The Republic clamorously assailed by those to whom it opened 
wide the Portals of Freedom. But they have been blinded by the glare of 
Liberty. Blinded, they dare force their guidance on Americans who for genera¬ 
tions have walked in the Light of Liberty. Drunk with the strong wine of Free¬ 
dom, they presume to impose their reeling gait upon citizens to whom Freedom 
has been a pure and refreshing fountain for a century and a half. 


The author’s exhaustive research, in an earnest attempt to isolate and 
identify the genesis, origins and promoters of Communism, went back through 
re-did history Before Christ; thence downward through the centuries to 
"Proofs of a Conspiracy against all Religions and Government, by John Robi¬ 
son Professor of Natural History and Secretary of the Royal Society of ^mhurg, 
Scotland (1798) ; which book blazed "The T rail ot the Serpent of subcersmn 
The Illuminatti ' to the sequel of the French Revolution, into the Bolshevist 
Marxianholocaust, and thence First and Second World Wars, to the present 
Soviet internationalist threat to all nations. 

No other book like this is in existence.'It is a memoir-recital of a man now 
in his eighties who, standing alone and childless m the shadow of inevit¬ 
ability, obviously can have no ulterior or selfish motive in producing ic. 

While this report to countrymen covers the high spots, a general review of 
correlative and corroborative evidence discloses an additiom, similar mass or 
what newspapermen call "good sniff" alter applying the acid test of cold 

print’* inspection. 

Its "official” character is attested by the fact that it is a Constitutional 
"Petition to Congress,’’ which is the representative of the American ° f 
Public Opinion, and therefore its legality cannot be successfully challenge 
Hus the further fact that such a status is affirmed by the following notaned 
oath which conveyed the Peticion to the Congress: 

''Personally appeared before me a notary public in and for the County of 
Deschutes of the State of Oregon, Robert Edward Edmondson, who swore that 
the foregoing Petition to Congress dared April 1, 1953, was written compiled, 
published and circulated solely by him; that all this was done to the bes of his 
knowledge and belief with honest conviction as to the truth of the matter pre¬ 
sented therein with reasonable interpretations, and which he broadcast whh the 
°ood motive of public interest, for the welfare and protection of The Republic 
of the United States of America; and that said Rooert Edward Edmondson 
hereby offers one thousand dollars for proof that the author has intentionally 
falsified any part of said production." 

In conclusion, speaking from the independent vantage point of half a 
century of strenuous service in the highly educative fields of The Fourth Estate, 
the logic of events impels the judgment that the average Occidental mind is at a 
loss to comprehend and interpret the fantastic aims and sadist cruelty of cir¬ 
cuitous Oriental thinking as exposed herein; and most Americans seem n0(: °™y 
unable to grasp the realities but are actually unwilling to accept as yet the 
sinister plot-pattern now progressively unfolding. Witness: It required two 
decades of revolutionary suppression by the Roosevelt New Dealers merely to 
arouse the American People to take Liberation Step No. 1 on November 4, 1952. 


Dated April 1, 1953 
At Bend, Oregon 
P. O. Box No, 854 


(Summary of Book Contents) 

SECTION ONE, order of presentation: New Deal N. Y.-Washington 
indictments—unconditional Dismissals—Seven years of persecution—Patriotic 
Publicity Crusade origins 1933-4—Communistic New Deal called "Jew Deal’’ 
by leading Jew—Evolution of "Jewish-Anti-Americanism” slogan—1936 Arrest 
and imprisonment in N. Y. "Tombs” Jail—Charge "Libel of all persons of the 
Jewish Religion” for unmasking Jewish Communism—"Out on Bail,” cmsad- 
ing—In 1938 Jews petition court to dismiss indictment as free speech violation— 
Unconditional Dismissal—Anti-Communist Publicity Crusade continued to Nov. 
30, 1940—Ill-health Vacation: including unbelievably boastful Jewish detailed 
government and its Christian foundation, through civil war. 

SECTION TWO, Order of presentation: New Deal "seditious conspiracy’’ 
indictments at Washington 1942—Mass-Trial 1944—Judge’s death in Novem¬ 
ber causes "mis-trial”—Unconditional Dismissal of Communistic Mass-Case in 
November, 1947—Persecution tactics at "Mess’’-Trial exposed by daily diary 
reports from Defendant Edmondson’s wife—Deadly Parallel—Court Exhibits 
uncover Communist Treason Warmongering — FDR Jewish Ancestry — New 
Deal conspiracy against defendants proved—Edmondson Testimonials and Bio¬ 
graphical Sketch—ANALYSIS OF ANTI-SEMITISM—1952-3 Russian Jew 
Purges explained; Stalin Successors unmasked—Jewish Problem in solution— 
A REMEDY—including two decades of irrefutable record-proof of almost 
incredible internal and internationalist ACTS OF PLANNED NEW DEAL 
HIGH TREASON to The Constitutional Republic of the U. S. A., its political, 
educational and religious institutions, its Press and its Radio Systems, 

Politico-Economic Solution 

The Jewish World Problem 


This is a "Petition To Congress For Redress Of Grievances, Succor and 

It is hereby filed with Congress under the authority of the Constitution of 
the United States of America, by the undersigned Robert Edward Edmondson, 
reporter, editor and publisher, a native-born citizen of pre-American Revolution 
ancestry Scotch descent, at present a legal voting resident of the State of 
Oregon, domiciled at Bend in Deschutes County; and who repeatedly voted 
against the Roosevelt Administration from its New Deal inception, casting 
his ballot November 4, 1952, for the straight Republican ticket. 

During 1942-44 your Petitioner was indicted by the Roosevelt Adminis¬ 
tration’s Department of Justice, charged with "seditious conspiracy,” based 
on a free-speech non-profit patriotic-publicity peace-time one-man crusade 
exposing by documentation subversive Communism, its origins and propaganda, 
with the good motive of defending, protecting and preserving our Republic, 
beginning at the end of 1933 and concluding November 30, 1940. 

Trial by Indictment No. 73086 of January 3, 1944, was begun in the 
U. S, District Court for the District of Columbia at Washington, D. C. early 
in 1944 before Chief Justice Eicher. 

On November 22, 1946, following failure of the New Deal prosecution 
to make a case after years of investigation and mistrial, the U. S. District Court 
for the District of Columbia, by Chief Justice Laws, unconditionally dismissed 
indictments as a travesty on justice; with the public press terming the action a 
violation of the free speech amendment to the United States Constitution, while 
the Washington Times-Herald Nov. 23, 1946, printed: "The case was bred in 
malice, prosecuted in hate and pursued in bigotry.” 

Effective July 31, 1947, the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D. C. 
AFFIRMED the lower court dismissal decision, ending the false mass-con¬ 
spiracy charges after five years of futile prosecution by the Roosevelt Depart¬ 
ment of Justice, concluding with the following words: 

"In this case the record shows that from January, 1946, to the dismissal 
order entered near the end of that year the trial court, AT THE INSTANCE 
of some of the defendants, .AGAIN AND AGAIN SOUGHT TO COMPEL 

"Its final decision to adopt the latter course seems to us ALTOGETHER 
TO SAY THAT IT WAS NOT COMPELLED, in the light of the facts then 
shown to exist.” 



Below is copy of the complete text of the unconditional dismissal decision of the 
Washington ' Mas -Case " as handed down on Nov. 22, 1946, by Chief Justice Laws and 
^held by the U. S. Court of Appeals effective July 31, 1947, ending the prosecution. 


United States of America j 

vs - V Criminal No. 73086. 

Jos. E. McWilliams et al, l 

Defendants 1 


These cases are before me on motions to dismiss, lately filed by permission of the 

C ° U UmU yesterday, so far as the Court has been informed the prosecution has been 
chiefly entrusted to O. John Rogge, Spl. Asst, to the Arty. Gen. 

On Tan ?5 1946, when the Court heard previous motions to dismiss Mr Rogge 
stated that in view of late decisions of the Supreme Court of the L. S., he felt doubtful 
as to whether a conviction of the defendants would be sustained. Counsel explained this 
was his per/oil opinion; that the Dept of Justice had not. taken a postion in the 
matter, and for this reason he was no: at liberty to stare us opinion. 

Two weeks later Mr Rogge again appeared before the Court upon further hearings 
of the mod'nfto d!s“ ss . Th? Cola <Xd whe.he, ho then was m a post.ton to tell 
whether the prosecution wished to proceed -with the case. 

The Court was requested to give the Government a reasonable amount of time to 
answer thA question However, on this occasion the Chief Prosecutor again stated that, 
Ite c„*S« in g Supreme Court decisions In arable cases, tt was h,s personal v.ew 
that it was doubtful whether a conviciuon would be sustained. 

The Court then cook the question of dismissing the cases under advisement. 

On Mar. 1 1946, while the matter was pending under advisement, counsel for the 
nrosecution applied to the Court to postpone its ruling for a period of thirty days, 
alS it wa P s P bel:eved certain testimony might be available trom witnesses in Germany 
which would directlv establish guilt of certain of the uefendants. 

When this application was presented it was stated the Attorney-General wished to 
send Mr. Rogge to Germany to make an investigation. Counsel for defendants objected. 

While unusual in the midst of a long-pending criminal case to permit an mvestiga- 
non to endeavor to build up a doubtful case, I decided, because the charges were serious 
and access to possible evidence previously had been toreclosed by the war with Germany, 

I should permit time for the investigation. 

Accordingly the prosecution was granted until Apr. 30. 1946, a longer time than 
had been nskfd A written memorandum filed by the Court granting this time that on 
or before April 30 1946. counsel for the prosecution will be expecteu to advise the Court 
in writing P (copy’to be sent to each defendant) whether prosecution of the case is 
desired' fiso whether, in his judgement, a conviction of defendants if one is obtained, 
mai be’sustained under controlling decisions of the Supreme Court of the U. S. 

On Aor 30 1946 a memorandum was filed by one of counsel for the prosecution, 
stating th£ prosecution was desired, "provided the prosecutions investrgation being 
presently conducted in Germany elicits additional evidence of gu> t of defendants. 
This memorandum stated that the investigation had not been completed, and that 45 
davs additional time would be required. 

While I did not specifically grant the additional time to complete the investigation 
it eventuated that Government counsel was able to secure this time, because it was not 
until May 18, 1946. that the motions to dismiss the indictments were over-ruled. 

The case' was called on Sept. 20. 1946, for the purpose of setting a date for trial. 
On this occasion, Chief Prosecutor Rogge, being asked the third time in eight months, 


the attitude of the prosecution, stated that there still remained in his mind the question 
■whether there was sufficient evidence to meet the test of the Supreme Court cases. He 
said he had serious doubts on this point, as he previously had advised the Court, but 
that the Dt-pt. of Justice wished to suggest a trial date in December. 

Mr. Rogge informed the Court that an analysis he had made of evidence found in 
Germany had been turned over to the Dept, of Justice the previous week. 

Motion to Dismiss Granted 

Inasmuch as Mr. Rogge informed the Court, on three occasions, one after a lengthv 
investigation in Germany, had stated to the Court his serious doubts of a successful 
prosecution, a renewal of the motions to dismiss was permitted. The motions to dismiss 
now' under consideration then were filed. 

On yesterday, at the time of the hearing upon these motions. Mr. Rogge -was not 
present representing the prosecution. Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the 
first time entered his appearance in behalf of the prosecution. 

Mr. Caudle stated the Dept, wished to prosecute all of the cases and to have a 
date set for the trial; that the Dept, did not share the doubts of Mr. Rogge. 

The Court requested Mr. Caudle to state his reasons why those now in charge had 
a different view' from Mr. Rogge. 

In answer, Mr. Caudle made no statement of reasons. 

However, he offered to submit to the Court a trial brief which had been prepared 
and a written report of Mr. Rogge made to the Atty. Gen. Asked -whether these docu¬ 
ments would also be made available to the defendants, prosecutor stated they would not. 

Counsel for the defendants objected to the Court’s examining the documents withouc 
copies being furnished them. 

The Court then informed counsel that by reason of the recent condemnation by the 
Conference of Senior Circuit Judges of the U.S., at a meeting presided over by the Chief 
justice of the U.S., of the practice prevailing in some districts of trial judges receiving 
from the prosecution a brief or other documents not furnished opposing counsel, he was 
not in a position to consider the trial brief and the report of Mr. Rogge. 

The defendants have undergone before a Court and jury part of a trial which ended 
on Nov. 29, 19-44, by reason of the sudden death of the presiding justice. The prosecution 
was still in progress at the conclusion of this trial, which had been under way for eight 
months. Eighteen thousand pages of testimony were taken and 1100 documents were 
introduced in evidence. The prosecution was formally brought to a dose Dec. 7, 1944. 

Beginning on Dec. 9, 1944, and from time to time thereafter, various defendants 
have sought a speedy trial of their cases. For nearly two years such a trial has not been 
made possible-for them. Their Constitutional right to a speedy trial has been denied. 

I can reach no other conclusion than that there is a serious doubt as to validity of 
these cases. More than eight months is an abnormally long time to be required by the 
prosecution to establish guilt in a dear case. One would expect convincing testimony of 
guile to be fully adduced long before the expiration of Such a length of time. 

When a retrial was in prospect, the Chief Prosecutor, who, mote than any other 
person, is familiar with the cases, expressed his doubts as to sustaining a conviction; 
and because of these doubts made the unusual request for permission to hold the question 
of their retrial in abeyance until he could make further investigation into the facts. Not 
only two times before this request was made, but on one occasion lately, after a lengthy 
investigation had been completed in Germany, this Court asked the prosecution whether 
it desired to retry 'the case. Until yesterday, there was no answer that it did. 

If these defendants are guilty, it would seem that any serious doubts as to their 
guilt would be resolved in more than five years of intensive investigation by able counsel 
and investigators of the Dept, of Justice. 

If they were clearly guilty, the prosecution should have unwaveringly assured the 
Court to this effect, at least upon the completion of the investigation in Germany. 

Usually the Court will permit the prosecutor to decide whether he will bring a 
case to trial; but when it appears, as here, there is serious doubt as to the success of 
the case, and that the defendants, because of long delays granted over their objections, 
cannot obtain a fair trial, the Court should exercise its discretion to deny prosecution. It 
would be both unjust and un-American to do otherwise. 

The defendants have been before the Cour& upon these charges for nearly four and 
one-half years. AH of them were brought here from other parts of the country to stand 
trial. Because of the impoverished state of the defendants, they were represented by 
counsel not of their own choice but assigned by the Court to serve without compensation. 

As in all long-delayed cases, the witnesses now are scattered; some are not accessible. 


more particularly to the defendants who are without funds: the memories of witnesses 
as to events occurring many years ago, are not clear. It is for these reasons, among others, 
that the Constitution of the U.S. requires a speedy trial, and that the Congress of the 
U.S. has imposed Statutes of Limitation to prevent long-delayed prosecutions. 


Under the circumstances, to permit another trial, conceivably lasting more than a 
year, with new prosecutors and newly-appointed counsel for defendants, with che eventual 
outcome in serious doubt, as Mr. Rogge has stated to the Court on three occasions, would 

I have no doubt the cases should be dismissed, and an order to that effect will be 
entered as to all defendants. 

The question of terminating these cases is one of importance. If the dismissal I 
shall order is sustained, new prosecutions may not be started, because they will be barred 
by the Statute of Limitations. 

The Court feels that the prosecution should have opportunity, if so advised, to take 
action by way of application to appellate courts to review my order dismissing the cases. 
While this seems to me to be possible after final judgments of dismissal, nevertheless, 
in order to safeguard the interests of the prosecution against any. doubt, the final order 
of dismissal will not be entered by the Court until Dec. 2, 19*46. 

The Court should and does acknowledge with gratitude the services of counsel who 
served in behalf of the defendants without compensation. Their sacrifices were extensive; 
their financial losses were great. Specifically, the Court thanks for their services in these 
cases, W. Hobart Little, Frank H. Myers, Elizabeth R. Young, J. Austin Latimer, M. 
Edward Buckley, Orville C. Gaudette, P. Bateman Ennis, John S. Hillyard, Ethelbert B. 
Frey, Harry A. Grant, James A. Davis, Ben Lindas, Frank J, Kelly, Arthur Carroll, 
Charles E. Morganston, Claude Thompson, William Gallagher, Joseph H. Bilbrey, Rees 
B. Gillespie. L. J. H. Herwig, John B. Gunion and George B. Fraser. 


Chief Justice 

Washington, D. C. 

Nov, 22, 1946. 

(Emphasis Supplied) 


The following points are from the personally composed and formally 
presented appeal to the Washington Court of Appeals which upheld dismissal, 
entitled "Brief of Robert Edward Edmondson, Appellee, opposing Appellant’s 
Plea Against Dismissal,’’ which brief was highly commended by defense 

"Why did the prosecution in the mass-case go back twenty-five years in 
the third indictment mistrial—as per Bill of Particulars and mistrial transcript— 
in search of evidence of criminal intent after Indictment No. 2 was struck 
because it violated the ex post facto clause of the Constitution by going back 
ten years? In its German-American Bund draft-evasion reversal-decision of 
June 11, 1945, the U. S. Supreme Court reprimanded the prosecution for 
going back only seven years. 

"In view of the revelations herein made exposing the "infirmities-of-proof- 
by-imputation” Prosecutor Rogge "secret report," why did the Justice Depart¬ 
ment even consider offering such an unacceptable document to Chief Justice 


Laws JSiov. 21, 1946, in support of its request for retrial, since the subject matter 
thereof was not only palpably irrelevant to the mass-case charge but was in¬ 
admissible in court on hearsay grounds? 

"Did the Justice Dept, offer such material knowing it to be inadmissible? 
Or, could it be so professionally ignorant as not to be able to distinguish 
between relevant and irrelevant evidence? 

"Affirmative answers to either query would be damning! 

"Exemplifying the vengeful, scandalous and libelous smear-technic ap¬ 
parently inculcated into the legal staff of the Department of Justice, Chief 
Prosecutor Rogge, who thrice admitted that he w-as unable to make a case, 
viciously attacked defendants’ patriotism publicly in numerous lectures on his 
investigations in Nazi-Gc-rmany, delivered under the auspices of Jewish 
organizations in cities of states where defendants were resident, including 
Pennsylvania, California, Washington, Illinois and Michigan, continuing the 
smear-campaign in New York and Massachusetts after the mass-case was 
unconditionally dismissed. 

"Mr, Rogge’s amazing admission during an invitation-address before the 
American Jewish Congress as reported by the Boston Post of Dec. 2, 1946, 
disclosing the exceptional high, wholly unimpeachable and unmistakable pro- 
American source of patriotic financial donations made to certain impoverished 
anti-Communist defendants during mistrial, thereby canceled out and utterly 
disproved his own Nazi bribery allegations made Mar. 1, 1946. All of which 
unmasks the inherently oppressive character of the Justice Dept, appeal from 
the lower court dismissal." 

(After O. John Rogge, mass-case prosecutor, was discharged by the 
Department of Justice, he was reported in the public press as repeatedly acting 
as counsel for notorious pro-Communist elements, and once visited Soviet 
Russia "to pay his respects" to Stalin in Moscow.) 

Continued quotations from the Edmondson brief follow below: 

"Court-appointed Counsel Frey of Washington, D. C, wrote defendant 
Edmondson Feb. 21, 1945, reporting mass-case hearings on Feb. 19 before 
U. S. District Court Associate Justice T. Alan Goldsborough. He quoted 
Justice Goldsborough as stating in open court after hearing oral arguments: 
"I don’t know if this trial is going on again or not. If so, IT IS BLOODY 
MURDER!" Mr. Frey wrote: "That is exactly what be said." (This writer under¬ 
stands that Justice Goldsborough was a member of the banc of judges who 
wrote later the "mistrial’’ decision in the mass-case.) 

"In his 1945 book The March of Bolshevism, Judge Geo. W. Armstrong 
of Texas, says the obvious Marxian conspiracy to deprive mass-case defendants 
of their Constitutional rights, with the connivance of the Attorney-General’s 
Department,' is such a serious abuse of the courts and of governmental power 
. . . that Congress should turn the searchlight of publicity on those who have 
broughc about this infamous prosecution." 

"It is of the essence of liberty that it be recognized that guilt is personal 
and cannot be attributed to the holding of opinions or to mere intent in the 
absence of overt acts."—Former Chief Justice Hughes of the U. S. Supreme 
Court, to New York Assembly members in 1920, regarding expulsion of 

In his brief to the U. S. Court of Appeals from which the above quota¬ 
tions are taken, Defendant Edmondson emphasized the repeated evidence that 


die Roosevelt Administration's Department of Justice did not go into court 
with dean hands; that it acted in bad faith during procedure; that it ignored 
U.S. Supreme Court precedent-decisions; that it made exploratory searches as 
well as illegal seizures; that it flagrantly failed to uphold the vital Constitu¬ 
tional decrees of ex post facto and impartial and speedy justice. 


In consideration of the positive declaration of defense-counsel that the 
prosecution in the seditious conspiracy case had even failed to establish the 
legal right to try the indictment in Washington, Defendant Edmondson sub¬ 
mitted to Chief Justice Laws under date of May 20. 194-6, the following 
''Motion to Dismiss" the case on the ground that the judiciary, according to U.S. 
Supreme Court decisions cited, lacked jurisdiction anywhere to handle this 
essentially political case, which was de facto under the exclusive power of 

"Now comes Ethelbert B. Frey, Actorney for Robert Edward Edmondson, 
defendant, says his client is innocent of the charge of conspiring co undermine 
the loyalty of' U.S. armed forces, should not be prosecuted further, and hereby 
respectfully moves this honorable Court to dismiss all charges against him on 
the ground of lack of judicial power jurisdiction in the matter, as established by 
decisions of the United States Supreme Court, refusing to consider questions 
presented because they were political and not under control of the judicial 
power. (AUTHORITY: Questions arising under a republican-form of govern¬ 
ment are political, not judicial, and are for Congress, not courts. Ohio v, Akron 
Metro. Park Dish, 28L U.S. 80, L. ed. 715, 50 S. Ct., 230, 66 ALR 1465.) 

"WHEREFORE, since this matter has degenerated into a wholly POLITI¬ 
CAL set-up, and is therefore beyond the jurisdiction of the Judicial Power, 
defendant hereby petitions the Court to forthwith dismiss the three indictments 
in furtherance of justice and in the public interest,’’ 

(Signed May 20, 1946) 

While that motion was denied ic will be noted that the accompanying 
affidavit (cited hereafter) not only refutes before dismissal, seriatim and 
meticulously, principal conspiracy allegations of the Roosevelt prosecution but 
unmasks the real conspiracy in this matter, namely, a conspiracy by the 
Roosevelt Department of Justice to depiive Edmondson of his substantial rights 
as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution—which policy follows precisely “the 
Communist Line” of attempting to conceal its own guilt by accusing adversaries 
of crimes the Communists themselves are actually committing. 

(Note; Chief Justice Laws of the U. S. District Court of the District of 
Columbia, unconditionally dismissed the seditious conspiracy case as a travesty 
on justice six months after this Motion To Dismiss by Edmondson May 20, 

In the record below', to enhance simplicity and accuracy and to clarify, 
the accompanying affidavit has been individualized and focused as much as 
possible consistent with important facts; diversive irrelevancies being minimized 
by concentraton on essentials. 



Robert Edward Edmondson being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says— 

CHARGE by the Roosevelt Administration Justice Department: That in violation of 
the so-called 1940 Sedition Law enacted on June 23, Defendant Edmondson conspired_ 
with others and with members of the German Nazi Party "to undermine the loyalty" ot 
the armed forces of the United States through publications issued and distributed by him 
in peace-time. 

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, on Dec. 7,. 1944 , following a mis-crial declaration 
at Washington, D.C., thirteen defence-counsel promulgated a joint statement saying the 
actual charge in the indictment (73086) was that defendants conspired . to advise, 
counsel urge and cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny and retusal of auty in the 
military and naval forces of the U.S.;" the indictment being based on the Act of 
Congress of June 28, 1940, Title 18, USCA, Sections 9-11. 

"That the prosecution tried but failed to show requisite intent, by the introduction 
of irrelevant, immaterial and inaccurate history going back more than 20 years (in 
violation of the ex-post facto provision of the U.S. Constitution), m a wholly fume 
attempc to prove that defendants joined the Nazi Party Leaders in a movement to destroy 
democracy government in the U.S. and other countries. 

"That prosecution faiLed to establish venue or jurisdiction in the District of Columbia. 

"That the prosecution failed to adduce any evidence tending to prove the specific 
charge in the indictment as recited herein. ^, - 

"That, in our opinion, defendants are INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES made m 
said indictment." 

REBUTTAL NO. 2. By reversing June 11. 1945, the draft-evasion conviction of 
ieaders of the German-American Bund, which the mass-trial prosecutor held to be the 
"spearhead" of the Nazi movement in the U.S. (although an FBI report of 1937 cleared 
it of Nazi seditious activities) the U.S. Supreme Court denounced the offering of a huge 
mass of evidence and exhibits similar to that at the 1944 mistrial. 

REBUTTAL NO 3. Regarding "requisite intent," the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 
Apr 23 1945 in Cramer v. U.S.: "Other evidence relates statements by Cramer before 
the U.S’ was at war with Germany. At the time they were uttered, however, they were 
not treasonable. To use pre-war expressions of opposition to entering a war to convict 
of treason during the war, is a dangerous procedure. 

ALLEGATION. That "The Nazi Party and its leaders publicly announced their 
program to destroy democracy throughout the world, in speeches, newspapers, pamphlets, 
books and other writings.” 

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, the Department of State of the U.S. Govt, in 1943 
issued a book entiled "National Socialism” in which on Page 56 the categorical state¬ 
ment was made: "IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to adduce from the speeches, or writings of Nazi 
leaders any direct statements chat they aimed to dominate the world."— 

REBUTTAL NO. 2. Since the Report of June 30, 1945, of Chief-of-Staff Gen. 
Geo Marshall of the U. S. Army to the Secretary of War, said "No evidence has been 
found that the German High Command had any over-all strategy plan adding that_ the 
German General Staff could not agree among themselves about invading Great Britain 
after the fall of France; never worked with the Italian leaders; did not agree on the 
conduct of the Russian campaign; and had no co-ordinated plan with Japan which was 
later confirmed by testimony at the Nuremburg War Criminals Trials—how could there 
have existed a Nazi-Fascist world-domination plot, as alleged by the prosecution, without 
an over-all strategy plan, since conspiracy bottoms on partnership agreement? 

ALLEGATION: That defendant organized, controlled and supported organizations 
ac home and abroad listed in the indictment. 

REBUTTAL; Whereas, Defendant Edmondson did not "organize, control or support" 
ANY of the 45 organizations named, and challenges the prosecution to produce any 
proof of its allegation. 

ALLEGATION: That, defendants worked together up to the time of the filing 
of Indictment 73086, filed Jan. 3, 1944. 

REBUTTAL: Whereas, Defendant Edmondson completely retired from all publica¬ 
tion Nov 30 1940 (3V 2 years previously). Witness statement of Asst. Prosecutor 

Toseph W Burns in February, 1943. to this defendant in the presence of Attorney 
Wa-ner H Parker and defendant's wife, viz.: "We were sorry to learn that you had 
stopped publication Nov. 30, 1940, because we hate to lose a defendant." 


ALLEGATION; That defendants issued propaganda to destroy the American form 
of Government. 

REBUTTAL: Whereas, in an address Aug. 14, 1940, at Stoddartsville, Penna,, 
delivered to Boy Scouts, Defendant Edmondson said: "Usurpers have sought to destroy 
our protective system of checks-and-baiances by a communizing process labeled 'democ¬ 
racy.' In these days of peril we should be more on guard than ever to protect traditional 
Americanism from alien labels and foreign ideologies of all kinds. The American Model 
is unique and unlike other so-called republics, and it is the best government on- earth. 
We should be prepared to defend it against all comers." 

The foregoing address—one of many defence-exhibits—was printed under the title 
"American Republic Model Best.” 

ALLEGATION: That defendant wanted a one-party system like that of the Nazis. 

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, on July 18, 1940, Defendant Edmondson published 
a bulletin headed "Commandeer & Compel Labor &c Capital," declaring: "This is a 
two-party nation.” 

ALLEGATION: That defendant "intended to abolish Freedom of Speech, Freedom 
of the Press and Freedom of Assembly.” 

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson on May 12, 1938, published 
under the caption "Court Dismissal" statements regarding his publications, saying that 
his "patriotic politico-economic exposures were directed without hate, to defend-protect- 
preserve the peace and safety of the Constitutional State against irreligious jewish- 
Communist subversions thereof . . . Our great Constitutional Form of Government stands 
or falls with Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly.” 

REBUTTAL NO. 2. Under the title "Free The Press!." on Mar. 3, 1938, Defend¬ 
ant Edmondson published: "Our Constitutional Guarantees have been communized and 
broken down by the 'terrible power of the purse' operating through the 'great power of 
the press.' FREE THE PRESS—and the Constitution is preserved! FREE THE PRESS— 
And America is saved! I am for free speech ballots—not communistic bullets. By public 
enlightenment, bloodshed can be avoided. Let the people know The Truth! They will act 
to Rescue The Republic!” 

ALLEGATION: That defendant wanted to run the U.S. as a totalitarian state in 
accord with the Nazi Leadership Principle. 

REBUTTAL: Whereas, on Oct. 24, 1935, Defendant Edmondson published a 
bulletin headed "Why Americanism Rejects Socialism,” in which he stated: "German 
Socialism . . . retains the European mass-action ’master-leadership’ principle, which is 
un-American . . . The world political struggle today is between the American Ideal of 
Individual Liberty and the foreign doctrine of regimentation." 

ALLEGATION; Defendant agreed that they should destroy our form of government 
and set up a Nazi or Fascist form. 

REBUTTAL NO. I, Whereas, Defendant Edmondson published Apr. 23, 1934, 

a bulletin captioned "Mis-Representative Minority Government," stating: "Being pro- 
American, this writer is ANTI-FASCIST, anti-communist and ANTI-SOCIALIST, 
because these forces have been obviously' subverting Americanism; having threatened to 
destroy the very foundation of American Liberty . . . This writer , is pro-American under 
the Constitution; for Representative Government without selfish minority dictation; for 
Individual Liberty without license; for Equality of Opportunity with profit-reward; for 
capitalistic economic freedom minus predatory practices.” 

REBUTTAL NO. 2 . Whereas, Defendant Edmondson published Feb. 24, 1938, 

under "Patriots Halt Internationalists," his lecture on Americanism before the German- 
American Bund in N.Y. City following an FBI 1937 investigation-report clearing the 
BUND of Nazi subversive activities, in which address was the following: 

"Are you a Fascist?"—I am asked. 

"The answer is NO.” 

"Are you inclined toward Fascism for America?" 

"No, the dictatorship regimentation thereof is un-American.” 

"Do you favor German Nazism for the U.S.?" 

"I do not. It represents regimentation by master-leadership, which is also un- 


ALLEGATION: Defendant appealed to members of the armed forces to be disloyal 
to our democracy form of government. 

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson challenges the prosecution to produce ONE 
such appeal. His publications were always addressed to the American People under the 
constitutional free press guarantee—never addressed to members of U. S. armed forces. 

ALLEGATION: Defendant attacked every step our government made to defend 

REBUTTAL NO. 1. Whereas, Defendant Edmondson wrote May 20, 1940 under 
the publication title "High Treason:” "There is no excuse for not making America 
invincible to all comers . . - The Hour is Grave! And the time has come to make the 
voice of We The People effective in Washington. . . . Rescue The Republic! Make it 

REBUTTAL NO. 2. "Keep America out of the second Jew-^made European War!” 
published Defendant Edmondson Sept. 4, 1939, under the title STAY OUT OF THE 
SUICIDE WAR!.” in an appeal to the American people calling for "Billions for 
defense against invasion but net one drop of American Christian blood for the second 
kosher suicide war!” 

ALLEGATION: That defendant set race against race by publications to promote the 
Nazi racial concept in the U.S. 

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson declared Oct. 24, 1935, summing up the Nazi 
German racial stand: "COMPOSED OF MANY RACES, America cannot cultivate 'A 
RACIAL SOUL' Like Germany"—captioning the article "Why Americanism REJECTS 

ALLEGATION: That defendant "identified himself by the main label of anti¬ 
communist;" spread propaganda that Communists were trying to take Over the U.S.; 
accused many of our public officials of being Communists; labeled everything he opposed 
as Communist and Jewish including international bankers and democracy; and preached 
hatred of Communism and Jews. 

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson admits being anti-Communisc because Com¬ 
munism is directly against the American constitutional representative republican form of 

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson is "being prosecuted for circulating, 
right up to the time of the finding of Indictment 73086 on Jan. 3. 1944, thousands of 
documents describing President Roosevelt as a Jew because some of his ancestors were 
named Jacob, Sarah and- Samuel—carrying the implication that he got the country into 
the war to help fellow-Jews,” and "referring to the President as a warmonger.” 

REBUTTAL: NO. 1. Since Defendant Edmondson retired from all publishing 
activities Nov. 30, 1940, he could n-ot have been ''circulating 1 ’ said documents "up to 
Jan. 3, 1944." 

To uncover and explain to his countrymen what he believed to be President 
Roosevelt's Jewish anti-Americanism and pro-internationalism, which put Jewish before 
American interests, Defendant Edmondson, many years before the Nazis in 1939 referred 
to it, reproduced previous publications as below listed which traced the Roosevelt ancestry 
to the Rosenvelt-Samuels Family of Holland. 

The Daily Citizen of Tucson. Ariz., Published Mar. 7, 1934, a Roosevelt genealogy 
made up in the Carnegie Institution of Washington, showing descent from the Rosenvelt- 
Samuels Family of Holland. 

The St. Petersburg, Fla., Times of Feb. 8, L954, printed an interview with former 
Gov. Chase Osborn of Michigan, personal friend of Franklin D. Roosevelt, detailing 
Roosevelt's Jewish descent from the same Holland ancestry. 

REBUTTAL NO. 2. This defendant believed President Roosevelt was warmonger¬ 
ing by placing Jewish interests in peace and war before those of The Republic, in view 
of the following associations: 

"The Social Justice Committee of the Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency 
of the recently adopted social legislation in particular the scope of the Tennessee Valley 
Authority. It endorses the President's plan for reorganization (packing) of the U.S. 
Supreme Court.”—From the Jewish National Day of N.Y. City, May 1L, 1937. 


Challenging che present American social system, the Central Conference of American 
Rabbis, largest Sanhedrin in the world, at its 1936 annual convention, declared by resolu¬ 
tion- ''We advocate a socialization of basic enterprises- There is only one way in which 
the American People can escape fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing 
thoroughly socialized democracy is communism. 

“The man behind the U.S. Supreme Court repacking process was Samuel I. Rosen- 
man, close friend of the President. 1 '—Washington Correspondent Paul Mallon, Feb. 7, 

President Roosevelt appointed Felix Frankfurter to the U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 
4, 1939, although he had never administered a judgeship. 

A short history of B’nai B'nth in England, written by Paul Goodman, Past 
President, says: “In the U.S. the B'nai B’riih Order is the power behind the President.’’— 
Free Press of London, July, 1938, 

The late Gen. Hugh Johnson, who called President Roosevelt “The Jewish People's 
Idol" in the N. Y. World-Telegram of June 19, 1939, wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer 
of June 18, 1940: "There is no longer any question that Mr. Roosevelt is exercising 
no effort to’ keep us out of war. It may not be fair to say that it is his purpose to exert 
everv effort within his supposedly limned powers to get us into war; but at Least this 
statement is incontestible: EVERY ACT OF KIS. IN THE PAST THREE YEARS IS 
THEREWITH. It is shooting craps with the country’s destiny.” 

“Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread all over 
Europe and che world, as it is organized and worked by Jews."—Netherlands Minister 
to Russia reporting to the British Govt, in September. _ 1918.—From U.S. State Dept. 
Book 1931. entitled 'Foreign Relations of the U.S., Russia I.” Pages 674-6/9. Library of 

The 1919 Overman Report to the U. S. Senate contains much evidence that leaders of 
the Bolshevist Revoition were largely Jewish. 

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson attacked New Deal public officials, 
with intent to undermine the confidence of the American people in them. 

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson's “attacks" were exposures of New' Deal anti- 
Americanism. delivered under auchority of the First Amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States and were in direct response to a Presidential call (Oct. 13, 1933) to 
newspapermen for criticism of New Deal policies. 

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson spoke before the German-American 
Bund meetings. He spoke at a Bund meeting Oct. 30, 1937, at the N. Y. Hippodrome. 

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson challenges the prosecution to produce any 
evidence whatever that he spoke at that Hippodrome meeting. He lectured on American¬ 
ism once before the Bund Feb. 24, 1938, after a 1937 FBI investigation-report had 
cleared that organization of Nazi subversive activities. 

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson collaborated with the German-American 
Bund, exchanging publications with it. 

REBUTTAL; By advice of counsel, Defendant Edmondson never joined nor 
collaborated with any group or organization whatever, maintaining an independent 
position in his anti-Communist activities. He exchanged publications with many pub¬ 
lishers, in accord with established custom. 

ALLEGATION: Defendant Edmondson worked with James True and Geo. E. 
Death erage. 

REBUTTAL: Publisher Edmondson exchanged publications with Publishers True 
and Deatherage in the customary publishers-exchange relationship. He did not meet either 
of them until about a year after he had engaged in his one-man crusade for Americanism. 

ALLEGATION: That Defendant Edmondson was in contact with the German 
Embassy at Washington. 

REBUTTAL: While oublishing from the country hamlet of Stoddartsville, Penna., 
Defendant Edmondson received a Martin Luther pamphlet printed in German. Not under¬ 
standing German, he sent it to the German Embassy at Washington asking for the 
courtesy of translation—which was done. That is the sum total of such contact. 

ALLEGATION: That after Pearl Harbor defendant asserted that our Government 
deliberately invited the Japanese attack Dec, 7, 1941, 

REBUTTAL: Defendant Edmondson retired from all publishing activities Nov, 
30, 19^0, more than a year before Pearl Harbor, and consequently could not have 
published the assertion indicated, 

ALLEGATION: That defendant called Democracy decadent and wanted co destroy 
our democracy-form of government, 

REBUTTAL NO. 1. just how could defendant conspire to destroy a democracy form 
cf government in the U.S. where such a setup does not exist, in view of the following 

(A) The Founders of the U.S. specifically repudiated "democracy," the 'Father of 
the Constitution,” James Madison, stating that it was incompatible with personal security 
and the right of private property; (B) Since Sc-c. 4 of Art, 4 of their Constitution, which 
did not contain the word ''democracy.” by the simple act of guaranteeing to each- state 
in the Union a REPUBLICAN-form of government, completely bars a democracy-form; 
and (C) The 1928 U.S. Army Citizenship Training Manual seals the anti-democracy 
verdict with these words: 'The Government of the United States is NOT a Democracy 

ALLEGATION: Defendant Edmondson "followed the Nazi Line" in— 

Attacking Democracy: Whereas he was guided by the repudiation cf the Democracy- 
Form by the Founders of the U.S., whose Constitution bars from the Nation any but a 
Republican-Form of government; 

In Attacking Public Officials: Whereas, he exposed their New Deal political Social 
Democracy ideology as destructive of our Constitutional Representative Republican 
System—doing so long before the Nazi attacked U.S. public administrators; 

In Attacking President Roosevelt: Whereas, five years before the Nazis attacked 
the President as a Tew, this defendant exposed his Jewish Internationalism and his state 
socialist domestic policies as diamettically against the interests of The Republic; 

In Attacking Communism: Whereas, this defendant was guided in such activity by 
the Principles laid down in the book "Communism Unmasked” by Maj. Gen. A. A. Fries. 
USA retired, which American Army high official pointed out over a decade ago that 
Communism was the worst enemy of The Republic, and that Fascism was merely the 
name applied to all and-Communists by Communisis themselves. 

In Attacking Jews; Whereas, he directed his attack against Jews who were under¬ 
mining our form of Government by aggressive and forceful Socialism, Communism and 
Sovietism—calling attention to the historic fact that "Anti-Semitism" ("exclusively a 
product of European politics" according to the 1910 edition of the Encyclopaedia 
Britannica), had been in existence in Germany 30 years pre-Hitler. (See Donald S. 
Strong 1941 book "Organized Anti-Semitism in U.S.") 

Not only did the prosecution in the mass-case fail to establish venue- in the City 
of Washington in the District of Columbia (as indicated in the Not Guilty Joint 
Statement" of defence-attorneys), but also JUDICIAL jurisdiction, in view of the over¬ 
whelming POLITICAL character of this erse which automatically removes it from 
consideration by the JUDICIAL POWER into the province of - the LEGISLATIVE—as 
witness decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court cited hereafter, refusing to take jurisdiction 
in similar cases on the specific ground that they constitutionally come under the control 
of Congress. 

The essentially political nature of the prosecution’s allegations is obvious in the 
indictment, the bill of particulars and the prosecutor's address to rhe 1944 trial jury, as 
pointed out below; being replete with political terms, i.e.: 

"Forms of Government;" "republican;” "totalitarian;’’ "Democracy;” 
"Party program”; "Nazi movement;" "New Deal Party;" "Socialist;" "Communist;' 
"Nazi or Socialist State;’’ "National Socialist Party,” "British Imperialism;” "Presi¬ 
dential election;” "political campaign;" "Anti-Semitism." 

(The political phrase "National SOCIALIST German Workers PARTY" and us 
derivatives appears 240 times in the prosecutor's 1944 address to the trial jury; "Demo¬ 
cracy" 50 times; "Communist" 39: "Anti-Semitic” 35 and "Fascist” 13 times.) 

In his long address to the trial jury the prosecutor repeatedly emphasized the point 
that "Anti-Semitism” was "the spearhead of the Nazi Party movement;'' therehv bringing 
the essential nature of these indictments to a POLITICAL focus on "ANTI-SEMI¬ 
TISM,” which is not a crime under American Law. 

The following citation is from Page 168 of "The Constitution Of The U.S., Its 
Sources And Its Application,’’ a 1941-5 hook by Thomas Janies Norton, published by 
"The Committee For Constitutional Government," 205 E. 42nd St., New York City. 

"In 1912 a taxpayer in Oregon . . , claimed chat the Amendment of 1902 to the 
Constitution of Oregon, by which the people reserved to themselves- the right to propose 
amendments to the Constitution and to enact or reject at the polls laws or amendments 
independent of the legislative assembly, had destroyed the republican-form of' government 
which had been guaranteed by the National Constitution. 

"The U.S. Supreme Court said that the questions presented HAVE LONG SINCE 

Which apparently puts this miscalled sedition under the sole jurisdiction of 
Congress because practically every page of the indictment (except the charging part), the 
bill of particulars and chc prosecutor's opening address to the trial jury is OVER¬ 
WHELMINGLY POLITICAL IN CHARACTER; coming directly under the free speech 
authority of the First Amendment to the Constitution. 

Subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary Public in and for the County of 
Nevada, State of California, oil this 23rd day of April, 1946. 

Lynne Kelly 

Notary Public 


Below is a perfect example of the attempt by the prosecution to follow the infamous 
"Lasswell Thought Parallel" thesis of "guilt by association’' notwithstanding its repeated 
denunciation by the U.S. Supreme Court. 

(a) The Nazis were anti-Semitic; Defendant Edmondson was anti-Semitic; there¬ 
fore defendant was Nazi. 

(b) The Nazis were ami-Communist; defendant was ami-Communist; hence, de¬ 
fendant was Nazi. 

(c) The Nazis wanted to keep U.S. out of war; defendant wanted to keep U.S. out, 
of war; ergo, defendant was Nazi. 

(d) The Nazis and Fascists were anti-Roosevelt; defendant was anti-Roosevelt; so 
the defendant was Nazi and Fascist. 

(e) The Nazis and Fascists were anti-Democracy; defendant was anti-Democracy; 
so Defendant was Nazi and fascist, notwithstanding he accepted the dictum of the 1928 
U.S. Army Training Manual that "The United States is NOT a Democracy but a 


The foregoing unmasks a subversive New Deal political conspiracy to 
suppress news vital to the peace, dignity and safety of the American people: 
for the' mass-prosecution was, as regards your Petitioner, a sequel to a June 11, 
1936, New Deal New York City group libel indictment sponsored personally 
by Roosevelt advisor Mayor LaGuardia, against Defendant Edmondson, which 
action, when defendant in 1938 announced his READINESS FOR TRIAL, 
was promptly and unconditionally dismissed on the court’s own motion, as 
WITHOUT’WARRANT IN LAW and "in furtherance of justice’’—and in 
direct violation of the frc-e speech amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as 
ADMITTED in amicus curaie ''backdown" petitions to the Court by the 
American Civil Liberties Union, American Jewish Congress et al. New Deal 
supporters whose members had previously publicly applauded the mayor s 
indictment, for which the latter was given a medal. 


The mass of documentation hereinafter submitted, not only in justification 
but in the line of further performance of patriotic duty, is of unique character: 
and your Petitioner is convinced that the invaluable confession-documents 
quoted will effectively aid Congressional investigators in their present task of 
unmasking New Deal overt act treason to The Republic, as well as unprece¬ 
dented politico-economic Corruption. 

Identification of the secret forces which have been promoting national 
destruction by acts as well as published propaganda, is unerringly indicated by 
circumstantial and direct evidence, providing testimony beyond reasonable 

Verbatim, quotations are provided by the following: 

(1) Exhibits in court procedure of twenty-two months in New Deal 
New York prosecution and five years in Washington. 

(2) Responsible "overt evidence’’ amply supported upholds this writer’s 
legal exposures of the undermining of our Republic and traditional 

(3) Original .and photostat copies of historic books, pamphlets, docu¬ 
ments, illustrations, etc., from ail over the world, substantiate accusations re¬ 
garding origins of Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Liberalism, Bolshevism 
and allied national subversions. 

(4) There are revealing confessions of guilt by boastful published con¬ 
fessions from "the horse's mouth," almost unbelieveable, staggering occidental 
imagination by their arrogance and sadism, 

(5) Edmondson bulletia publications of themselves completely refuting 
seditious conspiracy charges of the New Deal prosecutions, are shown to have 
been in the possession of Roosevelt Department of Justice lawyers before in¬ 
dictments were made. 

The documentation next following begins with factors leading to the 
patriotic non-profit Edmondson Crusade, reported chronologically hereinafter 
as nearly as possible. 


Publisher Edmondson responded to a call to The Press for criticism, issued 
by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, as published in the New York Times of 

Oct 14 1933 from which the following is taken: 

' "This program (New Deal) is too vast an undertaking for any one man 
or set of men to make sure of, I rely on jou newspapermen to check us. I 
want your criticism as well as your support. 

Following public endorsement of Roosevelt's platform promises your 
Petitioner,—a journalist specializing in pol.tico-econom.c :f.elds-answered that 
cal! in good faith with an Oct. 24, 1933, signed bulletin headed Wholesale 
Reform Blocking Recovery;" pointing out that wholesale reforms were operat¬ 
ing to prevent business' recovery, listing definite factors, concluding with 
"Replace Reform Fears With Recovery Confidence. 

Thar constructive criticism publication was sent to the White House and 
later broadcast from coast to coast. 

Finding no evidence of action along the lines suggested, becoming increas¬ 
ingly alarmed over repetitionai evidence of communistic penetration into 
National administration key-posts, about two months later I wrote and published 
on Dec. 27 1933, an "open signed lecter" addressed Mr. President: Do You 
Favor This un-Americanism?", from which che following extracts are quoted. 

"Washington political communists are boring from within to undermine 
the American Government. Communists in Government service, by arrogantly 
making a false blanket accusation against all in the capitalist class, have cun¬ 
ningly counted upon fear to protest. In view of the foregoing and your recent 
call to The Press for criticism (of che New Deal) the time has come to ask, 
Mr. President, are you in sympathy with such apparent trend toward State 
Socialism? If not, why are those who seek to overthrow it allowed to stay 
in Government service againsc the interests of American citizens? Such un¬ 
checked boring shakes the foundations of The Republic. Is a new form of 
government to be forced upon Americans by a system of secret covenants 
secretly arrived at? Those of us who think for ourselves want to know, Mr. 


That "open letter," was mailed to the White House, broadcast throughout 
the United States, and received widespread approbation. (It was answered 
in 1936 by a New York indictment against the undersigned in direct violation 
of the free speech amendment to the U. S. Constitution.) 

Dated Mar. 27, 1934, an Edmondson bulletin captioned 'Bankrupt 
Leadership" was given nationwide circulation, one patriotic agency mailing 
TO 000 copies In it I categorically enumerated Roosevelt administration acts 
which were causing confusion and business uncertainty, promoting politico- 
economic unsettlement along the "Communistic Line: 

"Has a sinister alien economic power secretly gained invisible control of 
important political machinery as well as that of the channels of publicity ana 
the LLS. monetary system?" 

-come of our friends kindly warn that we may be framed for daring to 
exercise the Constitutional right of _ free speech—but you might as well be 
crucified one way as well as another. 

The foregoing "frame warning" was translated into action when I was 
uronp-lihcl indicted in New York; and prosecuted in Washington, D. C, 

19-12-7, as a seditious -.onspirator. 


About April first, 1934, John T. Mills, associated with a prominent 
N.Y. Stock Exchange firm; Lewis Gouveneur Morris, descendant of a signer of 
the Declaration of Independence; and Clarence M. Chauncey, member of the 
Union League Club and of a prominent New York family, actively and 
practically working against Communism, communicated with Editor at his 
New York publication headquarters, following anti-Communist bulletins. They 
wanted to know if I was informed as to who was really behind the sub¬ 
versions of Communism and Socialism. 

I replied '’no.” 

"Will you read printed proof as to the internationalists promoting such 
anti-national propaganda?" 

"Yes," was the answer, and I was given a large supply of old and modern 
historical books, pamphlets, and other documents, chiefly from British 
patriotic sources, 

Those publications were carefully read and verified from New York 
Public Library sources in .many cases; and, after intensive study, analysis and 
digestion I became fully convinced as to the identity of leadership-forces pro¬ 
pagandizing and subversively using Communism and Socialism to undermine 
our Republic. 

To the best of this Petitioner’s recollection he was never harmed personally 
by Jew's, and therefore his approach to the Jewish Problem could not have stem¬ 
med. from personal animus; and it is worthy of note that he had three decades 
of previous experience as an independent successful reporter, editor and analyst 
in the greatest Jewdsh financial center of the world—New-- York’s Wall St.— 
with its vicious cycles of international manipulation of security . markets into 
general inflation-booms and depression-busts, due to calculated shirtings of 
cash billions, as dictated by the materialistic Gospel of Get. 

It was this exceptional experience with its comprehensive knowledge, 
continual investment analysis and trained observation, which enabled him 
promptly to understand and with unerring accuracy to 1 interpret the concrete 
suppressed record presented to him in 1934 by responsible sources as to the 
Cause of New Deal political subversions, energized by economic-financial- 
monetary monoply of the world’s vast resources. 

In his 1913 book, "Jews and Modern Capitalism," Economics Professor 
Werner Sombart, graphically epitomized thus: "Capitalism was born from the 
money loan; Jews made an art of lending money; they were taught early to 
look for their chief happiness in money; thc-y fathomed all the secrets that lay 
hid in money. They became Lords of Money—and Lords of the world." 

That not only unmasked the Communist Plot to destroy The American 
Republic, but the world dominion aim of the ideological people today generally 
termed "International Jewry.” 

Later, I personally bought, with my own funds, other authentic English 
and French documents, which provided added confirmation. 

When I reported back to the three patriots named, I was queried: 

"Well, whac are we going to do about it?" 

"I don’t know what you men are going to do" was the answer, "but I, as 
a publicity specialist, intend to start a non-profit patriotic exposure crusade 

against Communism and its promoters to defend, protect and preserve our 
Constitutional Republic—with an independant editorial platform along the 
lines of the following:" 


Political, non-partisan, for Americanism First; Anti-Internationalism, and anti-Dictator- 
ship, Communistic or Fascistic. 

Financial, modestly independent, no entanglements. 

Religion: a believer in Christian Principles, not a church member, 

Ancestry: Virginia-Maryland pre-Revolution native American, chiefly Scotch descent; 
bom Dayton, Ohio, 1872. 

Business career; Forty years of journalism as reporter, editor, author, publisher, 
investment-economist and public relations counsel. 

Ambition and Objective: Restoration of The Republic. 

Without ambition except to be of service to my country, I cater to no leadership 
complex. Believing that circumstances create and draft true leaders, I am ready ro co¬ 
operate with any patriotic group not wasting time with effects. I follow no policy that 
takes account of fear and compromise. No important issue was ever won by cowardice or 
by suppressing truth. I am for free speech ballots, not Communistic bullets. Let the 
People know the Truth, they will Save The Republic. "Pitiless publicity is the cure for 
Public Evils!’ " 


Jewish power propaganda has accepted, applied and proved Irish Statesman 
Edmund Burke’s historic tribute to the great power of the press when, during a 
1780 session of the British Parliament, he dramatically turned and, pointing 
to the Reporters Gallery, said: "There is an Estate more potent than any! . . 

He bore eloquent testimony to the maxim that "Pitiless Publicity is the 
cure for Public Evils," as did Voltaire when he epigrammatically exclaimed 
"Revolutions are made by the pamphleteer!’’ The logic of events indicates 
that Voltaire might have well added "and unmade" to that eulogy of "The 
Fourth Estate." 

It will be noted by the reader that in his patriotic crusade reporting, upon 
encountering documents unauthenticated, such as the so-called "Protocols of 
the Learned Elders of Zion," "Benjamin Franklin’s anti-Jewish Prophecy," and 
other unauthenticated documents, the author hereof has been careful to treat 
them in accord with the basic principles of the Fourth Estate regarding 
rumors, gossip, etc., namely, as controversial data lacking confirmation but 
justifying a report as circulating news of live public interest. Also ultra-con¬ 
servatism was exercised in handling documentation from Nazi, Fascistic or 
other sources which current propaganda had labeled as "prejudiced anti-Semitic 
matter." The whole truth has been assiduously cultivated to the best of this 
writer’s ability, and when ascertained, he has presented it as clearly as possible, 
in the "language of vigor," logically convinced as to its reliability. 

(Signed Bulletin of April 7, 1934, issued by Edmondson) 
WHICH is more TRULY REPRESENTATIVE of American Institutions? 
This Group or This List 

Famous practical Americans who, under 
Constitutional individual reward system, 
helped to build United States prestige and 
wealth to unequalled pre-eminence. 

ATTERBURY, W. W., President Pennsyl¬ 
vania. Railroad, 

ALDRICH, Winthrop W., Chairman, 
Chase National Bank, 

BRUERE, Henry, President, Bowery Savings 

BUCKNER, Thomas A., President, New 
York Life Insurance Co., 

Professors, Doctrinaires, et al, prominent 
National Administrators and Advisors, 
favoring policies antagonistic to American 


BARUCH, Bernard M., "Unofficial Presi¬ 

BERLE, Prof, A. A, Ji,, "Unofficial 

BULLITT, W. C., U. S. Ambassador to 

BRANDEIS, Louis D., "Braintrust God¬ 


CORTELYOU, Geo. B., President, Con¬ 
solidated Gas Co., 

DAVIS, John W., Former Democratic 
Presidential Candidate, 

DAWES, Charles G., Former Republican 
Vice-President, United States. 

ELY, Jos. B., Democratic Governor of 

FORD. Henry, Automobile Manufacturer. 
GLASS, Carter, Democratic Senator from 

GIFFORD. W. S., President, American 
Telephone & Telegraph Co„ 

GRACE, E. G., President, Bethlehem Steel 

HARRIMAN, H. I., Chairman U. S. Cham¬ 
ber of Commerce, 

HUGHES. Charles Evans. Chief Justice, 
U, S. Supreme Court, 

HARBORD, Gen. James G-. Chairman. 

Radio Corp. of America, 

JORDAN, Dr. Virgil P„ President, Nation¬ 
al Industrial Conference Board, 
KEMMERER, Prof. E. W„ International 
Monetary Expert, 

LINDBERGH, Col. Charles A„ Famous 
American Aviator, 

MORGAN, J. P„ Great Republican In¬ 
dustrial Banker, given clean bill of health 
in Democratic Banking Investigation. 
MF.LLON, Andrew, Noted Financier, re¬ 
duced U.S. National Debt from 2 6 to 
16 billion while Republican Secretary of 
U. S. Treasury, 

RITCHIE, Albert C, Governor of Mary¬ 
land, former Democratic Candidate for 

RAND, J. H., Jr.. President, Remington- 

SMITH, Alfred E., Former Democratic 
Candidate for President, 

SPRAGUE, O. M. W., Professor. Inter¬ 
national Monetary System Expert, 
SLOAN, A. P„ Jr., President, General 
Motors Corp., 

SCHWAB, Charles M., Steelmaster, 
TAYLOR, M. C., Chairman, U. S. Steel 

TEAGLE, W. C., President, Standard Oil 
of N. J., 

VANDERLIP, Frank A„ Financier, 
YOUNG, Owen D., Chairman, General 
Electric Co., 

WILLARD. Daniel. President. Baltimore 
A Ohio Railroad. 

WADSWORTH. James W., Independent 
Republican Congressman, 
WILLIAMSON, F. E., President, New 

COHEN, Benjamin, Stock Exchange Regu¬ 
lation Bill Co-Author, 

EZEKIEL, Dr. Mordecai, AAA, "Farm 
Regimentation Co-Author," 

F1LENE, E. A.. "Unofficial Advisor," 
FRANKFURTER, Felix, "Unofficial Ad¬ 
visor," called "Karl Marx Professor," 
FEIS, Herbert, "the brains of the State 

FECHNER, Robert, Forest Army Head. 
FRANK, Jerome, AAA General Counsel, 
GOLDENWEISER, Dr. Emanuel, Federal 
Reserve Research Director, 

HILLMAN, Sidney, Labor Advisory Board, 
Amal. Clothing Workers’ Union Radical. 
HUNT, Henry, RFC, Ex-Socialist Mayor, 
KIRSTEIN, Louis R„ RFC Advisor, 
KOHN, Robert, PWA Special Advisor, 
LUBIN. Isador, Labor Statistics- Director, 
LIL1ENTHAL. David R., TVA Counsel, 
LANDAU. L. N.. PWA General Solicitor, 
LANDIS, Prof. James M., FTC, Co-author 
Regulation Bill and Securities Act, 
MORGENTHAU, Henry. Sr., "Unofficial 

MARGOLD, Nathan R., Interior Dept, 

MOLEY, Raymond, Prof., "Unofficial 
Favorite Advisor," Co-author Regulation 

ROSENMAN, Samuel, "Unofficial Ad¬ 
visor," alleged creator of the "Brain 

R1CHBERG, Donald NRA Labor counsel, 
SACHS, A., NRA Economic Advisor, 
SCHNEIDERMAN, Rose, Labor Advisory- 
Beard, noted New York Radical, 
SWOPE, Gerard, "Unofficial Advisor,” 
SOBELOFF, Simon E.. District Attorney- 

TAUSSIG, Prof. Albert E., NRA. 
TUGWELL, Rex G., Asst. Secy. Agri¬ 
culture, holds up Russian System as ex¬ 
ample for America. 

UNTERMYER, Samuel, Stock Exchange 

WARBURG, Tames P., "Unofficial Ad¬ 

WOLLMAN, Prof. Leo, Labor Radical, 
Neutral Member Labor Strike Board, 
WYZANSKI, C. £., Labor Department 

(Many other consultants omitted for 
lack of space, including—in addition to 
Cabinet Counsellors Wallace, Murgcnthau. 
Jr., Perkins, Farl'ey, Ickes—"Advisors" 
Gov. Lehman, Basil Manley, Texas Banker 
Jesse Jones, H- J- Lasky, Gen. Johnson. 

York Central System. 

In all National crises. Washington, Lincoln and other great Presidents of the 
Republic enlisted America's distinguished practical patriots against enemies at home and 

abroad, . 

Why does the Roosevelt New Deal control discredit and deprive America ot 
representative wisdom in its hour of supreme politico-economic distress? 

Political Bankrupt Leadership is the Poison of the People! 

The editorial reprinted below was received by Edmondson about April 10, 
1934. It was re-published. 

(As listed in reprint below from the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of 
October 20, 1933, Editor, Rabbi Gross) 

PERHAPS the most pointed contrast between the lot of the Jews in 
Germany and the position of their co-religionists in the United Stares is af¬ 
forded by comparing the Hitlerite- government’s policy of deliberately and 
ruthlessly eliminating from every phase of Germany's economic industrial and 
cultural life those Jewish men and women of talent who have labored to make 
Germany great and resoected, with that of the ROOSEVELT ADMINISTRA¬ 


In dealing with those Jew's actively participating in framing and carrying 
out the New Deal legislation it will be simpler ro separate them into three 
groups' those who were prominently identified with Roosevelt s fortunes before 
be became President: the members of the "brain trust;” and those who by sheer 
merit have found themselves drafted into the growing army of men and women 
helping the Roosevelt administration, in official or unoificial capacities, to 
instill new strength into the nation’s economic life by means of the national 

recovery program. 

Attention was first drawn to Roosevelt’s close association with Jews long 
before he became President. During Mt. Roosevelt’s first gubernatorial cam¬ 
paign in New York in 1928 he became acquainted with Samuel Rosenman, 
then a member of the State Bill Drafting Commission. Impressed with Rosen- 
man's ability in gathering campaign material, Mr. Roosevelt appointed Rosen¬ 
man his personal counsel It was in the course of those relationships that Mr. 
Roosevelt came to appreciate Rosenman’s judgment and he soon charged him 
with a multiplicity of confidential and responsible tasks. When Roosevelt 
elevated Rosenman to the Supreme Court he admitted he was "cutting off my 
right arm” That this was not idle flattery is evidenced by the fact that Judge 
Rosenman owns a photograph of Assistant Secretary of State Raymond Moley, 
which is inscribed "To Sam Rosenman, founder and bead of the Brain Trust. 
The inscription aptly summarized Rosenman's service to Roosevelt because the 
now famous "brain trust” came into being during Roosevelt’s years as governor. 
Even now Judge Rosenman is frequently called to Washington to consult with 

the President. 

Rosenman was not the only Tewish advisor of Mr. Roosevelt while he was 
in Albany Henry Morgenthau. Jr., who served as State Conservation Com¬ 
missioner, was constantly called in by Governor Roosevelt for advice and help, 
and during the Presidential campaign Morgenthau did a great deal in mapping 
out the Rooseveitian appeal to the farmers and in drafting the Democratic 
party's agricultural plank. After March 4 President Roosevelt turned to Morgen¬ 
thau as the logical candidate for the chairmanship of the Federal Farm Board, 
a position which clothe? him with great authority under the recovery program. 
Mr. Morgenthau is also the generalissimo of the co-ordinated farm relief forces 
and a member of the Roosevelt super-cabinet. 

Another pre-election associate of Mr. Roosevelt was Jesse I. Straus, now 
ambassador to France. It was Mr. Straus who led the way in organizing the 
business men of the country behind Roosevelt’s candidacy for the Presidency. 


One of the key Roosevelt advisors is Bernard M. Baruch, a power in the 
Wilson administration, who first came into the picture as an early Roosevelt 
supporter in the pre-convention days, It was Mr, Baruch who recommended 
the appointment of his former associates on the War Industries Board, General 
Hugh Johnson and George N. Peek, as administrators of the National Recovery 
Act and the Farm Relief Act, respectively, When former Assistant Secretary of 
State Moley went to London co keep an eye on the World Economic Con¬ 
ference President Roosevelt called Mr. Baruch into his administration as an 
advisor without portfolio. In assuming this position in the absence of Secretary 
of Stare Hull and the President from Washington, Mr. Baruch was regarded 
as the "unofficial President." 

The second group of Jewish ’’New Dealers" is comprised of those who are 
members of the so-called "brain-trust/’ the body of youthful and liberal econ¬ 
omists, technicians and professors upon whose expert counsel and experience 
the President has leaned heavily and drawn freely in framing the recovery 
projects. The Jewish members of this loosely-knit "kitchen cabinet" are James 
Paul Warburg, Herbert Feis, Charles W. Taussig, Emanuel Goldenweiser, 
Mordecai Ezekiel, Felix Frankfurter, Nathan Margold, Charles E, Wyzanski, Tr,, 
and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Of the latcc-r we have already spoken. 

Professor Frankfurter, who has declined a number of important positions 
in the Roosevelt administration, has nevertheless had his recommendations 
accepted in filling nearly half a dozen of the most important legal posts in 
the government and continues to function as one of the President's most 
trustworthy advisors and a link between thq liberalism of the Brandeis-La 
Follette era and the new Roosevelt liberalism. Two of his proteges are members 
of the "brain trust,” Nathan Margold, solicitor for the Department of the 
Interior, and Charles Wyzanski, Jr., solicitor to the Department of Labor. 

The remaining three members of the "brain trust" are veterans in the 
government service whose records of achievement led President Roosevelt to 
include them in his personal entourage. The best known of this trio is Dr. 
Emanuel Goldenweiser, whose official title is director of the division of re¬ 
search and statistics of the-Federal Reserve System. 

Dr. Mordecai Ezekiel’s highly specialized talents in various technical 
phases of agriculture have made him an invaluable member of the Roosevekian 
inner circles which look to him for guidance in the development of practical 
methods of economic restabilization of farming, a major problem in the 
recovery program. Dr. Herbert Feis, referred to as "'the brains of the State 
Department" by the Washington newspaper corps, is the diplomatic expert of 
the "brain trust." 

The last group of Jews holding important positions under the Roosevelt 
administration is the largest and includes a number of well-known figures as 
well as some who are newcomers on the national scene. In the latter category 
are Robert Straus, personal assisant to General Johnson; Lloyd H. Landau, a 
St. Louis disciple of Professor Frankfurter, who is the general solicitor of the 
Public Works Board; Dr. Maurice Karp, dc-an of the Jewish School of Social 
Work, to whom has been assigned the task of training che personnel needed 
to carry out the National Recovery Act; Dr, Alexander Sachs, chief of General 
Johnson's research division and the man to whom the recovery administration 
turns for facts on the various codes; Robert Kohn, former president of rhe 

American Institute of Architects, who is special advisor to the Cabinet Advisory 
Board of the Public Works Administration and in complete charge of plans and 
projects submitted for loans under the Public Works Act; Isador Lubin, former 
professor at the Brookings Institute in Washington, who heads the vitally 
important Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Department of Labor; David E. 
Lilienthal, former member of the Wisconsin Public Service Commission, who 
is a member of and counsel to the Tennessee Valley Authority for the develop¬ 
ment of the Muscle Shoals program; Jerome Frank, counsel for the administra¬ 
tion of the agricultural relief bill, and Celeste Jedel, chief archivist of the 
American delegation to the World Economic Conference. 

More prominent Jewish personalities are to be found on the various 
Industrial Recovery Boards. Sidney Hillman, president of the Amalgamated 
Clothing Workers' Union, and a veteran trade unionist and labor economist; 
Rose Schneiderman, founder and president of the Women's Trade Union 
League, and Dr; Leo Wolman, professor of economics at Columbia University, 
are members of the Labor Advisory Board, of which Dr. Wolman is chairman. 
Louis Kirstein, Boston merchant and philanthropist, and Gerard Swope, presi¬ 
dent of the General Electric Company, sit on the Industrial Advisory Board. 

(COPIES 1c EACH at Edmondson Economic Service, 80 Washington St., N. Y. City. 
DELIVERED POSTPAID by Sealed Mail, 3 copies for 6c; 6 for 12c; 10 for 20c; 15 for 
30c. Above 15 copies to 100, lc each plus 15c prepaid express. 500 for $5.50, express 
prepaid. Payable in "small" stamps, coins, dollar bills, checks or money orders.) 


Invited by "The Booster Club” of New York City about the middle of 
April to deliver before it an address on "Americanism," Editor Edmondson 
under date of April 24, 1034, spoke in part as follows: 

"It is customary for speakers and writers to get auditors or readers into a 
good humor to make them receptive or to 'put something over,’ but I have no 
ax to grind except an American-Tomahawk, which is kept razor-edge in these 
perilous days. Good humor has no place in the grim job ahead of us. I w r ould 
like to make all pro-Americans fighting-mad—and they will be once they 
realize individually that sinister minority interests, seeking to control, have 
brought them face to face with politico-economic death. 

"As this address is On Americanism’ it is apropos to outline my concep¬ 
tion thereof. I am for Americanism under the Constitution; for representative 
Government without selfish minority dictation; for Individual Liberty without 
license; for Equality of Opportunity, without predatory practices. Being pro- 
American, I am anti-Fascist, Anti-Communist and Anti-Socialist because they 
undermine Americanism. 

" We ain't seen nothin’ yet' (to use the words of Gen. Hugh Johnson) if 
the Roosevelt trend to the 'Left' can't be stopped soon. 

"Americans want no Communism! They need no Fascism! They desire no 
class warfare! They demand honest representative American government, ad¬ 
ministered by honorable Americans acting as their servants, public officials who 
will not be led astray by irresponsible, corrupt and selfish minorities. If we do 
not fight now, there may be nothing left to fight with or for.” 

That speech was broadcast throughout the Nation. 

(Edmondson Bulletin dated April 23, 1934) 

To Mr, David A, Brown, President-Publisher, The American Hebrew, 212 
Fifth Avenue, City: 

Sir: Replying to yours of April 17: You say—as if such things were 
sacrilege: "On the face of it, these two documents ('Bankrupt Leadership’ and 
'The Deadly Parallel’ issued by Edmondson Service) are an attack on the 
Roosevelt Administration * * * The Nazi jew-baiting, Jew-hating groups in 
this country evidently see in this, definitely anti-Semitic propaganda furnished 
by one who purports to be an editor, an investment-economist, and designates 
himself to be absolutely independent * * :!! Just a casual analysis of these 
two lists proves beyond any question of doubt that whoever got them up 
deliberately and maliciously attempted to mislead the public, and to create the 
impression that Jews are in the majority of those whom you label: Bankrupt 
Leadership,’ thereby attempting to poison the minds of the public * * * The 
circular '* * * is an offensive attack upon the Administration and implies that 
the government is in control of those who would set up a communistic form of 
government, the main purpose of which is to attack rhe Stock Exchange bill 
* * * Aside from the fact that you have been guilty of a dis-service to the 
Roosevelt Administration, and, by innuendo, been guilty of a rank injustice to 
the Jews of this country, you have played into the hands of the Nazi and have 
made the very worst use of a service which is supposed to be an ’interpretation 
of events in finance-business-investment-speculation’ * * * We should be in¬ 
terested in knowing if you deliberately and with malice aforethought, sent out 
these destructive pieces of propaganda; and if it is with your approval that the 
Nazis in America are making use of this propaganda in their own interest.’’ 

First: This writer is pro-American, under the Constitution; for represent¬ 
ative government, without selfish minority dictation; for individual liberty, 
without license; for equality of opportunity, with profit-reward; for capitalistic 
economic freedom, minus predatory practices. 

Being pro-American, this writer is anti-Fascist, anti-Communist and anti- 
Socialist, because these forces have been obviously subverting Americanism; and 
having threatened to destroy the very foundations of American Liberty, such 
minority elements face the righteous wrath of an outraged people. 

Neither the writer nor his organization has been anti-Jewish, anti-Nazi. 
anti-Russian, anti-Irish or anti-German—and will not be so unless such minority 
elements speak or act anti-America. We want Americanism for the U. S. 

Second, specifically replying: "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly 
Parallel" were written by this writer. They were intended as an "attack on the 
Roosevelt Administration." If that be treason to America, the majority and not 
a minority will "make the most of it." Minorities in this country seem unable to 
realize that Americans regard their officials as servants, not masters; holding 
deserved criticism of public policies a duty as well as a Constitutional right. In 
their minds, no aura of omnipotence hangs over Washington. 

Third: If a pro-American veteran investment-economist, with an unim¬ 
peachable 30-year record of impartial service, cannot, from an independent 
American standpoint, analyze politico-economic developments for his clientele 
without being branded a ’Jew-baiter" by an apparently representative source 
like yourself, then free speech, as well as representative govemmnt, has been 
prostituted to zero, and the present 50 per cent "free" press will continue its 
commercialized funeral march, 

Fourth: Certainly, with the gigantic job of American reconstruction de¬ 
manding its exclusive attention, Americanism, forced to fight for self-preser¬ 
vation against irresponsible and selfish minorities actively conspiring for its 
downfall, manifestly cannot jeopardize its existence by dulling the edge of us 
defensive weapons out of consideration for quarreling bystanders. 

Are you blind to the growing procession in the American daily press of 
prominent American men and women caustically denouncing the Roosevelt 
New Deal as socialistic, communistic, and un-Amencan. Do you know that this 
writer editorially supported Mr. Roosevelt 100 per cent m the public press and 
privately until the President called for criticism last Fall. 

Do you realize that instantaneous demand for reprinting and re-circulation 
bv the tens of thousands, of "Bankrupt Leadership" and "The Deadly Parallel 
with coast to coast patriotic commendation and no discordant recorded note 
except your own, obviously means that militant Americanism stdl lives. 

Apparently some of the oppressed people who hopefully came to American 
shores Muring the last half-century, made welcome by American freedom, 
tolerance and generosity, have not yet contacted the militant Spirit of America— 
or they might prefer to play with explosives rather than with the dynamic 
patriotic forces now surging toward^ concert pitch throughout the nation on 
account of subversive minority activities. 

You further say: "The Deadly Parallel," whether so intended or not, gives 
color to the claim'of the Nazi anti-Semitic group in this country that the 
President is surrounded by Jews and that the New Deal is supposedly a Jew 
Deal.” * * * 

By the last phrase of your sentence above—you round out, clarify and bring 
this whole matter to an issue, in view of the following: 

When pro-Americans have continually and offensively thrust upon their 
consciousness the unfair over-representation of Jews in the national braintrust 
advisory council: see the great number of Jewish names in Washington ad¬ 
ministrative bureaus; and read in the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct 20, 
1933 a boastful reference to Bernard M. Baruch as Lnofficial President, 
and to Herbert Feis as "the brains of the State Department is it surprising 
that the average citizen begins to ask if the five million Jewish minority is 
dominant in the national personal government, with 120 000 000 other people 
"forgotten” and also, whether their "Moses" has not futileiy led the nation 
long enough in a barren wilderness of trial and error. 

As an illuminating geographical example of apparent "minority control," 
the so-called Roosevelt "brain-truscV personnel seems to largely over-represent 
New York, in comparison with the West and South, according to press directory 
an d other listings giving the following prominently-mentioned official and 
unofficial "advisors" as being from that State: 

Bernard M. Baruch, Prof. Adolf A Berle, Jr, Judge Benj. Nathan 
Cardozo, Nathan M. Margold, Jerome Frank, Jesse I. Straus, Sidney Hillman 
Robert Kohn, Isador Lubin, Henry Morgenthau, Sr, and Jr Prof, Raymond 
Moley, Prosecutor Ferdinand Pecora, Samuel Rosenman, Alex Sachs, Rose 
Schneiderman, Prof, Rex G. Tugxcell, Samuel Untermyer, Ptof Leo dolman, 
Prof G F Warren Gov. Herbert Lehman, Robert Straus, Frances Perkins, 
Beni'. Cohen, Gerard Swope and others less prominent. Conspicuous Mass¬ 
achusetts "braintrusters" listed include Prof. James M. _ Landis, Edward A. 
I'ilene, Prof. Felix Frankfurter and Prof. Frank W. Taussig. 

Now, as a practical demonstration of a Fair Deal, contrasted with a Raw 
Deal, since you yourself have crystallized the issue to a focus, I am laying this 
communication before the same clientele who received “Bankrupt Leadership’’ 
and “The Deadly Parallel,’’ so that the record may be complete, for their in¬ 
formation, consideration and verdict—with the following answer to your 
closing query, which characteristically puts race above country: Obviously, 
petty malice has no place in a life and death struggle to save American Con¬ 
stitutional Liberty. 


In the interest of continuity, documentary data in connection with “Opera¬ 
tion David A. Brown" is submitted below out of chronological order: 

On May 8, 1934, I received another letter from Mr, Brown saying in part: 
“It is the opinion of myself and my associates that your writings would bear 
investigation, and we are sending literature to the Department of Justice, so 
that they may scrutinize it in detail." 

Upon which Editor Edmondson in response, publicly commented: "That 
is O.K. If the time shall come when an American patriot is jailed for preaching 
Americanism, then he would rather be inside than out among 'free’ slaves,” 

Inspectors of the Department of Justice called later and finding that the 
Editor was exercising his Constitutional rights of Free Speech, did not in any 
way censure his activities. 

Under date of May 10, 1934, an additional letter was received from Mr. 
Brown, reading in part: 

* "You may be interested in knowing that 1 have a complete file on you. This 
file tells in substance your newspaper and financial history, and not only 
GIVES YOU A CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH, but shows that there is nothing 
in your previous history to match the poisonous documents (on Jewish anti- 
Americanism) that you have sent out." 


In the latter half of May Mr. Brown telephoned Edmondson asking if 
he was agreeable to a conference. A conference was arranged for Mav 24, 193-1. 
at Horn's Restaurant in lower N. Y. City; Brown being accompanied by 
the American Hebrew's Managing Editor, and Edmondson by John T. Mills, 
hereinbefore mentioned. A shorthand memorandum made by Edmondson at the 
time contains the following: 

Mr, Brown said: “The Jew is a capitalist. Why would he support 

“If the long distance objective of the Jews, as 'Chosen People,’ is ulti¬ 
mate world control, he would use Communism as a means to an end, 1 ' was 
the answer. 

_ ’'Pooh! Pooh!" ejaculated Mr. Brown. He denied that there was “a 
Jewish minority;” but was stumped when Mr. Edmondson pointed out chat 
Jews wouldn't "melt;" he having just spoken of "Jewish solidarity." 

"I have lived in all parts of this country," remarked Mr. E. Interrupting, 
Mr. Brown said: "I know it—and your record is as dean as a hound's tooth.” 

Mr, E. went on to say that the tide was rising against Roosevelt Leadership 
and the hidden Jewish Radical element. 

"Pooh! Pooh!" was again the non-answer. 

The Brooklyn Jewish Examiner eaitorial of Oct. 20, 1935. was then 
produced—-and Mr. Brown exploded. It was like a red rag to a bull. He said 
the paper was going to be "wiped out"—inferential!}- by the Jews them¬ 
selves. He added "It was all wrong!" 

"What do yon want us Jew's to do—get out of Washington?" 

"IT WOULD BE A GOOD THING!" I remarked. But he waved that 
aside and commented that "after all, the heads of the government is the place 
to hit." 

"That’s why I’ve been attacking and centering on Roosevelt Bankrupt 
Leadership," was the reply, 

Mr. Brown admitted: "Roosevelt is responsible, the government will stand 
or fall with him." 

He then strongly advised me not to "get tangled up with the Nazis, who 
are using your publications." 

"If I get out hot stuff and they use it, how can I help it?", I asked. 

Finally, Mr, Brown solemnly warned: "WE ARE GOING TO BRING 

World War Two on Germany started five years later in 1939- 


(Edmondson Broadcast Bulletin of May 11, 1934) 

The following correspondence is published as a clarification. 

Letter of May 6, 1934, from Louis A. Freedman, 33 Riverside Drive, 
N. Y, City to Robert Edward Edmondson: 

"The implications of anti-Semitism in your correspondence with Mr. David 
A. Brown and the open summons in the pamphlet mentioned to a campaign 
against the Jews, show that you are beginning to inject an issue which is in 
flat contradiction to your professed Americanism. You insist, properly, that 
our Constitution be respected by the government, and yet you are calling on 
everybody to violate one of its most important protective clauses as regards 
human rights—that forbidding race discrimination. 

"Into the American melting-pot have been thrown many races, who have 
all been equally welcomed, and to whom the same rights and opportunities have 
been accorded. Members of every race have abused these privileges. The Irish 
have played a most unsavory role in corruption in municipal and state politics, 
but shall a pogrom be launched to exterminate the Irish because so many who 
have attained office have been criminal grafters? Bootleggers, forgers and 
gorillas have come plentifully from among the Italians. Are the millions of 
Italian citizens to be dumped into the ocean? Shall we sweep the country clean 
of them all, good, bad and indifferent? 

"Killing off 5,000,000 Jews because several dozen of them are in Washing¬ 
ton in key positions, where, incidentally, they have been placed by the elected 
representatives of the American people, may seem to those who are inspired by 
the noble’ German experiment, to be an expeditious way of getting rid of all 
America's troubles; but let these apostles of a new kind of New Deal not call 
this an act of pro-Americanism. Why, however, stop them? If wholesale 
massacre is the way to restore the American Constitution and give us back the 

country of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, let 
such American patriots' revive the Ku-Klux Ki-an in all its pristine glory, ride 
through the countryside in white sheets and kill and bum Negroes. Catholics, 
non-Aryans and any and all races, tribes, creatures which pollute this pure soil! 

"So, at bottom, your campaign would seem to be merely an American 
mask to hide a hideous, anti-Semitic face, and this calling of Americans to 
awake an echo of Hitler's call to Germany to Na 2 ify itself. 

"If, however, you are a real American of the true and best American tradi¬ 
tion, you will not convert vour campaign into one of preaching race-hatred, 
and incidentally raking up old lies, which you know are lies, only for the sake 
of making the mob-hatred even more venomous. To be true to the Americanism 
you profess, make it a dean fight against the government octopus that is 
sucking up our liberties and our Constitutional rights; but if you degrade it 
to a fight against the Jews, it is you who will appear as the emissary of the 
true enemy—Germany." 


Reply thereto by Edmondson as below, under date of May 11, 1934; 

My campaign is for Americanism, and not against minorities who put 
country above race or association, whoever they may be. It so happens that, in 
my opinion—which obviously agrees with your own—there is a Jewish minority 
in key positions at Washington. 

My American politico-economic philosophy comprises no futile race¬ 
hatred or anti-Jew persecutions. This writer has raked up no lies, old or new. 
He has merely dramatized the record. 

My signed articles are based on records such as that of the Brooklyn 
Jewish Examiner article of October 20. 1933—now supplemented by your own 
admission that there are Jews in "Washington key positions," who, with others, 
must therefore form your "government octopus that is sucking up our liberties.” 
Why befog the issue by pointing out the political "octopus,’’ and then refusing 
to admit or expose its Jewish minority makeup? 

You properly point out that Washington key position jews were "placed 
by elected representatives of the people"—Roosevelt Leadership. My criticisms 
have been unceasingly aimed at such leadership to hold it to strict account. 

The writer is earnestly directing whatever ability he may possess to pre¬ 
vent, not promote, the reported violence you fear. He sincerely believes that if 
the United States Jewish minority will do its American duty it will achieve its 
own salvation by putting country first. 

Guided by many years’ experience in the independent journalistic field, this 
writer is convinced that America’s First Line of Defence—the Constitutionally 
guaranteed free press—is being subverted politically through Legislative, ad¬ 
ministrative and propaganda acts made possible by Washington minority over- 
representation, supplemented by economic reprisals through advertising chan¬ 
nels. Such an outrageous condition prevents the American majority from learning 
the truth about policies undermining American institutions. 

Arguing that other minorities have abused American privileges, you say: 
"Into the American melting-pot have been thrown many races,” including the 
Jews. But the record, as I read it, is that the jews do not "melt;" and they seem 
unable as a class to think, during crises, in terms of America First, but only- 
in terms of “international race consciousness.” 

In defence of Americanism, this writer would take exactly the same 
position as herein outlined, were the present Jewish influence exercised by the 
German group minority, the Irish minority, the Russian minority or any racial, 
religious or other minority group in the United States. Any minority element 
seeking to rule the American majority will fail. There is no clause in the 
Constitution "forbidding race discrimination," except as to the ballot. 

YOUR concern is for the 5,000,000 Jews in the United States—MIKE is 
for 125,000,000 citizens, including the Jewish minority. Which is TRUE 

Below is a signed Edmondson publication of July 4, L934. 


The soaring ambition oi' Prof Felix Frankfurter of Harvard University 
is evidently responsible for the persistent report that he is to be appointed to 
the U.' S. Supreme Court—which would then, with three Jewish Justices, be 
33-1/3 c /c Jewish, whereas the entire United States Jewish minoriev is but 4% 
of the total population. 

Does the record of this alien-born radical qualify him? 

Born in Vienna, Austria, in 1882; admitted to the American Bar in 1905; 
made Assistant to Secretary of War Baker; appointed Counsel to Presidenr 
Wilson’s Mooney Mediation Commission; nominated in 1932 for the Mas¬ 
sachusetts Supreme Court but defeated by 500,000 protesting petitioners— 
Frankfurter has never been elected to any important political office, gaining 
access to inner Government circles by appointive influence. 

Listed by the Industrial Defence Assn, of Boston as having been associated 
with seven subversive organizations, for more than thirty years devoting his 
talents largely to defending notorious Radicals and Communists, the ‘ Red ’ 
murderers Sacco and Vanzetti and a criminal organization like the I. W. W.— 
has not Frankfurter, by such environment, acquired a "cultural background" 
diametrically opposed to the traditions of the American Judiciary? 

He is named as a member of the National Committee of the American 
Civil Liberties Union, which is graphically described thus in House of Repre¬ 
sentatives Record Report 2290 of January 17, 1931: 

"The American Civil Liberties Union is closely affiliated with the Com¬ 
munist movement in the U.S., and fully ninety per cent of its efforts are on 
behalf of Communists who have come in conflict with the law * * * It is quite 
apparent that the main function of the ACLU is to attempt to protect Com¬ 
munists in their advocacy of force and violence to overthrow the United States 

President Wilson appointed a "Mediation Commission” to bring about the 
release of Communist "Tom Mooney,” -who was sentenced to imprisonment in 
California for bombing a 1916 Preparedness Day parade, killing 10 and in¬ 
juring 50 persons. Frankfurter was appointed Counsel of the Commission, and 
tried to enlist the influence of former President Theodore Roosevelt to aid 
Mooney. The ex-president scathingly rebuked Frankfurter in a Iecter of Dec. 
19, 1917, as follows: 

"Thank you for your frank letter. I answer it at length because you have 
taken and are taking * * * an attitude which seems to me to be fundamentally 
that of Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders in Russia; an attitude which 
may be fraught with mischief to this country * * * 

"I have just received your report- on the Bisbee deportation * * * You: 
report is as thoroughly a misleading document as could be written on the 
subject. No official writing on behalf of the President is to be excused for 
failure to know and clearly set forth that the I.W.W. is a criminal organization 

"Here again you are engaged in excusing men precisely like the Bolshevik 
in Russia, who arc murderers and encouragers of murder, who are traitors tc 
their allies, to democracy and to civilization, as well as to the United States 
and whose acts are nevertheless apologized for on grounds, my dear Mi- 
Frankfurter, substantially like those which you allege." 

Schuster in their 1934 edition of "The New Dealers," adding: "Franklin D. 
Roosevelt has been heard 10 say that the only man in the world who can give 
him mental indigestion is Frankfurter. His intimacy with him dates back tc 
the Wilson Administration. 

"When Wallace and Tugwell planned their new farm administration, 
they asked Frankfurter to recommend a solicitor for the Department of Agri¬ 
culture. He suggested Jerome N. Frank. When the first draft of the Securities 
Bill was practically wrecked, Moley sent for Frankfurter to rewrite it. Felix 
brought down Prof. Landis and Ben Cohen. When the TVA was organized 
and needed a smart lawyer. Frankfurter produced David Lilienthai. For Miss 
Perkins he produced Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., and Secretary Hull found wait¬ 
ing for him in the State Department another Frankfurter economic protege in 
the shape of Herbert Feis. Thus are Frankfurter men established in key posts 
throughout the Administration"—estimated to total hundreds, most of them 
from Jewish-Radical circles. 

Endowed with a tremendous intellectual vitality, a prodigious memory, a 
legal mastermind and the tact and ability to teach Presidents, can there be any 
doubt about Prof. Frankfurter's brilliant and commanding mental power to 
inculcate, with appallingly subversive effect, the poisonous germs of fatal 
fallacies and false doctrines in the credulous and open mind of American 
Youth, coming leaders of the nation? 

Apparently High Priest of the misrepresentative Jewish-Radical national 
political-minority leadership that has been undermining the American System 
of Government and its Free Press. Guardian, by Machiavellian legal artifice, mis¬ 
leading propaganda and economic subversion, WOULD IT NOT BE TREA¬ 


As Seen by 

Congressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania 
(Signed Edmondson broadcast Nov. 1, 1934) 

Kept from the American people by the sinister Jewish Communistic power 
that controls our press, lie buried in the 1933-4 Congressional Record im¬ 
portant knowledge vital to the destinies of the U.S. It is in speeches as per 
extracts below' of a courageous sterling patriot who is master of the Jewish 

2 7 

Question Chairman of the House Banking Committee, one of the few Repre¬ 
sentatives endorsed by both Republican and Democratic constituencies—Con¬ 
gressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania. 

''There has not been an administration since our advent into the great 
World War in which Bernard M. Baruch has not been a chief political, econ¬ 
omic and financial advisor, and every administration that has listened to him 

has carried us deeper and deeper into financial chaos.. 

"When Treasury-Secretary Morgenthau obtains his 'kitty' (this is what I 
am told he called the proposed two billion stabilization fund), American 
funds will be fed to Europe more expeditiously and with less secrecy. 

"Henry Morgentbau is related by marriage to Herbert Lehman, Jewish 
governor of New York; and by marriage or otherwise to the Seligmans of the 
International Jewish banking firm of J. & W. Seligman. It is not by accident 
is it, that a representative and a relative of the money Jews of Wall St. and 
foreign, parts has been elevated?" 

"Is it not true that in the United States today the Gentiles have the slips 
of paper’ while the Jews have the gold and lawful money? _ _ 

"This 'kitty' bill makes of Henry Morgenthau a central bank, an institution 
which Jefferson declared is one of deadly hostility to the free institutions of 
the U. S. It slides into his hands the emergency powers which Congress granted 

to the President." . . „, rrx . T , 

"Congressman Dickstein said in a radio address in Chicago over vvtNK on 
March 18, 193-4: 'We Americans must change our law to make it possible for 
them (German Communistic Jews) to come here at once.’ 

"There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know 
that this country has fallen into the hands of the international money changers. 

Why should the fact be hidden?" , . . 

"An attempt to establish a politico-economic plan is now m operation in 
England It is designated 'Freedom and Planning.’ May I suggest the similarity 
of the scheme to the NRA, Bankhead cotton bill, control of harm acreage, and 
Other developments of the New Deal? It is the Jewish Plan of a world state." _ 
Editor Edmondson was summoned to appear before the House un-Amen- 
can Activities Committee, to answer questions by Congressman Samuel Dick¬ 
stein of New York, but on the day prior to that set for examination he was 

notified chat his testimony vas not desired. 

Having prepared politico-economic points for exhaustive questioning, and 
feeling that .such important testimony should not be w-asted, on Oct. IS, 1934, 
he signed and broadcasc the following "questionnaire testimony.’ 


What is your business? . 

Writing analytical investment interpretation ot the general trend of politico-economic 

You issued an "Invisible Government" bulletin recently, giving a list of Jewish- 
Radicats” surrounding Mr. Roosevelt. What is your conception of "Radical? j . 

One who by speech, action or association is connected with Communists. Boisnevists. 
Red Socialists or Revolutionaries. In that sense, everyone named in said Invisible Govern¬ 
ment" chart is a radical, including Mr. Roosevelt. . 

What do you understand by the term "Un-American Activity? 

Any man or group, such as Jewish Communists, speaking or acting against American 
constitutional majority representative principles, or who may be associated witn those 

who do, is un-American, in my opinion. . 

You have stated that Jewish Leadership has been un-American Give example 
The Jewish boycott against Germany imposing great financial loss on the L. b. 

Do you not believe that "Hitler atrocities" justify such a boycoct? , 

I do not accept at face value or credit, such information from publicity cnanne.S, 
since they are Jewish-dominated, in my opinion. 

Can you give further illustrations of Jewish un-Amencamsm? 


Subversion of American press, radio and screen through ownership, advertising 
influence or misleading propaganda; Jewish New Dealer communistic laws and ad¬ 
ministration in NRA and aA. 4 ; Jewish promotion or Communistic New York meetings 
and parades, predominantly Jewish; disfranchisement of New York 80 per cent Gentile 
population by Jewish monopoly of ail important gubernatorial candidates. 

Futhermoie, I beiieve this Committee itself to be un-American because it has ap¬ 
parently exceeded and farcically prostituted its authority from being a Committee or 
Investigation to pro-Jewish Minority sub-Committees of Inquisition and Espionage ut 
Americans doing patriotic duty—practically ignoring manifest communistic subversions. 

In my opinion. Mr. Roosevelt is un-American because he has given aid and comfort 
ro enemies of representative American government by permitting minority usurpation 
at Washington. 

Are you not subverting constitutional guarantees by being anti-jewish, considering 
-lie religious freedom provision.' 

No. This is a plain politico-economic issue, not a religious matter. The Constitution 
does not forbid citizens to defend it and their liberties againsc enemes within the state 
who are apparently trying to merthrmv i; under cover of religion. By thus prostituting 
religion for materialistic ends. Jewish leadership puts itself outside the Constitution. 

What is your solution of the Jewish Problem? 

Unless the Jewish minority voluntarily repudiates us anti-American radical leader¬ 
ship and puts Americanism first, 5 believe the American majority should "vote and buy 
Gentile;" limit Tews to their population percentage in public affairs: force them to 
relinquish domination of U. S. economic life; and eliminate their influence from publicity 

My conception of fairness in connection with the jews is to demand from as well as 
to give to them a fair deal on the ground that justice must be mutual to be righteous. 
Jewish Jurisprudence and American jurisprudence. Jewish Economics and American 
Economics, being respectively Oriental and Occidental, are antagonistic, and will not mix 
anv more than East will melt into West. Such an invasion of American law during the 
past three decades under the flood of alien immigration, makes it almost impossible for 
patriotic citizens to get justice from pro-Jew channels, let alone a Fair Deal. 

Do you favor having Gentiles get rid of the Jewish people in the United States by 
killing them? 

No more than I do the slaughtering of 20,000,000 Gentiles in Russia. 

The preservation of priceless American Constitutional liberties is worth any sacrifice. 

Correspondence extracts below between James P. Warburg, New York Jew, of the 
well-known Warburg International Banking Family, and Robert Edward Edmondson, are 
among the most important and enlightening Jewish Problem data published by him. 


Dear Mr. Edmondson; New York, December 4 . 193-A 

There has been brought to my attention a circular letter which you mailed to your 
subscribers on Oct. 9, in which you make certain statements about my father, the late 
Paul M. Warburg. 

It is not the purpose of this letter to take issue with your general statements con¬ 
cerning Jews, not to attempt to dissuade you from what is apparently a deep-rooted 
prejudice. I am concerned here only with the statements you have made about my father, 
because they are untrue and cast an entirely unfair reflection upon a man who is no 
longc-r here to defend himself. 

I join with you in condemning any Jew or Gentile who fosters ideas or theories or 
practices subversive to the traditional American order. 

I have wandered a little from the main purpose of this letter, which was to set you 
right about my father. As a rule. I pay no attention to wholesale attacks upon jews or 
any other group because it is my belief that usually such attacks by their very nature 
answer themselves. 

Very truly yours, 



Dear Mr. Warburg; New York, Dec. 8, 1934 

Yours of Dec. 4. I appreciate and sympathize with your filial, desire to submit your 
record of your father's banking activities, and take pleasure in publishing and laying re¬ 
buttal before those to whom I mailed my pamphlet for their consideration and judgement. 

If you will carefully re-read my pamphlet of Oct. 9 you will see that I do not. as 
you say, "make statements about your father,” but quoted from a published printed 


record apparently genuine even though the identity of the author may be unknown to 
you. Surely an analyst may fairly allude to such data without '‘adopting' debatable pre¬ 
mises, when reporting associated developments. 

You accuse me of holding a "deep-rooted preiudice m being anti-Jewts.i. Tnc 
Standard Dictionary defines "preiudice” as "pre-judgement- without due examination. 
My present active pro-American attitude was adopted about eight months ago alter 
exhaustive impartial investigation and consideration t.iat indicated active U. Jewish- 

Radical leadership to be dangerously anti-Arnencan. _ 

Therefore with absolute poiitico-economic-religious independence, 1 have no pre¬ 
judice deep or otherwise, in this connection. Bur 1 am glad to have your personal as¬ 
surance in conference, that you are convinced of my "honesty of patriotic purpose in 
this crusade. Patriotic "prejudice'’ has in the past been deemed a virtue. 

My "militant opposition" has not been "wholesale," as you imply, put discnimnat- 
• ,‘j cnecificallv asainst "false leadership," which you yourself discredit. 

TRADITIONAL AMERICAN ORDER," is tantamount to a blanket endorsement ot 
practically every general premise I have implicated in my pamphlets. 

Therefore, f deeplv regret that so prominent a Jew ns yourself cannot wander a 
little further" from the'personal "main purpose” of writing your letter to clear a tami.v 
record into individual leadership in a. vastly more vital and general fiela. My com¬ 
patriots and I would have been glad if you could have seen fit to fol ow your_expressed 
"condemnation" of subversive jewish-Radiad elements with practical aggressive public 
action something like my own. for a sound solution of the admittedly momentous Jewish 
"Red” Problem- for we have not seen any specific public denunciation by you of the 
energizing Jewish Communism that is dangerously menacing American Liberties—a high 
duty patriotic Jews owe the country which you yourself have admitted to me nas done 

more than any other for Tewry. , . r 

American politics MUST NOT be ruled by Minority Power, American Economic, 
MUST NOT be subject to Minority Monopoly of any k ‘°d; The Press Rauio ana 
Screen incarnate bulwark ot American Freedom, MUST and SHALL BE FREE. 

These are times when Principles dwarf Personalities. We are caught up m the vast 
sweep of a cosmic movement. Who can stop such a- mighty momentum/ But those of us 
who understand, may to some degree directly influence us implications, provided 
courageous selflessness governs motive and action. 

Youts for Americanism First, 

I received a message from James P. Warburg, ie which it was suggested 
that we hold a conference on "Americanism.” He asked me to come to his 
palatial home on Fifth Avenue: but I told him that such would be unethical, 
under existing circumstances, and recommended the cocktail lounge ot the 
Plaza Hotel in the neighborhood, where we could each pay for hh own drinks, 

We met. The preliminary was a remark by Mr. Warburg: ‘In this con¬ 
ference, Mr. Edmondson, I want you to understand that I am a loyal Jew. 
That seemed to me to be a bad start, for wc were to discuss Americanism, and 
the implication was that Mr. Warburg put his loyalty to Jewry before his 

obligations to Americanism. . 

Mr. Warburg told me how much he hated Communism, admitting, in¬ 
cidentally, that he knew many Jews were Communists. I asked for the per¬ 
centage, and he replied that it was not quite as high as the 85% claimed. He 
admitted the crisis was pressing, and said America had done more for Jews 
than any other country, and he wanted to know what he could do in the matter. 
I suggested that in my judgement, the best procedure for him as a 
Jewish leader, to conduct a public campaign against Communism just as I was 
in a Gentile movement against it. 

"Oh, My God, I can’t do that" he ejaculated, without giving, any specific 
reason for such attitude. 

He said he didn’t like what was going on at Washington, and spoke 
against Frankfurter, Morgenthau and Brandeis. 


Mr. Warburg said he was convinced of the honesty of my patriotic purpose. 
But the interview ended fruitlessly. 

Later, he sent Norman Eeasely, his press agent, to my office one Saturday 
afternoon, where, during a long conference at which my wife was present, 
Beasley said he wanted to make us "love jimmy Warburg." 

My wife ejaculated "Why should we love Jimmy Warburg?" 

He said: "He's a fine fellow, and I don't want to see him hurt.” 

Puzzled, I asked: "Hurt, how come?" 

Beasley then admitted: "There may be a mass-march by indignant Ameri¬ 
cans on Washington to clean up this Communist mess." 

Quickly 1 questioned: "Does Mr. Warburg fear that?" 

Beasley replied: 'He does." 


The following was printed in Chapter E. Page 117, of the 1928 book 
entitled "Walther Rathenau, His Life & Work” by Count Harry Kessler, 
published by Harcourt, Brace & Co. 

" 'Three Hundred Men , all acquainted with each other,’ wrote Rathenau 
in 1909 in an article in the Christmas number of the New Free Press (Vienna) 
control the economic destiny of the (European) Continent.’ 

"He himself was one of the 300. He was associated at the time with 8-1 
large concerns, either as a member of the supervising board or as manager." 

(Rathenau was a prominent jew of Germany who, like Otto Kahn in the 
United States, sought to solve the Jewish Problem by assimiliation, but, being 
opposed by disagreeing tribal leadership, and not credited as sincere by 
Gentiles, he returned to the Jewish fold, Which was also done by Otto H. 
Kahn and also, later, by James P. Warburg, who denounced Roosevelt, and 
then voted for him later.) 


Confessing Jewish subversions in the Franciscan Monastery of New’ York 
City in the fall of 1934, addressing Rev. Peter B. Duffee and myself, Morris 
Gordin, son of a Chicago Rabbi and a "former Communist,” cried dramatically: 

"I can hear the footsteps of the pall-bearers carrying my people out of 


Following are extracts from "America's Great Menace" by B. A. M. 
Schapiro, Hebrew-Christian Publication Society, New York, N. Y., (1934) ; 

"The time has come when the patriotic jews of America should begin to 
feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) planned and 
hatched in-the camp of Israel. 

"Communism is tryranny worse than that of the Czarist regime * * * 
The Bolshevik Revolution was first hidden, rooted and started in Leningrad 
and Moscow, and thence hurled itself on the remainder of Russia. It is starting 
in exactly the same way here and now. 

"I meet Communists in their hunting grounds, Union Square (New York). 
'How will you start the revolution here in America,’ I ask them in their own 
language. Do you not think that ultimately the government will wake up and 
make what you are doing illegal?’ 

'Then we Communists will work underground, and use the same methods 
that brought about the Russian Revolution by ASSASSINATING the govern¬ 
ment officials and scaring the others to death. We will plant cells in their 
fashionable clubs and their homes—POISON THEIR FOOD. Did we not do 
so in Russia, and succeed?’ 

"At a mass meeting in Ness- York City commemorating the anniversary of 
the death of Lenin, there were nearly 25,000 present. There were not 500 

Gent ^r:slt“or their corneligionists in Russia; but why donT these 
lews in their comfortable pews on Fifth Avenue and Riverside Drive take the 
lTd lament and the pLyer Book and visit «uded Commun.stm 

brethren and convert them to Jehovah and the Republic BEFORE 11 li 

LAT1E Our coffers are full, our homes palatial, our synagogues rise, our hospi- 
tals multiply. Never has Israel so increased m wealth. 

"Demonstrations such as are often resorted to by Communist leaders and 
their dupes will soon exhaust the patience of tolerant Americans and create in 
them a spirit of hatred against all Jews, the like of which has never been seen, 
for we have become an IRRITATION to our American 

"The American people are long suffering to a fault, BUT THEY ARE 
ESSENTIALLY MEN OF ACTION, practical men, and surely Americas 
participation in the World War has shown what Americans can do when once 
aroused to the conviction that their forbearance has been abused. 

"Let no Jew who reads these words accuse me of trying to ingratiate myse 
with 'anti-Semites.' The baptismal font has not lessened the love I cherish for 
my people, but because I have a dual perspective being a Jew by birth and 
See and ^ the same time a Christian by faith, I believe I can help my people, 
especially since the Rabbis ignore what is ailing us, while the Christian ministry 


The following confession was published by Edmondson Oct. 1, 1935. 

find a Common gmundt unified action against us, SUCH ASCOMMUN^SM 
will encounter only a tissue paper opposition resisting them. -New York 
Jewish Daily Bulletin of Nov. 28, 1934. 


While I was absent one day from my office in 1934, a Jew and a Gentile, 
allegedly representing the U. S. Chamber of Commerce to solicit member hip 
made a call. The Gencile would ask a question, then look up quickly at his 
companion for approval. He took the Edmondson Service to task for publishing 
a bulletin captioned "Blame Roosevelt, exposing the New Deal. 

My wife informed him that I was exercising my constitutional right oi 
free speech and that we believed Franklin D. Roosevelt was a traitor to The 
Republic ” that the time would come when the .American people would re- 
cognize that fact; that he would ultimately be the most hated President the 

country ever had. , . . , , 

The Jew commented: "You, as his wife, should realize that the kind of 

work he is doing puts him in a dangerous position. . 

She retorted: "Robert Edward Edmondson can’t be bought and he can t be 
scared He is going to keep on with his patriotic work single-handed, if neces¬ 
sary. I quote to you Patrick Henry: 'Is life so. sweet or peace so dear as to be 

purchased at the price of chains and slavery?' ” 

The lew turned around and left the office without a word 
Mv wife did not sleep for many nights, fearing she had been too out¬ 
spoken; but audacity was precisely the right attitude, for subversive Jews fear 
personal initiative and high courage. 


On March 15, 1935, an Edmondson bulletin was published under the 
above heading, reading: 

Louis Dembitz Brandeis of Massachusetts, aged 79, is Jewish Associate 
Justice of the U, S. Supreme Court, Wilson appointee, confirmed after long 
opposition in the Senate. 

In 1930 there appeared on the market a book entitled "The Social and 
Economic Views of Mr. justice Brandeis."’ The publishers printed a pamphlet 
in which this appears: '"Brandeis" ideas have been slowly changing social 
chough: * * * For the past fifty years he has gone quietly about his busi¬ 
ness * * * to give his country a new social order—a plan now being enlarged 
by our New Dealers to embrace the whole country.” 

The jewish-owned New-York Times of Jan. 28, 1934, confessed: "The 
underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy ol Justice Brandeis. 
The Recovery Program is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions.” 

The following appears in the ’ Foreword"’ of "Other People's Money,” 
by Brandeis: "Back in the time when Lenin was riding the revolution and was 
a symbol of it a friend said to Justice Brandeis: If you had the power to 
determine the treatment the world should give to Lenin, what would" be your 
course? 1 Brandeis replied: l WOULD GIVE HIM EVERYTHING HE 
WISHES. It is the only way to dispose of him.’ ” 

Here is the record regarding Commonwealth College at Mena, Ark., which 
has been under investigation by the Arkansas Legislature as '"communistic and 
subversive.” A New York Herald Tribune recent dispatch referred to ic as 
"A Frc-e Love College.” "Two of the prominent financial supporters of this 
institution are justice Brandeis of the Supreme Court and Mrs. Brandeis,” 
said the November, 1930, issue of "The National Republic.” 


(On April 1, 1935, the exposure below was published by Edmondson 
under the above heading:) 

Carveth Wells, author of ""Kapoct,'" Fellow of the Royal Geographical 
Society and the American Geographical Society, member of the Explorer's Club 
of New York City, wrote Col. E, N. Sanctuary of New York City, March 9, 
1935, as follows: 

"At the time of my visit to Russia, the Presidental campaign of 1932 was 
in full swing over here. 

"In many places in Russia I saw large cartoons of Mr. Hoover entitled 
'The Fathead in The White House,' and beside them very flattering portraits 
of Mr. Roosevelt entitled "THE NEXT COMMUNIST PRESIDENT OF 

"At the time the names of Bullitt and Tugwell were unknown to me, so 
that I was puzzled when young Communist guides asked me when Comrade 
Tugwell was going to have Russia recognized, and said Comrade Bullitt was 
going to be the first ambassador. Future events showed that the youne Com¬ 
munists of Russia knew more about American politics than I did.” 

Elizabeth Dilling says in her "Roosevelt Red Record” that "Both Com¬ 
munist and Socialist Parties demanded U. S. recognition of the Soviet Union, 
self-styled "base of world revolution.’ Roo.sevc-it invited its ex-bandit repre¬ 
sentative, Litvinoff (Finkelsteir.) to the White House to be entertained with 


Under the caption above, on April 15, 1935, Edmondson broadcast a 
signed call and appeal as below: 

To One Hundred Million American Freemen: 

Now is the time to lend every possible financial and other support to a 
self-less PRO-American Crusade with no racket to serve or complex to nurse— 
(1) One that is consecrating directly to campaign expense, every dollar re¬ 
ceived; (2) That KNOWS the great peril the nation is facing, and the real 
remedy therefor; (3) That has demonstrated capacity to face facts in the raw, 
without fear or favor; (4) That is attacking the Cancerous Cause instead of 
its radiating Symptoms, and has achieved vitally important coast-to-coast 
results in less than a year; (5) That has concrete practical constructive plans 
which, adequately financed, properly focused and boldly executed, cannot fail 
to overthrow an alien-admitted "tissue-paper resistance," and restore representa¬ 
tive Constitutional Government; (6) Whose crusade contemplates EXACT 
JUSTICE for Gentile and Jew, 

"Trustees of Great Wealth," amassed through the operation of the natural 
law of "increasing returns," sit supinely and blindly inert while the "back¬ 
bone" of the nation dies by inches in a sinister attrition, oblivious to the fact 
that if the Communism they may hope to defeat by a do-nothing policy, shall 
pass on, they might face confiscation by an outraged middle-class who hold 
that such riches were bestowed as a trust for the salvation of America in time 
of peril. 

Why longer dally with a danger that may flame into civil war? 

Let us strike now like men, with the full patriotic power of never-defeated 
America, at the CAUSE of Communism and its ballyhooing dupes. 

If you can’t afford to contribute cash, be a Paul Revere and personally 
broadcast the deadly peril—by spoken and written word. 

The evangelical fervor of aroused American public opinion, in an in¬ 
vincible self-preservation crusade, will liberate the subsidized "great power of 
the press" and smash this "Cross of Gold." 

Are Americans to be Slaves or Masters in their own House? 


The exclamation of a well-known New York lawyer supplied the above 
caption over an April 15, 1935 Edmondson publication after bearing chat 
Governor Hoffman of New Jersey had signed "racial-religious" Assembly Act 
257, ' repealing ’ Section 3, Article 1, of the State Constitution guaranteeing to 
all citizens "free speech liberties." 

Here is a composite of the new law signed April 8, 1935: Any person 
or organization who shall utter any speech or declaration, or have in his 
possession for the purpose or with intent to utter, give away, circulate by- 
exhibiting, or by radio, to the view of another person, any statement, speech, 
pronouncement or printed or multigraphed matter, or emblem, photograph, 
banner or flag, which, in any way, in any part thereof, tends to promote or 
promotes or incites hostility, hatred or violence against any group’or persons 
residing or being in this state—by reason of race, color, religion or manner of 
worship, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine of $200 to 
$5,000 or a 90-day or 3-year imprisonment. 


If there is any doubt as to the Jewish origin of this Jersey abortion, the 
following special dispatch to the New York Jewish Daily Bulletin from Tren¬ 
ton, N. J. s April 10, 1935, will clarify the atmosphere: "Jewish leaders in 
New Jersey were highly elated today over the new anti-Nazi law approved 
last night bv Governor Hoffman, prohibiting the dissemination of ANTI- 
JEWISH propaganda throughout the state.” 


The Rafferty Act of New jersey, prohibiting anti-Jewish propaganda, was 
declared on December 5, 1941 by the New Jersey Supreme Court to be un¬ 
constitutional because of abridgement of free speech; the court unanimously 
holding that the anti-Jewish language of nine speakers attacking Jew's before a 
German-American Bund meeting in June, 1940, did not constitute "a clear and 
present danger to the peace and safety of the state." 

New' York No Longer an American City 

One evening soon after the circulation of "Jersey Goes Jewish.” there was 
a loud knock at the door of the Edmondson New York apartment, My wile 
opened the door—and drew back. In the hallway ranked along the walls were 
New York police with tommy guns aimed at the door. 

'■’What is the matter?” exclaimed my wife. 

"Are vou Mrs. Edmondson?” 

"Yes,” she replied. 

"Having any trouble inside” 

"No, why?” 

"Police Headquarters ordered us here because of an anonymous telephone 
call saying your husband was shooting you up.’ ” 

"Want to come in and see?” my wife asked. 

"Yes"—and two officers came in. They came to where I was having a 

sandwich in the kitchen, looked me over. One of them said: 

'Where's the gun?” 

I replied ”1 have no gun.” 

The officers were making a fruitless search when the leader of the 
"army” called out: 

"It's al! right, boys. Another hoax! Our men have traced the anonymous 
call to a candy shop over on the avenue, where it was stated that an un¬ 
known man had recently used the phone to call police headquarters. Let's go!” 

The platoon filed out grinning sheepishly, with my wife laughing at them. 
I called to the men: 

"My guess is that somebody didn’t like my last bulletin headed 'Jersey 
Goes Jewish.’ ” 

The foregoing is a sample of the many annoyances—trivial dementia 
emanations from unbalanced vindictive and revengeful mentalities wallowing 
in futile insensate hate—to which the Edmondsons were subjected during their 
patriotic crusade in a cosmopolitan city no longer American and under control 
of alien elements. 


The following is from an Edmondson bulletin of April 22, 1935: 

The letter quoted below, dated Washington, D. C., April 16, 1935, has 
been received from Congressman Joseph A. Gavagan, Democrat, 21st N. Y. 
Dish, which covers the Harlem section in which Communistic rioting occurred: 

"I am in receipt of your recent ravings. Piety prompts me to charity, and 
charity questions your sanity. You are quite suggestive of the APA, the KKK 
and the recent madness in Germany. To which of these do you owe your soul? 
History suggests that 'patriotism' has always been the refuge of a scoundrel. 
Granting you are 'one-half of one per cent' American, you should curb your 
bitterness or hate when you refer to the President of the United States. Any 
good American w'ould insist on your doing so were you to utter orally in his 
presence your spleen. The patriotism of President Roosevelt needs no defence 
nor defenders. As a citizen, however, I desire to suggest to you to seek the 
quiet and sanctuary of an institution where science strives for reclamation of 
disordered minds." 

Waving aside "ravings." I reply first to your allusion to principles, which, 
in this crisis, transcend pusillanimous personalities and their rantings. 

Assuming to deliver "a patriotic lecture," you say: "You should curb your 
bitterness or hate -when you refer to the President of the United States," etc. 

Since when has the Republic crowned its Servant-Presidents with an aura 
of immunity from justified condemnatory free-speech criticism? Those Ameri¬ 
cans who retain their sanity in the current Roosevelt political inferno seem to 
be in perfect agreement on the point that "His Imperial Majesty" has made the 
American Government Master of Man—in reversal of our written Constitution. 

The primary meaning of "spleen" is "anger;" but, judging from the "pious 
and charitable" tenor of vour letter. I infer that vou have endowed the term 

j J / 

with malice and malevolence. However, the writer's pro-American anti-Roosevelt 
literature of the past year has been, inspired solely by jewish-Radical Leader¬ 
ship’s anti-Americanism, having nothing directly to do with different races, 
individuals or religion. 

Were 1 confronted today personally by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, as a 
loyal native American citizen who "owes" his patriotic soul to the "Spirit of 
'76," exercising Constitutional rights of free speech, I would boldly say: 

"Mr. President; in mv opinion—which is not incompetently supported— 

"In my judgment, you repeatedly violated your Presidential oath to 
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States by usurping, 
in time of peace, functions expressly reserved by it to the Legislative and the 
Judicial Departments of the Government, specifically, when you and your 

"(a) Attempted to 'regulate the value of money' (which is sole- 
power of Congress) through manipulation of the Federal Reserve Monetary 
System, national credit, dollar devaluation, and foreign exchange currency 

"(b) By arrogation of the Congressional sole-power to levy and collect 
taxes, and disburse untold millions of dollars in the administration of the 
AAA—later declared illegal by the Supreme Court. 

" (c) In defiance of anti-monopoly laws, your NRA administration usurped 
powers reserved to the Judiciary—which found it also illegal. 

3 <5 

"(d) You and your advisors gave aid and comfort to the enemies of 
Americans by ignoring protests and maintaining diplomatic relations with the 
Moscow Soviets in promotion of thc-ir Communistic undermining of the liberties 
of the Republic. 

"Furthermore, in my judgement, promises made by you as candidate have 
been directly broken as President, notably, to maintain bound money at all 
hazards’—instead of which the dollar has been devalued and contracts dis¬ 
honorably repudiated; to establish a tariff commission 'free from executive 
interference'—whereas dictatorial power has been demanded and received; 
to ‘reduce Government expenses 25 per cent,' whereas they have progressively 
enlarged to crushing proportions; to lower the national debt, whereas it is 
now at record high; to cut down bureaucracy, which has tremendously ex¬ 
panded: to 'bring economic rc-covc-rv,' whereas it has been deliberately blocked 
by wholesale and impractical reforms that broadly upset confidence, without 
which recovery is impossible, under your regime state sovereignty has been 
violated and' other Constitutional liberties of the people have been com- 
munistically suppressed and fascistically centralized. 

“Responsibility rests where power lies, Mr. Roosevelt.' 

So much, Mr. Gavagan, for Mr. Roosevelt's "patriotism"—which you say 
"needs no defenders/’ 

If that be treason to Americanism, "make the most of it! ’ 


(From August 1, 1935, Edmondson bulletin) 

Jewish Comedian "Eddie” Cantor exhibited apprehension in a "persecu¬ 
tion" speech before a B’nai B’rith Convention July 1, 1935, in Los Angeles, 
regarding an approaching Jewish world crisis. He said: 

"You know the Jewish situation in Europe—BUT I DOUBT IF MANY 

Let us dispassionately turn the Searchlight of Truth on the persecution 
propaganda record, and analyze historic facts. 


The Dispersion (beginning A. D. 70) under Roman order, was apparently 
regarded as "persecution’' by Lord Rothschild, for in talking with British States¬ 
man Balfour in 1917 referring to the Ziomst-Palestine hope, he said his people 
"had no home where they could lay their heads." 

Irving L. Potter’s pamphlet on "The Cause of Anti-Jewism in the U. S.»” 
says: "The Jews were expelled from England in 1290. They gained control of 
trade, monopolized manufacturing and financial operations. The King caused 
280 Jews to be hanged in London for having corrupted the English coin. For 
nearly 400 years no Jew was allowed in England. 

"In 1492 Queen Isabella urged the expulsion of the jews from Spain. It 
is estimated that more than 200,000 "were banished. 

"The Jews were driven out of France four times, the last in 1394. French 
commerce was entirely in their hands. The Paris of the Middle Ages was al¬ 
most a Jewish City.” 

Ingram Hughes says in "Anti-Semitism: A World Survey,” 1934 edition: 
-"Massacres of Jews occurred in Germany and. Poland in 1836-/. In 1881 
occurred a series of pogroms in Russia." 

Expulsion of Tews from Germany under Hitler as communists. 


Digging into the historical record of fact, authority and evidence, the un¬ 
biased investigator finds that in ancient Babylon* reign of Ahasuerus, jews are 
reported as having killed 70,000 Babylonians—in memory of which event they 
celebrate their holiday "Purim." Was this a "persecution" of Gentiles? 

Gibbon, the historian, quotes the Roman pro-Consul of Africa, Dion 
Cassius, as saying that 220,000 Greeks were massacred by Jews in Cyrene, 
240,000 in Cyprus, and "a very great multitude in Egypt." 

The persecution-by-fire of Christians by Nero (whose wife was a converted 
Jewess) anticipated by 19 centuries the slaughter of millions of Russians by 
the Tewish Bolsheviki. 

* Rabbi Browne in his 1924 book, "How Odd of God," says: "WE intend 

On Dec. 13, 1933, the Jewish National Anti-Defamation League issued a 
circular from Chicago headquarters saying: "Scribner & Sons have just published 
a book by Madison Grant entitled 'The Conquest of a Continent. It is extremely 
antagonistic to Jewish interests, for the author insists that American develop¬ 
ment depends upon the elimination of unassimilabie alien masses in our midst. 
other words, the Jews ordered a ' persecution boycott on a pro-American 
analysis. The present international trade boycott 'persecution' 'of Germany for 
expelling Jewish Communists is being energized by prominent American Jews 
—Rabbi Wise and Samuel Untermyer, 


We now come to evidence showing where Jewry has REALIZED A NET 
PROFIT from "persecution.” Prof. Werner Sombart says in his 1913 "Jews 
and Modern Capitalism": "It may be somewhat inexplicable that, while through¬ 
out the Middle Ages, Jews were deprived of their All, they managed to be¬ 
come very rich again. THE JEWS WERE NEVER MULCTED. A good portion 
of their wealth was transferred to fictitious ownership.” "Other races have 
come and gone. The Jew has survived. Persecution cannot crush him. HE IS 
THE ARISTOCRAT OF THE WORLD," boasted Samuel Untermyer, in a 
speech April 13, 1933, quoted in the London "Investigator” of June, 1935. 

The victorious "Russian" Revolutionary Bolshevist Council of 500 included 
over 400 Jewish members. 

The League of Nations was created by Jewry, according to Jewish writers. 

Who is the "Father’’ of the New Deal? Brandeis, Who is Chief Execu¬ 
tioner? Frankfurter. Who is "Unofficial President"? Baruch. Who is in control 
of gold and banking but the Morgenthaus? The Palestine Zionist Mandate has 
been followed by Jewish acquisition of hundreds of billions of Dead Sea 
mineral wealth. The gold and diamond fields of South Africa are Jewish-owned. 

"Our coffers are full, our homes palatial, our synagogues rise, our hospitals 
multiply. Never in the palmy days of our history has Israel so increased in 
wealth * * * The time has come when patriotic Jews of America should feel 
the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) hatched and planned 
in the Camp of Israel," says B. A. M. Schapiro, "A Jew by Race, a Christian 
by Faith,” in a pamphlet on "America's Great Menace.’ 




(From Edmondson Bulletin of Aug. 1, 1935) 

Prof. Werner Sombart, in his "Jews & Modern Capitalism,” 1913, holds 
the market in shares from 1800-1950 to be of equal significance with the ex¬ 
pansion of the House of Rothschild, saying: ''The name of Rothschild means 
more than the firm. It means ALL JEWDOM SO FAR AS THE STOCK 
EXCHANGE is concerned; for only with the help of compatriots could the 
Rothschilds have reached their position of power—which dominates all others 


to obtain command of the stock exchange and the money market all possible 
means were utilized. The Rothschilds practiced stock jobbing in the narrowei 
sense which the French attach to the word. They employed the expedient of 
artificially influencing the market by creating a favorable atmosphere. The 
capitalist "movement reached its highest point in the speculation banks. By means 
of loaning speculative securities, banks are placed in a position, by acquiring- 
other securities at a cheap price, to create the impression that money is plentiful 
and is accompanied by a desire to buy. Thus powder of creating an upward 
movement in prices is easily acquired—and this porver can be reversed just as 
easily to depress prices by depredating the store of available securities. The 
great banks, accordingly, hold the handle which controls the machine called the 
stock exchange. And the heads of the banks tend more and more TO BECOME 
ENTIRE MASTERS OF ECONOMIC LIFE.” Holding key position in politics 
and finance, the system of espionage employed places these Internationalists in 
a position to obtain quicker and more reliable stock exchange, financial and 
speculative-investment information than anybody else, not excepting govern¬ 
ment, according to over thirty years’ experience by the undersigned .in the active 
investment field. Sombart further declares that: "Capitalism was born from the 
money loan. Money fending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the 
pages of the Talmud and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending 
money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the posses¬ 
sion of money. They fathomed all the secrets that Lay hid in money. They be¬ 
came Lords of Money and Lords of the World.” 




Robert Edward Edmondson of New York, N. Y., being duly sworn, deposes and says: 

On Aug. 7, 1934, David Gallup, Jewish Statistician of Ira Haupt & Co. Stock 
Brokers, 50 Broadway, Nc-w York City, invaded my office at 80 Washington St., New 
York city, and, shoving into my hands a communication he said I sent him, angrily 
shouted: "I 13 'get you' for that." 

Glancing at it, I replied: "I never saw it,” handing it back. 

"Yes, you have, and I’ll get you’ for it," he retorted, advancing excitedly and shak¬ 
ing his fist in my face. 

Gallup is a young and physically powerful man, fully capable of carrying into effect 
his threats; is a "prize-fight fan,” according to a letter of June 25 he wrote to me; 
while I, at 62, am past the age of physical prowess, and wear glasses. 

I was sitting cornered behind my desk at the time, with my secretary, sole witness, 
beside me. Unable to offer any adequate physical defense against what was a definite 
menacing movement probably involving bodily injury, from a man who seemed to have lost 
his head, and who had previously visited me, antagonistically and angrily objecting to 
my anti-Jewish-Radical publications; understanding the legal definition of assault to be 
"threats or menaces coupled with real or apparent intent and ability to commit bodily 
harm or injury"; having a pistol under permit to safeguard against Communist threats 
previously made; believing I was within the bounds of propriety in defensively displaying 
my revolver—I lifted the latter from a desk drawer and, laying it on the desk WITH¬ 
OUT POINTING, I said to Gallup: "Get out!” 

"Oh, I see you've got a gun," he shouted, "Ail right, I'Ll TAKE CARE OF 

With that, he left, angrily repeating, "I'll get you.” ' 

Notwithstanding the foregoing affidavit, supported by witness, dated Feb. 1, 1935. 
pistol permit was revoked by half-Jew Mayor La Guardia, and restoration refused regard¬ 
less of written statement by Edmondson's New York Counsel that "there is not a word 
of evidence of Edmondson's improper use of his pistol.” 

Charles Hall Davis, leading Virginia Constitution lawyer, wrote: "On the face of the 
facts as set out in your affidavit it seems to me that the action of the N. Y. Police 
Department in revoking your pistol permit was absolutely unjustiried. ... 1 think i: 
would be wise for you to publish the affidavit, sc that the people may know the facts, 
and in case of any future threat the full responsibility for vour helplessness may bt 
fairly chargeable to the department which revoked your permit for insufficient reasons." 

A bulletin was broadcast Mar. 1. 1935, reporting the event. 


The following was broadcast by Edmondson from coast to coast on Sept. 
18, 1935: 

Beiow is an invitation-speech delivered by Robert Edward Edmondson 
before "The National Sentinels" of the Republic on Constitution Day, Sept. 
17, 1935, at the Hotel Montclair, New York City: 

“Sentinels of The Republic! 

“I am honored in having the privilege of addressing you regarding my 
work in this great national crisis. 

"The subject is too immense, too complex, too loaded with dynamite, for 
extemporaneous treatment. We are trying to solve in a fragment of time, a 
problem centuries old. For your own self-interest, I beg you to listen with open 
minds. You will hear nothing but a record of fact and authority. 

"I have been publicly exposing secret Anti-Americanism by POLITICAL 
Jewish Leadership, which I believe to be promoting Communistic plans to 
overthrow our Government. 

"This is no time for suppression of FRANK FREE SPEECH. It is not a 
question of race class or religious PRIVILEGES. IT IS A FIGHT FOR THE 
preservation, as well as their OWN, the Constitution imposes a DUTY on its 

"Instigated by pressure of economic inconsistencies, an exhaustive research 
going back thousands of years PROVES MY THESIS FROM JEWISH RE¬ 
CORDS THEMSELVES. Theodor Herzl, "Father” of Zionism, Dr, Oscar Levy 
and other prominent Jews agree that Jews furnish the driving power for BOTH 
Communism and Capitalism. 

“Preliminary to a study of this problem, the word "Jew” must be accepted 
as symbolizing a TRINITY-minority, namely, A Race, A Nationality, A Reli¬ 
gion. The basic issue is NOT religion. It is fundamentally ECONOMIC. The 
CHIEF CREATION and Weapon of Jewry is DEBT. 

"As a patriot, I am not against Jews on ANY of the three counts cited. I 
became definitely anti-Jewish in April, 1934, upon being convinced that 
Jewry’s unrepudiated leadership was destroying Americanism. 

"PRECISELY the same attitude would be taken were any other minority 
so offending, 

'In the final analysis, we are up against a Satanic philosophy crystallized 
bv centuries of absorption into an unscrupulous, predatory and inhuman Gospel 

0 £ Q et _practiced upon what its ruthless power-drunk leadership falsely calls 'A 

Gentile Common Enemy.’ 

- Lords of the World 

"Author Sombart ("Jews & Modern Capitalism," 1913) naively outlines 
p n j s c - r eed thus: 'Jews were Height early to find rheir chief happiness in the 
possession of money. They made an ART of lending money. They became 
LORDS of money—-and Lords of THE WORLD.’ 

"In an agonized Jeremiad against the false leadership of his people, Dr. 
Oscar Lew. noted London Jewish Savant, cried out in 1920: We who have 
promised to lead you to a New Heaven, have landed you in a New Hell.' 

"1 do not accuse every Jew. But my premise is that, as we are in a Conflict 
wome than Civil War owing to the parasitical penetration of a generous, un¬ 
suspecting host, self-preservation demands NO exception for 'Pet Jews’ or 
Gentile TOOLS, until the battle is won. 

"My campaign has revived the age-old cry of 'Persecution;' but the un¬ 
varnished historic record proves that Jewry has actually THRIVED on so-called 
persecution—CASHING IN on the SYMPATHY of the world. 

"Futhermore, Jewish Leadership has usurped supreme political power 
throughout the world Finkelstein-Litvinoff is President of the Council of The 
League of Nations, itself admittedly a Jewish idea; Lord Reading, with Samuels, 
Sassoon and other Jews, rule England; Jewish-blooded Laval is Premier of 
France, whose Government is SHOT THROUGH with his tribe; The Big 
Five of the Soviet Regime, with their ambassadors to England, Germany, Italy 
and the United States, are ALL Jewish by ancestry or marriage. 

"At home, we have 'Father Brandeis’ of the New Deal; as Executor, 'Karl 
Marx Professor' Frankfurter; 'Unofficial President' Baruch; International 
Bankers Morgenthau and Lehman; Roosevelt's 'Right-Arm' Rosenman—all so 
titled by a boastful JEWISH publication—the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner. 

"As a veteran journalist, I tell you that over 95 per cent of our metropoli¬ 
tan daily press is Jew-cowed by politico-economic pressure. Out of 1,800 
managing editors of leading American dailies, to whom 1 recently sent a per¬ 
sonal fraternal patriotic appeal, with 'Proof of Plot,' TWO ONLY HAD TEIE 
COL1RAGE TO REPLY. Our Citizens are BLINDED by the 'kept men of 
the press.' 

"Economic Cancer being the basic CAUSE of the trouble, Economic SUR¬ 
GERY is the REAL Cure; but the IMMEDIATE destroying agency is POLITI¬ 
CAL. As the necessary PURGING of politics can come ONLY through public 
enlightenment, the PRIMARY remedy is PUBLICITY, 

"Therefore, with the press unavailable, my work has been directed along 
the Voltarian thesis that revolutions can be COUNTERED, as well as pro¬ 

"What can we PERSONALLY DO? 

"Use the latest WEAPON OF THE ENEMY. BOYCOTT Jewish pro¬ 
duction. BUY Loyal Gentile. Boycott Jewish POLITICANS. 

"Above All, FREE YOUR PRESS. It is America’s FIRST LINE OF 
Defence. BOYCOTT unpatriotic publications which do not print ALL the news 
or POLITICALLY DISTORT headlines. Withhold ADVERTISING patron¬ 
age—Their LIFEBLOOD. 

''History proves that THE WORST happens to those who won’t believe it 
CAN happen. Are treasonably negligent Americans going to give up their 
PRICELESS LIBERTY-BIRTHRIGHT, bought with centuries of untold sacri¬ 

"Sentinels of The Republic! MAKE NO MISTAKE! 

'"We are not in a racial, class or religious conflict. IT IS A FIGHT FOR 

"An historic Hour of Decision is upon, us! The COMMUNISTIC Die 
is Cast! 


The following was published by Edmondson Oct, 15, 1935; 

Farmers of America! 

You are being fooled by alien anti-national financialists. Watch your step! 

Are you going to surrender your Birthright of Freedom for a Mess of 

The "dole" you receive from Washington is America’s heritage of Work¬ 
ing Capital. When it is gone—WHAT THEN? 

This is not Republican or Democratic or other political partisan propa¬ 
ganda. It is an American PATRIOTIC APPEAL to save the Republic. 

Look at the farmers of Russia! Are they FREE? No! Millions have been 
"liquidated’' and millions enslaved by Internationalists. 

Read this: "What Jewish Idealism and Jewish Discontent have so power¬ 
fully contributed to produce in Russia, the same Historic Qualities of the Jewish 
Mind are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES. The Jew evolved 
organized capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system.”— 
The American Hebrew, Sept. 20, 1920. 

Communizing enemies of the Republic have been inciting farm against 
city and city against farm. The interests of each are as identical as those of 
industrial capital and labor. WHO will buy from you if the city cannot pay 
price advances caused by the destruction of food? 

The farmer receives too little for his products and the citv pays too much. 
WHO GETS THE PROFIT? The Middleman. WHO is this Middleman? An 
un-American PARASITE. 

We have been sold out to a foreign foe! We are in a war for SELF-PRES¬ 
ERVATION against the most deadly enemy that ever menaced the Republic. 

The undersigned PRO-American is not afraid of what the enemv is doing 
so much as WHAT AMERICANS ARE NOT DOING to save the Country 
to which they owe ALI.. 

It’s up to you, Farmers of America to "RESCUE THE REPUBLIC" 


(From Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 19, 1935) 

To remove any doubt as to the authenticity of the astounding sadistic con¬ 
fession in part quoted below, boldly addressed to Gentiles, the undersigned 
desires to say that he has the Century Magazine in which it was printed, as 
published in the January, 1928, issue. 

The author of the article uses a boastful pen-name; "Marcus Eli Ravage” 
—translated "The Big Destruction Hammer of God.” He is said to be a 
Roumanian Jew, and has written a number of books. 

The title, "The Real Case Against the Jews,” uncovers a tragic wise¬ 
cracking audacity elevated to the nth power of expression, dramatized in a 

4 2 












devastating!)’ penetrating admission of universal guilt so appalling, yet com¬ 
pletely confirming to those who hold the key, as to put it at once in the classi¬ 
fication of the "protocols,” whose predictions are being fulfilled today with 


"Of course you DO resent US JEWS. The thing that intrigues me about 
this anti-Jewish business, however, is your TOTAL LACK OF GRIT. You 
seem to be suffering with self-consciousness horribly. It is not as if you were 
amateurs—you have been at it for over 15 centuries. You resent us, but you 
cannot clearly say why. 

"We are. if you are to be believed, a menace to your racial integrity. We 
shirk our patriotic duty in wartime, because we are pacifists by nature and 

"You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow’. Suppose we admit 
the charge, WHAT OF IT? 

"Take the three principal revolutions in modern times—the French, Ameri¬ 
can and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, 
political and economic justice? And che end is still a long wav off. WE STILL 

"You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your 
theatres and movie palaces. Granted, your complaint is well-founded. But what 
is that compared with our STAGGERING INFLUENCE in your churches, your 
schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think?"" 

"You believe ‘The Protocols of che Eiders of Zion.' But what is that beside 
the unquestionable and historical conspiracy which we have carried out, and 
which we have never denied because you have never had the courage to charge 
us with it? 

"You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. IT IS THE TRUTH 
—and I cower at your discovery, 

"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We have 
taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with 
them. We are at the bottom not merely of the latest great war, but nearly all 
your wars. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your 
personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. We did it solely with 
the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda, 

"If we were in your place we should dislike you more cordially than you 
WHY. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this 
and that. IT MAKES US QUAKE. We are conscious of the injury we did when 
we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify 
and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, 
and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never 

"Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather 
lightly, as long as they did not resort to VIOLENCE?” 

When one comes ro fuLl realization of what all-engulfing insensate power 
surging emotion wields over even disciplined individual minds, then will be 
understood their deep fear of mob violence. Jewish Leadership is past-master in 
evaluating mass-psychology, 


(James Waterman Wise in "The New Masses” of Oct. 29, 1935.) 

Claiming that the CONSERVATIVE element of Jewry is misrepresenting 
it in belittling Jewish Communism, James Waterman Wise, Rabbi Wise's son, 
in the Oct. 29, 1935, issue of "The New' Masses’ (edited mostly by Jew's) 
attacks the ’'statistic-buttressed” proclamation broadcast Oct. 21 by the Ameri¬ 
can Jewish Committee, the B'nai B'rith and the Jewish Labor Committee. 

"These three representative Jewish organizations publicly challenged the 
recent Hitler charge that the Jewish race predominated in the Communist move¬ 
ment in Germany, and in addition declared that only a few of the rulers of 
the Soviets are Jewish.” 

Says James Waterman Wise: 

"Jews are not Communists,” is the burden of 2 statement issued jointly by 
Dr. Cyrus Adler, President .of the American Jewish Committee; Alfred M. 
Cohen, President of the B’nai B’rith; and B. C. Vladeck, Chairman of the Jewish 
Labor Committee. 

"These gentlemen hysterically deny that Communism is Jewish, and 
frenziedly repudiate Jews who are Communists. Their statement libels Soviet 
Russia and lies about the Jewish people. 

"Let us analyze their statement, the First attempts to show that the Jews 
of Germany and of other countries were not and are not Communists. The 
Second, that Communism and the Soviet Union are themselves foes of Jews and 
Judaisim. Of Soviet Russia, it says: ’Among the 3 6 Commissars who constitute 
Soviet Russia, only two are Jews.’ 

"Is it possible that the heads of the American Jewish Committee, the B’nai 
B’rith and the Jewish Labor Committee, have never heard of Litvinoff, of 
Yaroslovsky, Kaganowitch, Radek, Bela Kun? Jew's who deny that many Jews 
are Communists are jockeying themselves into the position of citizens on 

"Will not tdie gentlemen who today disclaim Jewish Communists, tomor¬ 
row disclaim Jewish Socialists? 

"That the authors of this piece of perfidy do not represent THE MASSES 
of American Jews, will be made abundantly clear. To counteract its poison and 
to preclude its repetition, Jews must take active and positive measures. There 
must be a widening and strengthening of the united front against fascism. And, 
if by taking full part in the forging of this united front, the Jews of America 
write themselves down as Communists—SO BE IT.” 

The foregoing statements supply a complete justification of the writer’s 
strong contention for many months that a majority of Jews are Communistic. 
Why was the Communist Party mass meeting called on June 2, 1934, at Madi¬ 
son Square Garden to endorse the Soviet, sponsored by 100 Jewish organiza¬ 


(From Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 1, 1935) 

"The American Civil Liberties Union is a supporter of all subversive 
movements in the U. S.”—Lusk report to N. Y. State Legislature in 1928. 

"The ACLU is closely affiliated with the COMMUNIST movement in 
the U. S., and fully 90% of its efforts are on behalf of COMMUNISTS who 
have come into conflict with the law. It is quite apparent that its main function 



i< to attempt to protect COMMUNISTS in their advocacy of force to overthrow 
the U. S. Government.”—House of Representatives Report 2290 of Jan. 17, 


Roger N. Baldwin, former IWW, alumnus of Harvard University, des¬ 
cribes himself as follows in the April Class Book of 1933, according to Donald 
Parson, a classmate, writing to the N. Y. Herald Tribune Oct. S, 1935: I 
have continued directing the unpopular fight for the right of agitation, AS 
DIRECTOR of the ACLU. I have been to Europe several times, mostly in 
connection with INTERNATIONAL RADICAL ACTIVITY. I am for Social¬ 
ism. I seek social ownership of property and the abolition of the propertied 
class. COMMUNISM is the goal!'' 

The International Labor Defense aids COMMUNISTS arrested for revo¬ 
lutionary activities. The ACLU 1931 report prints this: 'The ACLU early in 
the struggle raised money and aided the defense committees of both the IWW 

and "iLD” 

Hundreds of other similar cases are given on page after page in the Red 
Network.” William Z. Foster, COMMUNIST candidate for President in 1932, 
was an ACLU Committeeman until 1930. Harry F. Ward, ACLU Chairman, 
admits cooperation with COMMUNISTS, according to Page 331 of the Red 

Reporting an anti-war meeting of students April 12, 1935, the N. Y. Sun 
said: "Roger N. Baldwin, ACLU Director, spoke as follows: 'We cannot main¬ 
tain an organization worthy of its name without COMMUNISM. 

Felix Frankfurter. "Karl Marx Professor of Harvard,” born in Vienna, is 
listed as a National Committeeman of the American Civil Liberties Union. 

Frankfurter was appointed Counsel of the Mooney Commission and tried 
to enlist the influence of Former President Theodore Roosevelt to aid Mooney, 
a COMMUNIST. The ex-President wrote Frankfurter Dec. 19, 19! T , as fol¬ 
lows: "You have taken an attitude which seems to me fundamentally that of 
Trotsky and the other Bolsheviki leaders.” 

(Prom Edmondson Bulletin of Nov, 15, 1935) 

The six-point Solomon Star Picture below, presenting "AMERICA'S IN¬ 
VISIBLE GOVERNORS" and important "allies,” gives only part of a long 
list of New Deal "Supreme Council’' members surrounding President F. D. 

The above interlaced triangle Star Seal of Jewish Ownership—on all syna¬ 
gogues—now appears on U. S. Post Office dead letter envelopes; U. S, Army 
Helmets, Sixth Division; U. S. Navy Dept, seals; new one dollar bills; medal 
of President Roosevelt; Masonic Lodges; Police Badges of Chicago and 

In the 1937 World Almanac under "U. S. Presidents and Their Wives,” 
appears this: "Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the son of James Roosevelt, 
a direct descendant of Claes Martenzan van ROSENVELT, who arrived in 
New Amsterdom in 1649 and married Jannetje SAMUELS.” 









r 2? 











,p r0 , Speech Delivered by Robert Edward Edmondson Before Audience of 
j ( 500 . aPa Meeting of The American National Labor Party m New York City, 

^Nta^nd 5 Women of America: KNOW your Government. Until you do, 
vou cannot Protect, Preserve and Defend your Country. 

The United States Government is neither a True Democracy nor a True 
Reoublic, It IS AN AGENCY, established and existing by reason of a written 
Constitution which limits its control over the 48 states through the giving 
g bv heir people of only eighteen listed powers, delegated for he purpose o 
the different national object! of the union. The states especially reserved all 
other powers to themselves. The Washington National Government has powers 
over the states ONLY to the extent necessary for NATIONAL operations. 

In jealous guardianship of all their state tights, the Framers and Founders 
of the United States Federation carefully avoided the creation of a dangerous 

cencral^Wa^hmgton „o ^ ^ GOVERN THEMSELVES through a DOUBLE 


The ONLY kind of a government communizing or socializing internation¬ 
alists CAN EASILY SUBVERT is a liberalized or true democracy, because such 
mob-rule is quickly misled by confusion propaganda. 

Therefore the plan of socialistic communiz.ers is to work always tor any¬ 
thing that will cause a "leveling down" of electoral intelligence to the lowest 

democratic average. 

The price of liberty is eternal vigilence. We have failed to guard the price¬ 
less gift of common sense liberty given to us by the wise men of '6. 

• German National Socialism, as outlined by its leader should so ve Ger¬ 
many’s problems because it is founded in Patriotism—which the Jew tears be 
cause it is his worst enemy. But our Individual Americanism is-best tor_ the 
United States because Americans decide their affairs as individuals. Further¬ 
more America cannot have a "single racial soul, for it is made up of many 
races’ It was founded on A Great Principle^that of Individual Freedom. ^ 
must be loyal to such Americanism, first and last. 

Throwing off the European political custom of relying on master-leader- 
ship which they believed to be dangerous to human freedom, Americans long 
ago P ’fitted themselves individually for self-government, That system worked 
well before the 20th Century Jewish Invasion. 

Remember, from the President down, the men we elect to o ficei 
become our musters, but our servants. In time of peril, citizens must show their 

patriotism by honest public criticism of their official servants. 

The head of our present national political administration has admittedly 
broken most of the pledges of the Democratic Party Platform on which he was 
elected. He is therefore not a party Democrat. 

He has taken and used powers belonging to Congress and the courts in 
time of peace, thereby violating his oath to protect defend and 
Constitution. He has tried to sovietize American industry by an illegal NRA 
and American farmers through the triple A His admmistranon has become 
widely known as "The Jew Deal.” He is therefore not an American. 

Above all let us present a united front against the enemy. His defense is 
a false front. He admits it by calling his real resistance "tissue paper against a 

united Americanism. But he works while you sleep. He sows the seeds of sus¬ 
picion,, jealousy and hatred, His safety lies in keeping us quarrelsome, confused 
and divided. Banish all differences until this great fight is won. We have but 
one enemy—Jewry. 

Whether or not you were born here, if you believe in and are loyal to 
America's Great Principle of Individual Freedom, this is your country. Don’t 
forget that our forefathers came from the conquering pioneer men of Europe. 
They settled this land. They built this nation. It's ours! We are going to keep 
it and run it. No Horde of Asiatic Pirates is going to take it from us! 

It is rime to think straight American, to speak plain American, to act 
direct American. 


Below is copy of an open self-explanatory letter from Edmondson: 

Gen. Maiin Craig, 

Chief of Staff, U. S. A., New York, Dec. 10, 1935 

Washington, D. C, 

Dear Sir: 

The Recruiting Publicity Bureau of the United States Army on Governor’s 
Island is distributing 38 x 25 recruiting posters. At the top in the right corner 
thereof appears a picture of five American soldiers lying among brush aiming 
rifles, with the order printed below: "Fire at will!" SIX-POINT STARS ARE 

From the Recruiting Publicity Bureau the undersigned obtained a copy of 
"Recruiting News" of August 1 5, 1933, issued by the Adjutant General of the 
United States Army, on page 3 of which the following information is printed 
around a six-point star: 

"The original insignia of the Sixth Division of the American Expedition¬ 
ary Forces was A WHITE CROSS surmounting a White Circle. AFTER the 
Armistice m 1918, a RED SIX-POINT STAR was officially substituted for 
this symbol." 

This six-point interlaced double-triangle has been the "possession symbol" 
of International Jewry for centuries. It may be seen today on synagogues; on 
Jewish-Masonic emblems; on documents of the Jewish-controlled British 
Government; on Jew-owned public buildings in New York; ON MEDALS 
D. ROOSEVELT—'On the other the said Jewish .star. And recently, this six- 

In the Name of The Republic, the undersigned native American loyal 
citizen and his associatees hereby patriotically demand the restoration to the 
Sixth Division of The White Cross insignia—symbol of our overwhelmingly 
CHRISTIAN country —in place of the six-point alien star, an Oriental anti- 
Christian and un-American emblem. 

Yours for America FIRST, 


4 8 


(From Edmondson broadcast of Dec. 19, 1935) 

The following quotation from the New York Jewish newspaper, "The 
Dav,” of Dec, 14, 1933, printed in English below the above caption, speaks 
for" itself in no uncertain arrogancy, and is particularly interesting at Christmas 

"With the approach of Christmas we begin to be wary of religious prop¬ 
aganda disguised as music and cultural entertainment. WE WANT ALL THIS 
CHRISTMAS PROPAGANDA STOPPED—leave the public schools alone! 

"Some Jews 'falling’ for the Christmas slogan: 'Good Will to All Men, 
pretend not to see in Christmas a distinctly 7 Christian Holiday but a sort ol 
folk festival common to all in the United Slates. That they are thoroughly 
mistaken, goes without saying. 

"The masses of Jewish people in America HAVE A RIGHT TO DE¬ 
MAND from the educational svstem of the United States that IT KEEP 
place this demand before public officials. 


"This is a CHRISTIAN NATION," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" 
Case decision by the U. S. Supreme Court, per fustice Brewer, FEB. 29, 1892, 
143 U. S. 457. 

Chief justice Kent of the N. Y. Supreme Court said in "The People vs. 
Ruggles, 8 Johns, 225, p. 227, 228—1811": "The majority of the people ol 
this state, in common with the people of this country, profess the general doc¬ 
trines of CHRISTIANITY, as the rule of their faith and practice." 

The last paragraph of the Constitution of the United States reads. "Done 
in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present the 17th Day ol 
September, in the year of OUR LORD (Jesus Christ), 1787, and of the In¬ 
dependence of the U. S. A., the 12th." 

1932 AGENDA 

Three resort owners in upstate New York have been haled to court by the 
American Jewish Congress for displaying a sign "Church Nearby” without 
another saying the same thing about "synagogue," charging violation of the 
N. Y. State FEPC anti-Discrimination Law forbidding advertising along the 
lines of race, color or religion. (N. Y. Jewish Examiner of Dec. 5, 195 2) 

Isn’t that N. Y. State law a violation of the personal privilege right which 
repealed the unconstitutional Prohibition Amendment? 


Tudging from a twenty-year experience, most Jews cannot live in the rare¬ 
fied atmosphere of simple Christianity, and apparently, in obedience to a 
mysterious emotional or sadistic paranoic complex, seek to drag everything 
down to a materialistic level—in line with the following jeremiad written by 
their Poet Leader Israel Zangwill, in "Israel," published on Page 131, in the 
book "Blind Children": 


“Pious, fanatical zealots, throttled by Talmud-coil; 

“Impious, lecherous skeptics, cynical stalkers of Spoil; 

“Wedded ’neath Hebrew awning, buried ’neath Hebrew sod; 

“Between, nor a dream of Duty, never a glimpse of God; 

“Blarneying, shivering, crawling, taking all Colors but None: 

“Lying a fox in the covert, leaping an ape in the Sun!” 


That is the most dreadful indictment ever published according to the 
criterions of piercing penetration, merciless dissection, derisive mockery and 
excoriating sadistic cruelty. 

Surely it must have been soul-searing surgery for the author, a Jew thus 
to so contemptuously hold up before the world the horrific picture of his own 
people’s humiliating degradation. 

After analyzing, the impartial spectator stands aghast at the ail-engulfing 
tragedy of it all, while the wells of pure pity drain dry in pre-viewing the 
inevitable mass-reckoning foreshadowed by the evolutionary principle of com¬ 
pensatory-retribution . 

This writer has not found in secular or biblical history any parallel ar¬ 
raignment outside of the Divine Denunciation (minus sadism) which, in 
company with that other curse in John S:44, has come thundering down the 
centuries, which condemnation began with the phrase "WOE unto you Scribes 
and Pharisees,” as recorded in New Testament, Matthew, Chapters 15, 16 , 21, 
23 —wherein, incidentally, reference is made to “Blind Guides,” which might 
indirectly have been responsible for Zangwill’s Title "Blind Children." 

And, judging from the past and the present, in view of this and biblical 
Jeremiads, dare any man challenge the historic accusation: "The Same, Yester¬ 
day, Today—Tomorrow”? 

I sincerely hope that frequent use of the “language of vigor” in exposure 
of Jewish anti-Americanism, may arouse victimized Jewry to tribal revolt 
against and emancipation from the false leadership that is destroying them as 
well as shaking civilization’s foundations. 


In response to a request for support of Senator L. J. Dickinson of Iowa as candi¬ 
date for the Presidency of the United States in May, 1936, Editor Edmondson replied 
that if the senator would broadcast “A New Proclamation of Emancipation" as outlined 
below, support would be forthcoming from many quarters. This was published on 
May 26 : 

My Fellow-Countrymen! 

I have a high duty to perform. Our Immorcal Lincoln has said: "Have faith in the 
people—TELL THEM THE TRUTH!" Believing that ONLY rhe Truth will set us FREE 
from our present oppression, at the risk of all I hold dear I hereby broadcast the truth, 
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, 

The existence of this Republic is menaced by a world conspiracy. By the monopoly 
of international gold-flow through a foreign-devised monetary system, a hidden inter¬ 
national financial super-power controls the political and economic destinies of our country. 

By secret money corruptions, the freedom of communication between our citizens 
has been destroyed. WE NO LONGER HAVE A FREE PRESS. At the source in great 
metropolitan centers and through distributing agencies, news vital to the welfare of the 
nation is deliberately suppressed by (1) advertising influence, (2) financial necessities, 
(3) political manipulation and (4) alien ownership. Even the air is subsidized. America’s 
first line of defense—the avenues of information—is down. The people are blinded. The 
Supreme Court and the Constitution are undermined by propaganda, and the very existence 
of the Republic is at stake! 

ONLY by a free and public exchange of news and views can Government of, by and 
for the Majority, be carried on. The primary issue before us today is neither the Consti- 


, fiotl n0r the Supreme Court—IT IS FREEDOM TO PRINT AND BROADCAST ALL 
THE NEWS With Freedom of Press, the Constitution is defended! With Freedom ol 
Press, the Supreme Court is preserved! With Freedom of Press, the Republic is saved. 

I charge Franklin D. Roosevelt with being the forefront of this conspiracy in Amer- 
• a I accuse him of giving aid and comfort to our alien enemies through his Jewish- 
Radical administration. I believe him to be guilty of treason to the Republic. He has 
Grounded himself with a Supreme Council of alien-minded Jews, led by Karl Marx 
Professor Frankfurter, International Banker Morgenthau, Wall Street Speculator Baruch, 
7ionist "Elder" Brandeis, Socialist Filene and other prominent leaders of that minority, 
and he has appointed thousands of Jews to key-controls throughout the entire Government. 

He has not fulfilled pre-election pledges. He was elected under false pretenses. 
Tn the language of the Declaration of Independence, by his bureaucracy, “He has erected a 
multitude of new offices, and set swarms of officers to harrass our people and eat out 
our" substance." Through his Jewish-Radical Advisory Council, "He has combined with 
others to subject its to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by 
our laws." By his AAA processing and other attempted confiscatory levies "He has im¬ 
posed taxes on us without our consent”—raising our national debt to record high levels. 
Through thousands of Communistic strike revolts for high power and not for justice, "He 
has incited domestic insurrections among us.” And he has blocked economic recovery by 
impossible wholesale reforms. 

■'It is evident that Roosevelt is not the leader of the forces behind him. He is being 
used by them.” Such was the judgment of journalist Walter Lippman, in the N. Y. 
Evening Post of June 26 , 1952. in commenting upon Democracy National Convention 

To use the concluding language of the Declaration of Independence: "When a long 
train of abuses and usurpations evince a design to reduce them jo absolute despotism it 
is the people's right, it is their duiy to throw off such government.” 

What is this international conspiracy!' you ask. Who is behind it? What is its 
object? I will tell you the truth. 

We first knew it by the name of "New Deal.” It is centuries old. It has paraded 
under many disguises down the corridor of time. It promoted French revolutions, It con¬ 
quered Russia by bloody betrayal. It overcame Germany. It helped to finance the Spanish 
revolution. In our own land, by many subversions, it has finally exposed its Internationa, 
revolutionary character, shaking the Communist fist of civil war. 

But Communism is not its real nature. Communism is an impossible atheistic doc¬ 
trine founded on the evil theory that "might makes right!” It is a diabolical philosophy 
of gross materialism. And it is AN EFFECT. The Cause of Communism is an ancient 
fantastic ambition lusting for universal power. 

The source of Communism is the deadly enemy of Civilization. It especially covets 

False Jewish Leadership 


In this connection I call your attention to che significant Los Angeles defi-speech on 
Oct ioa 5 b v Agricultural "Commissar” Tugwell. who declared that the New Deal 

"movement will go on in any case. IT LIES IN THE BRAINS AND BLOOD OF A 

In the light of what follows, 1 leave it to your imagination as to whether or not 
those "Old Racial Dreams" of super-dominion are associated with a Jewish fanatic 
ambition to govern the world spurred on by a selfish legendary complex. 


"Jewish elements provide the driving power for both Capftalism and Communism, 
We Jew's have grievously erred. We who invented the chosen people myth, and who have 
posed as having given to the world its Savior, are nothing but its seducers, its incen¬ 
diaries its destroyers. We, who promised to lead you to a New Heaven, have led you 
into a New Hell.” Those damning words were written by a London Jewish Savant,. Dr. 
Oscar Levy—afterward exiled—in a preface to the book, 'The World Significance of the 
Russian Revolution,” by George Pitt-Rivers in 1920. 

"There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations. It occupies everywhere the 
avenues of power—the double assault of Jewish Revolution 2 nd Jewish Finance.” That 
is from the pen of Jewish Author Rene Groos. as quoted on June 15, 1929, in a French 
weekly called “La Vieilk France,” 

"When we Jews sink we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic). When 
we rise, there arises our terrible power of the purse (Capitalistic)." Thus wrote Theodor 
Herzl, European Zionist Leader, in his book, "The Jewish State." 

"The Talmud, the Rabbis' Bible, is the very soul of the Jew. He was taught early 
to find his chief happiness in the possession of money. They became Lords of money, 
and Lords of the World." That is from Werner Sombart's suppressed book, "Jews & 
Modern Capitalism,” (1913). 

Note this: "What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent so powerfully contributed 
to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind are tending to pro¬ 
mote IN OTHER COUNTRIES. The Jew evolved organized capitalism, with its working 
instrumentality, the banking system."—This from The American Hebrew, Sept. 20, 1920. 
(Paul M. Warburg was "Father" of the Federal Reserve System.) 

"The Revolutionary Administration which directed the Communist Conquest of 
Russia was composed of 545 men, 447 of whom were Jews," wrote Victor Marsden (in 
December, 1918), for many years Correspondent in Russia for The London Morning 
Post—naming as leaders Trotsky, Apfdbaum, Rykoff, Radek and other Jews. 

"We intend to remake the Gentile—what the Communists are doing in Russia," says 
Rabbi lewis Browne in his book, "How Odd of God." "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti- 
Christian," said the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923. 

"The League of Nations is a Jewish conception,” wrote Jewish Author Israel Zang- 
will in the London Jewish "Guardian" of June 11, 1920; while Zionist Leader Sokolov- 
toasted. "We Jews established it after a fight of 25 years." (N. Y. Times of Aug. 

In the shadow of those immortal documents, the Declaration of Independence and 
the Constitution of the United States, I hereby declare chat I am not opposed to Jews 
as Tews. as to their Race or as to their Religion; but I am unalterably againsr that Jewish 
anti-Americanism which, directed by false leadership, IS DESTROYING THE REPUBLIC. 

With the help of Divine Providence and your aid, if you elect me to the Presidency 
with a mandate to smash this deadly alien conspiracy against our beloved country, to that 
great reconstructive end I solemnly consecrate "my life, my fortune and my sacred 

(From a Jan. 20, 1936, Edmondson bulletin) 

Cunningly designed to abolish free speech, press, radio and assembly in New York 
State, the text of Senate Bill 165, introduced Jan. 9, 1936, by Jewish Senator Schwartz- 
wald’of Brooklyn, a strengthened DUPLICATE of the law enacted on April S, 1935, in 
New Jersey, reads as below: 

"Section 1; Any person who shall print, write, multigraph, or In ANY MANNER 
WHATSOEVER, make or produce or by any means set out or make legible in any 

"(a) ANY BOOK, speech, statement, circular or pamphlet which, in ANY WAY, 
in any pare thereof, incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOS¬ 
TILITY against any group or groups of persons residing or BEING in this STATE, by 
reason of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship; 

(Interpretative Comment: "Ariy Book” must include the New Testament, Christian 
Bible, in which Christ is quoted in John 8:44 as denouncing the Jews: "Ye are of your 
father, the Devil. The Truth is not in you.” "Any article" must include newspaper items 
printing "Shylocks" over names of Jewish criminal usurers.) 

"(b) Any constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations or record of any proceedings of 
ANY ORGANIZATION, association, corporation, society, order, club or MEETING OF 
THREE or more persons, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advo¬ 
cates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY * * * by reason of RACE, color, religion or 
MANNER of worship; 

("Any organization" must include churches, whose preachers frequently quote the 
Old Testament Bible, in which this appears, Kings 11:32: "Jehovah turned not from his 
fierce wrath against Judah, saying, 'I shall remove Judah out of my sight.’ ” 

'(c) Any PICTURE, photograph, emblem, representation, sign or token, which in 
ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES, advocates or symbolizes hatred, violence or 
HOSTILITY * 15 by reason ‘of RACE, color, religion or MANNER of worship, 

("Any picture" must include one of "Christ Crucified" by the Jews. "Any sign" must 
include the Cross, of which the Swastika is a form,) 











► i 






. d 





5 2 


"Section 2: Any person who shall HAVE IN HIS POSSESSION, for the purpose or 
WITH INTENT to utter, sell, give away, circulate, distribute or exhibit to the view of 
ANOTHER, or any person who shall utter, sell, give away, circulate, send, transmit, 
distribute or exhibit to the view of another ; 

("Having in possession" must include a newspaper containing an item unfavorable 
to Jewish aims, and a Jewish Judge may decide whether or not there was "intent" to 

"(a) Any book, speech, article, statement, circular, pamphlet or other written, printed 
or multigraphed matter, made or produced in ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, in anv 
language or by ANY means set out and made legible which in ANY way in any part 
thereof, incites, counsels. PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.; 

("Any book" must also include the Congressional Record, in which Congressman 
Hamilton Fish reported that a "large percentage of known Communist district organizers 
are of Jewish Origin''; and in which Former Congressman McFadden said: "The U. S. 
should not permit the Jewish International Bankers to drive it into another war.” Also the 
"Red Network," which lists 350 Jews as undesirable radicals.) 

"(b) Any constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations of records of any proceeding or 
PURPORTING to be such, or any organization, association, corporation, society, ordeh 
club or meeting of THREE or more persons, made or produced in any manner, or by any 
means set out and made legible, in any language, which in ANY way or in any part 
thereof, incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc. 

"(c) Any PICTURE, photograph, emblem, representation, sign or token made or 
produced in ANY manner, which in ANY way incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advo¬ 
cates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.; 

("Any emblem" must include the Cross embodying a crucified Christ worn by 
church officials. "Any picture” would include a hook-nose cartoon, holding Jews up to 

"Section 3: Any person who shall EXHIBIT or display at any meeting of three or 
more persons or in any parade, public or PRIVATE, or in any public place, ANY FLAG, 
banner, emblem, picture, photograph, representation, tableau, performance, sign or token, 
which in ANY WAY incites, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY, 

("Any Performance” means a Christmas Tableau in church or public school.) 

"Section 4: Any person who shall, in the presence of TWO or more persons, in any 
language, make or utter ANY speech, statement or declaration, which in ANY way 
incites, counsels, PROMOTES or advocates hatred, abuse, violence or HOSTILITY, etc.; 

("Any speech" means constitutional free speech or discussions. It would be a crime 
to name Frankfurter, Brandeis. Baruch, Morgemhau, Filene, Rabbi Wise. Trotsky, Karl 
Marx, all Jews, in connection with Communism.) 

"Section 5; Any owner, lessee, manager, agenr or other person who shall knowingly 
let or hire out, or permit the use of any building, structure, auditorium, hall or room or 
any part thereof, whether licensed or not, to or for the use of ANY organization, associa¬ 
tion. society, order, club, group or meeting of THREE or more persons, where it it pur¬ 
ported or INTENDED to hold ANY MEETING or ASSEMBLY of THREE or more 
persons where at any provision or provisions of the four preceding paragraphs are to be 
violated; and any person oc persons who shall knowingly hire any such building, struc¬ 
ture, auditorium, hall or room, or any part thereof, for the purpose of using or permitting 
the same to be used by others, for the purpose of violating any provision or provisions of 
the four preceding paragraphs hereof, SHALL BE GL r ILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR; 

("Any Assembly” means denial of the constitutional right of free assemblage or 
mass meeting to protest against a monopoly like the moving picture industry, Jew- 

"Section 6: Any persons who shall from any station, studio, radio transmission equip¬ 
ment, microphone or any other equipment or device of ANY nature or kind, located 
within this State, broadcast or make audible to others, within this State, through any radii: 
receiving set. device or equipment of any nature or kmd, located within this State, in 
any language, any speech, declaration, statement or PRONOUNCEMENT which in ANY 
way incites, counsels, promotes or advocates hatred, violence or HOSTILITY SHALL Bn 

"Section 1: Anv persons, firm, corporation or association violating any provision of 
this act shall be PUNISHABLE by a fine of not more than $5,000 nor less than $200, 
or by IMPRISONMENT not exceeding THREE YEARS, nor less than NINETY DAYS, 
or by such fine and imprisonment, in the discretion of the court. 

For Governorship at the last general Stace election, LEHMAN headed the Demo¬ 
cratic ticket; MOSES the Republican, SOLOMON the Socialist; AMTER, the Communist. 
AH Jews! 

(Edmondson February 3, 1936 publication) 

The magazine "Fortune," in a February 1936 issue largely devoted to the 
defense of Jewry, asks with familiar arrogance: "WHY SHOULDN’T THEY 

"It is not pleasant to have individuals like the REVEREND Gerald B. 
Winrod of The Defenders of The CHRISTIAN FAITH' (of Wichita, Kan.) ; 
or like Robert Edward Edmondson, WHO MANUFACTURES HATE in 
New York City, invite the country to attack Jews.” 

If the Patriotic Crusade against the Jewish anti-Americanism of the 
Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Administration is so unimportant—as it argues while 
soothing "suspicious tycoons"—why do prominent Jewish publications as 
"The American Hebrew," "The New Masses," "The N. Y. World-Telegram," 
"Fortune" and other "kept men of the press," repeatedly devote so much 
publicity to the Edmondson Americanism FIRST Campaign/ 

If to WARN fellow-countrymen against the CAUSE of the Communism 
that murdered and enslaved Russia and is similarly trying to destroy American 
Political, Economic and Spiritual Liberties; 

If to EXPOSE to Patriotic JUSTICE the anti-national treason-conspiracy 
of the false leadership of the greatest international blood-regimented parasitical- 
solidarity the world has ever known; 

If to turn the X-Ray of Truth on Minority Materialists once denounced by 
AN AUTHORITY—than whom there is no higher—as "Sons of the Devil;’’ 

If THAT be "manufacturing hate," then I plead guilty to obeying the 
Eligh Command to "Love Good and HATE EVIL," and await, supremely confi¬ 
dent, the verdict of an ENLIGHTENED AMERICA. 


The following is from February 8, 1936 Edmondson bulletin: 

"Sudden Death," or "Oppose Roosevelt and Die," is the designation of a 
startling and • impressively informative news-editorial published by the inde¬ 
pendent Highland Post of Ulster County. New York, under date of February 
6 , 1936, in which the writer essays to answer the query: Whence the Curse? 

This rather terrifying analysis, with relentless logic, takes apart the notori¬ 
ous Tugwell revolutionary speech delivered Oct. 28, 1935, in Los Angeles, and 
exposes the horror lurking therein. 

Note the Tugwell camouflaged key-phrases as X-rayed below: 

"We are assisting OUR PEOPLE to place thcmselvc-s in the most 
advantageous and permanently SECURE situations. 

' The nation is witnessing the Death-struggle of industrial autocracy and 
the birch of democratic discipline," declared Tugwell. 

"We are establishing a farmer-worker alliance which will carry ail before 
it. Our best strategy is to surge forward with the workers and the farmers, 
trusting to the genius of OUR LEADER for the disposition of our forces and 
the timing of our attacks. 

"The movement will go on in any case. IT LIES IN THE BRAINS AND 

It is especially noteworthy that Tugweil repeatedly employs the phrase 
'worker- farmer.” This is the precise expression continually used by the official 
organ of the Communist Party, "The Daily Worker,” in urging civil war 
combination of the two classes against the industrial and agricultural "kulaks." 

Commenting on Tugwell's speech, Washington Correspondent Mark Sul¬ 
livan said in the N. Y. Herald Tribune on Nov. 16 , 1935: "Prof. Tugweil is 
the REAL ANIMATING GENIUS of the New Deal. He is powerful in 
astuteness; powerful in understanding how to bring about revolution. He has 
studied it in Russia.’’ 

Is Tugweil Jewish? 


I enjoyed a Californian’s illuminating report received about March 7, 
1936, under the heading "A Real Tribute from the Jewish B'nai B’rith 
Messenger" of Feb. 21, 1936, published in Los Angeles, reading: 

"We should not dismiss Robert Edward Edmondson as a crackpot— 
though there is no doubt he is just that. Scientifically, he is an obviously 
dangerous paranoiac with a terrific persecution complex; bur of course nothing 
will be done about it, and he will die a more or less peaceful death after 

Commenting publicly thereon. Editor Edmondson retorted: "Emanating 
from a source for centuries mentally delusion-obsessed with a "Chosen People" 
complex, and physically by thousands of years of inbreeding, the foregoing 
might be considered a priceless tribute to selfless patriotic effort were it not 
for the fact that such ingrained condition could be accurately diagnosed as 
finally producing destructive madness that may have to be cured by drastic 
mass-surgical operation. However, the enemies of The Republic at last seem to 
know that they are in a real fight.” 


The above is heading placed over an Edmondson bulletin of March 19, 
1936, reporting the receipt of "A Constitutional Crisis” proclamation issued by 
the British National League, prophetically describing the current Middle East 
Moslem revolutionary unrest as a result of Palestine Zionist Jewish State plans: 

The proclamation reads: 

"Unless we act to right the wrong situation in policy the Arabs of 
Palestine are doomed to increasing martyrdom, which in the end would arouse 
the whole Arab and Indian Moslem Worlds. 

"Past British Governments through weakness in principle and action 
upon it * * * have unfortunately given the Dead Sea and Ruterberg Concessions 
into the hands of International Financiers. Mr. Felix Warburg, from whose 
group we borrowed the America Debt, is one of the powerful group of Inter¬ 
national Financiers at the center of the Dead Sea Concession, which is in a 

foreign and mainly Jewish Control. At a great gathering in New York, Dr. 
Chaim Weizmann (Zionist Leader), stated in a public speech: 'The key to the 
doors of Palestine is in the pocket of the Jews of America.’ 

"The money values of the Dead Sea products have been estimated to be 
approximately 240 billion pounds sterling, including Potash, Bromine, Salt 
NaCI., Gypsum and Magnesium Chloride. In addition. Prof. Georges Claud 
estimates chat gold in solution in the Dead Sea amounts to a value of five 
billion pounds sterling, and it can be extracted easily and economically. 

“There is extreme danger in Great Britain in failing to handle the moral 
issues. The future of our own country and Palestine is most urgently at stake, 
as well as the future of the Arabs and the Indian Muslims in relation to us. 

"Moslem opinion has been expressed in an historic cable from the All- 
India Moslem Conference, representing 72 million Moslems, as follows: 'The 
Moslems of India cannot tolerate Jewish Monopolies being created, which 
would soon make the proposed Jewish Home a purely Jewish State—as the 
Zionists clearly desire to establish in Palestine/ 

"Foreign control of the Dead Sea means the World Economic Domination 
of International (Jewish) Finance, raising the gravest issues for Anglo-Saxon 

(Signed) "National League, 

"M. Farquharson, President." 


The above captioned Edmondson bulletin of April 15, 1936, as below: 

“The jews of America, because of their NUMBERS, INTEREST and 
ABILITY, constitute A GREAT POLITICAL FORCE. They have not usurped 
this power; IT BELONGS TO THEM AS Of RIGHT! They are going to 
exercise it AS THEY SEE FIT! What are YOU going to DO about it?"— 
From an editorial of April 9, 1936, in the gFeat Yiddish Daily, “THE DAY,” 
of New York City, edited by Rabbi Samuel Margoshes. 

And this is HOW they USE their "great political force;” 

The Daily Worker of New York, Dec. 17, 1938, published the following 
damning confession: "As an expression of the fraternal relations exisiting 
between The Morning Freiheit, JEWISH language daily paper, and The Daily 
Worker, official organ of the COMMUNIST Party, the office staff of The 
Freiheit today presented WILLIAM BROWDER, N* Y. State Treasurer of The 
COMMUNIST Party, with a check representing their collective contribution of 
a day’s pay. The money is to be used to help strengthen The Daily Worker, 
and SUPPORT it for the coming year. 'The SPIRIT accompanying this check is 
even more important than the money itself’ said Browder, in accepting the gift.” 

The Jews of America 'number' about 4,228,000, (their official estimate) 
presumably based, as in Bibical times, upon MALES ALONE—which would 
give a total U. S. Jewish population of at least 8,500,000, or about a 7% 
minority. Based on "Passover Bread" requirements, it has been estimated that 
the Jews in America in 1920 numbered about 6,000,000—with 3,000,000 more 
seeking entrance—over 15 Million reported in the United States now. 

What are WE going to do about it? 

THIS is the answer of the Middle-Class American Patriotic Majority to 
the Jewish Minority: 


The Republic of the United States of America was founded upon "A 
Declaration of Independence” conceived, not by an oriental Jewish but by a 
Christian Majority that, through supreme sacrifice, creared the greatest freedom 
Constitution "ever struck off by the hand and brain of man,” and with it 
established a nation that rose from poverty to enjoy prosperity and happiness— 
until the advent of the revolutionary Jewish Invasion. 

Destinies of the America bequeathed to us by our great Christian Forefathers, 

In a renaissance of the "Spirit of ’76,'’ now rising, fighting under our 
historic crusading-cry "Liberty or Death!" WE are going to RESTITUTION- 
ALLY RECAPTURE what has been treacherously and predatorily seized 
through secret subversion of our unsuspecting good-will, tolerance and hospi¬ 
tality—PEACEFULLY, if we CAN, but MILITANTLY, if we MUST! 


The following is a self-explanatory publication of April 22, 1946: 

Under date of April 1 6 , 1936, Robert Edward Edmondson received the 
following letter from Dean Virginia C. Gildersleeve of Barnard College, 
Columbia University, New York City: 

"As a good American, I wish to express my indignation at the un- 
American methods of propaganda which you are following in the absurd 
document entitled, ’U. S. Invisible Government.’ This reached me through the 
mails on Monday, 

"Great barm is being done by you- and other persons who in this un- 
American manner are trying to stir up racial and religious prejudice and 
passion, hatred and fear, in the minds of the ignorant. 

"It would, of course, seem to me entirely proper for you to attack the acts 
or policies of any of the persons whom you enumerate; but merely to imply 
that they are radicals, Reds and Jews seems to me scandalous. 

"If Frances Perkins and Judge Cardozo belong in your list of Moscow 
Reds, I hope that I, too, am entitled to a position there. Let me add that my 
descent is American for over 250 years on both sides of my family/ and that, 
so far as I know, I have not a drop of Jewish or Russian blood in my veins— 
though what difference this would make, I do not know." 

The following reply was sent to Miss Gildersleeve by Robert Edward 
Edmondson under date of April 22, 1936: 

"I welcome your letter of April 16, 1936, gratuitously attacking, under 
the self-styled title 'A Good American,’ what you assume to characterize as 
my ’un-American methods of propaganda,’ exemplified in a public document 
exposing the Jewish anti-Americanism of what has come to be signficantly 
known in every state by the various political appellations of ’The Roosevelt 
Red Deal,’ 'The New Steal,’ 'The Raw Deal,' and ’The Communistic Jew Deal.’ 

"Since you have 'indignantly' expressed yourself frankly, you will not deny 
me the same privilege. 

"In order to complete the American background picture you draw' with 
Regard to yourself, may I also lay before you the fact of my own Colonial 
ancestry that geneologists say extends beyond pre-Revolution days back to Robert 
of Scotland in the year 800 A.D.—which ought to dispose of any predilection 
for doctrines other than Anglo-Saxon—likely to be unfavorably inferred from 
your insinuation as to propaganda,’ whose original meaning is to 'educate.’ 

"Further comparative background is provided by the fact that you, as 
Dean of Barnard College of the New York University—now notoriously known 
among patriots as 'Columbia, the Germ of the Nation because of its un- 
American internationalism-—at present hold a highly lucrative professional post, 
as against my position, namely, that of a $ 5 Q, 0 G 0 -a-year executive who has 
given up his regular business to unselfishly devote ail his time, money and 
ability to a crusade whose aim is the liberation of America from an alien 
politico-economic-publicity subversion, of which you are apparently without 
knowledge notwithstanding the fact that your exceptional educational key- 
status should have fully acquainted you with the overwhelming documentary- 
evidence thereof. 

"Now that our respective foundations have been established, may I proceed 
to analyze your denunciations seriatim? 

"The 'Invisible Government' document (not sent to you from this office), 
to which you have taken belated exception—since it was first published in May, 
1934, and revised in June, 1935—is attacked by you as 'absurd.' The New 
Webster International Dictionary meaning of 'absurd' is: 'Contrary to reason, 
inconsistent with common sense, opposed to manifest truth.’ The said docu¬ 
ment is subheaded 'The Roosevelt Internationalist Minority Advisory Council 
at Washington,’ under which appears an 'incomplete list of many unofficial and 
official powers behind Roosevelt Leadership, all apparently under Brandeis- 
Frankfurter-Morgenthau Jewish-Radical Minority influence—descriptions being 
taken from Jewish publications, the famous Dilling "Red Network” book, 
Congressional, Associated Press and other published records.' Surrounding a 
circle in which are the words 'Roosevelt Personal Government, is arranged the 
following names, with title as supplied by the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of 
Oct. 20, 1933, wherein it was stated: 'The Roosevelt Administration has 
selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration 
in American history; including Bernard M. Baruch, Unofficial President; 
Prof. Felix Frankfurter, Legal Advisor; Herbert Feis, Brains of the State Dept,; 
Henry Morgenthau, International Banker; Samuel Rosenman, Roosevelt's 'Right 
Arm,’ and Justice’ Brandeis, 'New Deal Father,’ who is designated by the 
N. Y .Times of January 28, 1934, as philosopher of the New Deal, whose 
NRA, 'is almost a composite of his dissenting opinions.' 

"And is it possible that you did not read in the Saturday Evening Post of 
Oct. 26, 1935, the confession by General Johnson thac Prof. Frankfurter is 
STATES,' owing to his 'invisible' power with the President. 'Frankfurter is 
the legal master-mind of the New Deal,’ say Simon & Schuster in their 1954 
book, The New Dealers.' 

"I could go on almost indefinitely, quoting overwhelming evidence as to 
the 'reasonableness, common sense and truth' of this startling portrayal, which 
you so lightly brush aside as 'absurd.' 

"Your implication that I am fanatically 'trying to stir up racial and 
religious prejudice and passion, hatred and fear’ has a most familiar ring— 
representing a typical 'canned product’ from a master factory, and being almost 
invariably used by. Jewish Communist denunciators of all patriotic activities. 
As a matter of fact, among others, James P. Warburg, representative Jew, 
personally admitted to me in 1934 that religion does not enter into the Jew- 
Gentile controversy. I know of no American action against the religion of 

Judaism, although, with other citizens, 1 strongly object to political religionists 
of any faith, meddling in governmental affairs, since our American philosophy 
properly contemplates complete separation of church and state. 

"Being typical internationalists, constituting an imperium in imperio in all 
nations, to me, Jews have no legitmate claim to specific racial status, although 
they may have originally belonged to the Semites, of which 'race' Arabs an^ 
other peoples are also members. 

"This Jewish Problem is largely economic because history shows that 
Jewry as a whole is predatorially materialistic, and self-confessedly so in view 
of writcen expressions of their own authorities. Zionist Leader Herzl admits in 
his book, 'The Jewish State’—'When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary 
proletariat; when w»e rise, there also arises our terrible power of the purse. Dr. 
Oscar Levy deprecatingly wrote in 1920: 'Jewish elements provide rhe driving 
force for both Capitalism and Communism.’ The logic of modern events proves 
the accuracy of this economic thesis. 

"You object to the listing of Justice Cardozo among radicals. Can you 
deny that he has always voted in important New Deal Supreme Court decisions 
with 'Radical’ Justice Brandeis? ’By their deeds shall ye know them! 

"Not being a churchman, I cannot be rightfully accused of religious 
fanaticism- but Secretary of Labor Perkins, who says she is a Christian, yet 
would be proud of Jewish biood did she have it, has largely surrounded herself 
with alien-minded and foreign-born Jewish Radical associates in place of citizens 
loyal to the Christian-American ideals of Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln 
and thereby brands herself not only as un-American, but as unfaithful to her 
professed religion. It is of course your privilege to align yourself with Mr. 
Cardozo and Miss Perkins. 

"I agree with you that 'great harm’ has been done—to the enemies of the 
Republic—by the Edmondson pro-American Crusade. There is also emphatic 
agreement on this point by the Los Angeles B nai B rith Messenger, organ 
of the Jewish Kehillah, when it admits in its Feb. 21, 1936, issue that this 
patriotic movement has done ’incalculable damage. 

"My documentary record of a desperate two-year selfless attempt to peace¬ 
fully enlighten deliberately blinded fellow-countrymen to the peril of civil 
war hidden in this Jewish Communism, challenges vour charge of 'un-American 
stirring up' of strife. I will say to you thac I consider any sacrifice justified, 
to redeem Washington and Lincoln’s Republican Government. 

"And the instantaneous welcome accorded the five million Pamphlets of 
Truth I have fortunately been instrumental in getting circulated from coast to 
coast, makes me supremely confident that I am not alone in that sentiment, or 
as to the correctness of my thesis and policy as to the Jewish anti-Americanism 
which is destroying the Republic. 

"Many religious and other teachers seem to have been theoretically edu¬ 
cated beyond their intellectual capacity to grasp and understand the practical 
realities' of the current super-crisis. 

"To close, I will quote from a letter of May 11, 1934, answering Mr. 
Louis A. Freedman, N. Y. Citv, wherein I declared: 'Any minority seeking to 
rule the American majority will fail. In defence of Americanism, I would take 
exactly the same militant position were the present subversive Jewish influence 
exercised by a German. Irish, Russian or any racial, religious or other minority 


group. YOUR concern is for die 5,000,000 Jews in the United States—MINE 
is for 125,000,000 citizens, including the Jewish minority. Which is TRUE 

Miss Gildersleeve replied April 23 to the above letter thus: "Thank you for 
printing my letter. I had thought of sending it to the newspapers. One always 
feels relieved at getting a protest of this sort off one’s mind.’' 

This is typical and confirmatory, namely; unable to make successful re¬ 
buttal, minds "theoretically educated beyond their intellectual capacity to grasp 
realities." either reply "I don’t agree." or by diversion, silently disregard un¬ 
answerable direct logic supported by overwhelming evidence, fact and authority; 
but "you can’t dodge the consequence of dodging your responsibility." 


From May 1, 1936 Edmondson bulletin: 

"More than any other one person, Prof. Frankfurter is the legal master¬ 
mind of' the New Deal."—Simon-Schuster in the 1934 "New Dealers." 

Who is the "Economic Master-Mind” of the New Deal? See below: 

"One of the key Roosevelt advisors is Bernard M. Baruch, a power in the 
Wilson Administration. In the absence of Secretary of State Hull and the 
President from Washington, Mr. Baruch is regarded as "Unofficial President." 
—Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933- 

"When President Wilson went to Paris to draw up the Peace Treaty, 
Bernard M. Baruch went with him and served as the war-time President’s 
Economic Advisor."—Boston Daily Globe of June 20, 1933. 

In the 1934 book "Are These Things $ 0 ?" appears this: Wilson's best 
friend was Bernard M. Baruch, who, heading a batch of 117 Jews, accompanied 
Wilson on his trip to the Peace Conference. He is listed in "Who’s Who in 
America" as "Economic Advisor to the American Peace Commission." 

"Bernard M. Baruch is called into frequent conferences with the President. 
He has financed many a Congressional campaign; and is surrounded by a 
praetorian guard of Senators, who hang on his every word. The figure of 
Baruch is swelling into enormous dimensions on the horizon of public life. He 
has been given Credit for Hoover's appointment of Eugene Meyer, Jr., as 
Governor of the Federal Reserve Board. He is the Mystery Man of Washington 
and Wall Street."—From 1933 October "Fortune." 

On Page 13080 of the Congressional Record of June 27, 1934, Vol, 78, 
No. 139, is printed: 

"Following the World W 2 r Bernard M, Baruch appeared before a select 
Congressional Committee and testified to the fact that he virtually had com¬ 
plete control of the resources of the American nation during the war, saying: 
'I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war.' 

CHAOS."—Congressman L. T. McFadden of Penna. 


The Associated Press on June 22, 1934, announced that Baruch was 
moving out of Walk Street to write his memoirs, but quoted him as saying: 
■‘I do not want anyone to think I am getting rusty and going to retire. I am 

Incidentally, Baruch was quoted on Sept. 25, 1935, by the Chicago Tribune 
as saying: 'T believe national pride (patriotism) a lot of nonsense. 

President Roosevelt unctuously denounced the speculators and money¬ 
changers’' of Wall Street. 


(A Waking-up reprint published in a May 22, 1936 Edmondson Bulletin) 

What is being called "the biggest Protestant news in many years," has just 
made its appearance in the "Christian Century. The following are from the 
April 29 and May 13, 1936, issues: 

"Most non-Jewish Americans know' little of the aspirations of the Jew. 
When they learn, their complacency in present ignorance is likely to be 

"Jewry is a mutual benefit organization; it is also a propagandist organiza¬ 
tion. The Jewish System violates the safeguards which can alone justify the 
continuance of factional groups in any democratic society. A democratic society 
is peculiarly sensitive to violation of its sacred unities. There can be no unity; 
nor can there be social bealch in the American community, so long as any group 
invokes the holy sanctions of religion, and the inviolable solidarity of national 
life, in the perpetuation of permanent and IRRECONCILABLE FACTION- 

"The time for realistic discussion cannot be indefinitely postponed. The 
tension between Jew's and Christians cannot be effectively resolved by appeal to 
the sentiment of mutual tolerance. In a problem of this kind, tolerance operates 
in a one-way street. It is exercised by the majority, not by the minoricy. 

"American Society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend 
toward SOLIDARITY, UNITY', INTEGRATION. Any unassimiiated element 
of the population is bound to have trouble, BECAUSE IT IS BOUND TO 

"If the Christian Community were once convinced that an impassable gulf 
is fixed between itself and the Jewish Community, ITS SPIRIT OF TOLER¬ 

"The Jew will never command the respect of the non-Jewish culture in 
which he lives so long as HE HUDDLES BY HIMSELF, nursing his own 
'uniqueness,' cherishing his tradition as something precious to him but which 
cannot be conveyed to others, nor participated in by others. 

"The Christian World would like to know what specific values Judaism 
has to contribute to civilization which Christianity does not likewise possess. 
A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot-luck' 
with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape 
the SUSPICION that it is hoarding its treasure for A SELFISH PURPOSE," 


(1937 Addenda) 


The following is a sequel reprint from an editorial in the Christian Century 
magazine of Chicago of June 9, 1937, pages 734-5-6: 

"What is the Jewish Problem? Jewry is a racial minority which conceives 
its racial integrity as the permanent basis of a distinctive culture, * * * They 
are an hereditary group, * * * Can democracy suffer an hereditary minority to 
perpetuate itself as a permanent minority? 

"The simple and naked fact is that Judaism rests upon an impossible basis. 

"Conceding without reserve that our Jewish brethren have the right to their 
faith and to the practice of it in whatever forms are seemlv and precious to 
them, we are bound to say that THEY HAVE NO RIGHT IN A DEMOCRACY 
to remove their faith from the normal influences of the democratic process by 
insulating it behind the walls of a racial and cultural solidarity; and we are 
further bound to sav that DEMOCRACY CANNOT GUARANTEE OUR 

"The situation in which the Jewish Problem arises is in large measure 
Jewry’s own creation, * * * We hold that the Jew is responsible, in a high 
degree, and that no solution of his problem is possible until his own degree 
of responsibility is recognized. The first step toward its recognition is to 
discern that his determination to maintan a permanent RACIAL STATUS 

"The root cause of the Jewish Problem is the Jew's immemorial and 
pertinacious obsession with u.o illusion, the illusion that his race, his people, 
are the object of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of 
their racial integrity and separateness as the medium through which, soon or 
late, will be performed some mighty act involving human destiny, 

hallowed racial uniqueness provoked UNFAVORABLE REACTION. * * * 
The Jewish Problem of today is rooted NOT CHIEFLY IN RELIGIOUS 
SOIL, but in the soil of common human psychology. 

"How can the vicious circle be broken by Jewish initiative? In only one 
way, as it seems to us, namely, for prophets to arise in Judaism who will begin 
to proclaim the terrible truth: That Judaism has been FEEDING ITS RACIAL 
PRIDE for milleniums on an illusion; that its martyrdom is in large measure 
self-invited; that its racial integrity is no more important in God's sight than 
any other race’s integrity; that race is of so little importance in God’s sight that 
he has not preserved the integrity of a single people now living, including the 
Jewish people. * * * 

"Their idea of an integral race, with its own exclusive culture, hallowed 
and kept unified by a racial religion, IS ITSELF THE PROTOTYPE OF 


For publicly exposing the Jewish Politico-Economic Monopoly System, 
Robert Edward Edmondson was indicted through Jewish Mayor LaGuardia 
of N. Y. City on a charge of libeling and inciting "all persons of the 
Jewish Religion"—which he never attacked. 

Having directly attacked the Religion of Judaism as such, wii! Editor 
Morrison of The Christian Century now be haled to court on a charge of 
libeling and inciting a community to commit a breach of the peace ? 

(1937 Addenda) 


(The above headed an Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 1, 1937) 

What does the word "JEW" signify? 

"A RELIGIOUS Minority,” is an answer by Dr. Sidney E. Goldstein, 
Chairman of the Social Justice Committee of the Central Conference of 
American Rabbis, largest organization of its kind in the world. 

"Jews constitute PURELY A RELIGIOUS SECT," is a statement made in 
"The U. S. and German Jewish Persecutions," by the lace Jewish "legal light," 
Max J. Kohler, who says further: "We Jews constitute 'a RELIGIOUS 
Minority’ in the U. S." 

"The term 'A Way of Life.' ’’ by Rabbi Lewis Mann of Chicago Sinai 
PLETE ANSWER to the question What is the Jewish Religion?' ” That 
statement is from a book "From Pharaoh to Hitler';" by Chicago Jewish 
Author Bernard J. Brown, who is a lawyer. 

"Judaism is essentially a religion of LAW." says the London Jewish 
Chronicle of Aug. 13 , 1937. This follows a statement by Moses Mendelssohn, 
a noted Jewish authority, that "Judaism is revealed LEGISLATION’ ■—as 
quoted in "The History' of the Jews" by Jewish Historian Graecz. 

Rabbi K. Kohler, in a 1900 "Manual for Schools and Homes," entitled 
"Guide for Instruction in Judaism," Page 41, says: 

"The Mission of the Jewish People is to unite mankind in spirit by their 
monotheistic truth and their work for righteousness and peace. ISRAEL IS 
THE MESSIAH—God’s anointed among the nations." 

"Judaism is fundamentally anti-Christian—London Jewish World of Mar. 
15. 1923. 

"The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the FINEST 
ideals of Judaism."—London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919. 

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel says in his 1924 book "You Gentiles: ' 
"We Jews cannot conceive of a duality—religion and life. I might say We and 
God grew up together.’ In the heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Between 
Gentile and Jew there lies an unbridgeable gulf. The two ways of life are 
opposed in mortal enmity. We thank God for having made us different from 
you." (Pharisaical prayer). 

"There is only ONE way in which the American People can escape 
Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing 'A THOROUGHLY 
SOCIALIZED DEMOCRACY.' "—Resolution by the Central Conference of 
American Rabbis, printed in the N. Y. "Times" of Sept. 13, 1936. 

Jews Against Nationalism 

"What stands in our way everywhere in the world is modern nationalism. 
That is our chief enemy. We are on the side of Liberalism against Nationalism. 
That is our only safety.’’ This is a quotation from "Race, Nation or Religion,” 
by Dr. Solomon B. Freehof. 

Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in his book "Anti-Semitism,” makes these 
statements: "By the very fact of denying the divinity of Christ, the Jews place 
themselves as enemies of the social order, SINCE THIS ORDER IS BASED 

The N. Y. Jewish National "Day” of Feb. 17, 1937, printed the follow¬ 
ing: "The Jewish Veterans of the U. S. ARE MOVING in the direction of 
having a hill introduced in Congress PROHIBITING THE SPREAD OF 

"STRANGER THAN FICTION,” by Rabbi Lewis Browne, says: "Jewish 
histories rarely mention the name of Karl Marx, though in his life and spirit 
he was FAR TRUER to the Mission of Israel than most of those who were 
forever talking of it. His book, "Capital,” is called the Bible of the SOCIALIST 

Dr. Oscar Levy, English Jew, wrote the following in a preface to the 
book by Pitt-Rivers (1920) entitled "World Significance of the Russian 

"Are not the Jews the inventors of the Chosen People Myth, and is not 
this obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation? 
We Jews have grievously erred. We who have posed as having given to the 
world 'the' savior, are today nothing else than its seducers, its destroyers, its 
incendiaries, its executioners, We who have promised you a New Heaven have 
given you a New Hell.” 

"Holyday Prayers, a New Ritual for New Year and Day of Atonement,” 
1936, Bloch Pub. Co., N. Y. City, contains the following Ko! Nidre prayer 
under the heading "Evening Service for Atonement.” 

"AH vows and self-prohibitions, oaths, vows of abstinence and promise, 
vows with self-imposed penalties and obligations, which we may vow, swear, 
promise and bind ourselves until the next day of atonement—may it come to 
us in happiness—we repent them all. MAY THEY BE ABSOLVED, CAN¬ 

From Jewish Encyclopedia, Page 541,—"Many judges refused to allow 
Jews to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections chiefly on this Koi 
Nidre prayer.” 

"We want all this Christmas propaganda stopped. The masses of the 
Jewish people of America have a right to demand from the educational system, 
of the U. S. that it KEEP CHRISTMAS OUT of public schools.” N. Y. Jewish 
National "Day” of Dec. 14, 1935. 

Rabbi Levinger’s "History of the Jews in the U. $.,” says that "of the 
4,200,000 Jews in the U. S. m 19.28, fully 3,500,000 were of EAST EUROP¬ 
EAN birth or descent.” In other words, 82% are descended from Asiatic 


"The Bolshevist Revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking 
and discontent.. What Jewish idealism and discontent have so powerfully con¬ 
tributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind 
American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920. . 

"The ONLY way to induce the American President to come into the World 
War, was to secure the co-operacion of Zionist Jewry by promising them 
Palestine. The Zionists carried out their part AND HELPED BRING AMER¬ 
ICA INTO THE WAR."—British Propaganda Agent, S. Landman, in the 
London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1935. 126,000 Americans were killed and 
234,000 wounded in the World War. 

"This is a Christian Nation," is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" case 
decision by U. S. Supreme Court per Justice Brewer, February 29, 1892. 

(From Edmondson Bulletin of May 28, 1936) 

Informing Robert Edward Edmondson that New York Representative 
Samuel Dickstein had introduced a bill in Congress to investigate the "anti- 
Semitic activities” of the Edmondson Crusade, in connection with the so-called 
"Black Legion" developments in Michigan, the Associated Press, asking for 
"comment on Dickstein," requested a statement May 27, 1936—which was 
supplied in writing as below; and which of course was not reproduced in the 
newspapers, thereby again proving the thesis of Jew-control. 

Why comment on Dickstein? This alien-minded un-American-actioned, 
international foreign-born Tew r from Russia, who assumes to teach patriotism to 
native citizens who have absorbed it for generations, would not be in his pres¬ 
ent position were Congressional district-representation based on citizenship 
instead of alien population. 


For the thousandth time, I repeat: I am not opposed to Jews as individuals 
or as to their religion or race; but I am unalterably against what the Jewish 
System is DOING, by Financing Communistic Civil War, TO ENSLAVE THE 

Investigations of the Edmondson Agency during the past two years by the 
Department of Justice, Post Office, and Dickstein’s "Nazi" Committee, in¬ 
variably developed the fact that I have been merely exercising my constitutional 
rights of free press and free speech—under handicap, for my mail has been 
constantly tampered with. 

If, as alleged, there is in existence a six-million "vigilante anti-Semitic 
semi-military organization" of Americans, the Jewish exodus rush from the 
United States would make the departure from Egypt look like a one-horse 
parade. I have no knowledge of such a body. 

Catholicism in Europe is apparently becoming aware of the reality of the 
menace. Read this public confirmation: "The Jewish Spirit threatens to corrode 
our economic and social life," declared the Federal Union of Catholic Youth 

in Vienna, Austria, on April 3, 1936, according to an Associated Press cable. 

'Polish Jewry is an avowed enemy of the Catholic religion; Jews are behind 
the bolshevik and socialist forces now attacking our church.” That was in a cable 
recently published by the Chicago Tribune, according to the James True Weekly 
Industrial Report of Feb. 29, 1936. The February (1936) Catholic Gazette of 
London, under a heading, "The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church,” printed 
a sensational article detailing proceedings at a secret Jewish Society meeting in 
'Paris, at which a protocolic program of attack on the Catholic Church was 
outlined, There was circulated recently in Europe this extract from the "Civilta 
Cattolica, a Vatican publication: "The Jewish Peril menaces the whole world, 
in particular the Christian nations.” 

DID NOT PASS.”—Report of June 29, 1936, received from the James True 
Associates, Washington, D. C. 

_ After the introduction of the Dickstein Bill the "advance Edmondson 
testimony” pamphlet "Proof of a Jewish Conspiracy to Communize America and 
Rule the World,” was sent to Congressmen, who apparently did not like the 
Jewish "Gent” in the legislative woodpile. 

(From an Edmondson May 31 , 1936, Bulletin) 

W. B. Ziff, Zionist Organization officer, writes in the N. Y, Herald- 
Tribune of May 31, 1936, as follows: 

Implicit in the viewpoint of British Government officials is a general 
anti-Semitism and distrust of the Jews. Many in high positions believe vaguely 
in the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion, the alleged inner Jewsh con¬ 
spiracy to rule the world. A heavy literature is extant in England on this 
subject. Col. A. H. Lane's book "Alien Menace,” in which the Zionists are 
accused of being the shock troops of this subterranean attempt at world con¬ 
quest, has gone through seven or eight editions. Volumes by Lady Queen- 
borough, Nesta H. Wc-bster (Author of "World Revolution,” "Secret Societies," 
etc.) and others, all of the same tenor, have been printed in number¬ 
less editions, and patronized largely by the anti-Jewish sections of British 


The following is self-explanatory: 

In Cell 113, "Tombs” Jail, "jew York,” Friday afternoon, June 12, 1936. 
In "The Land of the Free(?) and Home of the Brave" (?), I, Robert Edward 
Edmondson, Preacher of Patriotism, Christian Editor and Publisher, am editing 
mv "X-Ray 1 ' of June 13 behind the bars among "other criminals” in a 
notorious prison. Below is my understanding of the situation: 

This "commitment” follows a two-year crusade of preaching real Ameri¬ 
canism in an effort to awaken and enlighten Americans blinded by an alien- 
controlled press: and follows arbitrary summons, alleging criminal libel- 
unbacked by bill of particulars—issued personally by Jewish Mayor LaGuardia 
of N. Y, City on June 8, 1936. To me, this is a concrete demonstration of my 
fundamental thesis that "The Jewish Minority Rules the American Majority. 
To illustrate more technically: 


Since the Mayor failed to specify charges in his criminal libel summons, 
my counsel took the position that a citizen cannot answer charges until he 
knows what they are—and refused to allow me to be publicly examined ac the 
appointed court-hour of 10:30 on June 10, demanding a bill of particulars 
from Jewish Magistrate Mogilesky—who presided when LaGuardia's "pain’ 
(in his stomach) prevented his "sitting,” as originally proclaimed. Threats to 
issue a warrant for my arrest did not materialize, apparently for the reason that, 
if a criminal libel charge could nor be sustained, then Edmondson might have 
basis for suit against the city as to civil liability. Instead, the Mayors prosecutor 
promised to supply the required bill of particulars at a postponed hearing at 11 
A.M., June 12—at which time the charges were completely withdrawn, with 
LaGuardia saying he planned to go to the ball game—with his pain. 


In the Mayor’s ietter to the District Attorney, demanding criminal libel 
action against Edmondson, it was alleged that my literature tended to incite 
to riot.” Who? jews? And against whom? They are my only enemy, Yet I 
have steadfastly advocated a settlement of the Economic Jewish Problem by 
ballot versus violence or bullet. Documentary evidence proves that. LaGuardia 
also calls my reports untruthful, whereas they have been dramatized reproduc¬ 
tions of the records of fact and authority. The charge that I, a non-churchman, 
have been preaching religious bigotry, is laughable. Have I attacked Catholicism, 
for instance? I have repeatedly announced that I am not against Judaism or 
any faith or race, but against Jewish anti-Americanism or anti-Americanism by 
any other minority. 

The Jewish Problem is neither religious nor racial, in my judgment—we 
are in a self-preservation fight aaginst JEWISH ECONOMIC PIRACY. 


Now, on the afternoon of June 11, I was arrested on a warrant for 
"publishing a libel," under three indictments by the New York County Grand 
Jury, complainants being in this order of preference: (1) The Jewish Religion, 
No. 209220. (2) Virginia C. Gildersleeve, Dean of Barnard College, Columbia 
University, No. 209221; (3) Frances Perkins, Secretary of Labor, member of 
Roosevelt’s Supreme Council, No. 209222. 1 was paroled over night in the 
custody of my attorney, Mr. John S. “Wise, Jr., of 135 W. 16 th St., N. Y. City, 
pending bail next morning. 

Cash bail was promptly offered at the appointed hour of 10:30 A.M., 
June 12. Delays called "red tape,” but that looked suspiciously like ''jew Tape,” 
resulted in my being put in Cell 113 in the 'Tombs” Prison, release taking 
place around 3:30 P.M. 

Inspecting the exhibits on which the "crime of libel’ is based, I find 
prominent in allegation No. 1 as to libeling "a religion,” this pamphlet was 
headed: "Moe Roosevelt Wins Six-Point Solomon Star Medal,” wherein, 
after invesigation of Jewish records of history, the so-called "Roosevelt Good 
Luck Medal” was pictured as apparently indicating "Good Luck to a Modern 
Moses, Leading Jewry in che Promised Land Under the Seal of Solomon.” Can 
one libel a medal? As a matter of fact, there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution 
prohibiting analysis of religions, although the "free exercise thereof” is 

Miss Gildersleeve's plaint is based on my publication of her gratuitous 
letter of criticism of my Americanism, and my reply submitting the record, 
under a heading, "Barnard College Dean Calls Truth Absurd.” Following 
such publication, on April 23, she wrote me: "THANK YOU FOR PRINT¬ 
ING MY LETTER. I had thought of sending it to the newspapers." 

Miss Perkins plaint is based on bulletin headed, "Perkins-Wilson Mystery 
Solved?” which is summed up by a remark that it is a typical case of news- 
reporting, quoting from the record. Is it criminal libel to ask a public servant, 
"Were you known as Rachel LaZanski?” in view of Miss Perkins’ an¬ 
nouncement that she would be proud if she "had Jewish blood?" 


Well, it will finally all be washed up and out in the light of publicity, 
"the cure for public evils.” 

To avoid violence and the civil war promised by Jewish-Communism, I 
have been patriotically battling two years, for publicity, without fear or favor, 
to bring this Economic Jewish Problem before the bar of public opinion, where 
it can be settled by the American-way of ballot as against bullet. IF THAT 

When the arresting officer presented his authority credentials to me in 
the.presence of my wife he said: "Mrs. Edmondson, I hate like hell to have 
to do this.” 

My wife replied: ’’We appreciate your sympathy, but Jewish legal persecu¬ 
tion is exactly what we have been anticipating in this crusade for freedom. As 
a veteran newspaperman Mr. Edmondson believes resulting widespread press 
publicity will awaken his fellow-countrymen to militant ballot-defense of our 
subverted Republic.” 


GEORGE L. PAFORT, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 

I am a citizen of the State of New York and reside at 560 West 171st Street, in 
the Borough of Manhattan. 

I have investigated the personnel of the Grand Jury who returned the indictment 
herein to find ou'r the religion of the members. 


Abner DistiLlator, who informs me he is Jewish, endorsed the indictment as acting 

Of the fifteen who have told me they served in finding this indictment, six cold 
me they were Jewish. They are Jerome S. Blumauer, Samuel Rosenberg, Abner Disril- 
laror. Jacob Abraham, Mervin L. Lane and Horry B. Lieber. 

Henry J, Rosenbaum refused to see me or tell me whether or not he is a Jew. 

A. Leigh Robbins. Moses Goldsmith and Marcel H.' Stieglitz refused to stare whether 
or not they are Jews but made no claim to being Gentiles. 

1 am familiar with the characteristics of Jewish people, having lived among the 
millions in New York many years and these three to me present definite appearances of 
being thoroughly Jewish and likewise their names are usual Jew names. 

Only Messrs. Moe, Smith, O'Brien and BUuvelt, who remember serving on the case, 
claim to be Gentiles. 

Mr. Patton says he is Genrile. Mr. Hennessey told me he is a Christian. 

Peter McDonnell is reported to me to be a Gentile but I have not been able to see 
or talk to him. 

From my knowledge of these Grand Jurors it is obvious that no sixteen could be 
picked from them, without a large Jewish contingent. 

It seems to me that of those who found the indictment the majority must have been 



The oath taken by the Grand Jurors in the Libel Indictment reads as follows: 

"You shall DILIGENTLY INQUIRE, and TRUE presentment make, of all 

such matters and things as shall be given vou in charge; the counsel of the People of this 
state, your fellows' and your own, you shall keep secret; you shall present (indict) no 
person from envy, HATRED or MALICE; nor shall you leave any one unpresented 
through fear, favor, affection, reward, or hope thereof; but you shall present all things 
TRULY as they come to your knowledge, according to the best of your understanding: 
so help you God!” 


ROBERT EDWARD EDMONDSON, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 

1 am the defendant, being charged with commuting certain alleged misdemeanors of 
criminal libel. 

That I am a native-born Aryan Christian American,, a citizen of the United States of 
America, past sixty years of age, and my business career includes nearly forty years in 
journalism as reporter, editor, publisher, financial writer and investment economist, from 
coast to coast; that politically, I am non-partisan, pro-Conscitution, Pro-National, anti- 
International and ami-Communist; not a member of any secret society; financially, 
modestly independent, with no entangling alliances; religion, not a churchman but a 
believer in Christian Principles; by ancestry, native American, chiefly Scotch descent, pre- 
Revolution; a resident and citizen of the State of New York; and that I have never been 
convicted of any felony or misdemeanor. 

That my long and varied business and professional experience has provided me with 
knowledge which enabled me co identify positively the sinister Jewish Leadership forces 
which are subverting American Political, Religious. Economic and Social life, and raising 
n mysterious wall against recovery. 

That I have repeatedly announced that I am not against Jews because of their 
religion, as a race, a people or as individuals, but because Jewish Leadership is actively 
anti-American, is-attempting to jettison the American Political Philosophy and take over 
the Country, and that I would continue to be anti-Jewish until Jewry repudiated such sub¬ 
version Were the offender any other than rhe Jewdsh minority, my attitude would be 
precisely the same. This problem is the biggest and most accute thing in the world today. 
It is an abstract economic problem so far as immediacy is concerned, bur it is born of an 
essentially evil philosophy that has evolved a satamc system the chief weapon of which is 

Knowing that there was but one course, that pitiless publicity is the only cure for 
public evils, in 1934 I started on a campaign to expose Jewish Anti-Americanism and 
Talmudic Communism which has been called "The Code of Hell”; a "Rabbi Racket" that 
victimizes its own followers; an international "Satanic System” subverting France, Britain. 
Germany and Russia, causing the present depression and moving to take over the United 
States through Jewish-Radical administration. 


From the start I have been under no illusions nr misapprehension as to acute personal 
dangers involved in this pro-American crusade: bur. with passionate conviction, I would 
he false to patriotic duty to allow such considerations to divert me from exposing to my 
countrymen the Cause of Communism that ;s destroying The Republic. 

That since the beginning of my campaign to educate all Americans to the subversive 
activities of- the Jewish Internationalists tu Suv.euze our Country, _ I_ luve written, pub- 
ished ->'nd distributed some 200 odd bulletins treating of such activities in the political 
,mJ educational life of America, and among winch, bulletins are incmdcd the 84 bulletins 
incorporated in the -aforesaid three indictments by reference and annexed hereto that 
rff bulletins so written, published and distributed by me state the true tacts with fair 
comment on my part as to the effect or the principles advocated by and through the s„b 
verbivt agents ana organizations of Jewish Internationalism; are all of puolic interest and 
privileged in character. 


The following is from the court argument of John S. Wise Jr., Counsel 
for Robert Edward Edmondson, before General Sessions Judge Allen Aug. u, 
1936, in the libel action started by N. Y, Jewish Mayor LaGuardia: 

"This is a motion for the inspection of the Grand jury s minutes * * * 
and general relief, If vou will read the indictments I think you will see that 
Uiev do not ALLEGE ANY CRIME under Section 1340 or the Penal Code— 
to the end that ANY PERSON was injured. One indictment is for libeling 
everv member of the Jewish Religion. 

'"The majority of this Grand Jury, by their own statements, were JEWISH, 
and returned an indictment against this defendant for injury TO THEM¬ 

"It was the duty of the grand jury to act impartially and protect defend¬ 
ant's substantial rights. How can a New York jury indict a man for libeling a 1 
of the lews in the world. There is no such indictment on record any place. Still, 
it seems you must not mention Jew, 

"The patriots of the whole country are complimenting the defendant for 
his activity in trying to eliminate socialism led by Jews such as have destroyed 

"We are entitled to inspect the jury's minutes. We should not be subjected 
to trial without due process of law. It is an outrage. 

"The Grand jury violated its oath. It was sworn to act impartially and 
justly in proper protection of this defendant's substantial rights, An inspection 
ought to reveal facts on which every member of this grand jury should be sub¬ 
ject to indictment for oppression." 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, on Aug. 21, 1936, without opinion or explanation, 
judge Allen refused to perron inspection of the minutes. 

The following documentation accompanied the presentation to the court, with a mass 
of similar data.-- 


'(U ECONOMIC: To abolish private ownership; to establish state monopolies; 
to bring about centralization; to encourage greed; to lower ideals of craftsmanship; to 
promote unemployment; to establish a World Bank. 

"(2) POLITICAL: To secure control of the press, broadcasting, screen and stage— 
to influence public opinion; to put agents on all Gentile councils, in confidential posts 
-iuch as secretaryships, to maintain espionage, to break up Gentile organizations from 
the inside by fomenting dissensions; to decry patriotism and pride of race; -and in the 
name of progress, evolution, universal peace and human brotherhood, set up Internation- 
■ . -undermining national unity and weakening existing governments; to bang about 

disarmament and establish, an international police force controlled by Jewish League of 


"(3) SOCIOLOGICAL: To set up plutocracy; encourage vulgar display and ex¬ 
travagance, to provoke the proletariat to envy, discontent, revolt and class or civil war. 

(4) ETHICAL: To corrupt morals. weaken the marriage-bond, destroy, home and abolish inheritance. 

"(5) AESTHETIC: To foster the cult of the ugly, debasing, decadent and degener¬ 
ate in art, music, literature, theatre. 

"(6) RELIGIOUS: To undermine Gentile creeds and churches, and propugate crazy 
cults, unhealthy mysticism, pseudo-science and sham philosophies." 


"Race is humbug,' is the conclusion of 'Jewish Author Brown in "From Pharaoh to 
Hitler." in a chapter devoted to ''The Race Myth.” He asserts that there is less ground 
tor the premise that jews are a race than those who hold themselves to be Nordics or 
Teutons. Referring to the maddening mixture of the races of mankind, he intimates due 
Russian Jews are descendants of Russian Mongolians who accepted Judaism, because the 
icea of membership in a chosen race is attractive. Historian Max Radin is quoted as 
saying that the only significance modern anthropologists will permit us to attach to the 
phrase Semitic Race’ is language.'.” 


LEON BLUM, the present PRIME MINISTER OF FRANCE, wrote in 
his book; "Du Marriage:’ 

"They (young girls) will return from their lovers as naturally as they now 
return from having Tea with a friend. Virginity, thrown off gaily and early, 
will no longer exercise this singular restraint which comes from modesty, 
dignity and a sort of fc-ar ... 1 have never discerned what there is about incest 
which is really repulsive. I merely note that it is natural and frequent for sister 
and brother to be lovers." 

In 'The Hidden Hand” monthly of September, 1920. published by the Britons 
Society of England, is published a ''Protocol, 1 ' which students of the Jewish Problem 
believe furnished the basis for the detailed subversion Protocols of the Learned Elders of 
Zion,” called "forgeries” by Jews; alleged to have been from an address before Zionists 
in 189”; carried secretly into Russia in 1902; and from there into the British Museum in 
1905. The following is quoted from the "Hidden Hand”: 

"In our last issue we published in the ’Spectator' letters a Protocol of a century ago. 
La Vieille France has gone one better. The Revue des etudes Juives, FINANCED BY 
JAMES DE ROTHSCHILD, published in 1880 two documents which showed how true 
the Protocols are in saying that the Learned Elders of Zion have been carrying on their 
plans for centuries.” 


"On January 1. A 1189, Chemor, Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, wrote to the 
Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat at Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles 
were threatening the synagogues. What should they dot This is the reply: 

” Dearly beloved brethren in Moses: We have received your letter in which you tell 
us of the anxieties and misfortunes you are enduring. The advice of the Grand Satraps 
and Rabbis is the following. 

" 'As for what you sav that the King of France obliges you to become Christians: 
Do it, since vou cannot do' otherwise; BUT LET THE LAW OF MOSES BE KEPT' IN 

” 'As for what yo usay ab.out the command to despoil you of your goods (the law was 
that on becoming converted the Jews would give up their possessions) ; Make your sons 
merchants, that little by little THEY MAY DESPOIL THE CHRISTIANS OF THEIRS. 

'As for what vou say about making attempts on vour lives: Make vour sons doctors 

” 'As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues; Make your sons canons 
and clerics that they may DESTROY CHURCHES. 

As for the many other vexations you complain of: Arrange that your sons become 
advocates and lawyers, and see that they always MIX THEMSELVES Up WITH THE 
AFFAIRS OF STATE, in order that by putting Christians under your yoke. YOU MAY 

Do not swerve from THIS ORDER that we give you. because you will find bv 
experience that, humiliated as you are, YOU WILL REACH THE ACTUALITY OF 

'' 'Signed V. S, S. V. FF,, Prince, of the Jews, 21st Casleu (November), 1489.” ' 


In "From Pharaoh to Hitier,” Jewish Author Bernard J. Brown makes a very ex¬ 
haustive legal analysis of the claim to "Jewish Nationhood,” as below: 

"The Jewish National Complex" is the title of one chapter of this remarkable book, 
which says Jewish Nationalists hold that the Jewish Nation stands separate and apart 
even though jews are enjoying tights and privileges of the country where they live. 

Dramatically, the truism is held up that Jews will surely be feared and hated ir they 
refuse to be Americanized. "What do we expect to contribute to American Civilization AS 
JEWS?" he asks. "Do we expect to contribute the religion we have- abandoned?" 

He holds that logicians are forced to conclude that demand for Jewish 
nationhood in the lands where they live is "subversive of national unity. He 
exclaims: "In one breath, our people claim to be internationalists, and in the 
next, they assert that lewish nationhood is an ineluctable fact. 

The author maintains that the Jewish Problem cannot be solved with 
Zionism—all the Jews will not consent to settle in Palestine. 


"Out of jail on bail” your petitioner continued to publish and broadcast 
exposures of additional Jewish anti-Americanism when new documentation was 
received, among which were bulletins indicated hereinafter; 


The Jewish War Veterans of the U. S., Department of New York, by 
Harry Bloomfield, Welfare & Service Officer, submitted June 11, 1936, the 
following questions to Robert Edward Edmondson: 

"What do you consider a good American, and by what standard? 

"In the last war the Jewish Race contributed 250,000 men to the armed 
forces of our country. I, as one of them, consider myself a 100% American. 
14,000 men of our faith lie in Flanders' Field. Are they good Americans? 

"Do you know that men of our faith fought in the revolution and helped 
to build this country? 

"What did you do in defense of your country? 

"What makes you take the stand you do in printing your literature?" 

First, I call your attention to the definition below on Americanism as 
promulgated in February, 1927, by the Commanders in Chief of the Grand 
Army of the Republic, United Spanish War Veterans, Division of Foreign 
Wars, National Commanders of the American Legion and Disabled Veterans 
of the World War—now broadcast by the Americanization Department of the 
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States. 

"Americanism is an UNFAILING love of country; Loyalty to ITS insti¬ 
tutions and ideals; Eagerness to defend it against ALL enemies; UNDIVIDED 
ALLEGIANCE to the flag.” 

That is also my conception of Americanism. 

I do not find the name "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.” in the above 
iist of endorsers. Why? May I ask why you use the title "Jewish Wat Veterans 
of the U. S., instead of "American War Veterans"? 

Is it possible that the name "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.” is omitted 
as endorsing the Americanism definition heretofore quoted because Jewish War 
Veterans put JEWRY FIRST; that they maintain a DIVIDED allegiance; that 
they are not eager to defend America against ALL ENEMIES—within as well as 
without? Do not overlook the fact that a vast non-Jewish Majority also died in 
the World War. They are entitled to first consideration. It goes without saying 

[hat all soldiers of America who made rhe Supreme Sacrifice proved themselves 
’’good Americans.” I honor them. And our disabled veterans should receive the 
greatest care our nation can give them. 


W'hat did I do in defense- of my country during the World War? 

Unfortunately, at the time of the war. I was past military age, and an 
army liability; but I came out of the fight financially stripped whereas Henry 
Lord has estimated chat 73C'r of New York war millionaires were Jews; and 
he said in a N. Y. World interview on Feb. 17, 1921, that his investigations 
indicated that International Jewish Financiers had caused the war. 

I have documentary evidence proving (1) my profitless daily and aggres¬ 
sive co-operation with the Government in World-War work during the entire 
conflict; (2) editorials in my publications demanding conscription of ALL the 
nation’s labor and resources in place of drafting soldiers only; (3) published 
strong opposition to Wilson’s demand that the United States join the League of 
Nations—now denounced by the National Workers’ Party of Britain as "an 
instrument of -war.” Zionist Leader Sokoloff declared on Aug. 22, 1922, "The 
League of Nations is a Jewish idea; we created it after a fight of 25 years.” 

What makes me attack the Jewish anti-Americanism that is destroying my 

Doesn’t rhe question answer itself to any veteran-patriot? I would take 
precisely the same stand were offending leadership German, Russian, Irish or 
Italian. I have repeatedly declared that I am not against Jews as individuals as 
to their religion or race. This is a fight for self-preservation. 

Do vou ask special privilege for a minority, Jews are entitled to MIN¬ 


Read this confession by S. Landman, former British War Propaganda 
Agent, in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. 7, 1936: "The only way to 
induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the co¬ 
operation of Zionist Jewry bv promising them Palestine. The Zionists carried out 


Now, in my opinion, you Jewish War Veterans have an unprecedented 
opportunity to perform a super-service not only to Jews but Gentiles. The hell- 
fire of war should have purified you. Has it also made you self-reliant and in¬ 
dependent? Has it courageously individualized you? HAS IT FULLY AMERI¬ 
CANIZED YOU? I ask these questions since you apparently "huddle” by your¬ 
selves under the title "Jewish War Veterans of the U. S.,” from which legion 
Gentiles are barred, although Jews may enter the American Legion, 

If you will now boldly put Americanism above Jewry and place all your 
resources unreservedly behind this Crusade for lOOfT Americanism—which 
means chat you will have to completely submerge all Jewish interest—a patri¬ 
otic Gentile-Jew concert of action would promptly smash this predatory soli¬ 
darity that is destroying us. 

I am unalterably opposed to government by dictatorship of any kind—includ¬ 
ing the Roosevelt Jewish Radical Regime. 


I challenge the patriotism of American Jewish War Veterans to clean the 
House of Jewry and oust its false leadership, 

If that be what Jewish Mayor LaGuardia calls inciting to riot and Treason 


The address below was to have been delivered March 20, 1938. before the 
Russian National League in New York City by Robert Edward Edmondson, but 
the lessor of the Church of All Nations, 1 '' the place selected, refused to permit 
such free speech because references unfavorable co Jews necessarily appeared 

[Telephone and other messages were received from many persons by Robert 
Edward Edmondson, asking if an advertisement were true that he ■would speak 
at the Church of All Nations, saying they would like to attend. He replied to 
them, as he did to newspaper reporters, that, as he was denied free speech as 
to the truth about Jewish Anti-Americanism, the only subject which he publidv 
discussed, he of course could not appear.} 

The action of the 'Church of All Nations” was probably influenced by 
this itemJn the N. Y. Journal of March 17, 1938: "Charging that a scheduled 
meeting Sunday of the Russian National League of Americans was to be a 'Jew- 
baiting rally/ the East Side Post of the Jewish War Veterans announced today 
that it would march upon the meeting and stop it in a nice way or any way we 
can.' Murray Lipkin, Commandc-r of the Post, warned that 5,000 Jewish Veter¬ 
ans would be on hand to block the rally on 2nd Avenue, in the 'Church of All 
Nations. Among the speakers will be Robert Edward Edmondson, anti-Semitic 
pamphleteer, now facing trial on charge of criminally libeling * * * the 
Jewish Religion.” 

(The Undelivered Speech) 

To Russian Exiled Patriots and Citizens of the American Republic: 

As a native American, I stretch out to White Russians in tire United States 
'he hand of friendship. I wish I could speak in your language. I might then 
better express to you my deep sympathy. 

I love my country—you love your fatherland! Those of you who remain 
its subjects, are virtually men and women without a country. You have been 
driven from your homes. 

I am sorry you have been subjected to Jewish Communist persecution in 
this country. Those of you who have become militant fellow-citizens to the 
point of joining our national guard, have not been spared. 

But you can work for Russia HERE. You can now perform a double patri¬ 
otic duty. Your foe is our foe. We patriots must all unite and fight the common 
enemy—Jewish Communism. 

We peaceful people of Russia and America have not guarded our rights. 
We have been too generous, too tolerant, too hospitable. Such is fertile ground 
lor the Jewish Communist Revolutionary in whch to sow seeds of poison. 
Eternal Vigilance is the price of safety as well as of liberty. 

Men and Women of Russia' Fight with us for your country' When we 
break the back of the Jewish International Power, victory will come fast. 

I give you this Gentile Rally-Cry: "Patriots of the World—UNITF! You 
have nothing to lose but the Jews!" 



(From Bulletin broadcast of June 20, 1940) 

"The U. S. is a Democracy. Anti-Semitism : s a political weapon in :he hands of 
those- who want to destroy our Democracy. Anti-Semitic agitation is die chief smoke¬ 
screen of the subversive anti-democratic Tru.un Horse and Fifth Column activities in this 
country. THEY MUST BE STOPPED!" From "The Jewish Veteran" of May, 1940. 

Whereas: "The Government of the U. S. is NOT a Democracy, but A REPUBLIC 1 '' 
—V. S. ARMY CITIZENSHIP 1923 Training Manual. 

"The Jewish Veteran." proclaiming itself to be "The Patriotic Voice of American 
Jewrv." publishes, in its May, 1 940, issue, a lung article headed "Fifth Columns in the 
Lh S.," wherein it tries to smear militant patriots, Robert Edward 'Edmondson and uthers. 
with the brand of Fifth Column traitors, adding: "A fel'ow-Ameiica.n named Robert 
'Edward Edmondson—I suppose he calls himself an American—is very proud of a 
testimonial signed by the leading anti-Semites of 22 countries. He is probably the most 
prolific wrtcer of anti-Semitic pamphlets in the U. S." 

Who wouldn't be "proud" to have received from the 1937 Congress of 22 Nations 
the following communication: "We are sending you this letter to show that we admire 
you for your tenacity and great moral courage in fighting this greatest of all fights 
against Jew domination of all we hold noble and sacred." 

But the explanatory personal reference, while necessary for clarity, is incidental, and 
the main point of this analysis is to show that the organ of the Jewish War Veterans of 
the U. S. has publicly confessed that Jews are unfit for the high privilege of American 
cmzenship because their veterans, supposed to he the cream of Jewry, do not even know' 
(') what form of government they live under in the U. since they call The Republic 
a Democracv—which word was significantly deleted from the Constitution. They re¬ 
pudiate their U. S. Army- Citizenship Manual. Are they trying to change our form of 

Perhaps some light may be cast on his ineptitude by a reading- of the Congressional 
Record, wherein on page 1145 of June 10. James True reports in Ins June 15. 1940, 
weekly letter, the following statement is printed; 


"The Central Conference of American Rabbis reaffirms its conviction that consci¬ 
entious objection to military service is in accord with the highest interpretations of 
Judaism, and therefore petitions the Government of the U. S. to gtant to Jewish religious 
conscientious objectors to war the same exemptions from military service as has long been 
granted to members of the Society of Friends and similar religious organizations." 

Maybe the foregoing "conscientiousness" was responsible for the failure of the 
Jewish War Veterans Organization to sign the Patriotic American Crc-ed issued by the 
Grand Army of The Republic, Veterans of Foreign Wars, United Spanish Veterans. 
Disabled Veterans and the American Legion. 

Typical of the way Jewish Veterans put jewism before Americanism the following 
extracts are submitted from "A message from the Commander to all Jewish War Vet¬ 
erans and Jewish Communities," issued by George Marcus, Commander North Hudson 
Post No. 76, Jewish War Veterans, circulated on the advent of the Jewish New- Year 
in September, 1936: 

"As fellow-Jews, fellow-citizens, fellow-Americans, we must stand united to further 
the interests of*AMERICAN JEWRY. We are constantly alert to defend THINGS 
JEWISH. We are wholeheartedy devoted to the support of JEWISH IDEALS." 

Nothing is said about the support of or loyalty to AMERICAN ideals and institu¬ 
tions, or allegiance to the AMERICAN Flag. Why? Because "The Patriotic Voice of 
American—JEWRY" speaks and acts for "Jewry FIRST." 

IS the Jewish Fifth Column therefore a present deadly menace to peace and safety? 

Save the Republic! 

(From Edmondson bulletin of June 13, 1936) 

The following editorial by Dr. S. Margoshes, from "The Day." of June 
10 1936, N. Y, Yiddish newspaper, is largely self-explanatory: 

"For the last three years one Robert E. Edmondson, who styles himself an 
investment expert, has been flooding the mails with most scurrilous anti-Semitic 

"An effort to get the P. O. authorities to throw his filthy literature Out of 

mails proved unavailing. , , 

"A bill introduced in the N. Y. Legislature forbidding the dissemination 
of propaganda calculated to rouse race-hatred and race-feuds, got as far as the 
second reading, AND THEN WAS STOPPED. 

"When, months ago, some of us appealed to District Attorney Dodge for 
relief against the torrent of anti-Semitic circulars then inundating the streets of 
New York, the answer was that HE WAS POWERLESS TO COPE WITH 

"Now. Mayor LaGuardia has found a way to deal with Edmondson. He 
issued a summons charging criminal libel against Robert E. Edmondson. We 
can only hope that the courts will support the Mayor's contentions. ’ 


(1) No "anti-Semitic" circular has ever been issued by Robert Edward 
Edmondson, Answering the Call to Public Duty against Public Evil, his patriotic 
anti-Jewish publications have been concentrated against Jewish anti-American¬ 
ism. The Arab Minority has done no politico-economic usurpation wrong to 
America, as has Minority Jewish Leadership. They, too, are Semites. 

(3) I am glad to have Jews at last confirm my statements regarding the 
Post Office "OK" on mail-matter. Department of Justice investigation agents 
found me merely exercising my rights of free speech and free press, under the 

(3) Margoshes now- admits that Edmondson patriotic activities STOPPED 
the so-called New York Assembly racial bill, which would have ' gagged" all 
anld-Jewish free speech and prohibited circulation of the Bible or a U. S. Con¬ 
gressional Directory containing matter unfavorable to Jews. 


Margoshes was Chairman of the Resolutions Committee of the National 
Convention of the Jew-s, held at Washington, D. C., on June 14, 1936, to pre¬ 
pare for a World Congress of Jewry. At that meeting Rabbi Wise is quoted in 
the N. V. Herald Tribune of June 15, 1936, as warning Jews: 

"To refrain from saying things THAT TOMORROW WILL BE USED 
BY THE EDMONDSONS and enemies of the Jew's, WHICH MAY BE 

Does Rabbi Wise now.' admic that the material used in the Protocols WAS 
taken from previous utterances of the Jew's? 


A Jew and his Gentile wife recently visited my N. Y. office, and bought 
crusade literature, donating $25. She said to my wife, my volunteer executive 
assistant, "Your husband is doing the only thing that will stop this Jewish 

danger. My husband is a Jew. but he and his father are good Americans. I 
do nor know what may happen to us, whether we will be killed by Jewish 
orders,' or by Americans who realize what is being done to them; but my 
husband will do to die with. 1 ' 

During the New York campaign for The Republic, threats were received 
by telephone, mail and otherwise. A favorite epithet greeting my wife when 
she answered the telephone, was "bitch/' She was informed by telephone and 
letter "how Edmondson was to be mutilated,” details being given. Jews crowded 
the LaGuardia courtroom on the day of the first summons, some of them 
calling aloud for the "drawing and quartering" of the defendant. 


On July 2, 1936, the Edmondson Libel Case was postponed by the prose¬ 
cution for the fourth time. The defendant then made the following announce¬ 
ment : 

"It has been intimated to me that if I would apologize, the LaGuardia 
criminal libel action against me for crusading against Jewish anti-Americanism 
might be withdrawn. 

"My fight has been for two great principles—Constitutional Free Speech 
and against Minority Dictatorship. 

''An apology is a confession of wrong-doing. I am not conscious of having 
libeled 'all the persons of the Jewish Religion,' as accused. Retraction would 
be betrayal of Principle and Country. 

"Is it wrong to patriotically speak, expose and publish THE TRUTH 
from the records of authority and fact about those who seek to overthrow our 
political system? 

ICA AGAINST JEWISH COMMUNISM. Contrary reports will be of enemy 


(From Edmondson bulletin of July 3, 1936) 

The self-explanatory passages below are from the 1936 May and June 
issues of London "Saturday Review," founded in 185Y believed to foreshadow 
the collapse of the League of Nations, 

"What is the League of Nations? It is a League designed by the American 
President Wilson—which the American Nation very wisely refused to join. 

. . The . P 0 ^ League is to denationalize nations and destroy their 

individuality. It is destructive of the independence of the people, by usurping 


(From a July 3, 1936, bulletin by Edmondson) 

Under a heading: "B’nai BTith Sounds a CALL TO ARMS!" this power¬ 
ful Jewish Secret Order has broadcast a defiant printed program, calling for 
new Jewish Solidarity—from which the following are significant extracts: 

"Only through an organization which seeks to UNIFY FOR MORE 
can you really hope to serve. 

"The B'nai B’rith, the only International Jewish Fraternity in the world, 


organized the anri-Defamation League (of Chicago). The work of this League 
is directed by a governing board represented in all large cities of the U.S.A. 
A few of its accomplishments are: 

"Elimination of the defamation of the Jew in motion pictures. 

"Removal of objectional character of the Jew on the stage. 

"Discontinuance of libel of the Jews in magazine articles and trade 

"Securing cooperation of the Associated Press in eliminating the word 
'Jew’’ in connection with one accused of crime. 

"Reduction to a minimum of discrimination against Jews by resorts, 
hotels, private schools, etc. 

"Securing discontinuance of 'The Merchant of Venice’ in school systems of 
250 cities," 

Under another heading. "Our Plan of Action," this is printed: 

"As to literature mailed bv and-Jewish organizations in this and foreign 

"Continued intensive work by the Defamation League to counteract by all 
proper methods every attack upon the Jew' of such nature as to affect any 
appreciable part of public opinion. 

"Join now. WE COUNT ON YOU!" 

Note particularly the implied control of the press and channels of 
publicity. Observe the boasted accomplishment of special favors for Jews. 

Tomorrow is Independance Day, July 4, 1936. Let us regenerate our 
American Declaration. 


The following special privilege-demanding letter from Chairman Sigmund Livingston 
of the Anti-Defamation League of the Jewish B’nai B‘rith World Secret Order, to the 
Editor of the Chicago Tribune, under dace of Chicago, July 16, 1936, printed in that 
paper's issue of July 22, is self-explanatory: 

"The issue of THE TRIBUNE of July 14 contains an article giving recital of the 
motion entered by Robert Edmondson, indicted in New York for criminal libel. Among 
the grounds assigned why action of the grand jury was illegal , is that the grand jury was 
composed of a majority of "Mongol Jews" and that it should be composed of native born 
Aryan Christian Americans. The early edition of THE TRIBUNE carried very large, 
blackface type headlines as follows: "Editor Charges Indictment by 'Mongol Jews.' ” The 
same headline was used, not quite as prominent, in the later editions. 

"Edmondson has for some time made a business of issuing and selling circulars 
containing the most abusive and scurrilous attacks upon individuals as weli as the 
Jewish body. 

"There is no one but could at once detect that tlie reasons assigned by him for the 
motion to quash the indictment were merely for the purpose of publicizing scurrilous 
matter and for the very purpose of having newspapers use this term of 'Mongol Jew’ in 
prominent fashion. Our purpose in directing your attention to this is that greater care 
be taken in the publicizing of scurrilous matters, even though they might originate under 
the feigned guise of court procedure. 


"Chairman, the Anti-Defamation League.” 

The foregoing may be significant as to why most newspapers throughout the West 
failed to carry the news of the sensational developments in this case, since the Washing¬ 
ton James True Service estimates that 60% of the Associated Press headquarters in the 
New York Metropolitan news-source is Jewish. 

Sigmund Livingston evidently tries to suggest that I conspired with LaGuardia to 
have him start this action against my personal liberty for the sole persecutory-purpose 
of getting the "Mongol-Jew" news into the headlines. However, this absurdity admits 
that our campaign to force the Jewish Question into the press, HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL. 


The documentation as below was in an Edmondson Bulletin of July 25. 1936 and 
"speaks for itself.” 

Office of Joseph Gladstone 

84 William Street. New York 

My dear Mr. Wise: July 23rd, 1936 

I fully understand your lawful right to defend any type of client, but I do wish it did 
not embrace individuals and groups that are referred to by Dorothy Thompson as the 
Lunatic Fringe. It is distasteful to me to read of your tie-up with such characters as 
Edmondson. Such types of clients do you more harm than good in the long run. 

This constant propaganda against law-abiding minorities is extremely repugnant 
to true Americanism. Why must you shoulder the defense of such un-American orofes- 
sional propagandists? 

(signed) JOSEPH GLADSTONE (Jew) 
Office of John S. Wise, Jr. 

Dear Mr. Gladstone: July 24, 1936 

Thanks for your friendly letter of the 25d inst. 

I am not impressed by Dorothy Thompson's ideas. 

Nor am I alarmed about the effect on my professional standing by representing 

Of course our local judiciary is largely Jewish, but I don't believe that will em¬ 
barrass me. I estimate that our Jewish population in their segregated methods of living 
amongst us, use Jewish lawyers in 90% of their legal affairs. 

I shall not avoid an employment that helps bring out THE WHOLE TRUTH. 

(signed) JOHN S. WISE, JR. 

(Published in Edmondson Bulletin of Sept. 2, 1936) 

For Gentile enlightenment, 1 submit below a graphic parallel review of the 1924 
book entitled, "You Gentiles," by Maurice Samuel, Zionist Leader. 


Between Gentiles and Jews there lies an 
unbridgeable gulf. Ours is one life—yours 
another. This primal difference is noc re- 
conciliable. It is sbysmal. 

Wherever the Jew is found, he is a 
problem, a source of unhappiness to himself 
and those around him. Jews arc everywhere, 
to a large extent, ALIENS—unquestion¬ 
ably an alien spirit in your colleges. He 
will not accept your rules of right or wrong 
because he does not understand them. These 
two ways of life are utterly ALIEN TO 

Our Jewishness is not a creed; it is our 
totality. A Jew is a Jew in everything. We 
cannot conceive of a duality—religion and 
life, the sacred and the secular, I might say, 
"We and God grew up together.” In the 
heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Jews 
alone understand the universality of God. 

There does not seem to be a single 
country with a history which has not been 
ANTI-SEMITIC at one time or another. 

You might say, "Well. let us exist side 
by side and tolerate each other." But the 
two are not merely different; THEY ARE 

If that is so, why not promptly divorce 
this alien element from America, since it 
admits its inability to Americanize? 

Why, then, butt in where he is un¬ 
wanted? Clinging to his own Code, the 
Jew insists that Gentiles also adopt it. Why- 
should Americans submit to such out¬ 
rageous tyranny in their own country? 

Towering arrogance! The chosen com¬ 
plex! Superiority obsession! "Me and God"’ 
What Blasphemy! 

WHY? Who is to blame’ Two billion 
Gentiles are all wrong! Sixteen million 
Jews are always right! What a Philosophy! 

Our tolerance, then, means nothing to 
the Jew, except to use it to his own selfish 


In your world a man should be loyal 
to his country, to his province, to his city. 
To the Jew, naked loyalty is an incompre¬ 
hensible thing, 

Jews are the most CLANNISH of 
peoples. The fact that they have persisted 
for 80 generations in maintaining a racial 
and spiritual identity bespeaks essential 
discipline of amazing vigor and power. The 
discipline of our Jewishness is subjection 
of the individual to the mass. 

We Jews pay little attention to the after¬ 
life. We thank God FOR HAVING 

The instinct of the Gentile is to distrust 
the Jew, of the Jew to distrust the Gentile. 
Set side by side with us, you are bullies, 
cowards and mobs. 

' We are not in your midst by our own 
will, but through YOUR action. We are 
unwelcome to you because we are what we 
are. We have more cogent reasons for 
hating you (than you for hating us). 

Liberal Jews, Radical Jews, Modernized 
Jews, Agnostic Jews, ARE BECOMING 
RY. We have produced an overwhelming 
number of revolutionaries—banner bearers 
of the world’s armies of “liberation.” 

Repudiation of the Jewish Religion 

You must learn to dislike and fear the 
modern and 'unassimiiated" Jew more than 
you did the old Jew. He is more dangerous 
to you. His enmity to your way of life was 
tacit before. Today it is active. 

We Jews are accused of being destroyers. 
We are a homeless mass seeking satisfac¬ 
tion. We cannot find it. WE ARE DES¬ 
WE TURN FOR RELIEF. Jews will re¬ 
main destroyers FOREVER. NOTHING 
that you will do will meet our demands. 

There are hardly any Jews among the 
world's wealthiest men. The greatest fin¬ 
ancial institutions are almost exclusively 

One thing is quite certain: A Jew is 
never baptized for the purpose of becoming 
a Christian. He aims to become a Gentile, 

Jews put Jewry first. 

Which contradicts his statement that the 
jews don't know whac loyalty is. They do 
when Jewry’s interests are concerned. Isn’t 
the maintenance of mass discipline manifest 
evidence of regimentation like that of 

"The Pharisee prayed: 'God, I thank 
Thee that I am not as THE REST OF 
MEN' ”—Luke IS: 10. The same Yesterday, 
Today, Tomorrow! 

Where there is mutual distrust, harmony 
cannot live. So why waste time with Jewish 
“good neighbor” ballyhoo—designed to de¬ 
ceive Gentiles? 

Americans did not invite the Jewish in¬ 
vasion. They would welcome an exodus. 

Another confession-defi. Boasts and pride. 

Then, a Jew "converted” to Christianity 
remains Jewish in his real attitude toward 

This is a threat and a warning Gentiles 
will do well to heed before it is too late— 
noting the gains made by Jewish Com¬ 

Forcing themselves into the midst of their 
“common enemy,” they foolishly tell him 
of the destruction Jews work. "Bereft of 
Vision, the people perish!" WHY 
VIPER? If we are destroyed, can we say 
we were not warned? 

What about Rothschilds, Warburgs, Sas¬ 
soon, Samuels et al? Author Sombart says 
in “Jews & Modern Capitalism:” "The 
Jews made an Art of lending money. They 
became LORDS of Money—and LORDS 

Does the Jew use the screen of religion 
to promote his own material interests? 


You may ask; What difference is there 
between a Jew claiming to be an American. 
an J an Italian claiming to be one-' Is it more 
HUMILIATING for one than the Other? 

The cleft between you, Americans and 
Italians, Frenchmen and Germans, is but 
a wide jump compared with the CHASM 
YOU. We cannot assimilate. 


From Oct. 3, 1936 Bulletin by Edmondson. 

"We have consistently refused to attack Jews AS INDIVIDUALS. We do 
not attack the Jews on racial or religious ground. We believe in Justice for 
Jew and Gentile. 


The foregoing is from the Sept. 5, 1936, issue of "The Black Shirt" of 


In his maiden speech on the Jewish Problem in the early part of 193A 
the undersigned, emphasizing the primary economic nature of this menace, 
answered the question, "What is the remedy?" by proposing, "an ECONOMIC 
Boycott of all Jewish Production." 

In "The Riddle of the Jews' Success," by Stoltheim, this confirming state¬ 
ment is made; 

"The enormous liberation of energy caused by the Speculative Principle 
of the Jew, and the enormous development of external life caused thereby, de¬ 
ceive as to the true state of affairs. The glitter and gleam appear to many as 
the veritable light of life; but it is, in reality, ONLY THE PHOSPHOR¬ 
ESCENCE OF CORRUPTION. The last reserves of national energy are forced 

"Jewish understanding does not look beyond today and tomorrow, and 
operates destructively and suicidally in all directions. The Jewish mode of 
thinking is inorganic, and is, for that reason, incapable of creative action, The 
Jew is unable to conceive that the world dominion for which he is striving 

It will not be contested that the illegal "NRA," patterned after the Israel 
Moses Sieff "Politico-ECONOMIC Planning" set up in England, was essentially 
economic. Boston Jewish Merchant Edward A. Filene was the "financial angel" 
of this monopoly. 

Here are economic confessions from Jewish sources; 

"The Jewish Question is not so much anti-Semitic today as it is AN 
ECONOMIC QUESTION." That sentence is from the London Jewish Chron¬ 
icle of June 26, 1936, quoting President N. J. Laski of the Board of Deputies 
of British Jews. 

"The economic boycott being practiced against the Jews is even more 
deadly than the sporadic acts of violence thus far committed in Central and 
Eastern Europe," says H. J. Seligman, Director of Public Relations of the 
American Joint Distribution Committee, on returning from abroad, according to 
an article in the N. Y. Times Sept. 28, 1936. 

The Arabian Nationalist Leader Husseini accurately sums up the economic 
factor in the N. Y. Times of June 21, 1936, thus: "European newspapers 

Alter all this, why not disfranchise 
Jews- Under their Constitution, states 
may do so. Americanism is an organism 
which cannot tolerate an alien or foreign 
element—and must in self-preservation cast 
it out as poison to the body politic. Most 
of us consider it a privilege and an honor 
to be an American. 

mention 'anti-Semitism- in Palestine. This is nonsense. We ourselves belong to 
the Semite Race. We turn against the Jews, not because they are lews, but 


The following is from Edmondson bulletin of Oct. 10, 1936: 

A prominent Chicago Jewish "capitalist" lawyer-author asked the editor 
for an off-the-record conference this week. Having read and renewed Ins 
book apparently an effort to arrive at a fan understanding Detween Non-Jew 
and Jew, the meeting was welcomed. Following is the enlightening record 

made in shorthand at the conclusion thereof: 

"In your opinion," asked the editor, “how many Jews are Communistic._ 
"Among my acquaintances of a thousand, not more than .'5; and that is 

representative. , , . , 

^ "But one of the most prominent of New- York Jews admitted, to me 
personally that approximately 85% of Jews were Communistic; and James 
Waterman Wise says 'the-Jewish masses' are Communistic, challenging the 

American Jewish Committee to disprove it." ' 

"They don't know what they are talking about," declared the lawyer- 
author "My family and I and many other Jews refuse to accept the so-called 
Jewish leadership of Rabbi Wise, Samuel Untermyer, Justice Brandos, Chaim 
Weissman, the Warburgs, etal.” 


"Then," argued the editor, "why don’t the said Jewish masses publiciv 
repudiate such false leadership? Get rid of it!" 

"We can't get rid of it- How can we?" 

"That’s up to you Jews. Necessity finds a way. When an individual re¬ 
fuses self-discipline and disobeys laws, the world itself drastically disciplines 
him If minority Jewry doesn't 'clean house’ and discipline its leadership, a 
world majority that believes itself to be grievously injured by the Jewish 
System is going to do it without regard to Jewish feelings 

"Then you propose, for example, to deport my children who do not 

approve the Jewish Leadership?" . . , 

"Why not if they bv silence condone Jewish anti-Americanism and will 

not stand up and be counted for Country First. I am not fighting Jews as 
individuals. I am fighting the leadership of the Judaic Economic System, which 
ruthlessly victimizes both non-Jew r and Jew individuals. 

"There is now no such thing as Judaism." , 

"There is, however, Jewishness, which you condemned in your book, and 

on contacting which Gentiles become anti-Jewisb." 

"But the men indicated are not representative of Jewish leaders, the 

lawyer insisted. . , , , , , • , 

"Being prominently vocal, constantly declaring that they stand for Jewish 

licrhts and actively working therefor without public challenge or contradiction, 
the Gentile world naturally accepts them as representative leadership How can 
you expect non-Jews to understand the views of a silent contingent. 

"What do you say these leaders are trying to do,?" 


"Overwhelming circumstantial evidence shows that they are attempting to 
impose Jewish political domination on every large country in the world through 

predatory economic monetary weapons" 

Without attempting refutation, the Chicago lawyer-author contented him¬ 
self with: "You are all wrong.” 

"That's what most of the Jews say," retorted the editor, recalling the 
"chosen" superiority complex. "But, as a lawyer, you will admit that a 
'general denial’ without rebuttal proof .exposes a fundamentally weak case. 
Opinions will not settle this matter. The American public is going to judge 
from the facts and the unrefuted evidence of the record.” 

"But you are not going about the solution of the problem in the right 
way. Now, when I go into court and present my conclusions to the judge, he 
tells me that he must have supported precedents, which I give him; and he 
decides the case on those authorities and relative merits." 


"That is precisely what I have been doing—citing the record, quoting 
authority after authority—mostly Jewish—in support of allegations of Jewish 
anti-Americanism. Take the report of the conference of American Rabbis, 
recently held. They declared against the present American System and advocated 
'A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy in its place." 

"Yes, but many American non-Jew statesmen have argued for exactly the 
same thing, such as Norman Thomas, Clarence Darrow, John Haynes Holmes, 
and men of that caliber." 

"Those men are not representative American statesmen. THEY ARE 
SOCIALISTS. All socialists are antagonistic to Americanism. And 'the 
thoroughly socialized democracy’ of the rabbis is essentially Communistic.’’ 

"Ail these prominent Jews mentioned are acting for profit, not leadership. 
They speak publicly for profit; they write for profit. I wrote my book on the 
Jewish Quesrion for profit.” Thus said the author, 




Theodore Dreiser, the writer, wrote to Hutchins Hapgood in "The 
Nation" of April 17, 1935: "Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means INTER¬ 
NATIONALISM. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are 
money-minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which 
at least is endorsed, and to a degree, followed by lawyers of other nationalities. 
The }ew r has been in Germany for all of a thousand years, and he is still a 
lew. He has been in America ail of 200 years, and he has not faded into a 
pure American by any means—and he will not." 


The flip-flop described below in an Oct. 19, 1936, bulletin is typical of 
the communist policy of changing positions to meet new circumstances: 

"I join with you in condemning any Jew' or Gentile who fosters ideas or 
theories or practices subversive to the traditional American order."—James 
P, Warburg wrote Robert Edward Edmondson Dec. 4, 1934. 

Roosevelt is the man about whom Warburg said in his 1935 book, "Hell 
Bent for Election:” 

"He has FLOUTED the Constitution, which he swore on oach to protect; 

he is no more likely to change his basic characteristics than is a leopard to 
change his spots, and the sooner we have done with him, the better for the 


"I shall cast my vote for the re-election of President Roosevelt in Novem¬ 
ber.”—James P. Warburg wrote Secretary of State Hull, Oct. 13, 1936. 

Has Repudiator Warburg turned "Red?” Or is he obeying the Communal 
"Call of the Blood" to '‘Save Jewry!" 

"I am a Loyal Jew',' Warburg reminded me in 1934 when we first sat 
down in conference to discuss "Americanism.” 

Jewry FIRST—Americanism LAST? 

James P. Warburg’s reason for his somersault is phrased thus: "It is 
impossible for me to support an opposition (to Roosevelt) which either will 
not or cannot recognize that Economic NATIONALISM lies at the root of 
our great difficulties." 

NATIONALISM! The secret is out. Nationalism is Patriotic—Fascistic, 
when militant. Jewry is AGAINST FASCISM and FOR ' A Thoroughly 
SOCIALIZED Democracy”—according to the American Rabbi Conference. 
THAT is COMMUNISTIC! Jewish Communal Ideals are notoriously INTER¬ 
NATIONAL—and anthnational. 

So James P. Warburg is now apparently against "The Traditional American 
Order," which is NOT Internationalism! 


(The address herein reproduced in part was delivered upon the unsolicited invitation 
of the represenatives of the famous Cardinal Newman Club of New York in their church 
(auditorium ac 529 W. 121st St., N. Y. City, Feb. 7, 193", before more than 500 
Catholic Youth, by Robert Edward Edmondson.) 

The subject listed for this address is "'Anti-Semitic” Causes of Today. Quotation 
marks enclose the word ''Anti-Semitic” because it is a misleading term. 

It is of primary importance to know exactly what we are to talk about before 
analyzing a subject. Therefore, let us examine the designation "Anti-Semitic.” 

The number of Arabs, Syrians and Egyptians who are also Semites practically equals 
the Jewish world population total as supplied by Jewish authorities. 

Therefore, to be "Anti-Semitic'' you must be against ALL members of the so-called 
Semite Race—which is an absurdity, since most Occidental peoples contact only the 
Jewish Semites. 

Husseini, Arab Nationalist Party Leader, aptiy sums up the crisis in the N, Y. 
Times of June 21, 1936, saying: "European newspapers mention 'Anti-Semitism' in 
Palestine. This is nonsense, as we ourselves ; are Semites. We turn against the Jews not 
because they are Jews, but because they threaten our existence.” 

In presenting this matter to you I wish to make my own position crystal clear. I 
sincerely believe in the truth of the information offered. It is submitted and analyzed 
with the justifiable motive of concern for the public welfare. While the heart of the 
trouble is economic, in my opinion, the important fields of politics, publicity, religion 
and race have been invaded in varying extent. 

I do not belong to any church; but I am a believer in practical postive Christian 
principles. I am not a member of any secret society. My business is that of an independent 
economist, editor and publisher. I am likewise independent in politics, being merely 
a patriot who stands for traditional Americanism. 

I have never been against Jews as individuals, as ro race or religion.^ Under the 
Constitution of the U. S., I am for intelligent racial and religious tolerance forever. But 
1 am unalterably against that power-lusting false leadership which is promoting a preda¬ 
tory economic system that is destroying Jew as well as Gentile. 

Where there is an effect, there must be a cause. There must be _an offensive 
Jew ism before there can be a defensive reaction of Anti-Jewism. Let us diagnose from 
symptom back to origin. 


In this connection I quote from the N. Y. Times of Jan. 30, 1937, part of a sug¬ 
gestive display-advertisement published by the Polish Newspaper Guild of America, 

protesting against American Jewry's attack on Poland. It said: "There must be SOME¬ 
THING wrong somewhere if millions and millions of Germans, Arabs, Hungarians, 
Rumanians, French, English. Italians. Poles, Russians and Americans NURSE ANTI¬ 

In "The Truth Abouc The Jews", published in 1922 by Walter Hurt, the most pro- 

jewish Gentile-writer I have contacted, the following economic admission is made: 

"Racial prejudice rises only when different races come into direct economic conflict. His 
(the Jew's) economic ethics are not those of the Gentile. The Jew being an Oriental, 
his mental processes are unlike those of the Occidental. He exists in a mental ghetto. 
Even as the characters of the Hebrew Language read backward, so do Jews think re¬ 
versely. Modern Finance is chiefly the creation of the Jews. They found that the sceptre 
of power was fashioned of gold. Possession of much of this metal made an enslaved 
people masters of their masters." 

Pro-Jewish Prof. Werner Sombart in his 1913 "Jews and Modern Capitalism," makes 
this supporting economic analysis: "Capitalism was born from the money loan. The 
Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief 
happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. 
They became Lords of Monty—and Lords of the World." 

The British Guardian of July-August, 1924, reports Karl Marx, "Jewish Father of 
Communism," as having said: "What is the basis of Judaism? A practical passion and 
greed for profit. To what can we reduce his (the Jew’s) religious worship? To extortion. 
What is his real god? CASH!" 


Let us examine the record of the Soviet, where anti-Semitism is punished by death. 
This confession is from the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920: 

The Bolshevist revolution was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and dis¬ 
content. What Jewish Idealism and discontent have so powerfully contributed to ac¬ 
complish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the-Jewish mind and heart are tending 
to promote in other countries.’’ 

The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, says: "The ideals of Bolshevism are 
at many points consonant with the finest Ideals of Judaism." 

The 1919 Overman Report to Congress, quoting Rev. Dr. George Albert Simons of 
the U. S., formerly resident m St. Petersburg: "In the Northern Community of St. 
Petersburg out of 388 members only 16 happened to be Russians. All the rest were 
Jews. 265 came from the lower East Side of New York.” 

From the Dec, 29, 1934, American Patriotic Coalition Statement to a Congressional 
Committee: "The Communist movement in the U. S. is an alien conspiracy; it is treason. 
The brains and moving spirit are in Russia." 

The preface to the 1920 "World Significance of the Russian Revolution” was written 
by London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy. He admits: "Jewish dements supply the driving 
force for both Communism and Capitalism.” 

From "The Jewish State," by Theodor Herzl, Zionist Leader, we read: "When we 
Jews sink we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic); when we rise there 
also arises our terrible power of the purse" (Capitalistic). 


From "The Truth about the Slump” (1932) by A. N. Field: "The enormously 
significant thing today is that the Jewish "power of che purse" and revolutionary activity 
are working in a common direction; and there is a mass of evidence that they are working 
in unison.” Is Jewish Communism the tool used by Jewish Capitalism to subvert Gentiles? 

I believe it is. 

From the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933: '"The Roosevelt Administra¬ 
tion has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration;” 
referring to Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President;” to Felix Frankfurter as "one 
of the President's most trusted advisors;" and to New York Judge Rosenman as 
"Roosevelt's Right Arm." 

From the N. Y. Times, Jewish-owned, of June 28, 1934: "The underlying philosophy 
of the New Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court. 
The NRA (later declared unconstitutional) is almost a composite of his dissenting 

, , Arsi-.l o iQo 6 - "The Tews of America 

ccJir —*«** *« wbat - 

y° u * oin $ to do aboUt U - F w riiarv 7 1936 published a letter on the world 

The London Jewish^hrom^l t F b ^9 Qf - P g British Government, reading 

war ay former Je^idi Propaganu. g President to come into the world wav 

in part; "The only way to induce the American promising them 


From the January, 19-8, is t th naturai wor ld, your ideas, your destiny 

Marcus Eli Ravage: XT e M “ the bottom not merely of the latest great sear, 

U^^lyXorySu^^d'ttldTwtth the irresistible might of our sp.ri, 


Jewish baTta, IJthe father of the U. S. Federat R«*m 

The C^al Conferee of AmericafUbb^ larges,^-gm-tjon .of _^ 

in the world issued the; fol l?^ iri ^ fl h ent Social system. We advocate a 

Times of sept. 13, i9o6. We ch ^ en ^ . one wav m which the American people can 


SOC 'TZT^P™ no. .-"ti'V'a'b^oo ^ «« 

Lwtb^a^andTob-dTES'n.o'thioo grand balanced divisions as a bulwark aga.nsr 

fed a* rr responsibility for rho evil deed 

(Communism) hatched and planned in the^ m P ° the^on of Rabbi S. S. Wise, James 
In this politico-economic 0 «. 29, 1935: "Jew. who 

Waterman Wise, wiote in die jockeying themselves into the position of 

deny that many Jews are Communists are Mkey are Communistic, 

citizens on toleration. He imphes that tl J b Zionist Leader Maurice 

This confession appears in You Gen . ' 0 f destruction to which we 

s* :n 5s *** *« , u ^ - ■ 

Jhe an %brls,,a n Century'' of 

contains this indictment: Most ■ present ignorance is likely to be greatly 

the Jews. When they learn t jeir o Igan i 2ar j 0 n ? It is also a propagandist organization, 
disturbed. Jewry is a mutua a A UC h its vital forces tend toward solidarity unity, 

“Ta “Che population ts bound ,n have trouble because 

it is bound to MAKE trouble. 


In the Untred States the "g^ power of th^TiS 

exchanged vita. poUtico-econonuc lofortnaru.n, rs 

"’“trr^^^Lou sss&f 

?‘Sf£t^^"aper S ''abstain ton, saytng that auy person unfavorably 

r “ :: s q£ r . --j—„ s - scssj 

the following: Scribner A Sons } P American development depends 

^ “passes. ^ “ !rifli ” £ Ae Sak 

of this book. 

A research into modern religious fields in connection with the subject of this address 
uncovered the following from the London Jewish World of March 1 5, 1923: "Funda¬ 
mentally, Judaism is anti-Christian." 

From the N. Y. Jewish National Day of Dec. 14, 1935: "The public schools must 
be kept clear of Christmas carols and other Christmas influences. We want all. this 
Christmas propaganda stopped," 

The January 10. 1937, issue of the Jewish N. Y. Morning Freiheit, printed this 
attack: According to the Jewish Religion, the Pope is the enemy of the Jewish people 
by the very fact that he is the head of the Catholic Church. The Jewish Religion is 
opposed to Christianity, and to the Catholic Church in particular.'’ 

You may wonder how a minority can control the economic life of the majority. But 
one man with command over a million dollars can dominate 100 others dependent for 
their existence upon his resources. The number of Jews do not count. Money-control does, 
ft works behind Gentile Fronts. One subversive key-post Jew, backed by the practically 
unlimited wealth of Jewish Solidarity, can easily dominate his associates. And the power 
of gold enables Jews to crowd Gentiles out of and monopolize the avenues of opportunity. 

The 40% Jewish proportion of the population of Greater New York represents the 
largest centralization of jews in the world. New York is the Power Center of the U. 5. 
Washington is the Political Power Center of the U. S. More Jews admittedly hold 
key-positions in the present national regime than in any other. 

All this is not "by accident." False leadership is responsible, in my opinion. All jews 
are not guilty, but all Jews are "under control.'' Many have told me they did not like 
that leadership. They said they could not get rid of it. I pointed out that the world, 
which disciplines a man who refuses to discipline himself, would probably do it drastic¬ 
ally, in self-defense. 

The quotations I have listed in the address are taken mostly from Jewish records. 
While the surface has barely been scratched, I believe they furnish significant evidence 
as to the " 'Anti-Semitic' Causes Of Today.” 


The following question was asked by a priest-member of the audience: 

"Since Mr. Edmondson has attacked Jews on economic grounds, why have they 
attacked him in court on RELIGIOUS grounds'” 

The answer is that the camouflage strategy of Jewish leadership is to divert attention 
from the heart of the matter, which they cannot answer, and in reply merely enter a 
general denial—considered in law to reflect a weak case. 

And, having been attacked in court on religious grounds, there was no alternative 
for the defendant but to extend his investigations beyond the politico-economic field 
into that of the so-called Jewish Religion—which he began immediately after indictment 
in 1936, proceeding to assemble his findings in exhibit form for submission to court m 
rebuttal—as well as to broadcast them in line with his masthead declaration: "Pitiless 
Publicity is the Cure for Public Evils." 


Evidence of a control poLicy is found in the 1936-7 Jewish Year Book, 
just out, where, on Pages 224-5 the following statement is made after reference 
to the LaGuardia court action against Robert Edward Edmondson for "libeling 
all persons of the Jewish Religion”: 

"'The Lawyers' Advisory Committee of the American Jewish Committee 
* * * reached the conclusion that recourse to law and efforts to secure additional 
legislation were seldom advisable. The report pointed out the possibility of 
evoking UNDESIRABLE publicity; the difficulty of bringing an action which 
will not MAKE A MARTYR of the defendant; and the PARAMOUNT 
NECESSITY of refusing to take any action that would VIOLATE THE CON¬ 
PRESS AND OF ASSEMBLY. It may be the part of wisdom to adopt prin¬ 
cipally a long-range program of education." 


A demurrer was filed on March 16, 1937, in the Edmondson Case, with 
supporting brief containing the following, accompanied by documents quoted 

"The N. Y. Statute defining libel does not make it a crime co publish 
defamatory matter concerning a race, religion or class (group) of people. 

"Clearly, all the bulletins listed are treatment of subjects of governmental 
administration and public interest, which defendant published with good 
motives and for justifiable ends in honest belief of their truth. 

An appendix in support of the Demurrer includes the following: 

The following is from Exhibit 38: "The Patriotic Crusade defining aims, policies 
and objectives, of the indictment "bill of particulars: I stand for American religious 

and racial freedom under the Constitution forever; but 1 am unalterably against Jewish 
Minority Politico-Economic Monopoly over the American Majority. Is there any religious 
libel in that? 

The following is from the Jewish Magazine "Reflex" of November, 1927; 

"The modern rabbi is a man of the world. He is valued most as the executive 
manager of the wealthy congregation. He knows and cherishes the power of money, and 
is an adept in matters of finance, mortgages and loans." 

From the .August, 1927. issue of the same magazine: "Rabbi means master, intellec¬ 
tual master. Neither by law nor tradition is he a priest or a healer. He has no religious 
function whatever.” 

On* Page 368 of "Anti-Semitism: Its History and Causes, ' the Jewish Author, 
Bernard Lazare, declares: "Nor is Lt only Talmudism that is dying; but the Jewish Re¬ 
ligion itself is in its death agony." 

"Judaism has been described by Moses Mendelsohn, learned Jew, in this way: 'Judaism 
is not a religion but a law religionized.’ Judaism is not a religion. It is a sect with 
Judaism as a rite."—Taken from "Occult Theocracy” by Lady Queenborough. 

The "Holyday Prayers,” a "New Ritual for New Year and Day of Atonement." 
eleventh edition. Bloch Publishing Co., "The Jewish Book Concern,” New York, pub¬ 
lished in 1936, contains the following Kol Nidre under the heading Evening Service for 

"All vows and self-prohibitions, oaths, vows of abstinence and promise, vows with 
self-imposed penalties and obligations, which we may vow, swear, promise and bind 
ourselves from this day of Atonement until the next day of Atonement—may it come to 
us in happiness—we repent them all. May they be absolved, cance led and made null and 
void, without power or binding-force. May such vows, self-prohtbmons and oaths be 
considered as non-existent.” 

Commenting upon Kol Nidre. the Jewish Encyclopedia, Page 541 makes the following 
statement- "It cannot be denied that, according to the unusual wording of-the formula, 
an unscrupulous man might think that it offers a means of escape from the obligations 
and promises which he had assumed and made in regard to others . . .Many judges 
refused to allow them (Jews) to take a supplementary oath, basing their objections 

chiefly on this prayer.” 

Defendant a non-churchman, noted that The London Jewish Chronicle 
4 1919 said ’that: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many points consonant 
Finest Ideals of Judaism”; that the London Jewish World of March 15, 1923, 
"Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian. 

Describing the emancipation of the Jews, Jewish Author Bernard Lazare in 
"Anti-Semitism, Its History," makes the following statement: "The Jews made 
conouest for which thev were armed—that economic conquest for which they 
preparing themselves so many years. By holding gold, they became masters 
masters. They dominated them.” 

of April 
with the 

his book 
the only 
had been 
of their 


The following is quoted from "Anti-Semitism Yesterday and Tomorrow,” a 1936 
book by Rabbi Lee Levinger, Chapter 1: "In the year 59 before the Christian era, Marcus 
Tullius Cicero, the leading orator and lawyer of his day, was defending a certain Lucious 
Valerius Flaccus against the charge of embezzling various funds, including some which 
had been collected by Jews to send to their temple in Jerusalem. In that farnous speech 
C,cero remarked: 'Next comes the malicious accusation about the go d of the Jews, it 
is this count in the indictment, Laeiius, that has made you pick out this place; and that 
is responsible for the crowd around us. You know very well how numerous that class is, 
with what unanimity they act, and what strength they exhibic in political meetings. But 

I shall frustrate their purpose. I shall speak in a low tone, just loud enough for the 

jury to hear. There is no lack of men, as you very well know, co stir up these fellows 

against me and every patriotic citizen; and I have no intention .of making the cask of 

such mischief-makers lighter by any act of mine.' ” 

At the 1934 N. Y. State election for Governor, Lehman was Democratic candidate, 
Moses Republican nominee, Solomon the Socialist and Amter the Communist, all Jews. 

The front page of the Sth edition of the afternoon Chicago American of April 6, 
1936, had a seven-column head: "Secret Meeting against Horner" (Solomon Levy)’ 
Governor of Illinois, over an arcicLe quoting Mayor Kelly in a Jew-warning speech under 
the auspices of "The Democratic League of Chicago." with a political address by Jewish 
President-Alderman Jacob M. Arvey, during which the latter is quoted as saying; "I resent 
the fact that this (racial) propaganda has been started. I am a Jew first and then a 


Following are Excerpts from "The Mystical Body of Christ in The Modern World,' 1 
by Rev. Dennis Fahey, Blackrock College, Dublin. This 1935 book carries the Imprimatur 
of the Catholic Church: 

"In April, 1919, there was published by the command of His Majesty, and by His 
Majesty’s Stationery Office, a White Paper entitled Russia.’ No. 1 (1919). A Collection 
of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, as below: 

" 'Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one 
form or another over Europe and the whole world. It is organized and worked by 
Jews who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the 
existing order of things ... I would beg that this report be telegraphed as soon as 
possible in cypher in full to the British Office in view of its importance.' 

"Why did this official White Paper . . . disappear from circulation and become un¬ 
obtainable? And why was there published in its place an abridged edition, in which this 
particular passage was eiiminared? 

"It is obviously and logically clear that there is only one race on earth that has any 
interest in the suppression of this official document, and that race is the Jewish race." 

"Asia," the magazine, on Page 223 of the February-March issue of 1920, printed 
this: "In all Bolshevist institutions the heads are Jews. They are contemptuous of every¬ 
one, which excices the people against them. They. look upon Bolshevism as Jewish. 
Anti-Semitism is widespread in the Red Army. There is a great national religious fervor 
among the Jews. They believe that the promised time of the rule of 'God’s elect' on earth 
is come.” 

"Al" Smith’s "New Outlook” magazine of February, 1954, contained the following 
under the signature of James E. Abbe, author of "I Photograph Russia:" "The men who 
control Russia are not Russians. Members of the Jewish race from all over the world, 


The following letter, dated Aug. 21. 1936, signed by Louis Waldman, Jewish 
Attorney, addressed to the New York Herald Tribune, was printed on the editorial page 
of that paper August 29: 

"May I congratulate you upon your sane and sound editorial in today’s Tribune 
(Aug. 27, 1936), entiled 'Anti-Semitism as Criminal Libel'? 

"For the disseminators of anti-Semitic propaganda I have nothing but loathing; 
but the remedy sought to be invoked by Mayor LaGuardia is socially dangerous and 
legally unsound. 

"If the law', under which the disseminator (the defendant) of anti-Semitic propa¬ 
ganda in New York is sought to be held, is sustained, then freedom of expression and 
criticism will have received a fatal blow from most unexpected sources." 

In his letter of June 8, 1936, demanding action against defendant Edmondson, 
Mayor LaGuardia said in part: "It is repulsive to all thinking persons that religious 
prejudice and racial hatreds exist in this country. This type of agitation may incite a 
breach of peace and public disorder. You will find startlingly similar motives established 
in the case of Rex vs. Osborne in London, 1932. The law laid down in that case is the 
law today in this country. The remedy js by invoking the law of criminal libel if the 
statements are not truthful and the motive unlawful." 

Defendant challenges Mayor LaGuardia to produce AUTHENTIC evidence that his 
publications caused a single breach of the peace or violence either before or after the 
indictment of nine months ago. 



From Edmondson bulletin of Apr. 27, 1937: 

Following is the substance of an address delivered recently by Robert 
Edward Edmondson before a private and informal group of New York men 
and women: 

Communism—also known as Internationalism, Marxism, Socialism and Bol- 
shevism—has mysteriously and steadily gamed in America doling the past 
twentv years despite growing anti-Commumst activity, until we are now' im¬ 
mediately confronted with the nationalization of our youth, undermining of 
our individual property right, destruction of our great Constitution through 
proposed sabotage of the Supreme Court Guardianship. 

If the SHOCKING FACTS are not soon received by citizens with open 
minds, Americans and their Government of, by and for We, The People, ARE 


A pall of FALSE FEAR seems to paralyze the defense-initiative of higher 
intelligence, culture and wealth. That fear would evaporate like sun-pierced fog 
if the news censorship now blinding National Patriotism is thrown off. 

I'm not an alarmist. I'm just a hard-boiled veteran newspaperman who 
stands with Lincoln— Let the People Know the Truth, the WHOLE Truth— 
and the Country will be SAFE." Otherwise, if the great sound middle-class of 
America is not awakened and informed, I dread to contemplate the future. 

Since discovering the Cause of Communism in April, 1934, I have been 
conducting a patriotic DEFENSIVE campaign against the False Leadership of 
the International Jewish Economic System, announcing that I was not against 
Jews as individuals or as to their race or religion—Yet I am now DEFEND¬ 
ING in the courts, an indictment brought, against me by a New York Grand 
Jury the majority of which were Jews, who alleged that I had libeled the Jewish 
Religion, whereas the Jewish ECONOMIC System only was exposed. 

The explanation lies in the fact that the economic accusation is unanswer¬ 
able, and the screen of religion is invoked as a camouflage diversion. 

My own resources have been exhausted by this patriotic drain; but I have 
been instrumental, through the magnificent co-operation and sacrifice of patri¬ 
otic groups throughout the country, in exposing this plot in detail to over 10 
million people. In this connection, I would like to say that 90% of my general 
support has come from outside the big cities. 

In the final analysis this is not my fight, but that of the whole nation. 

Imperative in this great crisis is the support of Americans who believe in 
our form of Government, in our Constitution, in our Liberty—patriots who are 
against allowing Socialists, Communists and Jewish Internationalists, through 
political corruption, to invade our country and prostitute its great system to 
their own ends. 

There ought to be financial millions ready for such a grand service. There 
should have been millions behind this crusade before now. The preservation of 
American Institutions is worth ANY sacrifice. In this country true Individual 
.Libertv was bom. Here British Subjects and Black Slaves became FREE 

Americans are long suffering, over-tolerant, self-sacrificing; but the time 
has come when there will be a trial of the question as to whether or not they 


are WORTHY of and FIT for the unprecedented individual liberty the United 
States Constitution confers upon them. We may have to pass through the Valiev 
of the Shadow—like Russia, Germany, Hungary, Spain. 

The False Leadership of International Jewry covets this Promised Land 
of ours more than any other. 

The struggle converges on our country, which has been seized through 
secret controls ot the Press, Politics and Economics. 

America is now in FULL CRISIS '! And I cannot impress it upon you 
too earnestly—"IT IS LATER THAN YOU THINK!" 


The following was printed under date of May 3, 1937: 

"The American Hebrew," at a Waldorf-Astoria Hotel banquet on May 2, 
1957, presided over by International Jewish Banker Henry Morgenthau, Sr., 
hung a medal on New York half-Jew Mayor LaGuardia, in consideration of— 

Having had Robert Edward Edmondson, native American of the Scotch 
Minority, indicted for alleged libel of a non-existent ''Jewish Religion": and 
whose patriotic exposures of Jewish-Communist Conspiracies are preposterously 
denounced in the formal medal presentation as "rabid anti-Semitic incitations of 
one Robert Edward Edmondson, LONG SUSPECTED AS AN ALLY OF 
SUBVERSIVE UN-AMERICAN FORCES," resulting in the "indictment of 
Edmondson on a charge of criminal libel for traducing the Jewish Community" ; 
this last phrase being a deliberate lie, for the charge reads "libeling all persons of 
the Jewish Religion." 

(As the aforesaid indictment has not even been acted upon by a trial-court 
—the District Attorney having failed to set trial since it was brought over ten 
months ago—the farcical character of the presentation is obvious.) 

"Mayor LaGuardia's selection (for the medal) was based on his devotion 
... to A FAIR DEAL FOR ALL New Yorkers irrespective of race or creed," 
unctuously announced the "great" International Banker Morgenthau. 

Americans did not. START this fight; BUT THEY ARE GOING TO 
FINISH IT; and those who get in their way will do well to beware the wrath 
of an outraged people. This is not a threat; it is not even a warning; it is a 
prophecy which will be fulfilled when Citizen Patriots take back their own. 

(Edmondson Bulletin of May 10, 1937) 

Rabbi Stephen Wise, Zionist Leader, and noted for his sympathies for 
several subversive movements, is the Editor of the Monthly Magazine 'Opinion.’ 

The April (1937) number carried the mention of three prizes awarded to 
writers on the subject; "The Way to Combat Anti-Semitism.” 

One of the prize-winners was Rabbi Victor Eppstein, graduate of the 
Jewish Institute of Religion. He says: 

The present program of palliative relief must give way to a program of 
fundamental reconstruction. American Democracy MUST BE SOCIALIZED 
by subjecting industrial production and distribution to the will of the Peoples' 
Congress. The first step is to ABOLISH the Federal veto and to enlarge the 
express powers of the National Government through immediate constitutional 

"At the same time, energetic measures must be adopted to prevent the 
inevitable reactionary attempt to overthrow democracy ' n America, let it be B 

systematically removing from key positions in army 

Rabbi Wise is the leader of the American Jewish Congress, and his 
endorsement of Victor Eppsteins anti-American utterances implies the approval 
of leaders of Jewry in the United States. 

(Made Sept. 1, 1937) 


Trial of Robert Edward Edmondson, N. Y. City Publisher, indicted June 
11 1936 on a charge of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion, has 

been set for September 13, 1937, after a delay of about one year, during which 
time Mayor LaGuardia's alleged "danger to the peace of the community has 
been allowed to roam at large, since the District Attorney has had the power at 
any time to bring the case to trial. 

Justice Philip J. McCook of the State Supreme Court, on May 28, 1937, 
denied motion fot removal of the case from the jurisdiction of the New York 
City General Sessions Courts, to the Supreme Court ot Rockland or ertchester 
Counties; which motion was made on the ground that a rair trial in the midst of 
the greatest aggregation of Jew's in the world is .impossible because of their 
enormous secret politico-economic influence; and in consideration ot the long 
list of invariably unfavorable rulings quoted heretofore. 

Are patriotic citizens to be suppressed from exposing to their countrymen 
Communistic or other conspiracies to overthrow their government on the theory 

1 2 to 0 denials of defendant's relief motions in favor of the Jews have been 

made in New York City courts. 

While financial aid is needed for an EFFECTIVE presentation of the 
Edmondson Case, this is not a personal solicitation for charity funds. I nurse no 
personal ambitions; nor have I a martyr complex. I merely to be of 
practical service to my country. 

I repeat, this is not a charity-solicitation. BUT IT IS A CHALLENGE 
TO AMERICAN FAIRPLAY, and a Summons to High Duty. 

The defendant has steadily maintained that a self-preservation fight should 
require no salesmanship. 

This is YOUR fight. 

If I am convicted, so is Free Speech. 

With Freedom of Press further subverted—THE PUBLIC PERISHES. 
Are those who refuse to act substantially against the acuce danger worthy of 
and fit for Constitutional Liberty? They cannot dodge the consequences of 
dodging their responsibilities. 


Edmondson Today—YOU Tomorrow! 



In September, 1937, Defendant Edmondson received the following testi¬ 
monial'dated Sept. 4, i>*37, signed by tne delegates from 22 nations to an 
anti-Jewish Congress assembled in nrfurt, Germany: 

"Your case of World Jewry versus yourself wnich is to be tried on Sept. 
13th, and which now has a world reputation, has been much discussed by those 
present at tms conierence, and admiration expressed for the valiant light you 
are putting up on beftail of our Aryan Civilization against the pernicious 
forces of Judan. 

"We are sending this to show you that we are thinking of you, and admire 
you for your tenacity ana great moral courage in fighting this greatest of all 
lights against Jew domination ol all we hold noDle and sacred. 11 

The following reply, sent to the members of that Congress, was broadcast: 

' I have received your fraternal greeting containing the signatures of the 
representatives of 22 nations in convention assemoled, endorsing mv crusade 
in behalf of tree speech and national patriotism againsc international Jewry— 
World Enemy No. 1 . 

"This unqualified generous testimonial of commendation from the highest 
assemblage of our Noble Cause of Liberation has overwhelmed me, who am 
but an humble instrument. 

"Adequately to express appreciation would require the gifted eloquence 
of my great countryman Patrick Henry, whose immortal "Give me Liberty or 
give me Death" brought freedom to America, and has ever been for me a 
source of inspiration. 

"What can withstand embattled patriots of the civilized nations acting 
concertedly against the anti-nationalism of a Jewish International economic 
system made mad by 'the terrible power of the purse’—to quote the words 
of Zionist Leader Herzl? 

"Although New York's Jewish Mayor LaGuardia instigated this free 
speech persecution on June 8, 1936, followed by my indictment June 11 on a 
charge of publishing a libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion,' the matter 
has again been postponed to Nov. 15 , 1937, when my Gentile Counsel and I 
shall fearlessly face the court and demand acquittal in the name of justice. 

"On with the self-preservation fight!" 


Based on a World Jewry poll, 120 "greatest living Jews" are in a Jewish 
"Hail of Fame" based on "contributions to humanity," as published Sept. 25, 
1937, in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune. The following are included in this 
"'Roll of Honor:" 

Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet Communist Foreign Minister, bandit-criminal. 

Leon Blum, Ex-French Socialist-Communist Premier, whose book "Du 
Mariage" favors incest, 

Judah L. Magnes, American Rabbi who admits Jews are leaders in all 
revolutionary movements. 

Felix Frankfurter, whom Ex-President Theodore Roosevelt branded as 

Louis Dembitz Brandeis, reputed "Father" of the Communistic New Deal. 


(Edmondson Bulletin of November 15, 1937) 

Jewish Religion libel case against Robert Edward Edmondson, has again been 
put off to Monday, Feb. 7, 1938. 

the statement made by the District Attorney, notwithstanding the undisputed 
fact that the defendant has been held for seventeen months under heavy bail, 
large expense and in restricted conditions. 

Is this equivalent to a confession that there IS no case against the defendant? 

By the force of the circumstances involved, the defendant was obliged 
reluctantly to assent to further delay, despite his preparedness as implied by his 
having already subpoenaed FOR THE DEFENSE, for trial as of Nov. 15, the 
following partial list of witnesses—which the New York newspapers signifi¬ 
cantly called an "All Star Cast:" 

Mayor F. H. LaGuardia, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Bernard M. Baruch, 
Samuel Untermyer, James P. Warburg, Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Rabbi Sidney 
E. Goldstein, Congressman Samuel Dickstein, Columnist Walter Lippmann, 
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Brandeis’ daughter Susan; Former "American 
Hebrew” President David A, Brown, Editor Samuel Margoshes of "The Jewish 
Day;" Communist M. J. Olgin; N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosen- 
man, called "Founder" of Roosevelt's "Brain Trust" and Roosevelt’s "Right 
Arm;’’ Charney Vladeck, James Waterman Wise, Rabbi Israel Goldstein, Col. 
Edward Mandel House; Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor of the Brooklyn "Jewish 
Examiner;" Prof. John Dewey; A. A. Berle, Jr., N. Y. City Chamberlain; 
Roger N. Baldwin, Director of the American Civil Liberties Union. 

(The Edmondson Defense effected subpoena service on additional "star 
witnesses" Prof. Felix Frankfurter and Secretary of Labor Perkins while they 
attended The Survey Associates banquet at the Biltmore Hotel in N. Y. City 
on Dec. 2, 1937. Prof. Rexford G. Tugwell, Col. E. M. House and Gen. Hugh 
S. Johnson also have been subpoenaed to testify for the Defense at the post¬ 
poned trial on Feb. 7, 1938.) 

The manner in which the various "princes" accepted subpoena service is 
amusing in some instances. Baruch, Rosenman, Lippmann accepted quietly. 
Samuel Untermyer was explosive—■”} have never been summoned in this man¬ 
ner before; it is an outrage: I will break 'em in pieces!’’ 

Rabbi Wise bellowed, when served in the hallway, of his building after 
failure in his office, "I have been betrayed!” 

Morgenthau meditatively commented; "Oh yes, Edmondson; he is 

Rabbi Margoshes was at first mellow: "I shall be most happy to testify 
against Mr. Edmondson." The Process Server retorted: "But you are summoned 
to testify for defendant.” Margoshes exploded: "That’s all cock-eyed!' 


Below arc extracts from the three speeches of — 

(1) Captain Hc-nry Hamilton Beamish, Founder of the Anti-Jewish movement in 
Great Britain, member of a prominent, old English family (Oct. 30, Oct. 31, Nov, 1) ; 

(2) Adrien Arcand, Leader of the National Unity Party of Canada (Ocr. 30, 
Oct, 31, Nov, 1); 

(3) Robert Edward Edmondson of New York City (Oct. 31, Nov. 1). 

The addresses were delivered in New York City as follows: October 30, at trie 
N, Y, Hippodrome, October 31 at a private banquet in the Harvard Club. November 1, 
193 "7. to a private assembly in a prominent club house. 

Bv Robert Edward Edmondson 

The high honor of welcoming to the U. S., Veterans Beamish and Arcand In the 
national patriotic movement against the International Jewush System, was alloted to Robert 
Edward Edmondson at the October 31 meeting of American leaders. Part of his address 
is given below: 

"This is more than a happy event. The NEW HISTORY that is in the making will 
not fail to record it. 

"Captain Beamish, Veteran anc Dean of this historic movement of Liberation, REAL 
representative of the Jew-opposed people of Great Britain, brings a world-message of 

"You will have the priceless privilege of listening to Nestorian words nf wisdom 
from a great-hearted Soldier-Statesman who KNOWS whereof he speaks by the unim¬ 
peachable authority of two-score years of SELFLESS PERSONAL SERVICE to a world- 


"Down from the North has come Adrien Arcand, Leader ot the National Unity 
Party of Canada, a gifted young 'White Knight without reproach or shame,' a flame of 
youthful ardor, bearing his 'Key to the Mystery' and a clarion call to arms from the 
embattled patriots of historic Quebec, organized and ready to defend God, Home and 


"In this great crisis, can we doubt that were the Immortal Lincoln alive touay he 
would reiterate: ’Let the people KNOW THE TRUTH—and the WORLD is safe -1 

"We stand uncompromisingly FOR the basic constructive principles that make for 
human welfare and REAL progress. We also stand unalterably and ACTIVELY 'ANTI' 
Jewish ideologies and their subveisive practices. 

" 'Not to be ANTI is to SURRENDER the FIGHTING Spirit,' warns Nesta H. 
Webster, celebrated author of 'World Revolution-’ To win this war, you must not onLy 
have knowledge and courage, but a selfless last ditch determination.' Without it, you are 
LICKED before you start. 

"Fellow Patriots Beamish and Arcand, as an America Patriot I warmly welcome you 
to my Country and to 'Kosher' New York. We stand shoulder to shoulder with you and 
all White Men in this militant defense against that Jewish System which is destroying 
Nationalism and Western Civilization. 

"We have not been idle here in these United States. Your speaker got himself in¬ 
duced and is to be tried on a charge of libeling 'alt persons of the Jewish Religion'— 
millions of them, everywhere, dead and alive. 

"This feat was accomplished, not by attacking the so-called Jewish Religion, but by 

Many people have insisted that this case would never come to trial. That dangerous 
premise has heavily handicapped us ■ financially. Who wants to help where apparently 
none is needed? 

"Knowing that this enemy NEVER gives up, I personally have not shared that 
opinion, and have gone steadily ahead with exhaustive preparations, It there IS a 
dismissal, it will be due to that THOROUGH preparation at heavy expense, combined 
with frequent costly legal broadcasts exposing the LAW-weakness of the persecutors. 

"Above all else, the false leaders of che Jewish System fear adverse publicity, per¬ 
sonal initiative, forceful courage and calculated audacity. 

"Our only problem is financial. There should be behind this Americanism move¬ 
ment now hundreds of thousands of dollars to make effective the work of thousands of 

"This momentous matter rests on an exceptionally broad foundation. For the first 
time in history, International Jewry has been publicly exposed as a predatory SYSTEM— 
an ECONOMIC system. What happened’ 


"A FALSE camouflage RELIGIOUS indictment was brought. Ponder this: Are 
ECONOMICS and the Jewish RELIGION the same thing? The economic exposu-re 
remains unchallenged. It cannot be refuted. 

"The Jewish System of these Perpetual Aliens' —a term Captain Beamish tells me 
was applied to them by Lord Chief Justice Coke of England—has broken down our 
Economic System. 

"It has rotted our politics by Bribery, Blackmail and False Propaganda; it has 
-corrupted our Judiciary with complicated rules of procedure that prostitute our con¬ 
stitutions; it has converted into 'kept men of the press' our Journalists and Publishers 
through sinister advertising control, overthrowing rhe Free Speech First Line of 
Defense; it has publicly ridiculed our National Patriotism and pacifized us into cowards 
and poltroons. 

"With whose resources has this 'Plan of Hell' carried on? 


" 'How DEEP are the sources of your indignation?’ 

” ‘When wild the IRON in America's soul be touched? 

"The Edmondson Defense goes into Court with clean hands, unafraid, and armed 
with the Might of Truth. 

"But we do so under the shadow of a colossal economic power, and with a pitiful 
financial inadequacy. 

"If convicted, we shall appeal—to the United States Supreme Court—IF IT RUINS 
US; for we are in a life and death struggle for EXISTENCE. 



By Captain Beamish 

"We are engaged in the greatest war history has ever known. The question is, 
whether the Jew shall rule the world, or we white men. 

"The chairman has said that I was the originator or the movement in England. 
After taking part in three wars, I was tired seeing millions of people wiped out for 
this race of Asiatics. 

"Jews, being aliens in our midst, they must be segregated. 

"The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. I found all the gold and diamond mines 
were owned by Jews; that Rothstein controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Samuels 
controlled oil; Baum controlled other minerals, and Moses controlled base metals. Any¬ 
thing those people touch they inevitably pollute. 

"What we have to realize today is that the Jews are working overtime to bring on 
another war. The position is serious. 

"There are very few newspapers not owned or controlled by Jews except in. the 
countries that have named the Bolshevists as the enemies of mankind. 

"In discussing the Jew question, we must be conscious of the fact that we are 
white people. We must not mix race with religion. 

"The answer to the problem is to be found only in one of three ways: 

(1) Kill them, which is out of the question. 

(2) Sterilize them, which is out of the question. 

(3) Segregate them—and there is only one place, Madagascar." 

"I have been in many countries, but conditions in New York are perfectly appalling 
to me. 

"The whole essense of this fight is moral courage. Robert Edward Edmondson is a 
great fighter. Large numbers of people will die for their country, but few will live for ic. 

"In 1848 the word "anti-Semitic" was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the 
word ' 'Jew. ” The right word for them is "Jew." We are not against the Syrians, 
Armenians and Arabs, all of them Semities. 

"I implore all of you to be accurate—call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate 
on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be 
satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open and you 
were then free. Now he has got you absolutely by the throat—that is your reward. 

"Who rules Russia? How do you account for the fact that out of 550 commissars 
in Russia only 17 are Russians? 

"You must have leadership—not dictatorship. In England there is not a soul we 
would follow. You must get a leader and define definitely what you stand for. 

"I have discovered the spot for the segregation of the Jews. It is the only place in 
the world—Madagascar. The map of the island shows it to be 1,000 miles long, and it 
will hold 100,000,000 people. Segregation is the solution of our problem, and there is 
the place for segregation of the Jews.” 


by Adrien Arcand 

"I think that all of us here are fighting Communism. I do it politically. 

"Many times I have read in the press of this country and of my own, in all man* 
Tiers of tides, that I am a Nazi and in the pay of Chancellor Hitler. So was it said of 
my good friend Beamish. Well, Mr. Beamish began his work 40 years ago, and since 
Chancellor Hitler is 44 years old, Mr. Beamish must have begun to receive Hitler’s money 
when the latter was only 4 years old 1 

"Being not a German nor in Germany, I cannot be a Nazi. And I am no more in 
Hitler's pay than the great Edouard Drumont of France who fought the same fight for 
50 years; no more in Hitler’s pay than the great Edward the First of England who 
expelled the jews from his country in order to save it. 

The more Communism has been fought in the last ten years, the more progress it 
has made in our midst. There is a reason for it. 

"Communism has been fought as an intangible whilst it is the most material thing 
in this world. 

"Communism is no doctrine, no set of principles. It is but a criminal plan. 

"It is not by hazard that wherever Marxism comes to power, Jews also immediately 
come to power. In Soviet Russia, out of 550 higher officials 88 per cent are Jewish. 

"When it came to Spain we saw Azana and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela- 
Kun, Szamueily, Agoscon and a dozen ocher Jews; in Belgium, Marxian Socialism brought 
to power Vandervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian 
Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum, Mandel, Zyromsky; in Italy we' had seen 
the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. 

"Jews, in all their sacred and profane books, fanaticize themselves with the idea 
that they are 'The Chosen People;’ that the whole world belongs to them by birthright; 
that all Gentile races were made to be servants of Israel; that Jews must and will some 
day own the whole wealth of this planet. 

"How are they to get that wealth? If they use force, they know well that they will 
be repelled by force. 

"So, they have invented a devilish scheme. 

"There is nothing in Communism but a Jewish conspiracy to grab the world. 

"It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is—a Jewish 
scheme invented by Jews, profitable only to the Jews—that It has progressed against 
all opposition to ic. 

"One of Jew slogans is 'TOLERANCE/ which is the basis of the other slogan 
‘No race, color or creed discrimination.’ The Jew has only to yell ’TOLERANCE,’ and 
the whole of Gentility immediately becomes paralyzed. 

"But what is Tolerance? It is a word used only for evil. Can you tolerate Virtue, 
Good, Justice, Beauty? No, because they have rights by and in themselves. They exist 
by right and not by tolerance. 

"On the other hand, things that have no rights, as an epidemic of vice, a fault, a 
defect, we tolerate. 

"In consequence of it all, we have seen a handful of anti-Christian Orientals conquer 
political, economic and social power in Occidental Christian countries. 

"The world is not brought to Communism 'just like that/ and people won't re¬ 
nounce their property from night to day. There were long preparations for that stage. 

"It began with the so-called democracy brought by the Jews through the llluminacti 
one hundred and fifty years ago. 

"Having a hold of the upper Internationale, the GOLD one, they got a hold of the 
lower one, the proletarian; and they squeeze the bourgeoisie between the two, so as to 
eliminate the only remaining national forces of resistance. 

"One of your great patriots once said; Give me liberty or give me death/ I believe 
in more than that, for liberty is not a thing to be demanded, but to be worked for, fought 
for, WON. 

"When a patriot can no more mention the enemies of his nation and faith without 
being arrested—as has happened in this city—it is rime that people think of recovering 
their lost liberty. 

"Jews control 90 per cent of the world and national powers. They have but one 
item more to get; POLITICAL POWER. They have the economic, that of propaganda, 
that of International controls. AND COMMUNISM IS THE INSTRUMENT FOR 


an a 3S 3 ^ 

MO 'rrto°^ N y gratitude and P» fo “^ 

who, with, his personal experience b «n^*"£ yen y£ats _ 1 a dmire Beamish the more 
engaged. He has schooled me f P neatest English families on the steps of 

because he has been brought up m one ot th g & rhe hi her ranlcs 0 f 

the English throne He could have had one o he J ,ae ^ c “ ok onlv for the release of 

““ sss?== ": 

^'sr? irffsj «®£5si£ S-; i-S5 - ~5 

more than £540,000. up to j^ d to f] ee tw k e from machine guns in Montreal. 

1 have had many trials with Jews. I had t complete destruction of linotypes— 

^ thE fi * h ' ” f M '- 

„„ ' l!, 

have ma^v^ ^ ^ ^ ^ primed about iV I have readI aU^that Mj Edijondsmbas 

-- sis. "VI gWr de,ai1 ’ ' han is the Edmoni ' 

“ S« f rtr P ^ mu? know it, as ,he dai.y papers will repor, 

1 sfi b ri? s„ e r P ?uS S3 csss, to “. k ^f w™"? 

rame they had no candidates. „ ttcetc 




(An address by Robert Edward Edmondson before Members of The Amencan 
Nationalist Party in New York, January 27, 1938) 

The subject of this address is "The Treason of Tolerance." By its thought- 
less preachment, great harm is bang done. ... 

This Fetish of Tolerance is now our most deadly foe, for it is tantamoun 
to Treason to Free Speech through indirect suppression. 

We are heavily handicapped in combatting it, for we do not want to 
antagonize a possible friend. Well does the enemy understand this psycholog), 

and play upon it. 

It is singular that tolerance is international at the source, and that it is 

says Rabbi Freehof in "Race, Nation or Religion. 

I warn patriots m this battle to beware of ALL 
ism for it is used as a wearing-down diversion or process of attrition an 
must understand that diversion is subversion, whether by frtend or foe. 

In the final analysis, we are in a war between two. great elemental forces 

_Nationalism, directed by Patriotism; and Internationalism, engineered by th 

Jewish Economic System. 


(Note: Our Republic is a great group of individuals, for mutual protection 
merged into the single organism of an individual nation, among other nations, 
each with individualized characteristics, which are the soul of real progress— 
except where Communism has destroyed individualism and personal initiative 
and leveled all individuals down into a mass bereft of intelligence, slavishly 
surrendering national sovereignty to an internationalist World Government 
like the "UN”.) 

American citizens have tolerantly leaned over backwards until they got 
"toleritis."—Was that the inspiration of Emma Lazarus' Statute of Liberty poem 
calling upon the old world to "Send us the wretched refuse of your teeming 

We got that "refuse”! 

Tolerance operates on a one-way street as handled by the majority. Minority 
tolerance of the majority is flapdoodle. 

At the expense of Gentility, Jewry huddles by itself, solidifies its unity, 
nurses ics own interest first—and then unctuously calls for mutual tolerance. 

Says Rabbi Krim in his booklet "Liberal Judaism and Liberal Christianity”: 
"The chasm dividing Jew and Christian is too deep to make a meeting of the 
two possible." 

And yet the Jews call for tolerance of their "uniqueness.” 

Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel says in his "You Gentiles” book: "Our 
two ways of life are not merely different—they are opposed IN MORTAL 

And in his next address Rabbi Wise beats his breast and bellows for more 

When you find a poisonous snake in your home, do you TOLERATE it? 
It is written that we should "Love Good and Hate Evil”—not that we should 
tolerate evil. 

Were the money-changers tolerated in the ancient temple—or were they 
lashed out with a whip? 

Virtue and truth have inherent rights. We do not tolerate rights. They 
are unalienable. Evil has no rights. Why should we compromise with a deadly 
enemy? Are we going to crucify ourselves on a Fetish of Tolerance double-cross? 

"There is a limit at which forebearance ceases to be a virtue,” said the 
great English statesman, Edmund Burke. We have PASSED THE LIMIT! 

This campaign has been maliciously called an emotional program of hatred 
of Jews. In reality, it is an educational-defense-crusade for God, Home and 

True patriots love country unselfishly, and obey the High Command, to 
hate, not jews, but the evil things their politico-economic System is doing to 
destroy America. 

We patriots want no evil violence against Jews; and we shall tolerate none 
toward us of, by and for Jews. 

Error lay in the fact that we did not fully take into consideration that the 
"Great Power of the Press”—America's main medium for exchanging informa¬ 
tion—has been almost completely destroyed by the "Terrible Power of the 

Let me give you a timely concrete example of the confusion-strategy tactics 
of this enemy who ballyhoos tolerance. 


Endowed with equipment to apply practically the principle: Publicity is 
the Cure for Public Evils,” I conceived it to be my duty and privilege to hold 
high the Torch of Truth in connection with the Jewish Problem. 

For publicly exposing Jewish Communists, N. Y. Mayor LaGuardia in 
June 1936 denounced me in the newspapers'as a religious bigot and fanatic. 

Now "that’s all cockeyed,” to employ a Jewish wisecrack Is Communism 
a religion? The Mayor had me indicted for alleged libel of ail persons of the 
Jewish-Religion.” I was attacking Jewish Communists. 

Are said "All Persons” communistic? Does gross materialism plus Com¬ 
munism equal atheism? Communist Leader Bukharin declared: Religion and 
Communism are incompatible.” Therefore, Communism isn t religion. 

Note that a religious indictment was brought for analyzing politico- 

economics. , 

The Mayor called me a bigot. Did you ever hear of a man not a member 
of any church branded "religious bigot?” My strong supporters include many 
Catholics, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Methodists, Lutherans, Christian Scien¬ 
tists, Mohammedans—at home and abroad. 

’ He also branded me a fanatic. My principal business for more than 30 
years has been that of politico-economic investment-analyst. Fanaticism and 
the analytical judicial temperament are also fundamentally incompatible, 

The real issue in the Edmondson Case is not libel. It is Freedom of the 
Press But Tews it seems, cannot "tolerate” a Free Press, for the highest official 
of the metropolis of America has arraigned Free Speech before the New 

York Bar. 

Today we are confronted with: "Survive or Perish”—as 1 Nation, as a 
People, as a Civilization. It is just as simple as that—a question ot existence. 

Now is the Eleventh Hour of Decision. We stand at the Cross Roads. The 
Right leads to Freedom and Happiness. The Left goes down to slavery. 

Which are YOU going to travel? I have made my choice—TO FIGHT 



New York, N. Y„ Jan. 28, 1938. 

Dear Mr. Wise: 

In the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Robert Edward 
Edmondson, Indictment 209220, June 11, 1936, by a Jewish majority Grand 
■Jury instigated bv Jewish Mayor LaGuardia of N. Y. City, alleging criminal 
libel 5 of "all persons of the Jewish Religion” in news bulletins issued by him 
devoted to exposing the IRRELIGIOUS Communistic politico-economic anti- 
Americanism of the Jewish Financial System. 

This is my formal authority as defendant, to you as counsel, with regard 
to the defense-position Feb. 7. 

Please state to the Court that the defendant is (1) prepared and ready for 
trial- (2) that he is unable to consent with the prosecuting District Attorney 
to any further postponement in view of the 20 months delay in this case, dur¬ 
ing any time of which the prosecution had power to try it; (3) that while he 
may submit to postponement by court order, it will be under protest m conser¬ 
vation of his fundamental rights as outlined in Amendment VI ot the U., S. 
Constitution, reading in part: 

10 0 

In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a SPEEDY' 
and public trial, by an impartial jury * * * ” 

In determining this procedure I have been guided by factors outlined be¬ 
low, in addition to the foregoing, as well as by the heavy expenses to which I 
have been unfairly subjected through unnecessary delay. 

It may be unique in criminal law for a defendant to seek trial; but this 
case itself is historically unique, as well as outrageously farcical and a disgrace 
to American jurisprudence. ' 

The Jewdsh minority people of the State now find themselves on the horns 
of a dilemma. They do not really WANT this trial with its inevitable BOOM¬ 
ERANG exposures. Neither do they want dismissal. BUT THEY DO WANT 
FREE SPEECH. And they are apparently in a conspiracy to effect such viola¬ 
tion of the Constitutions of the State of New Y r ork and of the United States. 

For the Edmondson Defense or The Courts to be ACCESSORIES to such 
continued Persecution, Suppression and Conspiracy would be a monstrous per¬ 
version of Justice. WE MUST NOT BE A PARTY TO THAT! 

After more than a year’s consideration, you have assured the defendant 
that, in yout opinion, he has acted within the law; that the important witnesses 
summoned must testify in a way such as to justify his patriotic publications. 

Furthermore, under the existing circumstances, another postponement "BY 
CONSENT” would (1) unjustly deprive the defendant of his patriotic sup¬ 
port; (2) of his own self-respect; and (3) most important ot all. since they 
are the real issues, seriously damage the great causes of Free Speech and 
National Patriotism. 

If the Court issues a postponement mandate, then, as a matter of right 
and justice, ask that bail be returned, and that the defendant be released on his 
own recognizance in view of the fact that he wants an impartial trial, and is 

As I have repeatedly stated to you, this case offers the opportunity of ages 
for bringing a gigantic inhuman subversion into the arena of corrective public 
debate—my immediate objective—which would effect emancipation by peaceful 
methods, instead of through Communistic civil war, as threatened. 

If the court refuses dismissal, the defendant will appear before it with 
clean hands, unafraid, prepared and readv to put before the jury THE WHOLE 



Before going into court, my wife and I talked the matter over. I said, 
You must share with me the responsibility of saying Ready for Trial. If the 
prosecution agrees, our entire modest fortune may be used in carrying the case 
to the U. S. Supreme Court, I have decided on my course. What is your 

"I know your decision,” my wife soberly replied. "Mine is the same. We 
shall go into court with clean hands, unafraid, trusting to a Higher Power, 
which I do not believe will desert us in this selfless fight.” 

1 0 1 


On application of District Attorney Dewey's Office, the Edmondson 
Jewish Religion criminal libel trial was again postponed by court order, on 
Feb. 7, to April IS, 1938, despite the "We are ready" announcement of De¬ 
fense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr. Bail was reduced from $2,500 to $1,000. 

Since Former District Attorney Dodge, according to the N. Y. Jewish Day 
of June 10, 1936, admitted there was no law covering the situation, how can 
the District Attorney's office EVER prepare a case when no offense was com¬ 
mitted? Editor Samuel Margoshes said: 

"When months ago some of us appealed to District Attorney Dodge 
against the torrent of anti-Semitic (Edmondson) circulars then inundating the 
streets of New York, the answer was that he was powerless to cope with the 
YORK. ' 


(A Feb. 10, 1938, address in part before American Nationalist Party in N. Y, 
City, by Robert Edward Edmondson) 

Two subjects are contained in this address. The first part analyzes Fascism, 
the second, Alienism. I wish to put myself on record by the direct question and 
answer form. 

I am more and more frequently asked: Are you a Fascist? 

The answer is: lam not. I am an American Patriot. 

Are you in favor of Nazism for the United States? 

No. That is for Germany. 

Are you an enemy of Fascism or Nazism? 

I am not. 

Webster's International Dictionary of 1935 described "Fascism'' thus: 
"An Italian organization originated by loyal patriots to oppose all radical 
elements in the country, such as Bolshevists, Communists, and the like." 

Do you believe Communism is Jewish? 

I do. It is a tool used by the Jewish Politico-Economic System to subjugate 
National Patriotism to the Jewish lust for power. 

Once the American People grasp the idea that Jews and Communism are 
allies; that Soviet socialistic motive-power is Jewish; that an alien element is 
trying to overthrow' Americanism and substitute a poisonous anti-national doc¬ 
trine for it—the result will be no longer in doubt. 

For America, I am against the Dictatorship Principle. Yet I will say this: 
As the preservation of American institutions is worth any sacrifice, if some 
temporary power-centralization becomes imperative in self-preservation, then 
true American patriots will do at the last ditch what is necessary to save them¬ 
selves, their homes and their country. 


! now come to the second section of this address. 

I find that some foreign-born citizens protest the use of the world "alien,” 
holding that it refers to them. 

If foreign-born men and women have their first papers, they are not aliens, 
in the eyes of the law'. 

Any citizen of the United States, native or foreign-born, who by action is 
loyal to ’Americanism first, is definitely NOT an alien. 

1 02 

But think over this point: Any citizen of foreign descent who imagines 
himself alien, IS NOT ALL-AMERICAN; for he has not yet absorbed true 

Know your Constitution, Citizens of the Republic. Understand its Living 
Principles, its Vital Force, its unparalleled Endowment of Individual Freedom. 
Then give it the militant devotion it inspires in true patriots. 

I repeat here the following declaration I made on Nov. 19 , 1933, during 
an address before the American National Labor Party; 

"We patriots did not START this fight—but we are going to finish it"! 


An Invitation Address (in part) Before a'Patriotic Group of Over 200, at 
the Home of Miss Caroline Mead at New Milford, N. J., on Feb. 14, 1938, 
by Robert Edward Edmondson) 

It is a high honor to be asked co appear before such a loyal group of real 
Americans—men and women who, informally gathering in this patriotic home 
in defense of their country, are willing to consecrate to it their lives, their 
fortunes and cheir sacred honor. 

It is not easy to find words to express my profound respect and deep ad¬ 
miration for the splendid type of American womanhood exemplified by Miss 
Mead. A gentlewoman by birth and nature, she has boldly taken her stand. 
Abusive and threatening attacks by the enemy have not weakened her high 
resolve to defend, protect and preserve. I salute you, Caroline Mead, as one of 
that fearless band which today is making history. It is such as you, weak in 
physical force but strong in spirit, who really win the GREAT crusades. 

We have been hearing much of late as to the next greatest war of wars. 
Fellow-citizens, we are right now in the greatest war in ail history. 

Two tremendous world elements confront each other. The Evil of Material¬ 
ism challenges the power of the Spirit of Good. 

Your speaker is not attempting to preach a sermon. He is a hard-boiled 
veteran journalist. He but employs the gifts of reportorial analysis and dramatic 
publicity to accumulate facts and present them in understandable form to his 
fellow-citizens, in the earnest hope that through enlightenment they may be 
spared many unnecessary supreme sacrifices in this momentous struggle for 

If you accept the theory that this is a war on materialism, you must also 
accept my thesis that the solution for the Jewish Problem, which I believe to 
be at the bottom of our troubles, is essentially ECONOMIC—not religious, 
racial or individual so far as America is concerned. 

Before my indictment nearly two years ago on the charge of libeling "all 
persons of the Jewish Religion," my exposures of the enemy had been confined 
to politico-economic subversions, holding that "the terrible power of the purse" 
was the most deadly weapon of the Jewish System. Since then, in self-defense, 
I have been forced to discuss the religious angle; finding that Jews always 
conduct their destructive war against Gentility by hiding behind screens of 
so-called racial and religious persecution. 

These United States were Christian-founded. The Constitution of the 
United States ends with this witnessing: "In the Year of Our Lord”—who was 
Jesus Christ, not the Jewish Jehovah. 

'"This is a Christian Nation,” is an extract from the "Holy Trinity" case 
decision by U. S. Supreme Court per Justice Brewer, Feb. 29, 1892. 

10 3 

Now, do we intend to preserve such a righteous and precious heritage of 
freedom, or shall we become the economic slaves of a materialistic minority 
with an obsession to rule the world? 

Patriarch Cristea, head of the Greek Orthodox Church, Rumania, was 
quoted in an article in the N. Y. Herald Tribune Aug. 17, 1937, as follows: 

AND SOCIAL UNREST. They monopolize The Press, which, with the aid of 
foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Rumanians. To defend 
ourselves is a NATIONAL AND PATRIOTIC DUTY—not Anti-Semitic. 

'Lack of measures to get rid of this PLAGUE would indicate that we ate 
lazy COWARDS who let ourselves be CARRIED ALIVE TO OUR GRAVES. 

"Why should the Jew-s enjoy the privilege of living LIKE PARASITES 
on our backs? Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Rumanian 
CHRISTIAN BLOOD? It is logical AND HOLY to react against them.” 

The QUICK way to win is to establish a national daily newspaper which carries 
NO ADVERTISING. Under patriotic editorial dictatorship, within six months 
such a publication would have a 6,000,000 circulation and in a year would 
prove to be the greatest financial investment ever offered tOjthe American 
public—to say nothing of saving the Republic. For such a grand patriotic service 
financial millions ought to rush, to defense. 

In solution, this problem is definitely neither racial nor religious in Amer¬ 
ica. It is ECONOMIC. By sinister usurpation of key-posts the International 
Jewdsh System has obtained control of our Financial Dynamo, New r York, and of 
the Warburg-created Federal Reserve, which has enabled it to dominate our 
Political Power Center, Washington, aided by advertising-subversion of the 
Press. The rank and file of Americans do not yet realize that the whole country 
is invisibly governed by a foreign element through the "terrible power of the 

All lew's are not deliberately subversive, but all are under a master-control 
which victimizes its own people—the greatest regimented solidarity in the world. 

Jews decline to publicly discuss the Jewish Problem. They enter a general 
denial, refusing to be catechized. That is un-American. A Representative Re¬ 
public like ours cannot exist without freedom of debate. We demand public 
solution of our problems by the Rule of Individual Reason—not through 
Communistic violence. 

Jews have been expelled from almost every civilized nation in the past. 
That means segregation in the future. 

Without ambition except to be of service to my country, I cater to no 
leadership complex. I have never shirked responsibility—and shall not now m 
this crisis. Believing that circumstances create and draft true leaders, I am 
ready to co-operate with any patriotic group not wasting time with effects. 1 
follow no policy that takes counsel with fear and compromise. No important 
issue was ever won by ignoring The Truth. In this self-preservation fight, 
pussyfooting is suicide, for we have "A Rendezvous With Death.” 

In conclusion, Ladies and Gentlemen, let me say that the Scar Spangled 
Banner will wave just so long as the Land o-f the Free is also the Home of the 

1 04 


(An Invitation Address (in part) delivered on Feb. 24, 1938, at che Fifth 
Anniversary of the German-American Bund, New York City, 
by Robert Edward Edmondson.) 

A native American, I esteem it an honor, as a guest speaker, to address 
tonight your German-American association, whose heroic brothers abroad held 
back the red tide of Jewish Communism. 

I am officially informed that every member of the Bund is a full citizen 
of the United States, In addition to that, j. Edgar Hoover, Chief of the Federai 
Bureau of Investigation, recently gave it a clc-an bill of health in a thousand- 
page report declaring nothing anti-American could be found in the organization’s 

Have you noted the latest news "FOR AND AGAINST,” in the N. Y. 
City Communist Gerson Current Case? 

''For” the DEFENCE: Simon W. Gerson and Gilbert Goodkind, Assist¬ 
ants to Manhattan Borough President Stanley M. Isaacs, with the N. Y. City 
Jewish Lawyers Guild backing the bunch. 

"For” the PROSECUTION: The American Legion by State Commander 
Jeremiah F. Cross; Maurice Stember, State Legion Adjutant; Attorney S. M. 
Birnbaum, who files ouster suit before N. Y. Supreme Court Justice B. L. 
Shientag; Abraham Rosenblum, State Legion judge-Advocate— and who else 
do you suppose? None other than Samuel Untermyer. 

APPEAL-JUDGE: Gov. Herbert H. Lehman of N. Y. State. 

What a howling farce! And Communist Leader Browder brands American 
Legion tactics as Fascist. "Jews everywhere.” 

Noting the singular set-up, since the Jewish Veterans Order bars Gentiles 
from membership, patriots are wondering why American Legionnaires not only 
admit but elect Jews to rule over them in their own camp? The American 
Legion will futilely fight Communism twenty more years if it refuses to attack 
the Jewish Cause. 

Manhattan Borough President Isaacs says "The Communist Party is legally- 
organized under the laws of the United States.” Yet in 1925 the party was out¬ 
lawed by the U. S. Supreme Court, whose verdict has not been enforced by 
the Federal authorities for some secret reason. 

We patriots -want no ’’thoroughly socialized democracy” like that de¬ 
manded by the Rabbinical Assembly of America as an "escape" from European 
Communism and Fascism. Our Representative Republic suits us. The God of 
our Fathers is the ONLY dictatorship Christian America will accept. 

Are you a "Facist”?—I am asked. The answer is: 

No. I am vigilantly PRO-American. 

Briefly, I am an American Patriot. 

Are you inclined toward Italian Fascism for America? 

No. The dictatorship-regimentation thereof is un-American. In a bulletin 
of April 22, 1935, headed. "Roosevelt Impeachable,” I charged that the "Liber¬ 
ties of our people had been Communistically suppressed and Fascistically cen¬ 
tralized” by the New Dealers. 

Do you favor German Nazism for the United States? 

I do not. 


But—Nationalist, Fascist, Nazi or Vigilance, we ALL agree on the MAIN 
issue in this self-preservation fight—we are And-jewish because the material¬ 
istic Jewish System is destroying our blood-bought liberties. 

To his Army of Liberation my revered countryman, George Washington, 
welcomed ihe great German von Steuben, the Polish hero Kosciusko, and the 
French General Lafavette. What better example could an American patriot 
emulate today than to welcome to this self-preservation fight against Inter¬ 
national Communism, the volunteer patriot-sons of German descent/ 

Then you stand to the last ditch for American Government under its 
written Constitution? 

I do. I believe, with Gladstone, that, as originally written, "it is the great¬ 
est document ever struck off by the hand and brain of man." It has been Com- 
munisticaliy subverted while we patriots were off guard. 

Do you believe rescue can be effected without supreme sacrifices? 

No- It is our job to educate citizens to the danger as fast as possible. 

George Washington the Father of Our Country, endorsed vigilance in 
these warning farewell words: "The batteries of internal and external enemies 
will be constantly and actively—often covertly and insidiously directed against 
your Political Fortress. Watch over its preservation with JEALOUS care. 

When the Washington Political Power Center becomes subverted—as it 
has been by an alien "terrible power of the purse"—state communities must 
form Patriotic Vigilance Committees to devise ways and means to recapture 
rights wrongfully seized. 

And when their priceless heritages have been rescued and restored, mili¬ 
tant American Vigilantes voluntarily return to the arts of peace their Principle 
of Self-Government having been patriotically vindicated without the dangers of 
a central dictatorship. 

I will say this: If Communism does gain , the ascendency in the United 
States, then it may be imperative temporarily to establish some form of central 
coalition authority. To save Americanism is worth any sacrifice. 

Let me repeat briefly: I am an American Vigilante Patriot, not a German 
Nazi Patriot, nor an Italian Fascist Patriot. I am for Americanism in America. 

I am an enemy of no patriot who is not at war with my country. I am an 
enemy of Jewish Internationalists, who have no country, who are anti-national, 
and who are making war on the United States. 

And I am an eternal foe of those "two-fold more the children of hell’— 
Gentile traitors who have betrayed country and race. 

U. S. Constitution, Section 4 , Art. IV, provides: 

"The United States shall guarantee to every state in the union a republican 
form of government.’’ Our 48 republican states are not democracies. 

Therefore, when Washington invades or usurps any of the functions of a 
Republic State, the retained rights of the citizens are affected, and the citizens 
owe a duty to each other to resist any such Federal subversion, using reserved 


I am asked: Do you think we shall have to gee rid of the Constitution 
before we can remove the Jewish Subversion? 

I do not. Such an idea is born of brain-twisted propaganda. 

1 0 6 

By decision in the Supreme Court of 1878, Reynolds vs. the U. S., for 
practicing polygamy, Mormons were deprived of citizenship, property rights 
and other privileges granted by the Constitution, because such "religious prac¬ 
tice's" were held to be inconsistent with the American Political Philosophy and 
dangerous to the peace and SAFETY of the State. 

No minorities have constitutional special privileges in this countrv. Our 
political plan contemplates a single organism. "Equal opportunity for all, 
special privilege to none!" 

When Jewish politico-economic practices are shown to be destroying the 
peace and safety of the State, can there be any doubt that the citizen-majority 
will protect itself by a Constitutional amendment specifically providing for 
the disfranchisement and deportation of deadly alien internal enemies? 

To those whose minds are not dosed, our enemies are not hard to identify. 
Their own words confess the treason. Zionist leader Herzl admitted publicly in 
England that Jews regard Gentiles as "A Common Enemy." Talmudic quota¬ 
tions say Jewry is "living in a state of war" with all other peoples. Chicago Rabbi 
Freehof, m "’Race, Nation or Religion," says: "What stands in our way every¬ 
where in the world is modem NATIONALISM. That is' our chief enemy.' 
The Chicago Jewish Sentinel of September 24, 1935, supports his attitude. "It 
is the horrible figure of NATIONALISM, political and economic, which grins 
and mocks at us everywhere."—London Jewish Chronicle of August 13, 1937. 

Heed your hopes, fellow-patriots, not your fears. In this fight' for right, 
have faith that lies will be burned to ashes by the Fire of Truth. 

Irrevocably believing that true Americanism is worth any sacrifice, I stand 
committed to militant and vigilant Patriotism against anti-national Inter¬ 

We Gentile people did not start this greatest war in all history. 

We are NOT Aggressors—We are DEFENDERS! 


Following is a self-explanatory statement made by Robert Edward Edmondson at the 
March 17th, 1938, meeting of the American Nationals! Party in New York City: 

In November, 193™, The American Nationalist Party (name selected later) was pro¬ 
posed by Stanley Alexander Smith of New Jersey to a number of New York anti-fewish 

As originally submitted to the group called by him, including Robert Edward 
Edmondson, the plan was completely Fascist. 

When asked for an expression of opinion Mr. Edmondson promptly announced that 
he was a Constitutionalist, not a Fascist, and be could not therefore join such an 

Mr. Edmondson also stated, however, that since all the group were apparently anti- 
Jewish he would be willing to accede to their request to act as an unofficial advisor, and 
speak as guest speaker from their platform when invited, provided he was allowed to 
express his convictions freely; but that he could join no political party which omitted 
to identify the cause of die Communism which is destroying the Republic. 

Upon being requested to do so as an editor, Mr. Edmondson removed from the 
Party platform ail the important Fascistic elements. 

Robert Edward Edmondson now (April 18, 1938) wishes to say that, following 
the resignation of all but one of the original officers of the Party, he also has withdrawn 
all support from it; that while he spoke before it while it permitted Freedom of 
Speech regarding the Jewish Question: he never joined it: that he will no longer speak 
at any of irs meetings because of a recent statement that "good Jews" would be admitted 
to membership. 

1 0 7 

(Edmondson Call to Patriots March 16 , 1938) 


Arthur Kitson, the world’s greatest independent monetary economist, said 
in the British National Review of March, 1935: 

"The aim of the International Financiers is world control by the creation 
of inextinguishable debt.” In correspondence with me, before he died recently, 
Mr. Kitson made it clear that the International Financiers were Jewish, urging 
me not to falter in this fight for self-preservation. 

It may be remembered that reports were published in the newspapers in 
1935 reproducing figures showing that the Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Admin¬ 
istration in three years had spent over 24 billion dollars, which equalled the 
entire expenditure made by the Government during 124 years previous. 

Commenting upon this, Washington Correspondent G. R. Brown, signifi¬ 
cantly published: "The whole New Deal crazy quilt seems to have a distinct pat¬ 
tern once the idea is accepted that huge expenditures have been made, not for 
relief-public works recovery, but for the DELIBERATE purpose of CREATING 
DEBT. Debt is ESSENTIAL to the New' Deal. Without it, a public opinion 
appreciating the necessity of some day paying it off, could not be built up 
sufficiently to endorse confiscation of wealth.’’ 

Now, taxes have approximated confiscatory figures. Doesn’t this prove the 
truth of the old saying that "the power to tax is the power to destroy?" 

Let me quote from the Congressional Record—the late Congressman 
McFadden talking: 

"There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know 
that this country has fallen into the hands of the International Money Changers. 
Why should the fact be hidden? Is it not because those who have betrayed the 
United States are afraid to face the consequences? 

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great 
world war in which Bernard M. Baruch has not been a chief political, economic 

Are we in financial chaos now? Let me quote to you one single sentence, 
pregnant with meaning, taken from a letter published in the N. Y. Post 
March 9, 1938, signed "Bernard M. Baruch.” Here is the lacest Baruch 


According to that statement, he is FOR Communistic New Deal acts. 

In "The Riddle of the Jews' Success" by Roederich-Stoltheim,we find this: 
’’The enormous liberation of energy caused by the speculative principle of the 
Jew, deceives as to the true state of affairs. The last reserves of national energy 
are forced into action, which must end in exhaustion.” 

speculation with other people’s money through mortgages, instalment-buying, 
financial shoe-string operations, and manipulation of gold. 

Congressman Engel estimates chat the indebtedness of the railways, utilities, 
industrials, farm mortgages, etc., is above seventy-three billion. He’puts the 
grand total at 130 billions. 

10 8 

The National Industrial Conference Board estimates that the potential 
national wealth of the United States is 286 billions. The assessed valuation of 
that wealth is given by Congressman Engel at 134 billions. This is only four 
billions more than the 130 billions indebtedness total. These estimates of debt 
omit billions of short-term and instalment indebtedness, which must be 
liquidated. {In 1953 it is proposed to raise the national debt to $300 billion, 
which exceeds the total potential U. S. wealth.) 

Debt-slavery? The interest payable on the tocal is estimated at more than 
five billion dollars a year. You and I are paving that now "through the nose." 

Are we solvent? Europe owes us billions of war debts—but they, too, are 
UNPAYABLE. When merchants are insolvent, what happens? Repudiation! 

The time has come for plain words, short, sharp. We patriots have hereto¬ 
fore been building leadership by putting informative knowledge into open 

ONLY financial backing is necessary to restore our great heritage of 
freedom, stolen from Americans in their sleep of fancied security. Our political 
Judases have betrayed the people's sovereign power! They work under the 
double-cross sign of the six-point Solomon star. 

Tell these political parasites and subversionists that you will no longer 
stand for such treason. Make them obey your orders—or GET OUT! You 
middle-class men and women have the power! Use it! 

Alien-minded elements have LOADED our judiciary as well as our 
government administration. Has not the highest tribunal in the land been laid 
low by the Poison of Liberalism? 

"Jews in America constitute a great political force," says N. Y. Editor 
Margoshes. They arc going to use it as they sec fit—what are YOU going 
to DO about it?’ 

Criminal laziness, toleritis, sucker-generosity and limberitis are responsible 
for our troubles. Put patriotic men in political jobs—and keep them there! 
Out with "Yellows’’ as well as "Reds." If you continue to take it lying down, 
you will get what you deserve—a communistic dictatorship. 

No minority can stand against the aroused indignation of Majority 
Americanism if the sources of that emotion are deep enough to produce militant 

Fortune FAVORS the Brave! 

Audacity! MORE Audacity! ALWAYS Audacity—Makes the enemy jittery! 

Americans! BE YOURSELVES! 

1 0 9 



(Robert Edward Edmondson, Defendant, reporteJ as bc-!ow. under dare of 

May 12, 1938) 

Without warrant in law, following twelve "relief'' motion denials and six 
tual postponements, the Edmondson-LaGuardia so-called religion libel indict¬ 
ment was unconditionally dismissed in a written opinion May 10, 193S. handc-d 
clown by Judge James G. Wallace, after a 23-month Jewish juggling of justice 
in N, Y. City, involving suppression of Free Speech in violation of State and 
National Constitutions. 

The most powerful Kahal in the world—the American Jewish Congress— 
petitioned the Court April 14, 1938, to dismiss the indictment found by a 

jewish-majoritv Grand Jury June 11, 1936, as being "against the public in¬ 

terest: thereby exposing Jewry as the true prosecution hiding behind the 
technical title of the Case: "The People of the State of New York versus Robert 
Edward Edmondson ' for alleged group libel of "All Persons of the Jewish 

Upon the application of the JEWISH "friends of che Court," the action 
was dismissed on the same grounds pleaded by and for and denied to the 

GENTILE defendant, filed with the Court ac the beginning, viz: ( 1 ) No 

crime was committed under the law invoked; (2) There is no group libel 
statute; (3) "in futherance of justice;" (4) "in che public interest;" (5) in 
violation of the Freedom of the Press. 

It is noteworthy that the District Attorney's brief did nor oppose the dis¬ 
miss-morions of the defense or the Jewish "friends of the Court." 

The outcome is more than an individual triumph. It is a World Victory by 
National Patriotism and Freedom of Speech over Internationa! Jewish Com¬ 
munistic Socialism. 

Summoned before a Court of Law, the defendant appeared with "clean 
hands. His conscience clear, he does not fear to face any impartial tribunal 
with religious, moral or ethical jurisdiction; never having attacked any religion 
as such in his patriotic publicity campaign. 

As a matter of simple justice, Jewish Mayor LaGuardia, who was initially 
lesponsible for this judicial crucifixion and received therefor the "American 
Hebrew' Medal," should reimburse the defense for the $10,000 spent for legal 
and other defense expenses, which forced the hiding prosecution to back down 
and make the apologetic exposure-confession published. LaGuardia‘s assertion 
Lhat the defendant's publications would incite to a breach of the peace, was 
disposed of by the court declaring that as no violence had occurred during 
the period covered, none was apparently likely. The truth of the matter is, 
Jewry didn’t dare face damning evidence in a Court of Law'. 

But the Jewish Socialistic System will HAVE to appear before the Bar of 
Patriotic Public Opinion. 

. The defendant will continue his Free Speech educational publicity, NOT 
against any religion, but against the International Jewish Socialism that is com- 
munizing The Republic. 

Decision handed down in part below is by Judge Wallace, May 10, 1938; 

Recently, when this case appeared on the calendar, motions were made bv 
attorneys for the American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities, the 

1 1 0 

American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the Human 
Relations Committee of the National Council of Women and the American 
Civil Liberties Union, asking leave to be permitted to intervene as amicus 
curiae and to file briefs. 

In these briefs, the attorneys state their belief that sound public policy, 
looking to the safeguarding of the rights of free speech, of a free press and of 
religious liberty, makes it highly desirable that the court, in furtherance of 
justice, on its own motion, dismiss the indictments against this defendant. 

It has been urged that the prevailing rule in England, based on the old 
case of Rex v. Osborne (1732, 2 Barn. K. B. 1663) supports the theory that a 
criminal libel can be based upon a defamatory statement concerning such an 
extensive community. I do not agree with this conclusion. 

Putting aside the consideration of the rational basis of criminal prosecution, 
for libel, I am of the opinion that the soundest rule that has been enunciated 
on the subject of group libel is this: that an indictment cannot be predicated 
upon defamatory writings assailing a class or group, unless directly, or by inv 
piication, some individual is libeled. 

There is certainly nothing in the law of this State, nor in any of the cases 
cited, which justifies a finding that an indictment will lie, based on defamatory 
matter directed against so extensive and indefinable a group or class as "all 
persons of the Jewish Religion.” 

There can be no doubt as to the defamatory nature of the publications 
mentioned in che instant indictment. They are palpably the outpourings of a 
fanatical and bigoted mind. 

Nevertheless, they (defendant publications) have been circulated for years 
and have never provoked a breach of the peace in this community, nor, in 
spite of their virulence, are they apt to. 

After a consideration of the briefs submitted by the people, the defendant 
and amicus curiae, the court, on its own motion, and in the furtherance of 
justice, dismisses Indictment No. 2092 20, which charges the defendant with 
libeling all persons of the Jewish Religion. 



Judge of the Court of General Sessions 


Referring to the comment of the Court, that the publications of the de¬ 
fendant " are palpably the outpourings of a fanatical and bigoted mind;’' 
defendant believes that if the Judge knew' w'hat the defense knows, he would 
have omitted such dicta-by-taik of no legal value. The defendant also wonders 
how can a non-churchman be a religious bigot; and how can an investment- 
analyst be a fanatic—since fanaticism and the analytical or judicial tempera¬ 
ment are incompatible. 

Maintaining the "Conspiracy of Silence" policy of The Press by ignoring 
the real issue of Free Speech, which, as a newspaper, it should champion, the 
N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 12, 1938, commented editorially: 

"In dismissing three indictments charging criminal libel against Robert 
Edward Edmondson, Judge James Garrett Wallace wrote an opinion which, 
because of its clarity and the importance of the issue involved, deserves to be 
read and re-read as a tonic to the present epidemic of muddled thinking. The 
pertinent part follows: 'When one realizes how many forms of religion might 

1 X 1 

consider themselves libeled and seek legal redress, were our laws so extended, 
and when we reflect on how our courts might, in such event, fma themselves 
forced into the position of arbiters of religious truth, it is apparent that more 
would be lost than could be gained by attempting to protect the good name of a 
religion bv an appeal to the criminal law.' 

Now', it may disturb the "muddled thinking" of the Herald-Tribune to 
find chat the defendant, in principle per se, announces that he is in entire 
harmony with the quoted paragraph from the Court s purely by way of dicta 
by-talk'of "no legal value’—in its excursion away from jurisdiction of 
LAW into the field of Morals-Ethics-Religion; but the aefendant wonders 
if such diversion does not violate the fundamental American doctrine as to 
separation of Church and State, Politics and Religion. 

The defendant is supremely confident that time and the logic of events 
will completely vindicate his response to the Call of Public Duty. 

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT, by Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., said: 

There is no crime of libeling "all persons of the Jewish Religion. _ 

The Court stated that Counsel had not submitted any* brief showing it was 
not a crime to attack any Religious Group. There is no such decision m the 


The Indictment is absurd on its face. The return of it was notmng less 
than abuse of process by a Grand Jury dominated by a majority of alien- 
minded members as shown by the affidavits submitted on defendants motion 

to inspect the minutes. , , , c c 

The District Attorney has conceded that by Clause 1 of Section 37/ of 

the Code of Criminal Procedure, no Jew or person connected with any Jew 

can serve on the Trial Jury. He has said to read the indictment will take four 

dayS ' Inspection of the alleged libelous documents will show the Court they are 
the result of study of the literature and Press of the Universe; and as proof of 
defendant's justifiable motives and honest belief in the truth of his statements 
he would have the right to occupy the time of this Court and the Jury to read into 
the record a mass of material without end. There is no telling how many weeks 
or even months the trial might consume. 


The trial would develop racial and religious antagonism that would rock 
the foundations of this community. The expense of such a trial would be all 
out of proportion to any possible good to be accomplished. 

All the reasons for dismissal in the briefs amicus curiae are good. 

(Jewry Unmasks Itself as the Real Prosecutor) 

After ">2 months of trial postponement, the surprise-documents quoted in part here¬ 
inafter were submitted to Judge James G. Wallace Apr,! U 1938, as friends of the 
court” by the American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, American Com¬ 
mittee on Religious Rights and Minorities, and the American Civil Liberties Union. ^ 

The "Tewishness” of the "American Committee on Religious Rights and Minorities 
is shown by these General Committee names: Rabbi S. S, Wise, Henry Morgenthau Sr., 
ludlte Julian W. Mack, Abram I. Elkus, Arthur Hays Salzburger; Attorneys Morns 
Ernst and Arthur Garfield Hays (Haas); National Committeemen B. Charney Vladeck, 
Rabbi A. H. Silver, A. J. Muste, Joseph Schlossburg, and others, 

1 1 2 


Prosecutions like this tend to restrict traditional freedom of speech and press. The 
liberties of expression guaranteed by the Constitution are not limited to anv particular 
held. They include the right to express opinion upon anv subject, political social or 
religious. ’ “ 

said in his dissenting opinion in U. S. vs. Schwimmer 2"9 

b 654, hut it there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperative!',- 
calls for attachment than any other, it is the principle of free thought—not free thought 
for those who agree v.-tth us hut freedom for the thought that we hate.’ 

The proper remedy for ignorant and misleading doctrines is not suppression but 
enlightenment. As Mr. Justice Brandeis said in his dissenting opinion in Whitney 
vs California. 2/4 U. S. 357. 3W: 'If there be time to expose through discussion the 
falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil bv the processes of education the remedy to 
be applied is more speech, not enforced silence. " 

(Defendant has photostat of a Sept. 18, 1936. letter from the ACLU to Judge N W 
Rogers of Tompkins Corners, N. Y.. saying: 

We have discussed very fully our attitude to the prosecution of FdmorcNon We 
have conferred with his counsel and looked up the law. When the indictment was'first 
brought it was, in our judgment, clearly a case violative of the Free Speech guarantee 

for unlike ordinary criminal libel cases it did not specify persons libeled. The indierment 

was Liter changed to specific complainants, and thus the defect was cured." The letter 
was signed by Roger N. Baldwin, Director, who served a term in a Federal prison as 
a draft dodger, and whose exclamation "Communism is the goal," is notorious. 

Defense Counsel John S. Wise. Tr.. wrote Judge Rogers Oct. 1, 1936. saying that 
Baldwin had not conferred with him, as stated. The religion-indictment 209220 was 
never changed, as represented). 


The Memorandum below was Submitted on Behalf of The American Committee on 

Religious Rights and Minorities, The American Jewish Committee. The American 

Jewish Congress, and The Human Relations Committee of The National Council of 

These organizations are concerned with the fundamental question, whether the cause 
of rehgious liberty and tolerance will be advanced by this particular prosecution, and 
desire to lay before the court in briefest possible form their views in reference thereto 

(A) There is danger that such use of the criminal libel laws will ultimately react 
against the very minorities sought to be protected by undermining or abridging tht 
traditional and constitutional right to freedom of speech and of the press, This danger has 
recently been pointed^ out by 'The Christian Century" which, commenting editorially on 
the case at bar. stated in its issue of December 1, 1937; 

"The number one anti-Semite of America. Mr. Edmondson, is reported as about to 
be tried for libeling the Jewish religion. " * S; It may be said without malice that Mr. 
Edmondson's statements, especially ahour the Jewish religion, but also about many persons, 
have been so intemperate, so devoid of probable foundation and so wildly defamatory 
that it would be a pleasure to see him punished by any legal means. But it seems 
doubtful whether a charge of libel against a religion can'be‘‘sustained, and it- is still 
more doubtful whether it would be to the public interest in the long run for it to be 
sustained. It is of the utmost importance that there be freedom of discussion and of 
criticism in religion and in politics." 

(B) The statute itself does not bv its terms cover group libel, nor do any of the 
reported cases in New York hold that an indictment for criminal libel will lie where 
the group libelled is as broad as that here defamed. 

(C) It is doubtful if a conviction would be m the public interest. Efforts would be 
made to have it appear that the defendant was a "martyr" to the great cause of civil 

In sum, the organizations submitting this memorandum are convinced that the true 
and effective reply to the propaganda of bigots lies not in the invocation of criminal 
libel laws bur in a campaign of education. 

Section 671 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: "Court may order indict¬ 
ment to be dismissed. The court may, either of its own morion, or upon the application 
of the district attorney, and in furtherance of justice, order an action, after indictment, 
to be dismissed. If the Court feels that a termination of this prosecution is "in further¬ 
ance of justice," it may upon its own motion dismiss the indictment, with a written state¬ 
ment of its reasons for so doing. Under the statute, such a statement by the Court is 
filed as a public record, which becomes and remains the official pronouncement of 
this Court. 

1 1 3 


The foregoing documents enter a typical "general denial" of defendant's 
publication charges, unsupported by any specific refutations—the usual Jewish 
"reply’’ to unanswerable accusations. But it will be noted that it confesses that 
the defendant DID NOT VIOLATE ANY LAW. 

From the beginning the defense contended that the indictment was with¬ 
out warrant in law since no offense was shown. Does it make a difference 
"whose ox is being gored?" 

It is interesting to note that most of the legal authorities quoted by the 
persecution in this case were cited by the defense in previously uenied relict 
morions, totalling 12 in ail. 

The brief completely ignores and fails to reply to the defendant s un¬ 
answerable accusation of Communistic Jewish Anti-Americanism—which REAL 
issue therefore still stands unchallenged. 

Their own RUTHLESS INTOLERANCE having been ^uncovered, they 
now shamelessly pose a hypocritical role of "holier than thou.” 

Does this panicky move to have the indictment nullified imply that the 
so-called Jewish religion cannot endure the Searchlight of Truth.- Jewry 
created an unprecedented opportunity to defend Judaism—but sidestepped 
at the appointed hour. 

The briefs properly advocate a campaign of EDUCATION in place of 
court action. "The Edmondson movement has been primarily and essentially 
a campaign of enlightenment to fortify leaders with fact and authority de¬ 
clared the defendant in Indictment Bulletin 26 of April 1, 1936. 

In fine, the verdict of the American Jewish CONGRESS is tantamount 
to a legalistic repudiation of the indictment brought by the Jewish-Majority 
Grand Jury—suggestive of liability under U. S. Criminal Code Sections 19 and 

The JEW "apologizes” this time—not the White Man! It is a "run to 

cover 1 . 1 ' 


The Christian Century, which is quoted in the above memorandum as 
denouncing the defendant Dtc. 1, 1937, itself nevertheless printed on June 9, 
1937, the following "theological'’ attack on the so-called Jewish Religion AS 

"Judaism rests upon an IMPOSSIBLE BASIS. It tries to pluck the fruits 
of democracy WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF to the processes of democracy. 
Democracy cannot guarantee our Jewish brethren against the emergency of A 
CRISIS in which prejudice and anger generated by THEIR LONG RESIST¬ 
ANCE to the democratic processes, may flame up to their great hurt. The situ¬ 
ation in which the Jewish Problem rises is in large measure of JEWRY'S OWN 
CREATION. The root cause is the Jew’s immemorial and pertinacious OB¬ 
SESSION WITH AN ILLUSION that his race and people are the object of 
the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial integrity 
and separateness. Their idea of an integral race HAS ITS PROTOTYPE IN 

The parallel is deadly! 

Notwithstanding Jewish and duped Christian misrepresentation thereof, 
the. defendant’s patriotic politico-economic exposures were directed, without 
hate, to defend-protect-preserve the peace and safety of the constitutional state 
SPECIFICALLY against irreligious Jewish-Communist subversions thereof. 

1 14 

Until the publisher was indicted, he gave little publicity-attention to 
Jewish Talmudic doctrine; but in order thereafter to prepare his defense, he 
investigated and published his documentary findings. 

In this great battle, TWO MEN—Editor Edmondson and Lawyer Wise 
—ARMED WITH THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH, have beaten down wealthy 
World Jewry on its own materialistic ground. 

Since EVERY ONE of the many "relief motions" made by the defendant 
during. 22 months delay were UNIFORMLY denied, this retreat was forced, 
NOT in a Court of Law, but by "The Great Power of The Press" through 
Defense Pamphlets dramatically exposing the LAW WEAKNESS of the 


Upon receiving defendant's message that the Court had officially dis¬ 
missed all indictments, Adrien Arcand of Montreal, Leader of the National 
Unity Party, head of the Canadian patriotic movement, and highest authority 
in North America on the Jewish Problem, immediately wrote as follows: 

"The backdown on your case is the first real great defeat of the World 
Kehilla. They refused to carry on, on the very ground they themselves chose. It 
never happened before anywhere. Jt is an admission of defeat, jitters and in¬ 
BROUGHT, for they have done the judging themselves, on law as well as on 
facts. Nothing can erase the outstanding document brought forth by their most 
powerful organizations. 

What a Victory! What a Victory! Bigger and more significant than any 
previous in the history'of the legal Jewish question. 

"One thing to be pointed out is: American Justice (?) REFUSED TO' 
JUDGE YOUR CASE ON ITS MERITS. It judged according to the pleas of 
a third party. And the Court granted to a third party a demand it has refused 
to grant to the defendant. I have never met with such an instance in any case. 

"You emerge victor with a spotless sword from one of the greatest fights 
ever waged — that of an international super-wealthy and powerful combine 
against,a single man with truth and moral courage. If the Jews had had even 
a shadow of right or truth, they could have won. And if thousands Of cowering 
and timid 'anti-Jews' had been in the place of Edmondson, they would have 
given in long ago. I hope your triumph will awaken them. There is hope, in 
your country, as long as there will be ONE man of your type. 

I PREFER THE ISSUE AS IT CAME. A trial would cost 'unfindable' 
money, and with whatever result, could not have brought such a stirring result.” 

The defendant is speechless before such praise from so high an authority. 


In this hour of triumph the defendant pays tribute to courageous patriots 
named below, at home and abroad, who faithfully stood up publicly beside him, 
an instrument: 

Marian Louise Edmondson, wife of the defendant; John S. Wise, Jr., of 
New York City, Defense Counsel; Captain Henry Hamilton Beamish’ of 
England, World Dean of this Liberation Movement; Adrien Arcand of Canada, 
head of the National Unity Party;Col. U. Fleischhauer, famous Protocol Expert- 
William Kullgren of the "Beacon Light," Atascadero, Calif.; A. N. Field of 
New Zealand, author of "All These Things,” James True, Washington Pub¬ 
lisher of Weekly Industrial Reports; super-patriot Editor Arnold S. Leese, of 

1 1 5 

England; Editor McDermott of the London "Patriot;" Editor Gerald B. Win- 
rod of "The Defender" of Kansas; George L. Pafort of N. Y. City, who served 
subpoenas on the-."Princes of Jewry in the Edmondson Case. 

In grateful acknowledgement, the defendant raises his hand in Silent 
Salute to that noble and faithful-band of known and unknown women and 
men whose financial and other substantial contributions helped to bear the 
heavy sacrificial burden of this grueling battle in the Courts of the Law and 
before the Bar of Public Opinion. 

To the TEN MILLION Americans who. through the Edmondson Publicity 
Crusade have learned THE CAUSE of the Communizing activities which 
have been wrecking The Republic, the defendant extends patriotic felicitations 
directing-attention to the fact that the Edmondson triumph has tna/ed the trail 
for militant patriots of the Nation, who need no longer fear prison for 
patriotically employing Free Speech, Free Press and Free Assembly so long as 
[hey concentrate on the subversive SYSTEM. (The court established a legal 
"group libel" precedent in American jurisprudence.) 

As a Fellow-Vigilante, the defendant hails the Patriotic Vigilantes of 
America, and calls upon them to "Rescue The Republic! ’ To them !he declares 
that this is not a mere Edmondson victory; but a COMPLETE INDICA¬ 
TION of the thesis that our great constitutional form of government STANDS 
OR FALLS with Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly; that Treason to 



I have been a Jew' for 4000 years! Hitler wuis RIGHT—WE ARE A PEOPLE! 
The object of the AMERICAN Jewish Congress is to defend JEWISH fights 
at home AND ABROAD, of ALL JEWS—and to defend American DEM¬ 
OCRACY!"—Rabbi Stephen S. Wise (Weisz), N. Y. Times 6-13-38. 

The following is from June 15, 1938, Bulletin: 

You will observe from the quotation that this Austrian-born rabbi, one of 
the most important Jew's in America, in an astonishing Declaration of Principles, 
declares Jews are "A People;” and implies that, as such, they come BEFORE 


"I am a Jew first, then a Democrat"—Jewish Aldermanic President 

Jacob M. Harvey—Chicago American of April 6, 1936. 

You w'ill also observe that ALL Jews—good AND bad everywhere are 
to be protected bv The AMERICAN Jewish Congress, under the Rabbi Code. 
Nothin* is said about Citizenship DUTIES to the U. S. (or elementary Justice.) 

DEMOCRACY. Q.E.D.: "Communism is JEWISH!" 

Americanism is a single organism. Those w'ho refuse to be absorbed or 
assimilated into it are ALIEN, and MUST BE REJECTED as poison. 

Jewish anti-Americanism certainly makes Jews unfit for American citizen¬ 
ship' and when their most prominent and leading rabbi publicly admits that 


The solution of the Jewish Problem is: Disfranchisement and Deportation 
to Madagascar. This can be done by U. S. Constitutional Amendment on the 
ground that Jewish Anti-Americanism constitutes a danger to the "peace and 
safety of the state." 


Former President Theodore Roosevelt, addressing the American Defense 
Society January 5, 1919: "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes 
here in good faith, becomes an American AND ASSIMILATES HIMSELF 
TO US, he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else; for it is 
an outrage to discriminate against ANY SUCH MAN because of creed birth¬ 
OWN ORIGIN and separated from the rest of America, then HE ISN’T 
ALLEGIANCE here. * * * We have room for but one flag, and this excludes 
the RED FLAG, w’hich symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization. We 
intend to see that the crucible turns our people out AS AMERICANS of 

"The Jew remains a Jew—Assimilation is impossible"—Ludwig Lewi- 
sohn, Jewish author of ''Israel,” 1926 . 

N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman, "Rooseveit’s Right 
Arm," "Sharply attacked assimilationist plans” at the Council of Jewish 
Federations in Philadelphia—N Y. Times of Feb. 1, 1936. 

The following is from a speech delivered by Eric H. Louw, Feb. 24, 1939, 
tn the South African House of Assembly, on the "Alien & Immigration" bill: 

I find in ’The Book Of Jewish Thoughts' by Dr. J. H. Hertz. Chief 
Rabbi of England, this statement: 'What I understand by assimilation is loss of 
identity. It is the kind of assimilation I dread most, even more than pogroms.' ” 
(Pogroms kill but few Jews—assimilation would be mass "Genocide.”) 

"Basil M. Henriques, a Distinguished Jew, made a speech in London 
reported in the Zionist Record of South Africa, Jan. 29 , 1939, saying: 'There 
must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar people, and a peculiar people we 
must remain.’ ” 


Open Letter of August 1, 1938 to Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor Brooklyn 
Jewish Examiner. 

Many thanks. Rabbi, for the free publicity you gave me in your weekly of 
July 22, 1938, in three-column front-page article, containing a picture that looks 
like me about as much as you do. It is ail the more appreciated because the 
American Hebrew announced sometime ago it would not even mention me 
anymore. Evidently, it dosen’t believe in Free Speech for all citizens. 

Another sequence that deserves special notice is that in one of your last 
year’s issues you put me in what you called your "Rogues’ Gallery.” Now, 
apparently I have been honored by promotion. Is this action in recognition of 
the unconditional dismissal May 10, 1938, of the Jewish court charge against 
me of libeling "All persons of the Jewish Religion,’' because I publicly exposed 
Communism as Jewish in origin and direction; the throwing out of the case 
being on the ground that I was merely exercising my American Right 
of Free Press—just as you are doing in foolishly trying to make me a Hitlerite; 

1 1 7 

whereas, instead of being a German Nazi PATRIOT, or an Italian Fascist 
PATRIOT, or a Japanese Nationalist PATRIOT? I am a militant American 
Vigilante Patriot defending my country against Jewish Internationalism. 

But I suggest. Rabbi, that you watch your publication steps. In exercising 
Free Speech, libel guilt surely lies in misrepresentation. Your article of July 
22 quotes the court thus: "It’is necessary to bear with the fanatical ravings of 
SUCH SCOUNDRELS AS EDMONDSON because the greater principles of 
Free Speech and Free Press are involved.” 

M I have before me the judge’s decision, I challenge you to produce such 
a quotation therefrom. The court carefully avoided calling the defendant a 
"scoundrel”—which the dictionaries define as "knave, swindler, villain.” Can 
you legally sustain such an allegation, Rabbi? 

Further. "The Examiner's” article says my activities have brought me into 
"contact with the law on more than one occasion.” Just what law? The Jewish 
Code—or American Code? Careful, Rabbi! 

But I feel kindly toward your "Examiner.” for my patriotic crusade against 
Jewish Anti-Americanism received some of its high-explosive ammunition from 
it, notably in the issue of Oct. 20, 1933, wherein you said that the Roosevelt 
Administration has appointed more Jews to office-than any other in American 
History,” naming Bernard M. Baruch as "Unofficial President.” Although 
when I showed that article to President David Brown of the American Hebrew 
in 1934, in support of my exposure-campaign, he snorted: They don t know 
what they’re talking about. We’ll put 'em out of business;” but you’re still on the 

Now, while I am not a churchman and cannot truthfully be branded a 
religious bigot, it seems to me suggestively sinister to find Rabbis—who pose 
among the Christian Clergy as "Men of God”—engaged in a racket such as 
spreading reprehensible matter of the evil character I have outlined. Perhaps 
the answer is to be found in John 8:44, which has caused European students 
of the Jewish Problem to conclude that "Christ was the greatest ‘Anti-Semite’ 
of all time,” 

It is confessed in your article: "Anti-Semitic propaganda in the U. S. 
American Jewry DARE NOT overlook rhis.” 

That is substantially correct, Rabbi, except you should substitute "Anti- 
Jewish” for "Anti-Semite.” 


{From Edmondson bulletin of Sept. 1, 1938) 


Americanism is neither Nationalism, nor Democracy nor Communism, 

While Patriotism is the basis on which rest Americanism, Fascism, Nazism, 
Nationalism, its practical application differs in the U. S. 

True Americanism is Patriotic Individualism. It is for personal progress 
first, The supreme objective of Americanism is the good of the individual first, 
through ordered liberty. The supreme objective of the Socialist-Communist- 
Paternalist Philosophies is the good of the state first, through regimentation of 
the individual. 

The United States of America are not a nation like those of Europe. They 
are A UNION federated for common State welfare and protection against 

1 1 8 

external enemies. This federation is not a nation otherwise.’ It is unique in the 
history of the world. The 48 states retain THE MAJORITY of their soverign 
or "national” rights. They delegated to Washington only 18 specific "national” 

Second, to the Washington "National” Government. Citizens of other countries 
have a SINGLE allegiance—to a Central Authority. 

The checks and balances of the American Political system were designed 
to defeat communistic subversions, as well as those of plutocratic enemies of the 
Republic. States Rights are essentially MAJORITY RIGHTS since only a 
limited number of national powers were delegated to the central sub-national 
(not super-national) government at Washington. Such retained majority rights 
constitute a safeguard against usurpation by a powerful minority, for a highly 
centralized government is easily subverted by such an element. Not so 48 
sovereign states acting independently in self-preservation. When the central 
national government is subverted by faithless political servants, as at present, 
then state citizens automatically become virtual militia — Vigilantes — armed 
with sovereign rights and power recalled and reassumed. 

Hence, ultimate power resides in the American Home; for Washington is 
merely a sub-agency without nationalistic jurisdiction except as to certain 
carefully indicated and restricted powers. It has no other authority over the 

The attempt of the Roosevelt Regime to transfer supreme power from the 
Sovereign States to Washington was designed to destroy the American System 
of ordered INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY by subjugating it to a highly centralized 
SUPER-NATIONALISM, easily undermined by an organized minority. New 
Deal legislation is directed toward breaking down the majority rights retained 
by the States. 

Americans want no MASTER-Leadership because such dictatorship destroys 
their Individual Initiative, their personality, their self-reliance, liberties, equal 
opportunities, freedom of action and progress as a people. But uninformed 
American Individualism is still unorganized in the greatest crisis in its history. 
The Fetish of Tolerance has lulled vigilance into fancied security. Aroused, 
the Spirit of Thought moves far more rapidly than Physical Materalism. It took 
Communists more than 25 years to get headway. With proper enlightenment, 
American Individualism can be in concerted action "over night.” 

The SOUL of Americanism faces crucifixion. On its rebirth hangs the 
fate of The Union. For Individualism, the preservation of Americanism is 
worth ANY sacrifice. 

BE WARY, AMERICANS! And when invoking Militant Patriotism to 
fight Communism and its allies, be vigilant not to fall in the Hidden Pit of a 
false Super-Nationalism whose Paternalistic Co-operative "Social Justice” End* 
Product is ALSO REGIMENTATION, the deadly foe of Americanism. 


The following is from a Sept. 7, 1938, Edmondson publication; 

"Speaking as an American, I cannot for a moment concede that one can 

They who believe in and hope and labor for an ultimate restoration of 
Jewish Political life, and the re-establishment of a Jewish NATION, place A 
PRIOR LIEN upon their citizenship which * * * WOULD PREVENT 

1 1 9 

The foregoing confession appeared in the N. Y. Sun of Sept. 4. 1907, in 
a communication from Isadore Singer, quoting a letter from the late Jacob H, 
Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb Sc Co., dated Aug. 8, 1907, addressed to Prof. Solomon 
Schechter, President of the Jewish Theological Seminary, relative to the settle¬ 
ment of the Jews in Palestine under the Political Zionist Ideal. 

Zionism is Jewish Nationalism"—Rabbi S. S. Wise. Jewish Sentinel of 
Chicago, Sept. 29, 1933. 

Judge Julian Mack, in his Presidential address to the 1919 Zionist Con¬ 
vention, declared; "Beyond all question, to put it mildly, NINE-TENTHS of 
the Jews of America are Zionists.’’ 

The foregoing is on Page 57 of "Modern Palestine," ?. book by Jessie E. 
Sampter, a Jewess author, Julian W. Mack is a prominent N. Y. jurist. 

On Page 53, same book, appears; "Jews are a distinct nationality, of 
which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is neces¬ 
sarily a member."—U. S. Supreme Court Justice L-. D. Brandeis. 

"We Jews in the House of Commons, whatever our political opinions may 
be, will always stand in that assembly for the rights of the Jewish Community." 
(Emanuel Shrnwell, Jan. 23, 1929, vide the London "Patriot" July 18, 1929). 

"Jews who settle in Palestine become citizens of this Jewish Common¬ 
wealth. But a scheme has now been put into effect whereby any Jew who is 
interested in the rebuilding of this Jewish Home-land may be registered as a 
citizen thereof. In Jerusalem is kept a 'Book of Remembrance,' in which 
is written the name and address of every Jew- who contributes S1Q0 or more 
to the Jewish National Fund. All whose names appear in this book are auto¬ 
matically made citizens of the Jewish Homeland." 

The foregoing is from "Zionism in Prophecy," 1936, Dawn Publishers, 
Brooklyn, N. Y. 


"Dependable sources report that Zionist International headquarters are in 
process of removing from London to Washington. The B’nai B’ritb Anti- 
Defamation League, with its set-up perfected in practically every city of the 
U. S., will work in closest harmony with the transplanted group. It is under¬ 
stood that the League s cash' fund of more than $30,000,000 at the first of 
January, is substantially larger at the present time. With more than 14,000 
individual case records perfectly cross-indexed and co-ordinated, those who 
direct the League are in possession of tremendous pow'er. There is wide ex¬ 
pectation that this power will be felt in connection of the 1940 Presidential 
election."—From the Daily News of Amarillo, Texas, Aug. 31, 1940. 

(Edmondson Bulletin of Oct. 14, 1938) 

By thinking, earnest and fair-minded American patriots, deeply concerned Over the 
jazzy-communistic eyt-and-ear "education” American Youth is receiving via the "movies,” 
wc are repeatedly asked this vital question: 

"IS the motion-picture industry really Jewish-controlled? 

The straightest answer to that query is: "Let’s look at the record! ’ We believe quota¬ 
tions from it, as below, will support the estimate that over 95% of the business is Jewish- 
owned and operated. Jews themselves supply figures which confirm it—so let us examine 
;tn analysis of the industry published in the Sept. 22, 1958, issue of The Chicago Jewish 
Sentinel, ns follows: 

The film industry is one that employs thousands of Jews, shows no discrimination 
against Jewish labor, and ABSORBS ITS SHARE — AND MORE — OF JEWISH 

1 2 0 

The publication then proceeds to list as jew stars in the film-world: Paul Muni, 
Eddie Cantor, Edward G. Robinson, Luise Rainer, Edward Arnold, Joseph Schildkraut, 
Joseph Brombert, Tony Martin (Weiss), jack Benny, Ben Blue, Jules Garfieid, Ethel 
Merman, Eleanor "Whitney. 

Among the producers, writers and others are mentioned Max Reinhardt, Sol Lesser, 
Sam Briskm, Louis B. Mayer. George Bilson, Hunt Stromberg, Jerry Hoffman, Sidney 
Lanfield, Ben Bernie, Maurice Conn, Ben Kahane, Lew Seiler, Sam G. Engel, Lee Schul- 
man, David O. Selzmck, Clifford Odets, Paul Yawitz, Vincent Sherman, Lee Katz, 
Walter Winchell, Paltiei Buchner, Hunt Brand. 


Now, let us examine the statistical publications, especially Moody's Manual, for 
1938. In this we find the officers and directors of the important corporations in the 
motion picture business ,as listed below; 

LOEWS. INC.; David Bernstein, j. R. Rubin, N. M. Schenck, Isador Frey, Leopold 
Friedman, C. C. Moscowitz, Arthur W. Loew, A. L. Licbtmann, E. J. Mannix, Sam Katz, 
E. A. Schuler, Leo Cohen, N. Nayfack, R. Lazarus, B. Thau. WARNER BROS. PIC¬ 
TURES: H, M. Warner, Albert Warner, J, L. Warner, E. K. Hessberg, C. S. Guggen- 
heimer, Herman Starr, Morris Wolf, S. P. Friedman, S. E. Morris, Joseph Bernhard. 
UNITED ARTISTS THEATER CIRCUIT: J. M. Schenck, Lee Schubert, B, S. Nayfack, 
A. H. Frisch, J. H. Moscowitz. PARAMOUNT PICTURES; Adolf Zukor, Y. F. Free¬ 
man, Fred Mohrhardt. j. H. Karp, Fred Myers, j. D. Hertz. RADIO-KEITK-ORPHEUM: 
Lee Spitz, David Samoff, Morris Goodman, Fredk. Straus. METROPOLITAN PLAY¬ 
HOUSES: J. M. Schenck, L. B. Soper, Lee Spitz, M. C. Weizman, M. A. Albert. COL¬ 
UMBIA PICTURES: Harrv Cohn, Jack Cohn, L. M. Blancke, Sol. Bornstein, jack Koer- 
ner, Charles Schwartz. CONSOLIDATED FILM INDUSTRIES: J. Waller, j. W. 
Altschuler, M. J. Siegel, R. I. Poucher, E. H. Seifert, N. K. Loder. 

Following is a "Hollywood Record" printed in the "Liberation Magazine" of Aug. 
14 , 1938, giving "principal Jews in the business": 

Jack Benny (real name Kubelsky), Bert Lahr (Larrheim), Charlie Chaplin (Ron- 
steinj, George Burns (Birnbaum), jack Bernie (Ancelowitsch), Fanny Brice (Borach), 
Elaine Barrie (Jacobs), Bobby Breen (Borsack), Eddie Cantor (Iskowitz), Ina Claire 
(Fagan), Ricardo Cortez (Kranz), Patricia Ellis (Lefcwich), Douglas Fairbanks (UU* 
man), Paulette Goddard (Levy), Al Jolson (Yoelsen), Sybil Jason (Jacobs), Geo. 
Jessel, Sam Jaffee, Ted Lewis (Friedman), Myer Livingston (Marx), Paul Muni (Weis- 
enfreund), Ethel Merman (Zimmerman), Parkyakarkas (Eistein), Marion Marsh, Four 
Marx Brothers, Three Ritz Brothers, Joe Penner (Pintriern), Irving Pichel, Edward G. 
Robinson (Goidenberg), Gregory Ratoff, Harry Richman, Francis Lederer, Jack Berle, 
Florence Reed, Sylvia Sidney (Jason), Maurice Schwartz, David Warfield, Carmel Myers, 
Jackie Coogan (Cohn), Igor Gorin, Sophie Tucker, Jos. Schildkraut. Norm'a Talmage 
(Mrs. Geo. Jessel), Lionel Stander, Ed Wynn (Leopold), Walter Winchell, Luise 
Rainer, Milton Berle, Irving Berlin (Ballne), Sally Eileis. J. Edward Brombert. 

Ail the foregoing lists are very incomplete, Space prevents full coverage. 


The very important points below are taken from "The Movie Barons and Sunday 
Movies.” by Rev. R. H. Martin, President of the National Reform Assn.: 

"The motion picture industry is said to be the fifth largest industry in the U. S., 
with a capital of over two billion dollars. There are three divisions—producers, distribut¬ 
ors, exhibitors. Most of the producing companies are members of "The Motion Picture 
Producers and Distributors of America, Inc." There are 25 or more companies in this 
organization, which produces from 90 to 95 per cent of all the pictures in this country. 
A half dozen of the largest of these control the organization, and it in turn dominates 
practically the entire motion picture business. Probably no great industry in America is 
so completely dominated by a few men of wealth as the motion picture industry. 

"Investigation shows that the movie barons during the depression period were re¬ 
ceiving immense salaries and bonuses while their companies were heading toward re¬ 
ceivership and bankruptcy, or sustaining immense losses. Paramount-Publix is one of the 
largest production companies. In 1933, when Paramount was in bankruptcy, Gerard 
SWOPE, President received $72,308. In 1929 President Adolf ZUKOR received $130,000 
in salary and $757,500 bonus. Film executive salaries "revealed to the U. S. Senate" 
(1933 ) are listed: David Loew $521,000, Irving Thalberg $1>5,200, Arthur Loew 
$311,000, Emanuel Cohen $173,000. Harry Cohen $145,600, Carl Liemmle $156,000, 
Louis B. Mayer $84,500. Reports read at the meeting at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Dec. 11, 

1 2 I 

1934, showed Nicholas M. Schenck received $219,000 in salary and bonus, David Bern¬ 
stein $149,700, Vice-Prest. Jesse L. Lasky received in 1929 in salary and bonus $881,500 
from Paramount. 

''The Fox Film Corp. was one of the largest production companies which also went 
extensively into the exhibitor field, It went into bankruptcy in 1930 and came out in 

1935, and is now the Twentieth Century-Fox Co. Sidney R. Kent is now President of 
Fox and under a seven year contract is guaranteed a minimum salary of $180,000 with 
a possible maximum of almost $300,000 per year, plus $200.00 per week for entertain¬ 
ment. Under, the same seven year contract, Joseph M. Schenck, Chairman of the Board, 
is to receive $130,000 per year. 

"The figures on salaries and bonuses are taken from the report to the U. S. Senate 
by the Federal Trade Commission. 

"The same group of men, who have taken millions of dollars out of the American 
Public through their manipulations of the motion picture business, are still in control. 
ARE JEWS. From reliable sources we have learned that above 90% of the big barons of 
the industry are Jews—in fact, they themselves claim 95%, and boast of it." 

(Nov. 15, 1938, Edmondson Publication) 

During the past few years, there has been no single piece of publicity 
which has "got the Jewish goat" more than the alleged anti-Jewish "prophecy" 
of Benjamin Franklin, America's great statesman, reported as having been 
made at the 1789 U. S. Constitutional Convention. 

This "prophecy 1 was first published in the U. S. by 'Liberation” Magazine 
of Feb. 3, 1934. It went to Europe and was widely circulated by militant patri¬ 
ots. Reference was made to such circulation by the N. Y. Jewish Daily Bulletin 
of Sept. 20, 1934. The undersigned received many inquiries as to the content of 
said prophecy. He investigated and found that the late Madison Grant, author 
of "The Conquest of a Continent" (boycotted by Jews), had in his possession 
a report that Charles Pinckney's diary of the U. S. Constitutional Convention of 
1789 contained Franklin’s words as quoted herein; but up to that time Grant 
had not been able to find the record, for which a search was still going on. 
Thereupon, the undersigned, on Sept. 25, 1934, to meet a general demand for 
information, published the document AS CIRCULATING NEWS. 

"Franklin's Prophecy” has interjected itself into the newspapers frequently 
since then, always being referred to as a forgery, without any explanation as to 
what had been forged. A forgery, in dictionary definition, is a counterfeit of 
something. The same forgery-criticism may be extended to another "prophecy" 
—The "Protocols of The Elders of Zion,” denounced by Jews as a forgery—of 
what? And the resemblance goes further, for the predictions of both are being 
tarried into effect today by Roosevelt Jews in the U. S. The comment upon 
this is that the add test of the genuineness of prophecy lies in the fulfillment. 

Jewish publications asserr that Franklin was a friend of the Jews because he 
once made a $25.00 "contribution,” together with other Gentile churchfolk, 
for the building of a synagogue; BUT FRANKLIN WAS DEFINITELY 
ANTI-JEWISH according to his own writings. In the N. Y. Public Library 
will be found books containing "Benjamin Franklin’s Writings" by Smythe. 
Vol. 8, quotes a letter from Franklin to President John Adams, dared Passy, 
France, Nov. 26, 1781, prior to the Constitutional Convention, as below: 

"I think that keeping us out of the possession of fifty thousands pounds 
sterling worth of goods for securing the payment of a demand for damages is 

12 2 

not ony dishonorable treatment but a monstrous injustice. It seems to me that 
it is principally with John Neufviile of Amsterdam, Holland, we have to do ; and 
although I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem, 1 did not 
expect that, with so many and such constant professions of friendship for the 
U. S. with which he loads all his letters, he would attempt to enforce his de¬ 
mands by a proceeding so abominable. His proposition of terms on which he 
would borrow money for us stamped his character on my mind with an impres¬ 
sion to deep that it is not yet effaced.” 

In the same volume there is another letter to President Adams dated, Passy, 
France, Dec. 14, 1781, from which this is extracted: 

"I was led to understand that it would be agreeable to these gentlemen (1. 
Neufviile & Son), if, in acknowledgement of their zeal for our cause, and great 
services in securing this loan, they could be made by some law of Congress the 
general consignee of America to receive and sell upon commission in the dif¬ 
ferent ports of the nations, all the produce of America that should be sent by 
our merchants to Europe. I remark upon the extravagance and impossibility of 
this proposition. By this time, I fancy your Excellency is satisfied in supposing 
J. de Neufviile was as much a Jew as 2 ny in Jerusalem—since Jacob was not 
content with his percents but took the whole of his brother’s, Esau’s, birthright 
CUT THEIR THROATS-IN THE BARGAIN—which I do not think Neuf¬ 
viile has the least inclination to do by us while he can GET anything by our 
being alive.” 

Smythe’s Writings are pronounced genuine in the following report: Editor 
Wesley Winans Stout of the Saturday Evening Post wrote May 16, 1939, to 
Dr. J. E. Conner, 1121 Bedford Ave., Brooklyn, N. Y., that: 'Carl Van Doren 
is the greatest living authority on Benj. Franklin. I quote him: It is true that 
Franklin had difficulties with Jean de Neufviile & Son, a firm of Dutch bank¬ 
ers who made a tentative loan to Congress, negotiated by William Lee, and 
demanded an extravagant security.' ” 

Below is more evidence from the record. Read the following Pennsylvania 
Constitution's anti-Jew oath required of citizens at the time the great philos¬ 
opher was alive, and ask yourself if any Jew could honestly sign it: 


"I-, do profess faith in God The Father and in Jesus 

Chtist His Eternal Son, the True God, and in the Holy Spirit one God blessed 
evermore, and do acknowledge the sacred Scriptures of the Old and New 
Testament to be given by Divine Inspiration.” 

The following is from "The Republic Reclaimed” by Chicago Lawyer 
Newton Jenkins: 

"It is very significant that the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Constitutional 
Convention (1776) which wrote into the Constitution this provision against the 
Jews was none other than Benjamin Franklin. The great predominance of 
Quakers in Pennsylvania brought the matter to a head when, in 1790, four 
months after Franklin's death, the test clause, at it was called, was eliminated 
from the Constitution of Pennsylvania."' 

It is noteworthy that persons with Jewish names have been in charge of 
Franklin records. William GL T GGENHEIM has been head of the Benjamin 

1 2 3 

Franklin Society. Max FERRAND is understood to have supervised Franklin 
records for the Huntington Library at Pasadena, Calif. A collector of Franklin 
records called "Stone”, is said to spell the name "Stein." He announced some 
months ago in the newspapers that he was disposing of same to the Franklin 
Instituce at Philadelphia. 

Poultney Bigelow, of Malden-on-Hudson, who has world-wide fame as a 
man of letters and American author and journalist, writes the undersigned: 
"Voltaire, FRANKLIN and Frederick The Great, were the three outstanding 
champions of political and religious liberty in the most humanitarian period of 
the world. All three were friends, AND ALL THOUGHT ALIKE IN THE 
MATTER OF THE JEWS. All three advocated tolerance, the right of residence 
and police protection for Jews in their traditional pursuit of pawnbroking and 
money-lending. But not one ever dreamed of them claiming citizenship, much 

(Upon asking permission to quote him, Mr. Bigelow', with high patriotism, 
replied: "Anything from this pen which you think useful to our common 
country and the cause of historic truth, is at your service. The Jew is a fact of 
historic importance. We examine such facts with an open mind,” He wrote 
from Paris 2-7-37: "Paris is now almost as Yiddish as Manhattan or London. 
It is an International Plague that calls for SURGICAL TREATMENT.") 

Let us analyze, point by point, the alleged Franklin Prophecy, placing 
Prophecy in one column and Fulfillment opposite thereto, in a parallel com¬ 
parison, as below. Then digest the deadly significance. 


(l) In whatever country Jews have settled 
in any great number, they have lowered its 
moral tone and depreciated its economic 

(2) Segregated themselves, and have not 

(3) Have tried to undermine the Christ¬ 
ian Religion; 


(1) "From reliable sources we have 
learned that above 90 of the big barons 
of the Movie Induscry are Jews. The cur¬ 
rent run of motion pictures has been injur¬ 
ious to public morals."—From "The Movie 
Baron and Sunday Movies" by Rev. R, H. 
Martin, President National Reform Assn. 
The author of '’The Republic Reclaimed” 
says: "Jews control the slate-makers in all 
factions and in all parties. We find evi¬ 
dence of debasing Jewish Influence on every 
hand in the U. S. today.” 

(2) Ludwig Lewisohn, prominent Jewish 
author of "Israel,” says: "A Jew remains a 
Jew. Assimilation is impossible.” Prof. 
Albert Einstein was quoted in Collier's 
Weekly (11-26-38) as declaring: "A Jew 
who abandons his faith remains a Jew.” 
N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. 
Rosenman has spoken publicly against it. 
(N. Y. Times 2-1-36). 

(3) Maurice Samuel, Zionist Author, in 
"You Gentiles," exclaims: "We Jews are 
destroyers—and will remain destroyers for¬ 
ever. Nothing you can do will meet our de¬ 
mands. The unassimilated Jew is dangerous 
to you. Ours is one life — yours another. 
They are opposed in mortal enmity.” Jew¬ 
ish Author Bernard Lazare in "Anti-Semit¬ 
ism," says: "The Jew works at his age-old 
task—the annihilation of the religion of 
Christ.’ 1 The London Jewish World of Max. 
15, 1923, stated: "Fundamentally, Judaism 
is anti-Christian." 


(4) Have built up a State within a state: 

(5) Wlien opposed, have tried to strangle 
that country to death financially; 

(6) Did the world give the 
jews, they would find some cogent reason 
for not returning: 

(■?) They are vampires; they cannot live 
among themselves only; they must subsist 
on people not of their race; 

(8) They will dominate the land; 

(9) They will change our form of 

(10) If we do not exclude them then, in 
200 years our children will be working in 
the fields, and Jews will be in the count¬ 
ing houses, rubbing their hands. 

(4) "Let us recognize tfiat we Jews are 
a distinct nationality." U. S. Supreme Court 
Former Justice L. D. Brandeis. in "The 
Jewish Problem and How to Solve it." "I 
cannot for a moment concede that, at the 
same time one can be a true American and 
an honest adherent of the Zionist (polit¬ 
ical) movement." Jacob Schiff, in letter 
Aug. 8, 1907. 

(>) Promoters of the International 
Jewish Boycott against Hitler-Gennar.y for 
expelling Jewish Communists, boast that 
they have pushed chat country to the verge 
of financial bankruptcy. The boycott has 
been extended to Italy and Japan. 

(6) In his book "From Pharaoh to 
Hitler’’ Jewish Lawyer-Bernard j. Brow r n 
says: "The most ardent Jewish Nationalists 

(Political Zionists) do not intend to live 
in Palestine even if a Homeland were 
established there." The Dead Sen mineral 
wealth, estimated at many billions of 
dollars, has attracted Jew capital to 

(7) The anti-Communist Canadian pam¬ 
phlet "Key to the Mystery" quotes the 
following Jewish boast published in the 
Belingske Tidende of Dec. 9. 193 ^; "Who 
does not know what the glands in the 
human body represent'’ The Jews have 
settled upon the glands of the nations. 
These glands are the exchanges, banks, 
daily papers, insurance companies." 

(8) Roosevelt’s Key Jews control Wash¬ 
ington, the Political Power Center of the 
Nation, and N. Y. City, its Economic Dy¬ 
namo. See Roosevelt’s Supreme Jewish 
Council, including "Economic-Master Mind" 
Bernard M. Baruch; "Legal Master-Mind" 
Felix Frankfurter; "New Deal Father" For¬ 
mer Supreme Court Justice L. D. Brandeis; 
and U. S. Treasury Dictator Morgenthau. 

(9) "We challenge the American System; 
we demand a thoroughly Socialized Demo¬ 
cracy; we support an enlarged Supreme 
Court.”—Central Conference of American 
Rabbis’ proclamations published in the 
jewish-owned N. Y. Times. Sept. 13, 193<S. 
The U. S.A. is A Republic. Webster's 
Dictionary calls "Social Democracy" Com¬ 

(10) Are U. S. Jews in the "counting 
houses rubbing their hands" over their 
Kentucky Gold Pile, concentrated in Ameri¬ 
ca and wrecking European credit. 



The following extracts are taken from "Henry Adams and his Friends," 1947, by 
Harold Dean Cater, published by Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. Mass.—Henry Adams 
is a descendant of John Adams, signer of the American Declaration of Independence, 
and President of The Republic, elected in 1796: 

"... The Jew Question-is really the most serious of our problems. . . . The Kaffir 
Circus is the most startling phenomenon since the South Sea Scheme. It is almost wholly 
in Tew hands. Beit is building a palace in Park Lane. Barnato has rented Spencer House. 

1 2 5 

Harris) (Page 350 ) names tailed after J. P. Morgan in the 

$4 - *» J~j** ^^jrviTK 

save Morgans bankrupt stocks t.otn gig -pc ‘ | 10 | e car case is rotten with worms— 

■■■■•' tLemr *° john Hay ftom Paris ' 

JUly 'ThrSp 6 aL ( h P p £ a e „ S am- How ,0 ^"^rfhunXd SJ hence! * 7 whole 

. ^777^— i»Bu^ S 

M a‘ ri 

for rae -" (Letter 10 

JOhn ^^^T^. poem in Benjamin Frankhn's papers as printed in 

■Works of Franklin" by John Bigelow. Fr-edom gave 

on Genera. Benedict Arnold: ’ 

Whose god is Gold and whose saviour is a Bribe. 
' • '- r - -- ^ 

(On Page B < of;^» 
from Benjamin Franklin to Lafayette tr ?; ■• Enc j ose d i s copy of letter from his 

7^77^7 one of onr cruisers . . . Jndns sold oniv one 

man, Arnold three million. ) 


The following is from Edmondson Bulletin of Nov. 28. ISbS: . 

jas. sts » 

as making the following admission, , . 

EVERYWHERE CONSIDERABLE. The Jew who abandons his faith 


Observe the implications of that Jewish confession: 

(1) This pre-eminent leader and representative Jew evidently spring 
for Jewry not only admits in the foregoing that the Jew himself creates^ the 
very persecution about which he constantly wails, but by confessing J - 
actually THRIVE on it, Gentiles are forced to accept the premise that Jewish 
Leadership CAUSES "POGROMS” so that the tribe may materialistically profit 

(2) He admits that Jewish power is very important and effective m 

Gentile world affairs. 

( 3 ) He admits that the word "jew" stands for many more things than 

reUg, (4) He admits that Jews remain Jews after they abandon the so-ealied 

^^'ToleaTn the KIND of antagonism the Jews create in the non-Jews in order 
that they may profit, digest the statement of Louis S. Posner, Manhattan C 

12 6 

man of the N. Y. campaign of the American ORT Federation to get funds for 
training European Jews, The N. Y. Times of Nov. 23, 1938, quotes him as 

"The anti-Semitic trouble in Europe is NOT the result of the RELIGIOUS 
views of the Jews, and is NOT THE result of the cultural or RACIAL dif¬ 
ferences between Jew and Christian. It is due MAINLY to ECONOMIC 

I have unwaveringly held that the Jewish Problem in America is ECON¬ 
OMIC and political, not religious or racial. 

This Einstein confession completely vindicates a bulletin published by the 
undersigned on August 1st, 1935, headed, "Thriving on Persecution.” 

"Persecution cannot crush the Jew. He is the aristocrat of the world.”— 
Samuel Uncermyer, quoted in the London Investigator of June, 1935. 


Not in U. S. Constitution 

(From an Edmondson address before the Anti-Communist Society of Allentown, 
Penna., Dec. 9, 1938.) 


You have seen the Communist slogan: "Communism is Twentieth Cen¬ 
tury Americanism!” 

You have heard Communist Leader Browder bellow for ''democracy” and 
cali on his followers to vote for the Roosevelt New Dealers, who spout 
"democracy” while they play for socialism. 

"We are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY in the 
whole world, but many other democracies look to us for leadership—that 
WORLD DEMOCRACY may survive,” vociferated President Roosevelt in his 
speech quoted in the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938. 

But you know that the United States of America was established as A 
Representative Republic—not a Democracy; 

That, by Section 4, Article 4 of the Constitution, each state in the Union is 
guaranteed "A Republician Form of Government;"—By The Republic of the 
United States. 

That the checks and balances provided by the founding fathers were 
designed to safeguard against democratic tyranny as well as autocratic dictator¬ 

But do you also know that in neither the Constitution as amended, nor in 
the Declaration of Independence, does the word "DEMOCRACY” anywhere 

Let us dig deeper into this democracy business. Rabbis demand for 
America "A Thoroughly Socialized Democracy.” If you will read the N. Y. 
Times of Sept. 13, 1936, you will see an item therein quoting a resolution by 
the great Central Conference of American Rabbis, largest Sanhedrin in the 
World. That resolution calls for the scrapping of the American System. (See 
Foot Notes 1 and 2). 

What is a "socialized democracy?” Russia answers! The Soviets are 
ostensibly Communist, but the official title of the Government is "Union of 
Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.” Jews established it! 

On July 4, 1937, the Editor of The N. Y. Morning Freheit (largest 
Communist daily in the U. S.), M. J. Olgin, Russian-born Jew, published the 


"Communism is Twentieth Century Americanism. Communism is the theory 
and practice of putting into the terms of the present social forces the doctrine 
of the Declaration of Independence." 

Communism is the violence-tool by which its advocates hope to establish 
Socialism, the end produce. What is this socialism? A political rule where indi¬ 
viduals are regimented into machines, a condition of human slave-existence 
where the good of the state is always above that of the individual, who is 
leveled down to the lowest intelligence m the mass. 

We Americans want no Democracy-Communism-Socialism. Individualistic 
Americanism is the most deadly foe Communism-Socialism has, It levels up, 
not down. Individual creative genius is the Soul of Progress. Communism- 
Socialism are the REAL REACTIONARIES. For Individualism, the preservation 
of Americanism is worth any sacrifice, in my opinion. 

What a fight we are in! It will take all we've got to win, because we come 
into conflict with citizens who seem to like to advertize their ignorance, But 
Americans have shown themselves to be unbeatable, and I have no doubt as to 
the result,—ONCE THEY KNOW! 

Often we fighters wonder why we keep on sacrificing personal resources, 
comforts and health, with SO much judaized selfishness, cowardice and apathy 
around us; but there is something inside that tells us to go on; and we try to 
emulate the stout old Scotch warrior, who cried: "I’ll lay me down and bleed a 
while, and then get up and fight again!" 

NOTE NO. 1:—"Social Democracy" is defined thus in Webster’s Diction¬ 
ary; "The SOCIALIST PARTY founded in- Germany in 1863 by Ferdinand 
LaSalle (JEW), in 187? united with the followers of Karl Marx (JEW), 
aiming to secure adoption of state SOCIALISM (As in Russia). See Funk & 
Fagnalls Dictionary definition of Russia’s Jewish Bolshevik Party, viz: "The 
refer to Webster’s Dictionary description of "Bolshevik.’ thus: Radical Wing 

NOTE NO. 2—ConsCtution-Framer James Madison, who, in "The 
Federalist,” is held to have "sold" The Constitution to the American People, 
denounced "democracies” in these words: "Pure democracies have ever been the 
scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with 
PERSONAL SECURITY or rights of property." 



From Edmondson Bulletin of January 4, 1939. 

Nesta H. Webster, of Great Britain, famous author of "World Revolu¬ 
tion,” "Secret Societies & Subversive Movements,” "Surrender of an Em¬ 
pire"’ and other exceptionally documented books, has just written "Germany & 
England,” a penetrating analysis of the present political situation saying: 

"Hitler took the control of Germany out of the hands of the Jews. We 
are faced with a ruler who, although a dictator, REPRESENTS THE WILL OF 
NINETY-PER CENT OF THE POPULATION, a plain man of the people, 
coo socialistic for us. 

"The essence of Fascism and Nazism is NATIONALISM, while that of 

12 8 

"After Russia had been brought low and a hideous revenge taken on her 
by the PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH BOLSHEVIKS, the Jews started bol- 
shevizing Germany, and having got her almost completely under control they 
Remained pro-German until the rise of Hitler. It was then that the whole 
Jewish power turned against Germany. The Jews had not minded a certain 
amount, of persecution as long as they were given power in the state. This is 
precisely what Hitler took from them, hence largely the cry of persecution. A 
Jew, Ernest Lissauer, who coined the phrase 'Gott Strafe England,’ composed 
the 'Hymn of Hate.' 

"Since the main cause de guerre against Hitler is his treatment of the 
Jews, it is most urgent for people in this country to know the truth about it. 
BUT THAT IS JUST THE DIFFICULTY. The British public derives its 
information from the newspapers or the radio, WHICH ARE LARGELY 

"England of 1938 is not the England of 1914 because she is no longer 
TATORSHIP—a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life." 

From the foregoing, it is evident that the famous European author has 
had further confirmation supplementing the following extract from a letter 
written by her on May 4, 1934, to Arthur Goadby, a New York friend of the 

“Personally, I am more than ever inclined to believe that The Protocols 
of the Learned Elders of Zion are genuine. Without them I do not see how 
one could explain things that are happening today. More than ever, I THINK 


Puts Frankfurter on U. S. Supreme Court 
(From Edmondson Bulletin of January 12, 1939) 

At the Senate Judiciary Sub-Committee hearing in Washington on Presi¬ 
dent Roosevelt’s appointment of Harvard’s Zionist Professor to the U. S. 
Supreme Court, Senator P. F. McCarran of Nevada asked if Frankfurter 
believed in the doctrine of Marxism—according to the N. Y. World-Telegram 
of Jan. 12, 1939: 

"Mr. Frankfurter snapped: 'I do not believe you are any more attached to 
the THEORY OF Americanism than I am. I do not believe that you have ever 
taken the oath to support the Constitution of the U. S. with less reservation 
than I have or would now.” 

Do Senators take oath with ANY reservation? 

"Who’s Who in American Jewry” says Frankfurter was "Associated with 
the Brandeis-Mack Leadership of the Zionist Organization of America, and 
was Legal Advisor of the Zionist Delegation at the Versailles Peace Conference 
at Paris in 1919.” 

"Speaking as an American, I cannot for a moment concede that one can be 
HERENT OF THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT. They who believe in and hope 
and labor for an ultimate restoration of Jewish POLITICAL life, and the re¬ 
establishment of a Jewish NATION, place a PRIOR LIEN upon their citizen¬ 
BE GOOD CITIZENS."—Jacob Schiff, N. Y. Sun of Sept. 4, 1907. 

12 9 

How can Zionist Frankfurter reconcile that doctrine with his ’'allegiance to 
the Constitution"—or does he rely upon the advance absolution provided by the 
"reverse 1 ’ Jewish Kol Nidre "prayer,” reading: "All oaths * * * with w'hich 
we may bind ourselves from this Day of Atonement until the next Day of 
Atonement * * * we repent them all. May they be made null and void." 

Under the circumstances, is Zionist Frankfurter, who owes a foreign al¬ 
legiance, FIT to sit in judgement on citizens of the U. S.? 

The World-Telegram report continues: 

"'Nor do I believe you are more attached to the theories and principles 
of Americanism than I am,’ {Frankfurter added). 

What IS Americanism? Let the American Veterans organizations answer 
—"Americanism is an unfailing love of country; loyalty to its institutions ana 
ideals; eagerness to defend it against all enemies (that means Communists) ; 
undivided allegiance to the flag." 

Signed by all the American war veteran organizations and promulgated in 
February, 1927, the Americanism definition quoted was not signed by the 
"Jewish War Veterans of the U. S." Why? 

Some light on the subject may be had by reading the following from 
"Der Jude” (of Germany) (1916) by Zionist Leader Klatzkin: "Only the 
[Jewish Code rules our life. We form in ourselves a closed business and 
juridical corporation. A strong w'all separates us from the peoples in the lands 
in which we live—and behind that wall is A JEWISH STATE.’ 

Mr. Frankfurter said he never attended meetings of the American Civil 
Liberties Union, and was not among its executives. 

He is a National Committeeman—and the N. Y. American of Nov. 7, 
1935, said :"Frankfurter is AN ACTIVE MEMBER of the Communistic 

Former President Theodore Roosevelt wrote Frankfurter Dec. 19, 1917, 
on the Mooney Case: "You are taking an attitude which seems to me to be 
fundamentally that of Trotsky and other Bolsheviki leaders—an attitude which 
may be fraught with mischief to this country. * * * I have received your report 
on the Bisbee deportation. * * * Your report is as thoroughly a misleading 
document as could be written on the subject. * * Here again, you are engaged in 
excusing men precisely like the Bolsheviki, who are murderers and encouragers 
of murder; who are traitors to their allies, to democracy and to civilization, as 
well as to the U. S.; and whose acts are nevertheless apologized for on grounds 
substantially like those which you allege." 


The Simon-Schuster 1934 book, "The New Dealers," says: "More than any 
other one person, Frankfurter is the legal master-mind of the New Deal. 
Frankfurter men are established in key posts throughout the Roosevelt Ad¬ 

The World-Telegram report continued as follows: 

" ‘Did you know that William Z. Foster (notorious Communist) was a 
member of the National Committee of the ACLU?’ 

" T knew that he was on it at one time.’ (Frankfurter reply). 

"Senator McCarren said: 'I SHOULD THINK THAT A MAN IN 

"Frankfurter’s face reddened. 'I base my association with the Union on 
the record of its actions.’ 











1 30 

Another diversive retort? This is what Congressional Report of the House, 
No. 2290. Jan. 17, 1931, describes as ACTIONS: "The American Civil 
Liberties Union is closely affiliated with the Communist movement'in the 
U. S., and fully 909c of its efforts are on behalf of Communists who have 
come in conflict with the law. It is quite apparent that the mam function of 
the ACLU is to attempt to protect Communists in then advocacy of force and 
violence to overthrow the U. S. Govt." 

Report 2290 also quotes the Chairman of the Communism investigating 
Committee as asking Director Roger N. Baldwin of the American Civil Liberties 
Union if his ORGANIZATION upheld the right of a arizen or an alic-n to 
advocate the overthrow of the U. S. Government bv force and violence. "THAT 


ABOUT HIMSELF AND HIS VIEWS. That is my right, just as I am within 
legal bounds when I declare that I hold an honest belief in the truth of the 
matter herein presented, regarding an aspirant for public office, and submit 
fair patriotic comment thereon without malice. 

Many protests were made to the Senate Judiciary Sub-Conunitlee, which 
ignored them as of no value when it unanimously endorsed Frankfurter 

1940. ADDENDA 


Declaring that the due process clauses of the 14th Amendment to the 
U. S. Constitution protect Jews from pogroms in America, Senator losiah W. 
Bailey of North Carolina, addressing the Senate March 17, 1938, on the 
Reorganization Bill, made the following statement: 

' I was talking with a gentleman of the Jewish race, a Member of the 
Congress, in the lobby of a hotel the other evening. He said that he never had 
any respect for the due-process clause in the Constitution, 

"I was very much amazed, as he is an intelligent man. 

"I said: 'How long have you been in America?’ 

"He said: 'I was bom here.’ 

"I said: 'And you have no respect for the clause requiring that no man's 
life, liberty, or property shall be taken from him, either by the Federal 
Government or by a State, except by due process of law?' 

"He said: 'It is just a means of beating the.devil around rbe stump.’ " 

"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges 
or immunities of citizens of the U. S.; nor shall any'state deprive anv person of 
life, liberty or property, without due process of law-; nor deny to any person 
within its jurisdiction die equal protection of laws,"—I4th Amendment to the 
U. S. Constitution. 

In the "Law and Politics of Prof. Felix Frankfurter,” 1938, edited and 
sponsored by Archibald MacLeish, Librarian of Congress, appears the following 
from Frankfurter: 

"We have had 50 years of experiment with the 14th Amendment, and the 
centralizing authority lodged with the Supreme Court over the domestic affairs 
of 48 widely different states is an authority which it simply cannot discharge 
with safety either to itself or the states. THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES 

1 3 1 

Since Frankfurter says also "The U. S. Supreme Court IS the Constitution 
(N. Y. Times 4-17-30), the logical conclusion .is that this Jewish Justice is 
"working over" the rest of that high tribunal in order to alter the Constitution, 
eliminate the due process clauses, and deprive Gentiles of life, liberty and 



(Edmondson Bulletin, revised, Chronologically, to 1939.) 

"Beria, newest addition to the Council of People’s Commissars of Russia, like 
many ocher recent proteges of the Kaganowitsch family, is Jewish. THE INCREASING 
JEWISH CHARACTER'”OF THE BOLSHEVIK REGIME is said to explain its growing 
anti-German measures.''—Chicago Tribune, January 5, 1939, by its Correspondent Donald 
Day at Riga. Latvia, with whom Edmondson had personal correspondence. 

This is the latest up-to-date confirmation of the continuance of the Jewish Domina- 
ation of Russia, beginning with the Jewish Kerensky start of the revolution' that es¬ 
tablished the L T nion of Socialist Soviet Republics, directed by a Committee of 545 of 
whom 447 were jews. The following chronological order is illuminating. 

1918 Sept. 18: Netherlands Representative Oudendyke at St. Petersburg reported (as 
reproduced by British White Paper of April, 1910): "Unless Bolshevism is/ntpped in 
the bud immediately it is bound to spread, in one form or another, ail over the world, 
as it is organized BY JEWS, whose one object is to destroy, for their own ends, the 

existing order of things." 

1918 December "Jews in Russia" by Victor Marsden, Russian Correspondent of the 
London Post says in the Personnel of the First Soviet Bureaucracy were 17 Jews of 22 
members- War Commissariat, 34 Jews out of 43; Commissariat of the Interior, 45. Jews 
out of <54; Committee on Foreign Affairs, 13 Jews out of 17; Commissariat of the Ex¬ 
chequer, 26 jews out of 30; Commissariat of Justice, 18 Jews out of 19; Commission ot 
Hvgiene, 4 Jews out of 5; Commissariat of Public Instruction, 4 4 Jews out of 53, Com¬ 
mission of Social Aid, 6 Jews out of 6; Commission of Works. 7 jews out of 8 ; Com¬ 
mission of Reconstruction of Jaroslav, 2 Jews out of 2, Delegates Bolshevist Red Cross, 
8 Jews out of 8; Provincial Commissars, 21 Jews out of 23; Journalists, 41-Jews out of 
42 - Commission of Inquiry on Late Officials of the Empire, 5 Jews out of 7; Committee 
of Inquiry on Assassination of Emperor, 7 Jews out of 10; Supreme Council of General 
Economy 45 Jews out of 56, Bureau of First Soviet of Workmen and Soldiers of Moscow 
19 Jews’out of 23; Central Committee of the 4ch Congress of Soviets, 33 Jews out ot 
34- Executive Committee of the 5th Congress, o4 jews out of 62; Centra! Committee of 
Social Democratic Party, 9 Jews out of 12; Grand Total, 447 Jews out ot 5-*5. 

Peoples Communist Party Central Bureau, 5 Jews out of 6; Social Democratic Party 
Central Committee, 11 Jews out of 11; Socialist Revolutionary Party of the Left, 10 Jews 
out of 12. Marsden lists names, -md says "Jewry is a Bund with its own Seciet Govein- 

ment 19 1 9 February issue N. Y. "Jewish Forum," by Rabbi Judah L. Magnesp "The 

revolution in Russia set creative forces free—and look what a large company ot Jews 

were available for immediate service! 

1919 February 12 U S. Senate Overman Committee Report, Testimony of Rev. 

George Albert Simons/of the Methodist Church "In December 1918, under a man 
known as Apfelbaum (Zinovieff), out of 3S8 members (ot the Bolshevist Revolutionary 

Committee) only 16 happened to be real Russians--* 1 the rest were Jews w,tn the ex¬ 

ception of a negro; and 265 of these came from the lower East Side of N. Y. City. 

1919, March 29. London Times: "Of the leaders who provided the central machinery 
of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75% were jews." 

1919, April 4, London Jewish Chronicle: "The ideals of Bolshevism are at many 
points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism. 

1920 Jan. 11, "Bolshevism is Jewish," Editor A. S. Leese of England quotes Gen. 
M Schuvier of the U. S. Armv as saying: "The Government of Russia is almost entirely 
Jewish and our U. S. Army in Siberia was full of Bolshevist Jews d.rect from Moscow 

J 1920, Feb.-Mar. issue of "Asia," reported "In All Bolshevist institutions the heads 

ar€ J i920 Sept. 10 American Hebrew of N. Y.: "What Jewish Idealism and Jewish 
discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic 
dualities are tending to promote in other countries." , . , , _ „ 

q 1920 July "World Significance of the Russian Revolution, preface by Dr. Oscar 
Levy, London Jewish Savant, says: "Jewish elements provide the driving force for both 
Communism and Capitalism. 

13 2 

1923, Dec. 13, Correspondent Claire Sheridan in the N. Y. World: "The Communists 
are Jews, and Russia is entirely dominated by them." 

1924, Dec. 19, U. S. Congressional Record quotes Jewish Chairman Zinovieff of 
the Communist 3rd International: "We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. 
We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America." 

1933, Oct. 21 - 28 , London Catholic Herald. Dr. A. Homer: "The Soviet movement 
was a Jewish and not a Russian conception. Of the 224 revolutionaries who in 1917 were 
dispatched to Russia with Lenin to foment the Bolshevik Revolution. 170 were Jew's. 
The Jewish Chronicle of Jan, <5, 1933. said: Over one-third of the Jews in Russia have 
become officials. 

1933. December "Opinion," a Jewish N. Y, Magazine under Rabbi S. S. Wise's 
editorship; "With the rise of the Soviet Regime, jews have been granted rights not ac¬ 
corded even in the most advanced countries. The state, which previously did not employ 
any Jews, now employs in White Russia 6 l'A Jewish officials. A Jew is commander of 
the Ukranian Army; a jew is President of the State Bank; jews occupy almost all im¬ 
portant ambassadorial positions; universities, professions, judiciary and administration 
now have a greater percentage of Jews than any other 'nationality. Anti-Semitism has 
been declared a state offense, and is punished as counter-revolution. 1 ’ 

1934, February "New Outlook" Magazine of N. Y„ James Abbe, author of "1 
Photograph Russia, says: "The men who control Russia are not Russians. Members of 
the Jewish race from all over the world, predominate." 

1933. Oct. 29, The New Masses," James Waterman W'ise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, 
says: "Litvinoff. Yaroslavsky, Kaganowitsch. Radek, Bela Kuhn and Trotsky are Com¬ 
munist leaders in the Soviet." <All Jews.) 

1936, February "Defender" Magazine of Wichita, Kan.: "The Central Committee 
of the Communist Party at Moscow is the very heart-throb of international Communism. 
There are 39 members, and 56 are Jews. The remaining three are married to Jewesses. 

1937, ’GK’s Weekly," London, Feb. 4, quotes Hilaire Belloc, author of "The 
Jews." thus; "As for any one who does.not know that the present revolutionary movement 
is Jewish in Russia. I can only say that he is taken in by rhe suppressions of our 
deplorable press." 

1937, May London Catholic Times: "The Soviet Government has been and still is 
largely composed of Jews." 

1938, Feb, 10. "The Irish Catholic" of Dublin* quotes A. Stolvpine. son of former 
Russian Minister who was assassinated by a Jew in 1911, "Stalin’s government has never 
been and will never be a national government. Israel will always be a controlling power. 

1938, Feb. 17, N. Y. Times Cable from Rome, Italy, quoting escaped Russian Envoy 
Butenko to Rumania: "Tews control big industry, have a. monopoly of production, and 
live lives of luxury in Russia." 

1938. October, "Rulers of Russia." 34 pages, by Rev. Denis Fahey, quoting introduc¬ 
tion: "In this pamphlet f present to my readers a number of serious documents which go 
to show that the real forces behind Bolshevism in Russia are Jewish forces, and rhat 
Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews, for the establishment of 
their future Messianic kingdom." 

’The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews ... are internationalists, and 
are trying to start a worldwide revolution."—U. S. Ambassador Francis to Russia, taken 
from his "Russia from the American Embassy," in Library of Congress. 

"Through Thirty Years," a 1924 book by H. Wickham Steed, Bricish journalist:: 
"Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, wished to bolster up the Jewish 
revolutionaries to secure a field for Jewish exploitation of Russia"—reference being to 
Jewish loans to promote the revolution. 

"Impressions of Soviet Russia," a publication by Charles Sarolea, Edinburgh pro¬ 
fessor, student of Russian conditions for 35 years: "I am quite prepared to admit that 
the Jewish Leaders (in Russia) are only a proportionately infinitesimal fraction; but it 
is none the less true that those few Jewish leaders are THE MASTERS OF RUSSIA." 

"The Hidden Hand," by Col. A. H. Lane of England: "The supreme conflict in rhe 
world today is between anti-Bolshevism and Bolshevism, the tool and agent of the 
Jewish Hidden Hand. In spite of Moscow 'executions’ so dramatically written up in the 
Jew-controlled press of the world, the Jewish control of foreign-contact positions in 
Russia remains unaffected," 

Victot Marsden, British-Russian Correspondent, Translator of "Protocols of Elders 
of Zion," says Lenin was a Calmyc Jew, whose wife was Jewish and whose children spoke 
Yiddish. Lenin attended Zionist meetings. Scotland Yard Detective H. T. Fitch, in 
"The King's Shadow," said he served Lenin disguised as a waiter, and that he was a 
"typical round-headed Jew.” 

(The above record was prepared as a court exhibit in rebuttal of a Washington 
1944 prosecution contrary allegation.) 


While engaged in the early part of the patriotic crusade in New York- 
City I met Rev. George Albert Simons, referred to in the Overman Senate 
Committee report. In his talks with me this Methodist minister more than 
confirmed his tesrimony about Jewish rule in Russia, and said there was no 
doubt in his mind thac it continued. He was subjected to persistent Jewish per¬ 
secution on his return to the U. S. 

About this time I also met Dr. J. E. Conner, formerly U. S. Consul at St. 
Petersburg during the revolution. He told me he saw automobiles driven by 
Jews, machine-gunning crowds of people m the Russian capital. He reported to 
Washington—and was soon thereafter removed from his post. He told me 
that for years afterward he was Jew-hounded oyt of every position he obtained. 
Finally, impoverished, he died in a Brooklyn, N. Y., Y. M. C. A. room. 

(Edmondson Bulletin of Jan. 25. 1939) 

Since jews have been historically notorious as capitalistic exploiters, what evidence 
is there to support the charge that jews and Communism are allies and that International 
Jewish Finance is backing Communism-Bolshevism-Socialism, the International Trinity 
that is today trying to destroy Nationalism is a question skeptics frequently put. 

Below are documentary references, including confessions from Jewish authorities, in¬ 
dicating that Jewish Leadership is using International -Communism-Bolshevism-Socialism 
as a tool or weapon to exploit and break down. Gentile politics, economics, culture and 
national Patriotism, the chief enemy of Jewish Internationalism. 

"The Jew evolved organized capitalism and its working instrumentality, the banking 
system," said the American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920. The jew Karl Marx, is "The 
Earner of Communism." 

In "The American Mercury" for April, 1935. Jewish Anarchist Emma Goldman 
declared that the Soviet (Jewish established) had become the crassest form of State 

"Who's Who in American Jewry" and Jewish "Rolls of Honor" place the Capitalist 
Jews Baruch, Morgenthau. Brandeis and Lehman beside Communist Jew leaders Trotsky, 
Litvinoff, Olgin, Blum et al. 

In his book "The Truth about the Slump,” author A. N. Field points out: "The 
enormously significant thing today is that the Jewish power of the purse and revolutionary 
activities are working in a common direction, and there is a mass of evidence that they 
are working in UNISON. 

"When we 'sink' we become a revolutionary proletariat (Communistic); when we 
rise, there arises also the terrible power of the purse (capitalistic).’—Theo Herzl in 
"The Jewish State." 

In his booklet. "The Jewish Assault on Christianity," Rev. Dr. G. B. Winrod of 
■Wichita. Kansas, says: "h is impossible to separate Jewish Capitalism from Jewish 
Communism. ’’ 

The London Catholic Herald or Oct. 21, 2S and Nov. 4, 1933, published: "Astute 
Jew financiers would not be so stupid as to put vast amounts of Capital into the world¬ 
wide activities of Bolshevism (Communism) unless rhey were certain in their own 
minds that their own interests and power were secure." 

The N. Y. Times of June 28, 1934, said: "The underlying philosophy of the New- 
Deal is the philosophy of” Justice Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court. The NRA is 
almost a composite of his dissenting opinions." 

The Arkansas Gazette of May HO, 1927. printed this evidence, "A check for $100 
was received recently as a contribution by Commonwealth College of Mena, Ark., from 
Louis D. Brandeis, Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court.” Thar college was investigated 
as Communistic by the Arkansas Legislature. 

The N. Y. Jewish Day of May 11, 1937, said: "The Rabbinical Assembly favors 
the general tendency of the recently adopted social legislation, and in particular the 
TVA.” Socialist Norman Thomas said the TVA was typically Socialist. 

The Chicago Jewish Sentinel of Sept. 22, 1938, admics that: "The film industry 
* * * absorbs its share—AND MORE—of Jewish refugees"—expelled as Communists 
from Germany. 

1 34 

(Bulletin of Feb. 21, 1939) 

"Father Charles E. Coughlin should be prosecuted because, in violation of 
the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the U. S. he persists in libeling the 
Jewish Religion. He is amenable to both ecclesiastic law of the Catholic Church, 
and also to the law of our country. If these battles should be initiated by our 
government it may also have the salutary effect of forever silencing such 
enemies who promote the destruction of American DEMOCRACY as Colonel 
Robert Edward Edmondson of New York." 

The above is from an article "By Julius Hochfelder, LL.M., Ph. D.,’ Page 
4 of The California Jewish Voice, Feb. 3, 1939. Hochfelder is identified thus 
in the 1938-9 "Who’s Who in American Jewry" Page 446: "Julius Hochfelder. 
LL.M., Ph.D., member of Bar Assn, of N.Y., BORN HUNGARY, 1880. ' 

(Before exposing this foreign-born Jew lawyer’s misinterpretation of 
American Constitutional Philosophy and Law, may the undersigned native-born 
American veteran journalist first inject a personal note. By his article, I wel¬ 
come my return to the columns of rhe jewspapers. The conspiracy of silence in 
this respect had become "deafening" since the American Hebrew' sometime ago 
announced that nevermore would a certain No. 1 Anti-Semite be mentioned. 
Now, I am grateful to "Hungarian’’ Hochfelder for having restored me to dis¬ 
favor, and it is with patriotic ardor that I redouble efforts, especially since he 
has promoted me to the rank of COLONEL. Maybe increased loyalty to duty 
will bring a Jewish GENERALSHIP.—or perchance, a medal, since Jews are 
hell on medals. But, let’s look at the record and get down to business.) 

Hochfelder says I’m destroying American "DEMOCRACY’' by exposing 
Jewish anti-Americanism. Now', what is this "democracy?” The word doesn’t 
appear in the Constitution of the U. S., and that historic document takes pains, 
by Section 4, Article 4, to guarantee to every sovereign state of the American 
Union "A Republican form of government." 

It is worthy of note that the Central Conference of American Rabbis 
(N. Y. Times, Sept. 13, 1936) challenged the American Christian Social 
System, and demanded, in substitution therefor, "A Thoroughly Socialized 
Democracy," which "Social Democracy” is described in Webster's Dictionary 
as "The COMMUNIST PARTY in Russia.” 

If such "Jewmocracy” is what Hochfelder means by "Democracy.” he can 
bet his last shekel that I'm out to destroy ir in the U. S. A.l 


So much for the Philosophy of the American Government. Now, as to 
American LAW. There is no law in the U. S. prohibiting the publishing of 
a libel of any religion or group. The Constitution of The Republic and every 
sovereign state within it substantially provides that no law shall be made 
"respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise 
thereof.” The Constitution of New York State properly adds: "The liberty of 
conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to justify practices 
inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state." 

In dismissing May 10, 1938, the charge of "libel of all persons of the 
Jewish Religion" in the Edmondson-LaGuaraia Case, Judge Wallace of New 
York said in part: "After consideration of briefs submitted by The People, 

1 3 5 

The Defendant and amicus curiae, the Court, on its own motion, and IN 
FURTHERANCE OF JUSTICE, dismisses the indictment which charges The 
Defendant with 'libeling all persons of The Jewish Religion. 

In a letter to the N. Y. Herald-Tribune, published Aug. 29 , 1936, Louis 
Waldman, N. Y. lawyer, wrote as follows: "The remedy sought by Mayor 
LaGuardia to be invoked against them (disseminators of anti-Semitic propa¬ 

Here we have "Hungarian” Hochfelder on one side of the fence, and 
another foreign-born Socialist Jew—"Russian” Waldman—on the other; both 
sides as usual, promoting confusion, the "divide and rule” policy of Inter¬ 
national Jewry. 

However, che undersigned thanks "Hungarian” Hochfelder for affording 
the opportunity of using his legal "masterpiece" as a sounding board for more 
exposure publicity—and cordially invites him to "come again!" 

(Feb. 23, 1939 Broadcast) 

(An Open Defense-Letter, February 28, 1939) 

To Congressman Adolph J. Sabath of Illinois, 

Chairman of The House Rules Committee, 

Washington, D.C. 


On Feb. 13, 1939, replying to a lettc-r of Feb. 6 from Walter Steele, 
General Manager of the National Republic Magazine, in which he protested 
his branding as an Anti-Semitic promoter by Congressman Marcantonio, you 
included the following provocative paragraph, wherein you "extended yourself” 
under the immunity of The Floor—as printed on Page 2238 of the Congres¬ 
sional Record of Feb. 17, 1939, thereby making a public document: 

"Col. E. N. Sanctuary * * * Eastern Represenative of Col H. A. Jung of 
the American Vigilant Intelligence Federation of Chicago * * * is an associate 
—such men as Robert Edward Edmondson and James True. And behind all 
these is the High Priestess of the Nazi-movement in America, Mrs. Elizabeth 
Dilling. The assembled facts show' that you (Steele) are indeed, as Congress¬ 
man Marcantonio charged, closely identified with ’the most dangerous, un¬ 
democratic, un-American and subversive groups in the U. S.” 

I note that Who's Who in America Jewry reports you as having been 

In the Feb. 12, 1939, issue of the Constitutional Protective League of 
Illinois, Inc., 2405 Board of Trade Bldg., Chicago, I find the following 
quotation from the Sept., 1936, report of the Illinois National Defense 

"Adolph Sabach: In Congress 30 years. Has never voted for national 
defense movements within our program. * * * We have repeatedly found that 
plans for national defense are not safe in his hands." 

Congressman Marcantonio is reported as heading the International Labor 
Defense, which is described thus in Mrs. Dilling’s "Red Network"-—"The 
American section of the controlled Communist International Red Aid; legally 
aids and propagandizes in behalf of Communist criminals arrested for revolu¬ 
tionary activities; co-operating with American Civil Liberties Union”'—the 

1 36 

Frankfurter-Ernst-Hays Jewish organisation, champion of communizers. Mar- 
cantonio is not listed as a Jew, although his activities are oro-Jewish; but for 
the. present we may classify him according to the formula now proclaimed in 
New York, viz.: 'New Dealers are circumcised Democrats.” 

But—what is there "vicious” about my "stuff?” Is it because the publica¬ 
tions are documentary reproductions of what the Jews sav about themselves 
and how they are propaganda-blinding, confusion-dividing and politically- 
ruling gullible Gentiles? In THAT respect I concede that the term is "vicious/’ 
And I forsee a dreadful reckoning! 

What is there "criminal” about my publications? In dismissing, May 10, 
1938, the Jewish-Majority Grand Jury indictment against me in Jewish La- 
Guardia’s N. Y. City, charging "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion" 
because I exposed Jewish communizing activities, the court said the dismissal 
was "in the furtherance of justice." Where is the criminality? Did vou 
deliberately LIE? 

As usual, the Jewish prosecution hid behind the complaint-title "The 
People of the State of New York versus Robert Edward Edmondson;" but it 
was smoked out. Defendant Edmondson subpoenaed "Princes of Jewry" Bernard 
Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, Henry Morgenthau, Rabbi Wise, Samuel Untermyer, 
Mayor LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann, Justice Samuel l. 
Rosenman. Whereupon your American Jewish Committee and the American 
because the indictment violated the free speech guarantee of the Constitution. 

Are you Jews afraid to face facts? You certainly could not have feared an 
humble individual patriot like myself, with one lone lawyer and a few Jew- 
deflated dollars for defence—as against a thousand Jewish lights backed by 

No, Mr. Congressman, Jews are afraid of the TRUTH. They know that a 
few grains of it, plus a little courage, will blow the lid off when publicized. 

You have emphasized "undemocratic groups" in connection with your 

denunciation of the undersigned. As a citizen of a republic—not a democracy_ 

I plead guilty to that charge, since a democracy, particularly the Social Demo- 
ocracy demanded by your Central Conference of American Rabbis, is COM¬ 
MUNISTIC. You can count on me as being against such democracy to the last 

You Jews call me "Professional Patriot." Well, I’d rather be that than a 
"Professional Jew” or a "Professional Politician,” both of whom contribute 
destruction to the Gentile state, whereas a "Professional Patriot” contributes 
something constructive to the country that shelters him. However that may be. 
Mr. Congressman, my patriotic "nest” is almost as bare as Mother Hubbard’s 
cupboard; but I’ll bet your "coffers are full" of America’s hospitable bounty. 

1 3 7 


Extracts from speech delivered by Eric H. Louw Feb. 24, 1939. in the 
South African House of Assembly on the "Alien and Immigration Bill," are 
reproduced below: 

"I am convinced that if it were possible to remove Jewish influence and 
pressure FROM THE PRESS AND NEWS AGENCIES, the international 
outlook would be considerably brighter. In introducing this bili I am actuated 
neither by Fascism nor Racialism. I have acted solely as a South African. The 
main principle of this bill is that it admits the existence in South Africa of a 
Jewish Problem. It is perhaps appropriate that Communism should be dealt 
with in a bill which also deals with the Jewish Question because Communism, 
since its earliest day.s, has been linked with Jewry. 

"Communism is International, and a Jew' is International in his outlook. 
Communism had its birth in the teachings of Karl Marx, a Jew. I remember the 
Soviet delegation to the League of Nations included seven Jews and one 
Russian. We find that in most countries where Communism has taken coot, the 
leaders of Communism are Jews. 

"The Communist makes no distinction whatever on political, social or 
economic grounds, between the black and white races, which is particularly 
important for us in South Africa. 

"Why is the principle of discrimination introduced into my bill? Because, 
in the first place, the Jew is not assimilable, That he is not assimilable has 
been shown by the records of history, and it is also admitted by himself. Even 
in America, the so-called melting-poc of the world, Jews have remained a 
separate nation. 

"Ludwig Lewisohn, a well-known Jewish writer, says: 'Assimilation is 
impossible, because the Jew cannot change his national character.’ I find in 
'A Book of Jewish Thoughts' by Dr. J. H, Hertz, this statement: 'What I 
understand by assimilation is loss of identity. It is the kind of assimilation I 
dread most, even, more than pogroms/ Basil M. Henriques, a distinguished 
Jew, made a speech in London reported in the Zionist Record of South Africa, 
Jan. 29, 1939, saying: 'There must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar 
people, and a peculiar people we must remain.’ Ludwig Lewisohn also says; 
'We are a people; we are a nationality,’ 

"Another Jewish factor which causes friction is Jewish control of finance 
and business, the formation of monopolies, and domination of the professions. 
This is particularly so with regard to high finance and international banking. 
The International banker controls credit, and through it he controls industry 
and trade. 

"In Johannesburg 659c of the attorney firms are Jewish; in Cape Town 
the attorneys are 41 % Jewish. As regards medical practitioners, in Johannesburg 
48% are Jews; in Cape Town 31%. 

"May I commend, Sir, to this House and also to the members who arc 
Jews, and to Jews outside of this house, the words of a man who is a friend of 
the Jews—Author Hiiaire Belloc, who says; 'There is a Jewish Problem, and 
the Jews who resent the statement of the problem and an attempt at solving 
it, are not doing their own people any good ; and they arc- at the same time 
denying us the right to put our own house in order—WHICH IS OF 

1 3 8 


(Mar. 7. 1939, Edmondson Bulletin) 

Under the smear-title "Fascism in America," the March 6, 1939, issue of 
the weekly magazine "Life,” published in The Ghetto of the Nation, lists in 
part as below, anti-Communist U. S. agencies as "American Masqueraders,” in 
a pro-Jew article covering eight full pages, designed to belittle a recent Madison 
Square Garden huge anti-Jew mass meeting. 

American Nationalist Confederation; League for Constitutional Govern¬ 
ment of N. Y.; The Reveaier of Wichita, Kan.; The American Guard; Rev, 
Charles E. Coughlin of Royal Oak, Mich.; Dr. G. B. Winrod of Kansas; 
George W. Christians of Chattanooga, Tenn.; James True of Washington, 
D. C.; Robert Edward Edmondson of N. Y.. AND GENERAL GEORGE 

Of General Moseley "Life” says; "He made a bitter anti-New Deal out¬ 
burst on his retirement fast year.’’ SO—you are anti-Semitic if you are against 

That 22,000 attendance of anti-Jews at Madison Square Garden recently, 
plus many Red-Jew violence incidents in N. Y. City before and after, that are 
omitted from the jewspapers, prove that the Big Town has become JEW- 

"Life” is in the same classification as the "tycoon magazine” "Fortune"; 
is managed by the Larsen-Luce crowd of ''Time/' and carries the following fine 
old American names as staff members on Page 90, March 6, 1939: Joseph 
Kastner, A. Heiskell, R. Ruhi, B, Shrjfe, Rachel Albertson, David Cort, Bern¬ 
ard Hoffman, Albert Eisenstadt. 

To any open intelligent mind, "Life” exposes its hand, as well as its ignor¬ 
ance (?) of the Communist-Fascist matter at the beginning by diversively de¬ 
claring: "There is one profound difference which makes Fascism a far greater 
menace to America than Communism.” Communism is a frank proposition to 
change America's whole Way of Life * * * but Fascism begins as a call to 
fearful men to unite against clutching enemies.” 

Compare the foregoing sophistry with the following bullseye from 
Columnist Mark Sullivan — as published in the N. Y. Herald Tribune 
(9-20-38); "In any country where Communism goes far enough, the next de¬ 
velopment is sure. The Fascist principle rises to neutralize Communism. If 
America resists Communism, IT NEED NOT FEAR FASCISM.” 

In addition to that, "Life” quotes as high authority for its production the 
notorious Rev. L. M. Birkhead, Kansas City churchman who takes expensive 
trips abroad and at home smelling out Jew-Expose agencies which are putting 
revolutionary internationalists on the spot. 

Reputation-Destroyer "Life" seeks to arouse class hatred against the patri¬ 
otic agencies it "blacklists" by using methods outlined by the Jewish Institution 
For Propaganda Analysis, notably in saying: "Each (agency) derives its in¬ 
spiration and guidance, IF NOT ITS PAY, from a foreign eovernment.” 

So far as I personally am concerned, "Life” lies on most of the counts 
listed. I believe the other patriots mentioned would "sign that” refutation. When 
"Life” Jews say in one breath that they have bankrupted Germany by their 
International Boycott on it for expelling Jew-Communists, and in the next pro¬ 
claim that Hitler is financing all the Fascists, anyone with a grain of common 
sense will explode with hilarity. 


"Facts of Record, are few" about these agencies, remarks "Life." My own 
journalistic record is known to more than ten million people in the U. S. A. 
and elsewhere. 

We American patriots would like nothing better than to stand up before 
the Dies Committee and turn our pockets inside out. Dickstem twice backed 
down, after summoning me before his "Nazi-Exposure" Committee. 

One last word to "Life": Thanks for the publicity! Any kind is better than 
none! We patriots can’t yet strike off the chains from The Press; but coming 
events are casting their shadows before. Controllers of the press won’t let the 
public know the other side. That is suppression. 

We patriots are going to force you to publicize us. We know how to goad 
you into committing overt acts, AND WE’RE GOING TO DO IT, 

Thanks particularly for lining us up with General Moseley and Senator 
Reynolds. We are glad you put us in the proper class. 


"Look” of 2-28-39 imitates "Life," and says: "Robert Edward Edmondson 
aspires to be America’s Goebbels. He has no organization, but busies himself 
distributing Fascist propaganda." 

No, Edmondson "aspires" to nothing but the Salvation of The Republic; 
but he admits that, as dictator of a properly financed "ad-less" national daily 
newspaper he could, with such power publicly LIBERATE FORCES WHICH 


(The following was broadcast in the U. S. bv Edmondson Bulletin of 
Jan. 3, 1939:) 

Mark Twain, the famous author (Samuel Clemens in private life), it has 
been alleged by Jews, was pro-Jewish. However that may be, his daughter 
married a Jew, the Russian-born pianist Ossip Gabrilowitsch (Salamonovitch). 
Occasionally the humorist wrote in a jocular way about the Jews; but in the 
March, 1898, issue of Harper’s Magazine, under the heading "Concerning The 
Jews," he compiled a devastating analysis of Jew activities, which article was 
reproduced in a volume entitled "The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg" and 
other stories by Mark Twain, 1900 copyright. The last edition of this book 
was issued in 1928, copyrighted by Mrs, Gabrilowitsch—AND THE ARTICLE 
"CONCERNING THE JEWS” WAS DELETED. From the article published 
in Harper’s Magazine in 1898 the following extracts are taken in review: 

"Can fanaticism alone account for this ("Jewish Persecution”)? It is now' 
my conviction that it is responsible for hardly any of it. In this connection I 
call to mind Genesis, Chapter XLVII. We have all read the story of the years 
of plenty and the years of famine in Egypt, and how Joseph, with that oppor¬ 
OF THE POOR, AND HUMAN LIBERTY'—a corner whereby he took the 
nation’s money all away, to the last penny; took a nation’s livestock all away, 
to the last hoof; took a nation’s land away, to the last acre. Then took the 
nation itself, buying it for bread, man by man, woman by woman, child by 
child, till ALL WERE SLAVES; a corner which took everything, left nothing; 
a corner so stupendous that, by comparison with it, the most gigantic corners 

14 0 

in subsequent history are but baby things; for it dealt in hundreds of millions 
of bushels, and its profits were reckoned by hundreds of millions of dollars, 
and it was a disaster so crushing that its effects have not wholly disappeared 
from Egypt today, more than 3000 years after the event. 


Was Joseph establishing a character for his race which would survive long 
in Egypt, and in time would his name be familiarly used to express that 
character—like Shylock’s? IT IS HARDLY TO BE DOUBTED. Let us remem¬ 

"I wish to come down 1800 years later, and refer to a remark made b\ 
one of the Latin historians . . . The substance of that remark was rhis: Some 
Christians were persecuted in Rome through error, they being ’MISTAKEN 
FOR JEWS!’ The meaning seems plain. These pagans had nothing against 
Christians, but they were quite ready to persecute Jews. For some reason they 
hated a Jew BEFORE they even knew what a Christian was. Mav I not assume 
that persecution of Jews is a thing which ANTEDATES CHRISTIANITY, 

"In the U. S. cotton states, after the war . . . The Jew came down in force 
("carpetbaggers” ?),-set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the negroes' 
wants on credit, and at the end of the season was proprietor of the negro's 
shaie of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites 
detested the Jew. 

"The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. 
The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance 
againsr his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. 
When settlement day came he owned the crop; the next year he owned the 

"In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He 
gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Com¬ 
merce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons Spain had to 
banish him 400 years ago, and Austria about a couple of centuries later. 

"In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If 
he entered upon a trade, The Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a 
doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had 
to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the 
poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money, 
EVEN TO GET RICH. This history has a most sordid and practical com¬ 
mercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one parr of it, BUT NOT 

"Protestants have persecuted Catholics—BUT THEY DID NOT TAKE 
THEIR LIVELIHOODS AWAY FROM THEM. Catholics have persecuted 
HANDICRAFTS AGAINST THEM. I feel convinced that the crucifixion has 
not much to do with the world's attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for 
it are older than that event. 


"In Berlin a few years ago I read a speech which frankly urged THE 
EXPULSION OF THE JEWS FROM GERMANY. And the agitator’s reason 

1 4 I 

was this: 'Eighty-five per cent of the successful lawyers of Berlin were Jews; 
and that about the same percentage of the great businesses ol all sorts in Ger¬ 
CUTION STANDS OUT AS CLEAR AS DAY. In Vienna an agitator said 
those details were true of Austria-Hungary. 

"I am convinced that the persecution of the jew is not m any large degree 
due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a monev-getter. He made it the end 
and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome; HE HA.S BEEN AT IT EVER 
SINCE. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. 

"You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read 
in the Encyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the U. S. was 
250.000 I wrote the editor, and explained to him I was personally acquainted 
with more Jews than that in my country, and that his figures were without 
doubt a misprint of 25.000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect 
that for business reasons many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks 
plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have AN IMMENSE JEWISH 
POPULATION IN AMERICA. I am assured bv men competent to speak that 

"Will persecution of the Jew ever come to an end? On the score of re¬ 
ligion, I think it has already come to an end. On the score of race prejudice 
and trade, I have the idea that it will continue. Race prejudice is no particular 
matter. Jewish persecution is not a religious passion. IT IS A BUSINESS 


I take pleasure in truthfully answering queries submitted by Miss Dorothy 
Thompson, so far as lies within my power, in the following "open letter" of 
March 8, 1939: 

"Dear Miss Thompson: 

Although you have not seen fit, in your letter of March 3, to enable me 
to reply to my correspondents with original-source-infomnarion about yourself, 
I herewith gladly comply with your requests. Taking up the paragraphs of your 
communication seriatim: 

(1) For your enlightenment, an Investment-Economist and a Public 
Relations Counsel (both of which appear as titles on my letterhead), are 
directly concerned in root causes in American Economic and Political fields— 
which have been invaded and wrecked by jews; over 2900 ot them listed in 
Who's Who in American Tewry as foreign-born—all evidently summoned to 
this "Promised Land" by other Jews born here who have made it A Milking 
Pot instead of assimilating into integral Americanism's socalled Melting Pot. 

Consequently, the Brandeis-Frankfurter-Morgenthau-Baruch Jewish "School 
of Thought’’ is now dominating the politico-economic affairs of the nation 
with an alien and anti-American "Way of Life" that is destroying The Republic 
by trying to substitute for it the rabbi-promulgated "Thoroughly Socialized 
Democracy"—described in Webster’s Dictionary as "Social Democracy,’’ THE 

(2) It would be physically impossible, in the first place, to furnish you 
with a list of the names of the patriots who finance my publications because 
they reach from the Atlantic to the Pacific Coasts, and from the Great Lakes to 

1 4 2 

the Gulf of Mexico, and are the great middle clash of The Republic. Absolutely 
no Hitler-Mussolini financing has been received. However, such would be as 
acceptable as were the German volunteers George Washington welcomed into 
his Libration Army at the birth of the Republic. 

In the second place, to send YOU such names would be the-act of a Judas- 
betrayer—as you are apparently allied with those whom I regard as enemies of 
my country. 

You point out that "Who’s Who" doesn't provide ANY data about me. 
That is correct. Since my Jew-exposure bulletins, with my complete record 
(including a real-likeness-photo), are known among over 10,000,000 Ameri¬ 
cans—so many more than Who’s Who’s circulation—I did not think it necessary 
co BUY SPACE- in Who's Who. It pleases me very much to have confirmation, 
in the first sentence of your letter, as to the "widespread publicity" 1 am giving 
tc the cause of patriotism. 

If you ask for it. I'll send you a copy of letter from fromer President 
David Brown of the American Hebrew, wherein, after stating that he had 
exhaustively investigated my record, he was forced to give me "a clean bill of 
health" professionally and otherwise, excepting my "poisonous" Jewish Anti- 
Americanism documents, 


(From Edmondson Bulletin of March 13, 19?Q) 

In this pamphlet is presented "Key jews” resident in America, promin¬ 
ently appearing in the public press. Most of checking for accuracy has been 
in "Who’s Who in American Jewry"—although certain important U. S. Jews 
have been omitted from that big book for some mysterious reason, while 
France’s Blum, Russia’s Finkeistein-Litvinoff, Britain’s Hore-Belisha, Mexico’s 
Trotsky and other foreign Jews have been listed in this "American" Jewish 

Count of the Jews listed in the Jewish Who’s Who shows that it contains 
over 2900 who were born abroad. The first point to keep in mind in this 
connection is that these foreign-born Jews have attained the status very 
quickly of "KEYS," or they would not be incorporated in this cream list. 

The second vital point to hold in mind is chat Jew's will not assimilate and 
become an integral part of Americanism, but remain a notorius "Jewish Soli¬ 
darity Forever," which is essentially a Nation within a Nation. 

The question arises: If Jewish Religious PRACTICES are a menace to the 
peace and safety of the state, isn’t the U. S. Supreme Court Mormon decision a 
religious precedent for Jewry's expulsion from America—just as is the Asiatic 
Exclusion Act a ''racial" precedent? 

Like other members of their Tribe, these foreign-born Jews promptly 
"settle upon the glands” of our American System as Educator Jews, Doctor 
Jews, Lawyer Jews, Legislator Jews, Political Jews, Social Worker Jews, 
Publicity Jews, Economic Jews, Financial Jew's, Movie Jew-s, Radio Jews, and 
Government Jews—parasiticallv eating out the sustenance we have created. 
In short, instead of regarding America as the Melting Pot of Humanity, they 
make it the Milking Pot for International Jewry. 


The great influx of foreign-born revolutionary Jews, upon analysis, is 
shown to be chiefly from Russia, Poland, Hungary, Rumania and Austria, 
called "Eastern jews,” viz., Tribesmen from Asia—"Mongol Jews.” 

Many people believe that modern Freemasonry is a Christian secret society. 
Ic will enlighten them to know that more than 1700 Jews listed in Who’s Who. 
in American Jewry are Masons—245 Thirty-Second Degree and 23 Thirty- 
Third Degree, which is regarded as representing "the elect.” President Franklin 

D. Roosevelt is a 32d degree Shriner Mason. Many Rabbis are Masons. Rabbi 
Isaac M. Wise wrote in "The Israelite of America,’’ of August 3, 1866: 
'Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history, degrees, charges, pass-words 
and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end." 


President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Key-Advisor-Jews" 

Bernard M. Baruch, "Unofficial President, "Prince of Jewry. 

U. S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter {born Austria), "Legal Master-Mind," 
"Karl Marx Professor.” 

U, $. Supreme Court Justice L. D, Brandeis (retired), "Father of New Deal,” says 
Jews are a nationality.” 

Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Secretary of Treasury. Federal Reserve System boss. 

Herbert Feis, "key” for Secretary of State Hutl {wife a Jewess), known as "Brains of 
Stare Department." 

Mordecai Ezekiel, "key" for Secretary of Agriculture, author of the illegal AAA. 

Nathan Margotd {born Rumania), “key" for Secretary of Interior kites, 

Isidor Lubin, "key” for Secretary Perkins of Labor Dept., aided by Leo Wolman, Cecilia 
Razovsky, C. E. Wyzanski, David Dubinsky, Max Zaritsky, Rose Schneiderman. 
Thurman Arnold and Harold Nathan, "keys" for Attorney-General, aided by Ben], V, 
Cohen, Roosevelt's legislation-expert-framer. 

William C. Bullitt, Ambassador to France. 

Lawrence Steinhardt, Samuel Untermyer’s nephew. Ambassador to Peru. 

Harry F. Guggenheim, Aeronautic Counsel. 

E. A. Goldenweiser (born Russia), Federal Reserve Bank System Research Director. 

Wm. M. Leiserson {born Esthonia), Chairman National Mediation Board. 

David J. Saposs (born Russia), National Labor Relations Board Economist. 

Sidney Hillman (born Lithuania), Communistic CIO backer. 

Jerome N. Frank. Stock Exchange Commission Director. 

Nathan Strauss. Housing Authority. 

D. E. Lilienthal, Tennessee Valley Electric Power Authority Director. 

Abe Fortas, Gen. Counsel PWA. 


Sol Bloom of New York, Democrat. 

Emanuel Celler of N. Y., Democrat. 

Samuel Dickstein of N. Y.. Democrat (born Russia). 

Adolph Sabath of Illinois, Democrat (born Czecho-Slovakia). 

M. Edelscein of N. Y., Democrat, 

Leo Sacks of Pennsylvania, Democrat. 


Herbert H. Lehman of N. Y., International Banker. 

Henry Horner of Illinois. 

Payne Ratner of Kansas. 


Mayor F. H. LaGuardia. 

Postmaster Albert Goldman. 

Stanley M. Isaacs, President Manhattan Borough. 

Samuel Fassler. Building Commissioner, born Austria, 

Park Commissioner Robert H. Moses. 


Julian W. Mack, Edgar H. Lauer, Alfred Frankenthaier, Louis Goldstein. Louis B 
Brodsky (born Russia), Louis A. Abrams,, Bernard L. Shientag, Isidor Wasservogel, 
Aaron Steuer, Edward B. Koch, J. Sidney Bernstein, Jacob Panken (bom Russia,) Nathan 

I 44 

D. Perlman (born Poland), Anna M. Kross (born Russia), Samuel I. Rosemnan, 
Samuel Mandeibaum (born Poland), G. M. Moskowitz, Louis L. Cohen, Peter A. Abeles 
(born Rumania), Max Salomon, Justice Wise Policzer, Isidor I, Haber. Morris Ede'r, 
Irving Ben Cooper (born London), Morris Rothenberg (born Estonia), Charles Solomon, 
Jacob Eilperin, Lester Lazarus, Abraham Goldman, Charles Marks, Joseph M. Proskauer, 
Irwin Untermyer, Alfred Cohen, Edward Lazansky, Mark Rudich (born Rumania). 


Executive Committee of 50 includes these names: Joseph Breslau (born Russia): 
Meyer Bernstein, Joseph E. Brill, David Dubinsky (born Poland), T. J. Bambrick, Abe 
Chatman, Myer C. Finestone, Nathan Frankel, Harry Greenberg, Louis Hendon, Sidney 
Hillman (born Lithuania), Julius Hochman, Louis Hollender (born Poland), Abe Mendel- 
witz, Abraham Miller, Isador Nagel (born Poland), Samuel Permutter, Jacob S. Poto- 
sofsky, (born Russia), Alex Rose (born Poland, Secretary), Emil Schlesinger, Rose 
Schneidermann (born Russia), Samuel Schorr, Nathaniel Spector, Louis Waidman (bom 
Russia), Meyer Weinstein, Samuel Wolchok, Max Zaricsky {born Russia), Chas. Zim¬ 
merman, S. M. Biinken, Samuel Noll. (Mayor F. H. LaGuardia of N. Y. City, is enrolled 
as a member of The "American" Labor Party), 



Scholem Asch (born Poland), Rabbi Lewis Browne (bom England), Conrad 
Bercovici (born Rumania), John Cournos (born Russia), Rabbi Solomon B. Freehof 
(bom England), Waldo Frank, Montague Glass, Arthur Guiteimann (born Austria), 
Henry H. Klein (born Hungrav), Ludwig Lewisohn (bom Rumania), Rabbi Lee ), 
Levmger, Maurice Samuel (born Rumania), Geo, Seldes, Sidney Herschell Small, Rosika 
Schwimmer (born Hungray), Louis Untermyer. 


F. P, Adams, Alter Brody (born Russia), Benj. de Casseres, Edna Ferber. Rabbi 
Louis D. Gross, Maurice Hindus, W. B. Ziff, Fanny Hurst, Ben Hecht, Geo. S. Kaufman, 
Emil Ludwig-Cohen (born Germany), Walter Lippmann, David Lawrence, Louis Lipsky, 
Eugene Lyons (bom Russia), Isaac F. Marcosson, Rabbi Samuel Margoshes (born 
Galicia), Charles Michaelson, Rabbi Lewis I. Newman, M. J. Olgin (born Russia); 
Bernard Postal, Joseph Pulitzer, Dorothy Parker, Louis Rittenberg (born Hungray), 
M. S, Rukeyser, Morrie Ryskind, Marcus Eli Ravage (bom Rumania), Geo. E. Sokolsky, 
Philip Slomovit 2 , (born Russia), John L. Spivak, Herbert Bayard Swope, Walter 
Winchell. James Waterman Wise, Frederick William Wile, Max Winkler (born Rum¬ 
ania), Morris Fishbein (editor of American Medical Journal). 


Moses Annenberg of Philadelphia (bom Prussia); David A. Brown, of Detroit • 
Lowell Brentano, of New York; Paul Block; J. H. Biben, of New York; Abraham 
Cahan, of New York (born Russia): Levand Bros., of Kansas; Adler Chain, in North¬ 
west; Eugene Meyer, Jr., of Washington, D. C.; Arthur G. Newman of New York 
Journal; Liberty’s Bernarr McFadden of N. Y.; J. David Stern, of New York- Arthur 
Hays Sulzberger, of New York Times; David Schapiro, of New York (born Poland). 
The editorial departments of the newspapers are controlled chiefly through Jewish ad¬ 
vertising influence. Many Jews are in the Asso. Press and United Press Assn., and the 
Hearst papers are Jew-directed. 


Wm. S. Paley, President Columbia Broadcasting System; David Sarnoff, President Radio 
Corporation of America, dominaring National Broadcasting Co. Many individual broad¬ 
casting stations are Jewish-owned, as shown by the directorates. 


(Edmondson Bulletin March 2 5, 1939) 

Congressman Vito Marcantonio made the following speech on the floor 
of The House Feb. 3, 1939, against extension of the Dies Committee Investi¬ 
gation of Communism—and lost. In that deliver) 7 he remarked (see Congres¬ 
sional Record): 

The two MOST VICIOUS ANTI-SEMITES in America are Robert 
Edward Edmondson and James True, Edmondson will be remembered as the 
man who was arrested under charges of criminal libel brought by Mayor 
LaGuardia and other leading citizens of New York. He is best known as the 
most prolific writer of anti-Semitic literature, according to a University of 


Chicago study by D. S. Strong, published last year; and in recognition of this 
fact hts been invited several times to speak before the Naz, Bund in N. Y Ci R 
Ap , m in th- case of Edmondson, anti-bemitism and anti-New LX-almn are 
brought together in the person of Howland Spencer, EDMONDSON S CHILE 


In order to set the record straight, I wrote March 11 as follows to 

■■a, reported by (he Congressional Record of Feb. 3, 1939, your speech opposing 
the e«e„Z of thl aYoYXuriiM invested,>ns uf the Dies O.mmmee the 

following statements: 

showed the 


"( 1) That the undersigned is 'a vicious anti-Semite: 

"(2) That a University of Chicago study published last year' 

sicned to be the most prolific anti-Semitic writer; _ 

" ( 3 ) That 'Edmondson's chief backer is Howland Spencer. Hudson River aristocrat. 

(4 ) That { was arrested under charges of criminal libel brought by Mayor La^uatdta 
of New York and other prominent New Yorkers. 

Webster’s Dictionary defines "vicious" as addicted to vice or morally 
corrupted' in principles or conduct." That would be libelously actionable, 
uttered "off The Floor," being false. 

From the University of Chicago Press the following ww received by tire 
Edmondson Agency: "THIS IS NOT OUR PUBLICATION. lmrther in¬ 
vestigations developed a letter of March 7, signed by O. S. Strong, Wes c, n 
Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, saying: Marcantonio ERRED in stating 
that this study had been published. It exists only in_ the lorm ot a tew type- 
written copies, one of which ! lent the Congressman. 

The following letter has been received from Howland Spencer, dated 
March 7, 1939: 

"Dear Mr. Edmondson: 

"Replying to your leter of March 4, 1939. This letter will be authority tor 
my statement that 1 never contributed one dollar to the Edmondson jc\\- 
Exposure Patriotic Crusade; my only contributions being .muits reprinted 
from the Highland Post under the pen-name ’ Sep ire ot Krum Elbow loi 
the printing of which I personally paid, and which circular, were distnbuted 
through the medium of the Edmondson Service. 

The foregoing speaks for itself. Does this make Marcantonio a deliberate 


Marcantonio cold half the truth and misrepresented the technical prosecu¬ 
tion. The charge read: "The People of The State of New York Against Robert 
Edward Edmondson," having been brought by a Jewish-Maiority Grand Jury 
for "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion." But Marcantonio iorgot 
to sav that the court unconditionally dismissed the charge May 10, 19aS, m 
furtherance of justice." Marcantonio knew about this, but failed to tell the 
whole truth to his colleagues of The House, thereby laying himself open to 
the suspicion of trying to mislead them in an important action. 

"American Labor Party, born N. Y. City, Dec. 10, 1902, lawyer" is the 
complete information about himself Marcantonio supplied to the Congressional 
Directory of January, 1939- 

But we have looked up Marcantonio's record elsewhere. It smc-lis Com- 
nmnistfcally Kosher throughout. "American Labor Party" membership involves 
obedience to its Executive Council, which is composed mostly of Jews. 

1 4 6 

Marcantonio is "National President of the International Labor Defense." 
branded "Red" by the Dilling Red Network book of radicals. SASHA Small, 
Publication Director, sends out literature of the organization. On his letterhead 
appear 22 Jewish out of 39 other names, some of which may also be Jewish. 

I understand this New Dealer loose-talker not only denies he is lewish, 
but that he is not a Communist. What do you say? 


The following letter of March 22, 1939. from Robert Edward Edmondson 
js self-explanatory: 

Hon. Martin Dies, 

Chairman, Committee Investigating un-Americanism 
Washington, D. C. 

Dear Congressman Dies: 

I have been informed that you are being importuned to summon me 
before your Committee to investigate reports, viz.: (1) I am a "Nazi Spy" 
hiding out in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania (half a mile from 
Pennsylvania Highway No. 115); that (2) My power-publicity exposing 
Jewish commumzing of The Republic is financed by Hitler-Germany; that (3) 

I am working for a Fascist Dictatorship of America; and that (4) I ouuht to 
be deported at once. ' 

It would give me unalloyed pleasure to appear before your Committee any 
time anywhere, and tell The Truth, THE WHOLE TRUTH, and Nothing but 
lhe Truth, as to my exposures of the Jewish Politico-Economic System’s plans 
and acts to wreck America through communization. 

As "publicity is the only cure" for this public evil—Jewish anti-American¬ 
ism and as daily papers are under Jewish-advertising and ocher coercive 
control, little good would be accomplished by distortion or suppression of 
testimony Hence, I have hitherto regarded ''hearings/' etc., as more or less 
or little effect, 

If we could get broadcast publicity in this case, the result would be highly 
beneficial; otherwise, it would be largely a waste of vour and my precious time 
energy and reprehensible waste of taxpayers' money. 

However, it has occurred to me that, if you are undecided as to sub¬ 
poenaing me, it might be a good plan to acquaint you now with the nature 
ot my testimony; and I therefore submit below, in question and answer form 
points of interest as I envision them and your requirements; 


The Truth? U t0 ^ ^ Truth ’ the Whoie Truth ’ and Nothing But 

I do and will, if the Committee will let me. 

What is your name, age and residence? 

Robert Edward Edmondson, Stoddartsville, Penna. Born Dayton, Ohio, 
1872; of pre-revolution Virginia ancestry; 40 years in politico-economic 

What is your present business? 

Promoting patriotic power-publicity exposing the treasonable conspiracy 
of the anti-national Jewish Politico-Economic System that is seeking to over- 
throw The American System and substitute therefor the rabbi-proclaimed 
thoroughly Socialized Democracy," which is Communistic. 

1 4 7 

How iong have you been circulating publications on that subject. 

Since 1933- 

How many have been distributed? 

The Edmondson Associates have been instrumental in having printed, and 
republished and circulated over five million, reaching more than 10,000,000 
people, from coast to coast. I have no formal organization. 

What is the source of the information published? 

Books, pamphlets, testimony, legal documents and other suppressed publi¬ 
cations, including amazing Jewish confessions of asoirations and acts toward 
world power—from England, France, Italy, Germany, Arabia, China, Siberia, 
Sweden, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Japan, India, New' Zealand and the 
United States. 

What is the nature and object of your publicity? 

Educational Jew-exposure, to liberate the Republic from Jewish domination. 
Leaflets are designed to enlighten leadership, and fortify it with facts showing 
that the solution of the Jewish Problem in America is economic—to be 
achieved by ballots, not bullets. 

Do not racial-religious constitutional guarantees prohibit anti-Jewish action 
such as you are taking? 

No. For ics own self-preservation the Constitution must obviously require 
its citizen-supporters to defend it against enemies within, as well as without, 
who prostitute the state endowments into license that imperils its own exis¬ 
tence as a constitutional state"--using the words of the U. S. Supreme Court 
regarding Communistic subversions. 


How many contributor-subscribers have you? 

I do not know. By request, no regular record has been kept aside from 
that essential to tax requirements. The patriotic service is a sort of chain-affair, 
with contribution subscriptions irregular. 

You say your leaflets are supplied at cost. What do you mean by that? 

One cent is calculated to approximately cover labor, materials, supplies, 
printing, transportation and such operation-expenses. 

What is your salary? 

None. Not even a "drawing account." Edmondson capital to the extent of 
$20,000 has been sunk in this non-profit patriotic crusade to fill the gaps left 
by unavoidable deficits. I have regarded it as a privilege to make such a gift 
to my country. 

Have you received any large contributions? 

No. I do not recall any over $100; very few over $20. Most of them are 
anonymous, and impossible to trace to source, except in the case of requests for 
$1 to $5 literature-orders. Only volunteer contributions are acceptable. There 
is no specific solicitation, 

What have you to say regarding the report that Hitler-Nazi funds are 
financing your campaign? 

To the best of my knowledge and belief I have never received a dollar 
contribution from such sources, directly or indirectly. Without hesitation, I 
would gratefully accept any unconditional offering to preserve American liber¬ 
ties—whose preservation is worth any sacrifice. 






1 4 8 

Do you favor Nazism or Fascism for America? 

Absolutely NO. I am an American Vigilante Patriot, not a German Nazi 
Patriot, nor an Italian Fascist Patriot. My public and private record on this 
point is unimpeachable. I have repeatedly proclaimed that I stand irrevocably 
for traditional individualistic Americanism for America, as against collectivism, 
regimentation or any other foreign ideology. 

Why do you attack Jews in preference to Communism? . 

Communism is an effect. The Jews cause Communism. They introduced 
it to the world via Russia. Their leaders seek to Communize Gentiles. The 
Jewish Plan does not contemplate Communism for Jews. 

Jews call you an anti-Semite. Why? 


Because they hide behind Race, just as they do behind Religion. Arabs 
belong to the Semite race. If you are anti-Semitic you are anti-Arab as well as 
anti-Jew. I am not against Arabs. They take the stand I do, viz.: Their National¬ 
ist Leader says: "We turn against the Jews, not because they are Jews (or 
Semites), but because they threaten our existence." 

Has your agency ever been investigated by the authorities? 

Yes, by the Department of Justice and the Post Office. 

With what result? 

Both admitted that I was merely exercising my constitutional right of 
Freedom of Press. My mail has never been denied transportation by the postal 

Has any attempt been made to stop your campaign otherwise? 

Yes. A N. Y. City Jewish-majority Grand Jury, instigated by Je-wisb Mayor 
LaGuardia, indicted me in 1936 on a charge of "libel of all persons of the 
Jewish Religion,’’ everywhere, dead or alive, including themselves. The court 
unconditionally dismissed the charge May 10, 1938, specifically declaring 
that my work contained no incitement to breach of the peace. I have never 
attacked the Jewish Religion as such in my Jew-Communist exposures, which 
centered against politico-economic monopoly-power. 

You claim that a Jewish Conspiracy is trying to destroy The Republic and 
other nations. What is your authority? 

The Record 

Suppressed historical documents prove it. They show that Jewish revolu¬ 
tionaries wrecked Russia, and that the Soviets are now ruled by Kaganowitch- 
Finkelstein-Litvinoff-Maisky Jews thru Gentile Front Stalin, wedded to a 
Jewess. Confirmation is found in the writings of British Correspondent-Resi¬ 
dent-in-Russia Victor Marsden, who reported Lenin married a Jewess- British 
Author Wickham Steed, of "Through Thirty Years;" New Zealand’Author 
A. N. Field; English Editor-Author A, S. Leese. "The Moment," Jewish Soviet 
publication, was quoted in a U. S. Jewish weekly as saying: "L. M. Kagano- 
witch will one day rule over Russia. His sister is Stalin's wife.” The British 
White Paper of April 1, 1919, reported: ' Bolshevism is organized and worked 
by Jews.” The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4 , .1919, said: "The ideals of 
Bolshevism are at many points consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism." 
The American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920, said:” What Jewish idealism and 
Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the 
same historic qualities are tending to produce in other countries.” London 
Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy wrote in "The World Significance of the Rus¬ 
sian Revolution by Pitt-Rivers: "Jewish elements provide the driving power 
for both Capitalism and Communism." Zionst Leader Herzl admits in "The 


Jewish State" that: When we jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat; 
when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of the purse. The American 
Patriotic Coalition reported to Congress Dec. 29, 1934: The communist 
movement in the U. S. is an alien conspiracy." It is treason. 

Do you hold that Jews wrote "The Protocols of the learned Elders or 

I am not concerned with such authenticity any more than I am concerned 
with whether or not Benjamin Franklin actually delivered a prophetic denun¬ 
ciation of Jewry at the birth of The Republic. America is concerned with the 
fact that JEWS have put into effect such "protocolic” edicts in Europe and the 
U. S. The deadly parallel proves it. "Proof of prophecy lies tn fulfillment.’ _ 

Why do you object to Jewish championship of Democracy, -which kind ot 
go\ eminent has been praised by leaders of both the great parties? 

Because Democracy and Communism are synonymous; because this 
countrv's government was founded on republican, not democracy principles, 
"Democracy" does not appear either in the Declaration of Independence, nor 
in the Constitution. It was apparently deleted because democracies have always 
fallen to pieces in the past because their communistic forces automatically tend 
to disintegrate. 

Hitler says Jews want war. Do you believe that? 

Jews Promote War 

I do. The record shows it. Werner Sombart, in bis book: "Jews and 
Modern Capitalism," holds: "Wars are Jews’ harvests;’ going on to say: 'They 
became Lords of Money and Lords of the World." Henry Ford declared in the 
N Y. World of Feb. 17, 1921: "I am convinced that nearly all wars were 
caused so that some one would profit. Those who have profited were Inter¬ 
national Jews. They start wars by propaganda which set one people against 
another. They profit before war by making munitions; during war, by loans; 
afterward, in a free-for-all grab." Former British Propaganda Agent Landman, 
a Jew, wrote in the London Jewish Chronicle of Feb. /, 1936; "The only way 
to induce the American President to come into the World War was to secure 
the co-operation of Zionist Jewry by promising them Palestine. The Zionists 
carried out their part and helped bring America into the war. 

Do you know that Henry Ford recanted all he said about the Jews? 

Latest reports say his secretary "recanted” for him unauthorized. 

What is your proposal for a solution of the Jewish Problem? 

Disfranchisement of unassimilable Jews as a danger to the peace and 
safety of the state; their removal from economic monopolies and monetary 
domination; their purchase of the Island of Madagascar for a Jewish National 
Homeland State; their deportation seif-paid. 

Do you believe we Americans can return constitutionally to traditional 

I do. Enlightenment only is necessary. Once they know' the trouble, 
citizens will remedy it "American-way." No dictatorship is needed. America 
wants no communism, no fascism, no nazism, no bolshevism, no democracy, in 
my opinion. Individualistic Americanism demands the restoration of The 
Republic with its principles of special privilege for none and justice for all, 
no more, no less. There ought to be financial avalanche support for such a 
tescue and restoration, reconstruction and redemption. 

Yours, pro patria. 

1 5 0 


The following self-explanatory communication has just been received 
(April 17, 193-9) from English Editor Arnold S. Leese (the British Patriot 
whom the Jews of England imprisoned for six months recently because he 
publicly exposed the anti-British activities of World Jewry—and later interned 
five years without formal charges). 

"Dear Mr. Edmondson: In view of the immense importance of a speech 
made by the Jewish Poet Bialik in Palestine in 1933, and which is so little 
known, I have obtained the only six copies remaining of the report of this 
speech in a diocesan magazine of Jerusalem. I have kept one for myself, and 
am sending rhe others to five of the most genuine movements against the 
Jew of which I know; so that full use of Bialik's confession may be made. I have 
pleasure in sending one to you herewith. Bialik is now dead. His brother-in- 
law was Gamarnik, a Soviet Army General.” 

The name of this monthly magazine is "Lines of Communication,” and on 
the title page appears: "A Diocesan Magazine of the Anglican Church in 
Jerusalem and Throughout the Holy Land, Transjordan, Syria and Cyprus: 
Editor, Archdeacon Stewart, St. George’s Close, Jerusalem.” 

The tide of the article in the July, 1933, number, is "Judaism in History— 
A Jewish Conception," with an introduction reading: "From an address 
delivered at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, on May 11, this year, by Mr. 
N. H. Bialik, the most famous of modern Hebrew poets.” 

The matter below is taken from the Bialik address, and constitutes prob¬ 
ably the most amazing ''official" confession ever published from high Jewish 
"religious” leadership: 

To War on Gentiles 

"Judaism, which was destroyed politically (as a result of the destruction 
of the Temple 70 A.D.), went forth into the great world. It adapted its 
possessions to its wanderings. I once compared it to AN ARMY GOING TO 
WAR—a 'movable State.’ 

"Jews were compelled to smuggle their goods across from frontier to 
frontier; so they chose abstract wares, easy to smuggle; and this gave them 
ability, despite ghettoes and restrictions, TO ENTER EVERYWHERE; and 
so it is that the Hebrew people have PENETRATED EVERYWHERE. 

"The argument is that Judaism, by penetrating among the Gentiles (in 
its Christian guise or otherwise), has gradually undermined the remnants of 
paganism. Such penetration has NOT been without DELIBERATE JEWISH 
CONNIVING in the shape of assistance bestowed in a thousand ways, devices 

"By these devices, through Jewish will and through the power of their 
Jewish blood (I, too, like Hitler, believe in blood and the power of blood) ; 
and owing to an instinct for ’requital,’ they have gradually induced Christianity 
to shed what was left in it of pagan elements; and it is they who, in principle 
(even though they are called by great Gentile names), are the creators of the 
Renaissance, of Liberalism, of Democracy, of Socialism, and of COMMUNISM. 

"All this achievement * * * has come about chiefly through unknown and 
anonymous Jews, Jews in secret, either crypto-Jews who mingled among the 
Gentiles and nurtured great thinkers from among them; or, through the 

1 5 1 

influence of Jews, who, in the great crises of liberty and freedom, have stood 
behind the scenes; or through Jewish teachers and scholars from the time of 
the Middle Ages. It was disciples of Jewish teachers who headed the Protestant 

Calls Gentiles "These Dogs" 

"THESE DOGS, these haters of Israel, have a keen nose. In truth, Jewish 
influence in Germany is powerful. It is impossible to ignore it, MARX WAS 
A JEW. His manner of thought was Jewish. His keeness of intellect was 
Jewish; and one of his forbears was a most distinguished rabbi endowed with 
a powerful mind. 

"The newspapers, UNDER JEWISH CONTROL, obviously served as an 
auxiliary in all movements in favor of freedom. Not in vain have Jews been 
drawn toward journalism. In their hands IT BECAME A WEAPON HIGHLY 

"The Gentiles have at last realized this secret—that Judaism has gradually- 
penetrated and permeated them LIKE A DRUG. The Gentile nature is in 
revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle. Paganism is minded to 
organize its last war against Judaism. And there is no doubt that this warfare 
* * * is being waged specifically against Democracy, against Socialism. This 
is another worldwide warfare against the forces of Judaism. I venture to think 
that Socialism in its highest form is the fruit of the Jewish spirit, and the fruit 
of the world outlook of the prophets. It is they who were the first Socialists. 

War is now being waged against us, against Judaism—not in OUR OWN 
LAND but in the great outer world where we are scattered. They would 
'smoke us out’ of all the cracks and crannies WHERE WE HAVE HIDDEN. 
They would exterminate us like BACILLI, and be rid of us." 

To any but dosed minds, comment is superfluous. But to ignore the warn¬ 
ing ''protocol" of "an army going out to war’’ on Gentiles in the guise of 
secret spies, under the Oriental banner of diabolical duplicity, would be to 
commit suicide in the shadow of TOWERING ARROGANCE*. 


The following was printed in The Jewish Spectator of April, 1939, by 
Rabbi Samuel Horowitz: 

"One reason for the failure to silence Father Coughlin is the resigned 
feeling of helplessness and futility on the part of Jewish leaders. They fail to 
see the difference between free speech and libel. Coughlin is a dangerous 
demagague and vicious wolf in sheep’s clothing. 

"There is no way of keeping him off the radio directly. And we cannot 
expect his hierarchy to unfrock him, because, as an individual citizen, he has 
a right to free speech. There is only one effective and legal means of SILENC¬ 
ING him—to sue him for libel, 

"When a demagogue repeats his slanderous lies and ignores the truth, 
he is guilty of deliberate libel. Hence, all who have been libeled by him have 
a perfect right to sue him for libel. Thus, suing for libel for millions of 
dollars, ENOUGH TO CAUSE BANKRUPTCY, would prove the most ef¬ 
fective means of SILENCING Jew-baiters.” 

Is this a thoughtless exposure of synagogue "morals?” Of the materialistic 
philosophy of rabbinical Jewry? 

Here is an alleged Jewish "Man of God” proposing to suppress the free 
speech of a Christian "Man of God” before he is proven guilty in a court of 
law of misrepresentation. 

1 5 2 

Perhaps some light on this significant development will be cast by reference 
to "The Reflex,’ Jewish Magainze, November 1927, wherein, it was stated: 
"The modern American rabbi is a man of the world. He knows and cherishes 
the power of money, and is adept in matter of finance, mortgages and loans.” 

If the foregoing does not picture MATERIALISM PERSONIFIED— 
what does it exemplify? 

"Truth Seeks LIGHT"—nor SILENCE and Darkness! 

Americans! BE YOURSELVES! Don’t be a Jew-worm! Yon are NINETY 
TO ONE! Of WHAT are you afraid? 

STAND UP—AND FIGHT! "All for one and one for all!” 

(Edmondson Bulletin of June, 1939) 

Faint Hearts in the patriotic defense-war against Jewish communiziny 
ought to take courage from the first article of the Saturday Evening Po? : 
May 27, 1939, entitled "Star Spangled Fascists," by Rev. Stanley High- . 
is listed in the Red Network as a proponent of the "intermixing of races.'' 

While the article smearingiy insinuates that current patriotism in Arm.-i:- . 
is chiefly of the Nazi-Fascist type, force of circumstances compels the admission 
that "the movement is prospering" to the point where "The Leader" will find 
"something to lead.” 

An estimate is reported that a third of"all the families in America are 
receiving propaganda licerature "of this sort”—which suggests chat more than 
forty million Americans are becoming Jewconscious—going on to say that 
private and public patriotic meetings approach "astronomical figures." 

"There are a number of important organizations" says High, which are 
dedicated exclusively to research, information and interpretation.” He brands 
them the Fascist Brain Trust, "Prominent in this," he notes, "is Robert Edward 
Edmondson, who publishes American Vigilante bulletins; and, after a 1936 
indictment for his attacks on the Jews, keeps out of reach of reporters." 

High lies when he says Edmondson has kept out of reach of reporters. 

You, Mr. High, have my address, printed on millions of Jew-exposure 
bulletins. You know where I am located. 

Had I, as an American fairplay journalist, been writing the Post article, I 
would have added to "after a 1936 indictmenc for his attacks on the Jew's," 
the fact that on May 10, 1938, the court unconditionally dismissed the case 
"in furtherance of justice," because the defendant had been merely exercising 
his Constitutional right of Freedom of the Press. 

Instead of being forced out of New York, as rumored in some quarters. 
I would have added that the defendant, after waiting four months following 
said dismissal, to give the Jews more opportunity for further official attack, 
surrendered his apartment and, to enable his wife and himself to recuperate, 
moved to the quiet of the Pocono Mountains in Stoddartsville, Pa., where, as 
pledged in his May 12, 1938, pamphlet entitled "Court Dismissal Follows. 
Jewish Backdown," he has continued to conduct his "Free Speech educational 
publicity against the International Jewish System that is communizing The 


Had I wanted dramatic "atmosphere” for my story I would have quoted 
Dublidv a year ago about that dismissal, viz.. 

Ei" *»rf™. 1 «.TUSH 5 

eVer r n S d ed had I as an American reporter, been searching for more "human 
interest” I would have discovered that at no trme was the Defendant Edmond- 

t tf tVd^o 0 ^ i r srf sr&. *« l 

behev n ed a that Truth would win through Power-Publiafy exposmg the taw- 
wealtness High makes it very plain. There is NOW "something 

to lead!” 

''Back to The Republic!” 

(Edmondson Bulletin of June 2, 1939) 

American labor: Purge Your Ranks! Be AMERICAN! You^under 
FOREIGN rule! Investigate your controls. The} P 

nRS Et us start right 1 The undersigned has no ’’racket: He is an American 
patriJfseekinglhe lestoraticn of Thf Republic. He is not a wealthy capitalist. 
He is against the Jewish capitalistic sweat-shop system. 

Matthew Wo1 (foreign born), is Jewish Vice-President o the American 
Federation of Labor in charge of its Legal Bureau, which ™P»pasG»m 
rnnnse Toseoh A Padway Wisconsin Jew. whom the Jews Who s Who lists 
"gn tan also. Wotl is said to be an Episeopahan but so is Jewish Mayor 
as ujicigu wish Prof. Albert Einstein says: Ihe Jew 

who U a a bidons his Taith REMAINS A JEW (CoUiers' Weekly U-kb-38). 

For the C. I. O. Labor Group Jewish Lawyer Lee Pressman « Genera 
Counsel The Jewish B'nai B'rith Messenger of Los Angeles (3-12-37) narn 
Tewish Philanthropist Maurice Falk of Pittsburgh as the des.gner of the 
C I O CIO Jewish Leader Sidney Hillman is Pres.dent of the Amalgamated 
ciothing Worker Union, and has had the support of Dav.d Dubinsky-of the 
International Garment Workers, and Max Zarltsky of the Hat-Cap Union 

all foreign born. , . 

"President Arthur A Wharton of the International Assn, ot Machinists, 
wrote! omuTat feSr to his offtcais attack,ng the 'CIO JEWISH organizations 
with their red affiliates’” (Daily Worker 5-25-37). 

The N. Y. Times of Aug. 14,1938, printed this Washington dispatch, 
"lohn P Frey, vice-President, American Federation of labor (who is credited 
Jith being the real AFL power), told the Special House Committee instigat¬ 
ing un-American activities today that Communists hold key-positions m the 

CIO. He listed 280 alleged Communists as holding such position.' He also 
declared the program of the CIO had the hearty endorsemen. of the 
Communist Party." 

American Labor Party Key-Jewed 

The American Labor Parry executive committee of 50 include mostly 
Jewish names. 

Jewish President David Lasser of The Workers Alliance is assisted by 
Benjamin and other Jewish officials. 

"The Comprodaily Publishing Co. (Publisher of the Communor Party 
Official Organ, "The Daily Worker") was incorporated April IS, 1929 , with 
as directors, and Isaac SCHORR, Carol WEISS KING and Fay SIEGARTEL, 
as incorporators and stockholders."—From the N. Y. Times, Feb. 2, 1939. 
Mike GOLD is chief columnist. 

Isador Lubin is the American Delegate to the International Labor Bureau 
of the League of Nations, and in his Labor Department at Washington appear 
many key Jews, including, as consultants, Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., Jacob 
Perlman, Rose Schneidermann. 

The National Labor Relations Board includes, among others, the foreign- 
born key-Jews David J. Saposs and Wm. M. Leiserson. Abe Fortas is Jewish 
General Counsel of the great PWA. 

After an exhaustive investigation President E. H. Martin of the National 
Reform Assn., reported: "Above 909c of the Motion Picture Industry's big 
barons are JEWS—in fact they themselves claim 959c, and boast of it." Jew 
names dominate the directorates of the corporations. 

Politically, the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of Oct. 20, 1933, has this to 
say: "The Roosevelt Adminstration has selected more Jews co fill influential 
positions than any previous administration in American history''—calling 
Bernard M. Baruch "Unofficial President;" saying Frankfurter has great 
power; naming Judge Saumel I. Rosenman as "Roosevelt's Right Arm;" Ex- 
Justice Brandeis was regarded as "Father of the New Deal,” 

Be Warned, American Labor! 


(From Edmondson Bulletin of June 6, 1939) 

Responding to repeated requests, the undersigned below reproduces the 
salient features of London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy's awful tribal con¬ 
fession of guilt, as contained in his prefatory letter dated July, 1920, printed 
in "The World Significance of the Russian Revolution," by Pitt-Rivers (in 
New York Public Library): 

"W'hen you first handed me your MS. on 'The World Significance of 
The Russian Revolution,' you expressed a doubt about the propriety of its title. 
After a perusal of your work, I can assure you that your misgivings were 
entirely without foundation. No better title could have been chosen, for no 
event in any age will finally have more significance for our world than this one. 

"The Bolshevist simply did what his father, Mr. Democrat, never dared to 
do. Hence, the latter's vacillation, hypocrisy and failure; hence, the former's 
energy, sincerity and success. 'No movement,’ you rightly say about the Whitt 
Opposition, representing a heterogeneous jumble of contradictory elements, 
can ever defeat another movement which knows its own mind and allows of 
no compromise.’ 


''Bolshevism is a religion and a faith. How could these half-converted 
believers ever dream to vanquish the truthful and the faithful of their own 
creed, those holy crusaders who had gathered round the red standard of the 
Prophet Karl Marx; and who fought under the daring guidance of these 
experienced officers of all latter-day revolutions—THE JEWS? 

"I am touching here on a subject which, to judge from your own pamphlet, 
is perhaps more interesting to you than any other. In this you are right. There 
is no race in the world more enigmatic, more fatal than the Jews. The question 
of the Jews and their influence on the world past and present, cuts to the root 
of all things, and should be discussed by every hones; thinker. Jew's are very 
suspicious of any Gentile who tries to approach them with a critical mind. 

Jews Control Capitalism Communism 

"You point out, with fine indignation, the great danger that springs from 
the prevalence of Jews in finance and industry, and from the preponderance 
of Jews in rebellion and revolution. You reveal the connection between the 
collectivism of the immensely rich International Finance—and the International- 
Collectivism of Karl Marx and Trotsky—the Democracy of and by decoy-cries. 
And all this evil and misery, the economic as well as the political, you trace 
back to one source-—THE JEWS. 

Now, other Jews may villify and crucify you for these outspoken view's. 
I myself shall abstain from joining the chorus of condemnation. First of all 
I have to say this: There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be 
traced back to the Jew's. Take the Great War that appears to have come to an 
end. Ask yourself what were its causes and reasons. 

Are Jews not the inventors of the Chosen People Myth? And is not this 
obsession part and parcel of the political credo of every modern nation? 

"All latter-day ideas and movements have originally sprung from a Jewish 
source for the simple reason that the Semitic idea has finally conquered— 
CONQUERED THROUGH CHRISTIANITY, which, as Disraeli pointed out 
long ago, is nothing but 'Judaism for the people.’ 

"Now, Democracy pretends to proclaim everybody free and equal. It 
was therefore bound to destroy the bond between master and servant; and 
it replaced it by the bond of wages and salaries. Democracy, as we all know, 
abolished slavery—that natural slavery in which the master took an interest in 
his slaves because they were part of his most valuable property. But it reintro¬ 
duced it in the form of wage typranny—by means of which the 'freed' serf 
could be freely exploited. Thus ended this glorious liberty principle of the 
reformation and the revolution—the finest theory that has even been invented 
for the most miserable of practices that have ever defiled this world. No doubt 
the Jews are responsible for this, because they are the spiritual fathers of 

Jews Victims of Their Own Practices 

"No, you are not a vulgar—you are a very enlightened critic of our race. 
For there is an anti-Semitism which does the Jews more justice than any blind 
philo-Semitism, than does that merely sentimental 'let-them-all-come Liberal¬ 
ism,” which in itself is nothing but the Semitic Ideology over again. 

"You have noticed with alarm that the Jewish elements provide the driving 
forces for both Communism and Capitalism, for the material as well as the 
spiritual ruin of this world. From Moses to Marx, in practice and in theory, in 
idealism and in materialism, in philosophy and in politics, they axe today just 
what they have always been—passionately devoted to their aims and purposes. 


“ 'But these visions are all wrong’ you will reply. 'Look where they have 
led the world. Think, have they not had a fair trial of 300 years. How much 
longer are you going to recommend them to us, and inflict them upon us? 

"To this question I have only one answer. It is this: 'YOU ARE RIGHT!’ 
This reproach is only too well justified, and upon this common ground I am 
quite willing to shake hands with you, and defend you against any accusation of 
promoting race hatred. 

"If you are an Anti-Semite, I, the Semite, am an Anti-Semite too, and a 
much more fervent one than ever you are. We have erred, my friend, we have 
grievously erred. 

Jews The World’s Executioners 

"We, who have posed as the saviours of the world; we, who have even 
boasted of having given it 'the Saviour’—we are today nothing else but the 
world’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. We, who have 
promised to lead you to a New Heaven, we have finally succeeded in landing 
you into a New Hell. 

"There has been no progress, least of all moral progress. And it is just 
our morality which has prohibited ail real progress. 1 look at this world and 
I shudder at its ghastliness—I shudder all the more, as I know the spiritual 
authors of all this ghastliness. 

"There is hope, my friend, for we are still here; our last word is not yet 
spoken; our last deed is not yet done; our last revolution is not yet made. This 
last revolution, the revolution that will crown our revolutionary work, will be 
the revolution against the revolutionaries. It is bound to come. 

"And when that great day has broken, when the values of Death and 
Decay are put into the melting-pot to be changed into those of Power and 
Beauty, then you, my dear Pitt-Rivers, the descendant of an old and dis¬ 
tinguished Gentile family, may be assured to find by your side, and as our 
faithful ally, at least one member of that Jewish Race w-hich has fought with 
fatal success upon all the spiritual battlefields. 

"Yours against the revolution, and for life ever flourishing, 

(signed) OSCAR LEVY 

July, 1920 
London, England 

Down the corridor of history has never come a greater confession of guilt, 
a more powerful Jeremiad, a more impressive document, a more convincing 
testament. For it. Levy was exiled from his home by his tribe. 


Open Letter of July 6, 1939, To Charles Clayton Morrison 
Editor, Christian Century, Chicago 

"Two months ago, one of the most notorious Jew-baiters in the United 
States, Robert Edward Edmondson, published a bulletin entitled 'Hail Moseley.’ 
Edmondson is the man who, under the guise of running an investors service 
with a New York address, covered the country with such scurrilous attacks on 
the Jews that Mayor LaGuardia stepped in to bring him to trial for slander. 
Only the plea of Jewish organizations induced the Mayor to drop the case. 
Edmondson now operates from a Pennsylvania base. The most dangerous ele¬ 
ment in the Moseley campaign is its Anti-Semitism. * * * Gen. Moseley should 

1 5 7 

be court-martialed and disciplined. ‘ (Editorial from The CHRISTIAN Century 
of Chicago, a weekly self-described as "undenominational,'’ June l4, 1939, 

issue.) ,, .. ... 

My attention has been directed to (presumably) your entanglmg-alhance 

editorial comment emoted above, first by Rev. Harold W. Wager, Minister 
First Methodist Church of Pierre, S. D„ in a letter of June 14, 1939, wherein 
he remarked: "Read the article in the June 14, 1939, issue of The Christian 
Century, and you will discover what thinking people think of you. * * * 
Repent before it is too late," 

Rev Wager concludes his diatribe with a rather cryptic and amusing 
.postscript, reading: "I think it would be wise for you to trace back your 
Family Tree for several centuries to make sure there are no Jews to be found. 

I haven't yet informed the reverend gentlemen that my genealogy reportedly 
goes back to "Robert of Scotland" in the Eighth Century. If he was a Jew, then 
I'm a Chinaman. 

But, let’s get on with this matter, and reproduce, secondly, what Dr. 
William’ H. Anderson, General Secretary of the American Christian Alliance, 
N. Y.- City, has to say in his letter to you of June 16 —he having sent me a 

The Christian Century "Wholly Wet 

"I strongly suspect that you do not relish a showing that you are wrong in your facts 
1 ) 1 - mistaken in your judgment * * * respecting the Moseley editorial m June 14 
Christian Century. 

"Mv understanding and belief is that much of Mr Edmondson’s material is made 
up of quotations from Jewish sources. He insists emphatically that he is not opposed to 
the lews, or any jew, for any religious or racial reason; but opposes subversive activities 
by Jewish Internationalism. I have become fairly well acquainted with him. and I havc- 
a very high opinion of his intelligence, and implicit confidence in his integrity and 


"You are badly mixed and your information is pathetically fragmentary. The truth 
of the matter is that the Edmondson Case bade fair to become one of the most notable, 
if not the outstanding case involving Freedom of Speech in the history of this country, 
if not in the world; for it was unquestionably intended to convict and imprison Mr, 
Edmondson, with the help of a packed jury, after finally indicting him by action of a 
Grand Jury composed of a majority of Jews. 

"The truth is that Mr. LaGuardia did the practically unprecedented thing as Mayor 
of New York of issuing his own warrant as Chief Magistrate.' for the arrest of Mr. 
Edmondscm-a cheap, dirty political trick to clinch the Jewish vote for his re-election. 
And 1 said that much in writing to Mr. LaGuardia, who knows me very well. 

"You are wholly 'wet' in your statement: 'Only the plea of Jewish organizations 
induced the Mayor to drop the case.' The case had passed enurely out of Mayor La- 
Guardia’s hands long before it was even decided to drop it. II GO 1 lOO HOI 1U 

"Mr. Edmondson fortunately had a modest competence, enough to defend lumself. 
One of the things done which caused 'wailing and gnashing of teeth m Zion was to 
subpoena about 25 leading Jews, to be put on the stand for the defense, and confront 
them with certain things. After that, the plan Co railroad Mr. Edmondson cooled otf. 

"Jewish organizations intervened as 'friends of the court and set out what Mr. 
LaGuardia must have known, vi/., that there is under American law no such a thing 
-s racial libel They set out that the net result would react against the Jews. And that 
is a monumental understatement, for this case would have gone to the U. S. Supreme 

Case Unconditionally Dismissed 

I of course do not know how you "took" Dr. Anderson’s truthful account; 
but I will add that the case was unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938, "m 
furtherance of justice," the official decision of which added the publications 
of the defendant had "never caused a breach of the peace in the community 
nor are they apt to.” 

1 5 8 

Dr. Anderson is entirely correct in informing you that my removal from 
New York to Pennsylvania was dictated by the necessity for health-recuperation 
on the part of my wife, as well as myself, following a two-year court strain, 
pro patria; and I am carrying out my pledge made at the time of dismissal, 
viz.: "The defendant will continue his Free Speech educational publicity, NOT 
against any religion or race, but against the International Jewish Socialism that 
is Communizing The Republic—for only The Truth can set us free.” 

I am given to understand that The Chrisitian Century is one of "the most 
LIBERAL of the Protestant organizations.” In respect to my own case, judging 
from the editorial quoted at the beginning of this bulletin, it has—not to use 
the short and ugly word—"liberalized” The Truth in a most amazing un- 
Christian manner. Did you know that Ludwig Lewisohn, leading Jewish 
author, in his new book "The Answer,” says "THE JEWS ORIGINATED 
Liberalism?" Don’t you know that your epithet "scurrilous” is a typical product 
of the Jewish Master Factory? And I am "Anti-Jew,” not "Anti-Semitic.” 

I want none of that liberal brand of so-called Christian Chanty—which re¬ 
calls the historic words of Martin Luther, greatest Protestant—also the most 
prominent 'anti-Semite’ of his time—when he proclaimed that "Were God 
willing to give me no ocher Messiah than he whom the Jews desire, I would 
rather be a sow r than a man." 

You attacked the Jewish Religion AS SUCH—which I never did, for I 
concentrated on Jewry's politico-economic communizing—in your issue of 
Dec. I, 1937, when you exclaimed, anti-Jewishly: 

"Judaism rests upon an IMPOSSIBLE BASIS. It tries to pluck the fruits 
of democracy WITHOUT YIELDING ITSELF to the processes of democracy. 
Democracy cannot guarantee our Jewish brethren against the emergency of A 
CRISIS in which prejudice and anger generated by THEIR LONG RESIS¬ 
TANCE to the democratic processes, may flame up to their great hurt. The 
situation in which the jewish Problem rises is in large measure of JEWRY'S 
OWN CREATION. The root cause is the Jew's immemorial and pertinacious 
OBSESSION WITH AN ILLUSION that his race and people are rhe object 
of the special favor of God, who requires the maintenance of their racial 
integrity and separateness. Their idea of an integral race HAS ITS PROTO¬ 

And then you yoked yourself "with unbelievers,” in your pro-Jew de¬ 
nunciation of my patriotic devotion to our Christian Republic, made to the 
Court in the LaGuardia Case, wherein you listed me as "The No. 1 Anti- 
Semite of America,” and hypocritically prated of my "intemperance" and "wild 
defamations. What a "beam” the Christian Century must have in its own eye, 
considering the quotations above and below. 

After reading your editorial of Dec. 1 and the following anti-Jew com¬ 
ment in the Christian Century issues of April 29 and May 13, 1936, I have 
decided to resign in your favor the title "Anti-Semite No, l!” I quote: 

"Mutual” Tolerance Plea Exposed 

"Jewry is a mutual benefit organization. It is also a propagandist organi¬ 
zation. There can be no unity and no social health in the American community 
so long as any group invokes the holy sanctions of religion and the inviolable 
solidarity of nationa life, in perpetuation of irreconcilable factionalism. 

"The tension between Jews and Christians cannot be effectively resolved 
by an appeal to the sentiment of mutual tolerance. In a problem of this kind, 
tolerance operates in a one-way street. It is exercised by the majority, not by 
the minority. It is putting a mask on the truth to describe this sort of tolerance 
as 'mutual.' 


"American society is an organism, and, as such, all its vital forces tend 
toward solidarity, unity, integration. Any unassimilabie element of the popula¬ 
tion is bound to have trouble, because it’s bound to make trouble. 

"Let it be known that the Jewish Community holds its religion in such a 
manner that it neither desires to spread its characteristic ideals beyond those of 
its own blood, nor consents to expose itself to those normal cultural contacts 
which involve the exchange of spiritual goods—let this be known, and you 
have dried up the Fountain of Tolerance in the Christian Community. The 
Jew will never command the respect of the non-Jew’ish culture in which he 
lives so long as he huddles by himself, nursing his own 'uniqueness.' A 
Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take ‘pot-luck’ with 
humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot escape the 
suspicion that it is hoarding its treasures for a selfish purpose." 

"Dangerous Anti-Semitism’’—for Jewry—and I endorse every word of 
your profound philiipic. But, it’s a wonder the Jews haven’t sued the Christian 
Century for "libel of and concerning the Jewish Religion," in order to "court 
martial and discipline’’ and suppress it. The only reason I can think of is that 
maybe the indictment is true, and therefore the Jews know it is not action¬ 

Your defamatory misrepresentations in my own case are actionable at law, 
in my opinion. 

In passing, it may be remarked that the Christian Century has finally put 
itself in the same patriot-smear class as the Communistic New Masses, "Look” 
and "Life" and the Jewish-advertising dominated Saturday Evening Post’s 
"Star-Spangled Fascist" lies of Rev. Stanley High. 

Editor Morrison, take a friendly fraternal tip from a veteran journalist— 
warn the Protestant Churches to de-judaize themselves before it is too late, and 
purge the Religion of Christ of "Sens of the Devil" (John 8:44). 

(Following is an Edmondson Publication of July 10, 1939:) 

Following are the five points of Jewry’s Palestine Kahal-PIan for World 

(1) Wherever thev live, in organized groups, the Jews are A PEOPLE 

(2) Judaism is not merely a faith, a cult, a religion, in the Christian 
significance of these terms, but A CIVILIZATION, a culture unique in its 
ethical and social emphasis. 

(3) The spirit of the New Age in which we live is the Spirit of SCIENCE, 
progress and freedom. The entire Jewish Heritage must be re-evaluated in 
terms of THIS spirit. 

the program. 

1 6 0 

(5) This Jewish Homeland in Palestine is to be LINKED wich ORGAN¬ 
IZED autonomous Jewish Centers the world over. 

The foregoing outline is from Rabbi Barnett Brickner’s analysis in the 
Herzl Symposium Memorial published in 1929 by Meyer W. Weisgal, New 
York. Rabbi Brickner interprets thus: 

"By Nationalism and Nationality WE mean, not a political but a cultural 
concept. STATES exist whenever government controls nationalities for its own 
purposes. Jewish Nationalism does not divide the loyalty of the Jew; it seeks 
to release the spiritual potentialities latent in the Jewish heritage." 

On this point the American Zionist pre-eminent leader Jacob Schiff, wrote 
Aug. 8, 1907, to President Solomon Schechter of the Jewish Theological Semin¬ 
ary: "I cannot for a moment concede that one can be at the same time a true 
American and an honest adherent of the Zionist (Herzl) movement.’' 

Jewish Lawyer Bernard L Brown writes in his book: "From Pharaoh to 

"In law and in reason, there cannot be a division of nationality in any 
country without endangering the welfare of the Nation. To say that Jews are 
'a religious minority' completely destroys their claim to minority group recogni¬ 
tion in any country.” 

Rabbi’s World Rule Plan 

Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver’s contribution to the Herzl Symposium includes 
this startling allusion to Palestine—"FROM WHICH VANTAGE POINT 

"With the signing in London on Tuesday of the Dead Sea Concession, 
there was achieved what is the most remarkable effort ever undertaken by any 
group of American Zionists. The victory, which assures JEWISH DOMINA¬ 
TION in the management and direction of the Dead Sea, belongs to what is 
known as the Marks-Brandeis group."—N. Y. Jewish Daily Bulletin, March 24, 

Moses Mendelsohn materialistically declared: "Judaism is NOT a religion, 
but revealed LEGISLATION," as quoted in "The History of the Jews" by 
Historian Graetz. The London Jewish Chronicle of August 13 , 1937, confirm- 
ingly printed: "Judaism is essentially a 'religion’ of LAW.” 

A Jewish state in Palestine would not be "a religious homeland," as alleged, 
hut A POLITICAL move to establish a power-center with which the Jewish High 
Command could dominate the world through its "ORGANIZED MINORITY 
NATIONALITIES” placed in kev-control positions of Gentile Nations as 

In other words, Jewish Nationalism, directed by the Jewish State strategi¬ 
cally located at the Gateway between the East and the West, would be used to 
communistically break down and internationalize Gentile countries via local 
"nationality" ("Fifth Columns") representatives of the Jerusalem Super- 

Rabbi Brickner significantly says: "Jewish Socialist-Zionists founded their 
movement because their aim is to see Palestine reconstructed on the Socialist 
Principles of KARL MARX and the Hebrew’ Prophets. In Palestine today most 
of the Jewish workers are members of this faction—one finds numerous colonies 
in which people live and work on a Communistic basis." 


The Plan of the Plot for Jewish World Domination is vividly set forth in 
the quotation below from "The Key to the Mystery.” 

"Following is a boast written in 1918 by the Jew Louis Levy, edited by 
Nytnordisk Fortag, Copenhagen, as recited by the Jewish actor Samuel Besekow 
in a meeting of the Keren Hayesod in December, 1935; according to the 
Berlingske Tidende of December 9, 1935: 

" 'Who does not know what the glands in the human body represent? 1 In 
the modern community of nations, THE JEWS HAVE SETTLED ON THE 
GLANDS—Exchanges, Banks, Ministries, Newspapers, Publishing, Insurance, 
Hospitals, Peace Palaces, etc. 



Open Letter of July 15, 1939, to Roy P. Monahan, Chairman, National 
Americanism Committee of Disabled Veterans of The World War. 

I have before me a poster-sheet 17 x 22 inches, with PROPAGANDA 
KIT” and a "Nazi Octopus” emblazoned thereon in letters of RED, which 
includes a dateless letter signed with your name, attacking American patriots. 

Under a side-caption appears the following: Robert Edw'ard Edmondson 
in an interview stated that he had issued five million pamphlets. He was in¬ 
dicted for issuing LIBELOUS pamphlets on complaint of Mayor LaGuardia. 

In another expensively-printed communication entitled "Report of Pro¬ 
gress " prepared by the National Americanism Committee of the Disabled 
Veterans of the World War, dated June 7, 1939, 49 WALL St., N. Y. City (by 
which I locate you), the following statement is made over your name, referring 
to: "vicious, scurrilous, lying propaganda, issued by Robert Edward Edmondson. 
Anybody ‘who reads the Propaganda Kit could read about Mr. Edmondson and 
his other publication, published from Glendale, Calif., called the Christian 
Free Press; the contents of which indicate that Mr. Edmondson and his publi¬ 
cations are a part of propaganda coming into this country from Erfurt, Germany. 
Let us consider how well Mr. Edmondson has learned his lesson from the 
master-propagandist, Hitler," 

Six Lies Exposed 

LIE NO. 1: "In a interview Mr. Edmondson stated he had issued five 
million pamphlets.” The only interview ever authorized by me was June 9, 
1936, at the time of the indictment you refer to, including this statement; "It 
is estimated that we have been instrumental in having printed, reproduced and 
circulated more than 5,000,000 circulars.” The pronoun "we” refers to Edmond¬ 
son and patriotic associates. For your information the total to date is estimated 
to have reached over ten million Americans. 

LIE NO. 2: "He was indicted for issuing LIBELOUS pamphlets, on com¬ 
plaint of Mayor LaGuardia." As the indictment was unconditionally DISMISSED 
May 10, 1938, said pamphlets were not found "libelous,” as you falsely alleged; 
there being no group libel law covering the charge of "libel of all persons of 
the Jewish Religion"—which was not atcacked per se by the defendant. 


LIE NO. 3: "His slander included Dean Gildersleeve and Frances Perkins. 1 ' 
The last paragraph of the court's decision dismissing all allegations against me. 
reads this way: "And the court, on its own motion AND IN FURTHERANCE 
OF JUSTICE, dismisses indictments which charge libel against Frances Perkins 
and Virginia C. Gildersleeve, AS THESE INDICTMENTS ON THEIR FACE 

My "Slander?" Careful, Mr. Monahan. 

LIE NO. 4: "A piece of vicious, scurrilous, lying propaganda issued by 
Edmondson." As the court decision passed on my power-publicity and dismissed 
the charge against me, how could it be composed of "vicious lies?" That may 
be actionable! 

LIE NO. 5: "Anybody who read the Propaganda Kit distributed by the 
Committee, could read about Mr. Edmondson and his other publication—the 
Christian Free Press." 

The Christian Free Press of California is edited and operated, according to 
my information, by Mrs. Leslie Fry, author of the famous documented work 
"Waters Flowing Eastward." 

LIE NO. 6: "Edmondson publications are a part of the propaganda coming 
from Germany." You then attempt to show, by quoting from "Mein Kampf"— 
'how well Edmondson has learned his lesson from Hitler,’’ and falsely put the 
Nazi brand on my patriotic work for America—another typical JEW-Trick. 

April 23, 1934, replying co a letter from President D. A. Brown of the 
American Hebrew, I wrote: 

"Being PRO-American, I am ANTI-Fascist, Anti-Communist, Anti-Socialist. 
We want AMERICANISM FOR THE U. S." I have never received a dollar 
from Adolph Hitler, directly or indirectly, to the best of my knowledge. So 
much for YOUR Jewish-innuendo that 1 am a Nazi agent. 

As I have always maintained that "For our disabled veterans the best is not 
good enough," it will be a pleasure to circulate this factual open letter among 
your membership, so that they may expose and remove a "leadership" that seems 
to me to be working against their best interests. 

YOUR brand of Patriotism, Mr. Monahan, is spelled KOSHER! 

(Edmondson Bulletin of July 24, 1939) 

In the Congressional Record in June, 1939, w'as published "Americanism 
Defined—A Politico-Religious Creed," by Charles Hall Davis of Virginia, 
described by Maryland's Senator as "one of the profound Constitutional lawyers 
of our Country.” 

The undersigned was so deeply impressed with the contents of this 
Americanism Creed that he had the entire document of about 6 pages reprinted 
by the Government Printing Office, to make it broadly available to patriots at 
the cost price. 

I have herein given extracts therefrom. To my mind, this "Americanism 
Defined” demonstrates beyond controversy that the Jews of America, unable 
to accept the Christian Social System established by our forefathers, by their 
own repudiation of assimilation, are actually in revolt against the Government 
of, by and for The People of the United States. 

The quoted passages below are from Mr. Davis' masterpiece except as in¬ 
dicated otherwise: 

"The non-Christian citizen of the United States * “ !i mav worship God as he pleases 


and equal rights of others; YET HE MUST ACCEPT, ENDORSE AND SUPPORT 
NO MAN CAN BE A GOOD AMERICAN who does not accept, endorse and support 
that Political Philosophy or Theory of Government. 

Prominent Jews like Rabbi Wise. Ludwig Lewisohn, Jacob Schiff, Samuel I. Rosen- 
man, Maurice Samuel, have repeatedly declared that Jews cannot be assimilated into the 
organisms of the states in which they live. By that they proclaim hostility to such states 
as well as their allegiance to Jewry first. 

Mr. Davis points out: 'Americanism * * * is DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED to 
Communism, Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, Socialism, Totalitarianism, Paternalism, so- 
calLed Social Democracy, and all other 'isms' which are based on the Political Philosophy 
of the the Socialist School of Thought — because all of these 'ism’ * - * * assert the 

sovereignty of government over the people." 

Bialik, the great Jewish poet, in an address at Jerusalem May 11, 1933, proclaimed 
that in principle Jews are "The creators of Liberalism, Democracy, Socialism and COM¬ 
MUNISM." While The London Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919, declared: "The Ideals 
of Bolshevism ate at m£ny points consonant with the finest Ideals of Judaism." 

A Compound Republic 

The Creed continues: 

"The United States of America is A REPUBLIC OF REPUBLICS—A COMPOUND 
REPUBLIC. 'An indestructible union composed of indestrucdbLe states. 1 

(Editorial Comment: When Washington invades or usurps functions of the republican 
states of the Union, the great reserved rights are adversely affected, and loyal citizens have 
a self-preservation duty to resist. 

"The imposition of limitations on the powers of Government in the hands of agents 
is a basic principle of the American Governmental Plan," savs Mr. Davis. "LIMITATIONS 
IN A PURE DEMOCRACY, because, when JThe People act they act AS SOVEREIGNS, 
and any limitations agreed to be observed in their future actions can be abrogated or 
revoked' by them at any time in the exerose of that same sovereignty.’’ 

Mr. Davis, in the above, supplies the reasons why ''democracy” was omitted 
from The Constitution and The Declaration. The Founders and Framers would 
have no "democracy’' and established a Government at Washington as the 

(Edmondson Bulletin July 25, 1939) 

A sensational confession-communication published in the London "Jewish 
Chronicle” of Feb. 7, 1936, signed by S. Landman, a Jew, World-War British 
Propaganda Agent, indicates that Americans were slaughtered on European 
battlefields and robbed at home in an effort TO ESTABLISH A JEWISH 
STATE IN PALESTINE. The quotation below is self-explanatory: 

"During the critical days of the war in 1916, when the defection of Russia 
was imminent and Jewish opinion generally was' anti-Russia and had hopes 
that Germany, if victorious, would give them Palestine, several attempts were 
made by the Allies to bring America into the war on their side. These attempts 

"Mr. James Malcolm, at that time in close touch, took the initiative in 
convincing representatives of the British and French Governments that the best 



VICE OF MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS (Zionist Leader in U. S.) 

"Sir Mark Sykes obtained permission from the War Cabinet to authorize 
Mr. Malcolm to approach the Zionists ON THAT BASIS. 

AMERICA INTO THE WAR. The Balfour Declaration was not merely a 
voluntary gesture on the part of the Allies, but it was A CONTRACT BE¬ 
Authority: "History of the Peace Conference in Paris, Vol. (1920) Page 173, by 
H. M. V. Temperley (Jew)." 

The following Associated Press table of June 15, 1936, is confirmatory oi 
the foregoing: "The promise of a national home for Jews in Palestine to gain 
world-wide support for the Allied Cause in the World War was detailed to the 
House of Commons today by David Lloyd George. We came to the conclusion 
that it was most vital that we should have the co-operation of Jews throughout 
the world. I bear testimony to the fact that the Jews responded. 1 ' 

The Jewish Plan for world dominion is contained in the Super-Zionist 
protocol-conception of a Jewish Palestine Super-Government which would con¬ 
trol through Jewish "Nationality" minorities in all important nations, through 
the terrible power of the purse, reinforced by the 1200 billion dollars of wealth 
contained in the Dead Sea at the Gateway between the Occident and the 
Orient through the Suez Canal. 


Below is an Edmondson Bulletin of September 26, 1939: 

Citizenship Training Manual (TM-2000-25) of the War Department of 
the United States was officially issued Nov. 30, 1928. By those who compiled 
the Manual this statement is made: 

"Training Manual 2000-25 is the product of years of study and instruction. 
Every sentence was criticized by competent authorities, and approved by them 
as being correct and in harmony with the American Philosophy of Government." 

Following are some of the important passages in Training Manual 2000-25: 

"The American Philosophy of Government emphasizes that "THE 

"DEMOCRACY is a government of The Masses; authority derived through 
mass meeting or any other form of 'direct' expression results in mobocracy; 
attitude toward property IS COMMUNISTIC—negating property rights; atti¬ 
tude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be 
based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without 
restraint or regard to consequences; results in demagogism, license, agitation, 
discontent, anarchy, In practice . . . our form of government . . .is that of self- 
government by representation, which is 'the golden mean between autocracy 
and democracy,’ ” 

By War Department letter of Sept. 6, 1932, Citizenship Training Manual 
2000-25 was withdrawn after a criticism on the floor of the U. S. Senate—as 
printed in Congressional Record Vol. 75, June 9, 1932, Pages 12782-5. "Some 


of the matter was found to be of a controversial nature" says War Department 
letter of Tulv 18, 1959. responding to request for a copy of the suppressed 

Is .it "controversial" that "The Government of the United States is not a 
democracy but a Republic'? 

Is it ‘'controversial" that "democracy is a government of the masses"? 

Is it "controversial" trial "our representative government is the golden 
mean between autocracy and democracy"? 

Is it "controversial’’ that the "attitude of a democracy toward property is 

And whom do you think was the Senate critic of the Citizenship Manual? 
None other than Senator George W. Norris, Social Democrat from Nebraska, 
"Father" of the Socialistic TVA Government Ownersliip Project. 

Roosevelt was quoted by the N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938, as saying: "Wt 
are not only the largest and most powerful DEMOCRACY," but other democ¬ 
racies look to us for leadership—that World Democracy may survive." 

Now note that "Social Democracy" Senator Norris, among other features, 
especially objected (See Page 12785, Congressional Record 6-9-32), to the 
following in Training Manual 2000-25: 

RIGHTS; ANARCHY, WHICH NEGATES LAW; Substitution of direct 
action’ for Representative Government; Government Ownership — all should 
be avoided as perils that threaten the very foundation of The Republic.” 


(From 193S Edmondson Bulletin) 

In the address below of July 4, 1938, launching the program of the Cana¬ 
dian National Unity Party, with its aims purely nationalistic and anti-Jewish, 
under the battle-cry of "Canada for the Canadians," Leader Arcand of Montreal 
outlined its objectives before a Toronto audience in Massey Hall numbering 
more than 2500, mostly young men, "who thunderously cheered” the speaker, 
according to the Toronto Evening Giobe of July 5, 1938. 

Robert Edward Edmondson attended that enthusiastic meeting after addres¬ 
sing party convention leaders on the subject of U. S. conditions including eluci¬ 
dation of the victory won over Jewish anti-American elements who instigated 
against him the false religious libel indictment dismissed May )Q, 1938. 

A majority of the 85 national convention leaders were described in the 
Toronto Evening Telegram of July 4 as "comparatively young, nattily dressed 
and confident. THEY BELIEVE'IN THEMSELVES? Their enthusiasm is 
contagious and inspirational. To the death ' Courage is prophetic. And they 
are unitedly and intelligently ANTI-JEWISH. ' No Jews will be admitted into 
membership declared Leader Arcand in the Toronto Daily Star of July 4. The 
National Unity Party is going places." It is the organized spearhead of this 
great patriotic movement in North America. 

I have been in the midst of it. It is based on a moral rebirth. It is being 
directed by master-strategy. It ls conducted under Spartan discipline. Its progress 
is by law and order. And its energy has confounded the common enemv, whose 
jittc-riness is exposed by overt acts. Its keynote 'Servian?'—I SERVE! is em¬ 
blematic of its fundamental character. 

I 66 

'We are going through," Leader Arcand declared in his inspiring address. 

' We shall save Canada from the dutches of International Jewry. Who invented 
the word Gentile? Who invented lew? We did not. They started the discrimina¬ 
tion. We will carrv 1 : on. It is a question of life or death. 

’Russia is ruled lOdG by jews today. They would do the same to Canada. 
This is a fight to the finish. Communism was invented by the Jew Karl Marx. 
Socialism came to power in Frame through Blum. The Reds cn Spam were led 
by the jews Zamorra, Azana. Rosenberg. In Hungary, it was Bela-Kuhn. In 
England are Laski, Mdchett, Sassoon. The leader of the Communist Parry in 
China is a Jew jews everywhere! 

"When International Jewry gains power in a country, there i.-. no more 
liberty'. Dictatorship of finance is held by the Jew-. Monty was made to serve, not 
to exploit. Democracy has materialized and judaized us. Let us stand up and 
fight it. Jews are being poured into our land from abroad-- revolutionaries, 
destroyers. Look at the destruction of coffee, cotton, livestock, and other food! 

"We are going to bring back the Great Fire ot Truth. We say Canada must 
he a country of white men. We want Canada to be a Christian Country. Other 
religions will be tolerated so iong as they do not ineance the security of the 

(1942 ADDENDA) 

(For his patriotic selfless service Adrien Arcand was later interned five- 
years without charges at the beginning of World War Two at the instigation of 
the same forces who futilelv tried for seven years to jail Robert Edward Edmond¬ 
son, and which "International Jewry" brought on World War Two, as forecast 
to Edmondson by former President David Brown of the American Hebrew at 
a 1934 conference held in N. Y. City) . 


An Invitation Address delivered April 4. 1940, before the Public Relations 
Council of The Women's City Club of Philadelphia by Robert Edward 

Your speaker deeply appreciates the privilege and opportunity of sub¬ 
mitting for your consideration authentic information ot immense importance 
to our country in a great crisis. 

The general subject of this address is Adulterating Traditional or 
Constitutional Americanism." 

Its aim is to prove to you how and why Americanism has been adulterated; 
how to purge it of poison, and the way to restore it. 

Making my position clear, I come before you with no political or sectional 
partisanship—only a Militant American. Having no delusions of grandeur, my 
sole "racket" is restoration of The Republic. As publicity is the only cure tor 
great public evils, no "passion for anonymity" is permissible. 

I unalterably stand against ACTIONS by any group-minority—political- 
international-racial-economic-religious—which promotes ideologies alien to and 
subversive of our traditional republic form of government as set up by the 
U. S. Constitution. 

In this address it is intended merely to Open perspectives for those who 
mav be seeking truth and causes—in accord with our immortal Lincoln's ad¬ 
monition: "Let the people know the Truth—and the country u ill be sate'" 

l 6 y 

It is not- necessary to say that America is now in deep politico-economic 
distress. Never has oar country been in such dire peril. What is responsible 
for our apparent recovery-impotence? Has our moral fibre degenerated? If so, 
what has rotted it? 

In his 1939 book "Propaganda in the Next War," British Author Roger- 
son said Americans were easy marks for mass-propaganda. In witness whereof, 
he declared boldly that the United States was deliberately propaganda-embroiled 

In crusading for regeneration of Americanism it is astounding to find how- 
few cituens know their government, its political system, or rights and duties 

Therefore, in these parlous times of compounded-confusion, propaganda 
promoted, for clarity it is vital to understand just what one is talking about 
before attempting to impart knowledge. 

Just what is traditional or Constitutional Americanism? Let Charles Hall 
Davis,. Virginia's high constitutional authority, make it plain: 

"Americanism holds that the people are MASTERS of Government. The 
Socialist School holds that Government is MASTER OF MEN, 

"The fundamental principle of the American PLAN is that of LIMITA¬ 
TION on the powers of government.’’ 

Americanism is diametrically opposed to Communism. Bolshevism, Fascism, 
Nazism, Totalitarianism, Social Democracy and Paternalism. THE UNITED 

"The non-Christian citizen of the United States may worship God as he 
pleases provided he does not interfere with or infringe upon the similar and 
equal rights of others; yet he must accept, endorse and support the principles 
taught by Jesus because his rights as such citizen are based upon these principles 
as the foundations of Americanism.” 1 

In official supplementation, it is significant to note that in the 1928 Citizen¬ 
ship Training Manual of the L r . S. War Dept,, the following Republic confirma¬ 
tion is emphasized: 

"The Government of the United States is NOT a democracy but A 

Recall also that the Constitution guarantees to each of the 48 states "a 
REPUBLICAN form of government," not a democratic form. 

During an address on Dec. 10, 1938, before the Allentown, Pa., Anti- 
Communist Society, the privilege was afforded me of making prominently 
public for the first time in this modern era the fact that the word "democracy” 
had been deleted by the signers, not only from the American Declaration of 
Independence but also from the U. S. Constitution. 

Hendrik Willem van Loon, in his "Story of Democracy,” declares "The 
Athenian democracy perished, as practically EVERY EXPERIMENT IN 
inner violence.” 

An exhausive study has convinced me that the CAUSE of our major 
troubles has been the adulteration of Americanism by repeared mass-immigra- 
tion-waves of "the wretched refuse of Europe's teeming shores’—as Emma 
Lazarus describes it in a poetic welcome recorded on the bronze tablet of the 
Statue of Liberty in New York. 

1 68 

Socialistic "Refuse” 

They have brought with them leveling-down socialise and collectivist ide¬ 
ologies.. Our forefathers left Europe to escape such false doctrines. These inter¬ 
national communizing conceptions are deadly poison to our individualistic 
American Philosophy, with its check-and-balance protection against Proletarian 
as well as Autocratic dictatorship. 

Have we been too generous in alien policy? Have we worshiped at the 
liberalistic shrine of the Fetish of Tolerance until it has grown into a Franken¬ 
stein monster? "There is a limit at which forebearance ceases to be a virtue" 
declared the great English statesman, Edmund Burke. 

You would not tolerate a rattlesnake in your home. Were the evil money¬ 
changers tolerated in the Temple—or were they lashed out? 

Why should we compromise with a deadly enemy? In essence, tolerance is 
international—like Communism, which is also anti-national. We have tolerated 
an alien international flood that has dangerously diluted the Fountain of 

The Constitution has not failed us—we have failed it. And the Treason of 
Tolerance has had much to do with it. 

The Constitution does not invest those enjoying its endowments, with the 
right to destroy it. To exist, it must exact of citizens the eternal-vigilance duty 
to defend-protect-preserve such beneficent instrumentality. We hear too much 
today about rights, and too little about duties. But you cannot dodge the con¬ 
sequence of dodging your responsibilities. 

The N. Y. Times of Sept. 13, 1939, reported that the Central Conference 
of American Rabbis passed a resolution challenging the American System, 

"There is only one way in which the American people can escape Fascism 
and Communism—and that is by establishing a thoroughly SOCIALIZED 

What is Social Democracy? Webster's International Dictionary defines it 
as: "The Socialist Party founded in Germany by Ferdinand La Salle — later 
united with the followers of Karl Marx.” 

Do we Americans want in our country the Soviet democracy-communism of 
Karl Marx, Trotsky and Lenin, which makes government supreme and suppresses 
personal initiative? Shall we substitute that for the American Republic Individ¬ 
ualistic Philosophy which promotes personal initiative and security, preserves 
property rights and provides sound progress and enduring happiness? 

"Rugged’’ individualism in the sense of ruthlesness, is just as much to be 
condemned as its opposite, the despotism of the proletariat, aptly described 
by the immortal poet Homer as "that worst of tyrannies, an usurping crowd." 
Traditional Americanism stands for the Golden Mean—not extremes. 

When in 1913 Amendment 17 to the Constitution was adopted, a great 
political communization occured; for it set up a "POPULAR FRONT" election 
of senators in repudiation of the famous check-and-balance function originally 
established providing for legislative selection. 

High legal authority holds this 17th Amendment to be unconstitutional 
because states were deprived, without consent, of equal suffrage or "ambas¬ 
sadorial representation" at Washington as sovereign units. Eleven states 


President Roosevelt internationally proclaimed— (I quote from the N, Y. 
Times of Dec. (•>, 1938): "We are not only the largest and most powerful 
democracy, but other democracies look to us for leadership, that world democracy 
may survive.” 

Yet the LIMITATION-p rinciple corner-stone of our Republic is repugnant 
to democracy because it is destructive of democracy. 

This Socialistic New Deal is NOT Americanism. It is a foreign importa¬ 
tion. brought here through Great Britain, where it was called ''PEP''— like the 
NEP” of Russia; in both cases the alphabetical trick-explanation standing tor 
Economic Planning. " Its sponsor was the Socialistic Fabian Society of Britain. 

What has happened? Americans have been Communistically regimented and 
their governmental administration has been Ease istically centralized under the 
impcrted international New Deal. 

Unless Americanism is purged—make no mistake, DOWN GOES THE 
REPUBLIC! Therefore, we are in a self-preservation fight to the finish—a 
struggle for existence itself. How can we save ourselves- 1 

Obviously, the first remedial step is to stop immigration, strictly limiting 
visitors, the second is to deport aliens, the third is to Americanize new citizens. 
What is to be done with those who refuse to assimilate? The Christian Century 
ol Chicago (April 29 and May 13, 1936) offers this keen comment: I quote: 

Anti-Assimilationists Make Trouble 

''American society is an organism, and, as such, ali its vital forces tend 
toward solidarity, unity, integration. Any unassimilated element of the popula¬ 
tion is bound to have trouble because it is BOUND TO MAKE TROUBLE.” 

The politico-economic subversions heretofore listed could have been stop¬ 
ped at their inception if we had a press that was FREE? Many of you mav 
think we have a free press. As a veteran journalist, I warn you that such is not 
the case. 

One of my exposure publications on this subject was quoted recently in 
the Congressional Record. It emphasized these fundamentals; 

What is the DUTY of the press to the nation that endows it with freedom? 
Isn't it to guard jealously the state which creates it? 

Our press is tree—to betray us. Through secret coercion, it hides the 
real news. It dogs channels of publicity with anti-American propaganda. It sells 
its columns to an alien enemy. Judas-like, it betrays its creator for "a piece of 
silver.” r 

How can we emancipate this, our first line of defense? By boycotting 
offending publications. Without circulation, advertising space becomes worth¬ 
less. As a veteran newspaperman, your speaker tells you that when an editor 
receives half a dozen sharp criticisms from his reading public, he becomes 
jittery. He hears his master’s voice. 

Let us stop once and for all this destructive Adulteration of Americanism. 
Be George Washington vigilante patriots. Put none but Militant Americans on 
guard! Think Straight America! Speak Plain American! Act and Vote Direct 

Let us proclaim a New Declaration of Independence from internationalism. 
Shall we sit supinely inert while loyal citizens and their children are denied 
their priceless heritage of equal rights by alien elements winch crowd them out of 
the channels of achievement in their own country? 

1 70 

What is our practical political recourse.'’ \vhen our Washington servants 
usurp any of the ch'eck-and-balance functions of the government, the great re¬ 
tained rights of the citizenry are adversely affected, and under Constitutional 
endowments thev have a duty to resist. 

When elected and appointed officers disregard their sworn duties, Ameri¬ 
can citizens automatically become virtual state militia. They can be constitution¬ 
ally deputized under local sheriffs into militant vigilantes exercising the pro¬ 
tective reserved-powers of the sovereign scates. 

I do not believe that Militant Americanism is dc-ad. It still lives in the 
great heart of the nation. It has been lulled into fancied security by rhe siren 
songs of the Lilliputians of an anti-human Socialism that will not work. _ 

We Americans of today are being tested in a patriotic crucible. Shall we be 
found fit for and worthy of the matchless heritage bequeathed to us by our giant 
forefathers, who selflessly laid their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor 
on the Altar of Country? God grant it! 

The international enemy is not going to give up the rich prize of America 
without a show of force. It may or may not be physical. 

Some of us may be called upon to make the supreme sacrifice! Shall we 
shrink from that? Our heroic forefathers did not draw back. If they had, where 
would you and I be today? 

If Americanism is to survive, ALIENISM MUST BE DESTROYED. 

We shall keep America American just so long as the Land of the Free is 
the Land of the Brave. 


I thank you! 



(From Edmondson Broadcast of Jan. 16,1940) 

"Our President ... has called upon men and women . . . to preserve the principles 
of Democracy. Race consciousness is creeping into our political life . . . Increasingly we 
hear of racial or relig'Ous blocs. Divisions between our people must not be allowed it 
Democracy «s to be preserved. Hate begets hate, and intolerance begets intolerance. — 
"When the social and economic SYSTEM OF DEMOCRACY BROKE DOWN (in 
Eurofce) men could no longer make a living, and individual liberties were surrendered. 
Dictatorships gamed a foothold."—N. Y. Gov. H. H. Lehman’s Jackson Day Dinner 
Speech (N. Y. Times 1-9-40). 

Constitutionalists Damn Democracy 

"Pure Democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have ever 
been found incompatible with personal security or rights of property." — Constitution- 
Framer James Madison in The Federalist, November, 1787. 

As a loyal American I am required to be INTOLERANT of religious or 
racial activities dangerous to the peace and safety of The Republic. 

And I am required to be INTOLERANT of Jewish anti-American politico- 
economic activities tending to change the form of the present government of 
the United States without the constitutional consent of the people. 

Either you are FOR The Republic, or you are against it. THERE CAN BE 


(From Edmondson Bulletin Jan. 16, 1940) 

Lord Macaulay, famous English statesman, in a letter of May 23, 1ST', to 
a New Yorker, delivered a scathing denunciation of "Democracy” in the langu¬ 
age quoted below: 


"I have been convinced chat institutions purely DEMOCRATIC must, 
sooner or later, DESTROY LIBERTY AND CIVILIZATION. Either the poor 
will plunder the rich, or order would be saved by a strong military government. 

"The Huns and Vandals who ravaged the Roman Empire came from with¬ 
out; your Huns and Vandals will have been engendered within your own 

(The quotation is taken from "Macaulay’s Life and Letters” by G. O. 
Trevelyan, Voi. 1, 1875). 

The foregoing was printed in the Wilkesbarre (Pa.) "Record” of Jan. 
11, 1940. 

(Analytical Edmondson Bulletin of Feb. 20, 1940) 

Under the title "The Jews & Freemasons—Exploding the Myth of a World Con¬ 
spiracy,” Bernarr Mactadden's weekly magazine "Liberty" of February 10 and 17, 1940, 
attempts to g've International Jewry a clean bill of health as regards its complicity with 
the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' 'and rheir plans for world domination. 

"Why does this publication so prominently champion Jewry?" The answer may be 
found in the point that Bernard MacFadden is generally known in N. Y. City as a half- 
Jew—which supplies prejudice. 

So much for inspiration. Since the article supplies nothing new and is a rehash of 
old stuff, the sin of omission stands out like a sore thumb and is also confirmatory of 
bias, for the re-write authors base their forgery-allegation largely on a Berne canton trial 
in Switzerland where the lower court is said to have handed down a decision in which 
the protocols were alluded to as forgeries in "by-talk" of no legal value—but which verdict 
was REVERSED later (N. Y. World-Telegram 11-1-37) by the Switzerland High Court 
of Appeals with the statement that the question of whether or not the Protocols of the 
Elders of Zion were authentic was not the issue in the case—the technical charge being 
distribution of "indecent" literature. So that there was no "forgery verdict.” 


Just what are "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"? 

A book placed in the British Museum via Russia in 1906 containing a record of 2-i 
alleged secret meetings of an International Tewish Sanhedrin called "The Kehiliah." "The 
Protocols" are now reported as having a circulation larger than The Bible. Authorship is 

What is their purport? 

A plot or organized conspiracy to establish a world Jewish super-government. 

Do they indicate how this is to be done? 

Yes. The protocolic war-strategy is to promote Communistic revolution among 
Gentile nations and seize politico-economic control during the chaos through "the power 
of gold," which is declared to have been cornered by Jews through subsidization of the 

Americanism is unconcerned with the authenticity or the authorship of the famous 
so-called "Protocols of the Learned Eiders of Zion,” or whether, as alleged by Jewish 
writers, they are "racial libels,” "forgeries" or "plagiarisms.” 

Americanism IS concerned with WHY such prophecy-plans, used to promote the 
bloody Jewish-Communist Conquest of Russia in 1917, have also been adopted and actually 
fulfilled in subversive Communistic laws and administration by the Jewish-Radica! Roose¬ 
velt "New Deal" Regime. 

"There is not an iota of proof” says the "Liberty" article, "in the statement that the 
League of Nations was "the creation of Jewish minds,” Yet Zionist Leader Nahum 
Sokoloff declared: "We Jews established the League of Nations after a fight of 25 years 
(N. Y. Times Aug. 28, 1922). Jewish Poet Zangwill held the League to be a "Jewish 
Aspiration.” "A single world government is coming; we are going through the pangs of 
this creation AT THE PRESENT TIME,” declared Rabbi B. B. Glazer of N Y City 
(N. Y. Times, 12-11-39). 

The "Liberty" article also scornfully refers to "an alleged statement by Benjamin 
Franklin warning the American people against Jew’s—a statement long discredited by 

17 2 

scholars" That prophecy" is in the same class with the protocols, fur Franklin author¬ 
ship has never been legally proved nor disproved; but the N. V Public Library contains 
"Beniamin Franklin’s Writings" by Smvthe, Vol. 8, in which appears very repeated 
antagonism bv the American statesman against Jewish acts; ann the prophecies them- 
Svls i” likeThe protocols, being fulfilled BY JEWS IN AMERICA through the 
Roosevelt ’ Jewish-Radical Administration, as detailed comparisons herewitn incontro- 
.vertibly show. 

The Last edition of the Nilus protocols "was confiscated by the Kerensky government 
of Russia in 1917" says the magazine story. Kerensky is a Jew. 

Machiavelli is drawn upon to show that the protocols were taken from the Italian 
statesman's peculiar political philosophy, but it is not necessary to verify the chosen 
people" obsession as to world dominion, to search history any further than Biblical 
repetition of Jehovah promises to Israelites as to their prospective world super-government. 

Extracts below are from protocol plans, with their actual fulfillments in American 
political-economic life, the figures after paragraphs being protocol numbers: 


Protocol Plans 

Far back in the ancient times we were 
the first to cry "Liberty, Equality', Fratern¬ 
ity/'_i. When we introduced into state 

organisms the Poison of Liberalism, states 
have been seized with a mortal illness.—10. 


The United States of America is 'sick" 
politically. Is this illness due to a poison¬ 
ous propaganda flood of Liberalism, Social¬ 
ism, Communism—during the Jewish-Rad- 
ical New Deal Regime? 

The political has nothing in common wich 
the moral: he who wishes to rule must have 
recourse to cunning and make-believe; 
frankness and honesty are vices in politics. 
— 1 . 

Note broken pledges of the Jewish-Rad- 
ical Roosevelt Administration: "Sound 
money at all hazards"; "Farm recovery must 
not he coercive"; "a tariff commission free 
from executive interference", "we will cut 
government expenses 2 5 per cent." whereas 
national debt has trebled. 

In politics we must know how to seize 
the property of others without hesitation: 
we must not stop at bribery, deceit and 

A satisfactory government is one that 
concentrates in the hands of one person 

Throughout Europe and other continents 
we must produce ferments, discords and 
hostility. Intensification of armaments is 
essential to the completion of our plans—7. 

We shall appear as alleged saviors of 
the worker from oppression, and propose 
to him to enter the ranks of our fighting 
forces—Socialists, Communists and Anarch¬ 

We have got into our hands the admin¬ 
istration of the law. conduct of elections, 
the press, and educational training. We 
have foolc-d. bemused and corrupted the 
youth of the Gentiles by rearing them in 
principles and theories which are known to 
us to be fallacies, although it is by us that 
they have been inculcated.—9- 

Our power will be more invincible, than 
any other because it will remain invisible 
until it has gained such strength that noth¬ 
ing can undermine it.—1. 

Were voters "bribed" with Santa Claus 
gifts, and deceived by the New Deal ad¬ 
ministration of Jewish-Radical reforms? 1 " 

Roosevelt was unquestionably given dic¬ 
tatorial powers by pressure on Congress, 
which initiated few New Deal laws. 

Is there discord in Europe and America? 
Are the armaments of Russia, France, Italy, 
England, Germany, japan being increased? 

New' Dealers have constantly posed as 
saviors of labor with Sidney Hillman's CIO. 
The American Federation of Labor is re¬ 
ported to have bec-n communistkally sub¬ 
verted. Its Jewish Vice-President Woll wel¬ 
comes refugees. Its General Counsel. Jos. A. 
Padway. is a Jew. 

Are jc-wish-Radical elements in promin¬ 
ent university professorships and columnist 
positions of great metropolitan newspapers? 
Has tire U. S. Supreme Court been under¬ 
mined by packing" appointments? 

Have we "invisible government" by Jewish 
unofficial advisors" at Washington, such 
35 Brandeis, Frankfurter. Morgenthau, 
Baruch and hundreds of other Key-Jews? 


Protocol Plans 


The principal factor in Politics is secrecy; 
the word should not agree with the deed 
of the diplomat.—7. 

We have in our service persons of all 
doctrines — Communists, Socialists, dema¬ 
gogues, utopian dreamers.—9- 

To sum up our system of keeping the 
governments of the Gentiles of Europe in 
check, we shall show our strength to one 
of them by terrorist attempts,—7, 

We shall create an intensified centraliza¬ 
tion of government.—5. 

We have set the people on the hobby¬ 
horse of an idea about the absorbtion of 
individuality by the symbolic unit of col¬ 
lectivism. This hobby-horse is a manifest 
violation of the most important law of 
nature, which has established one unit un¬ 
like another precisely for the purpose of 
instituting individuality.—15. 

We must discredit personal initiative; 
nothing is more dangerous to our cause.—5. 

The best results in governing are attained 
by violence.— l. 

God has given to us (his Chosen People), 
the gift of dispersion, and in this, which 
appears to be our weakness, has come forth 
our strength—which has brought us to the 
threshold of sovereignty over all the world. 
— 11 . 

Who knows the secret framers of the 
Securities Paralysis Act, Monetary Defla¬ 
tion Law, NRA, SEC and 5-Billion Relief 
Measure? Mordecai Ezekiel framed the 
AAA. Nathan Margold runs the Interior 
Dept., Herbert Feis the State Dept. 

Washington.swarms with all those classes, 
including members of the Frankfurter 
American Civil Liberties Union. 

The "Red Terror" in Russia has "liqui¬ 
dated" 20 million Gentiles. It butchered 
Spain. NRA "economic death" policy ter¬ 
rorized and ruined American small busi¬ 
ness men, 

Political power has been centered as never 
before in Washington, with legislative 
power usurped. 

United States church reds, radicals, social¬ 
ists and demagogues ride this hobby-horse 
roughshod over all American Constitutional 

Restrictive regimentation laws in industry 
and agriculture have extensively curtailed 
individual liberties and destroyed personal 

There has been more strike violence dur¬ 
ing the Roosevelt Jewish-Radical Regime 
than in over 25 years previous. 

How does this check up wth super-gov¬ 
ernment League of Nations "aspirations" 
voiced by Jewish Author Zangwill in 1920, 
Zionist Leader Sokolow in 1922 and Rabbi 
Wise at the 193d Geneva Jewish Congress? 


Economic crises have been produced by 
us for the Gentiles by no other means than, 
withdrawal of money from circulation,—20. 

Wars should be brought on to the econ¬ 
omic ground; our INTERNATIONAL 
r'ghts will then WIPE OUT NATIONAL 
RIGHTS—2; the despotism of capital is 
entirely in our hands.—1. 

We shall establish huge monopolies.—6 

As landed proprietors can be most harm¬ 
ful to us from the fact that they are self- 
sufficing, it is essential for us to deprive 
them of their land by loading it with 
debt.— 6. 

Did cornering of money and the with¬ 
drawal thereof cause, and is it prolonging 
the "Great Suppression?" 

Germany, Japan, Spain, and Italy are 
being subjected to Jewish Financial Boycott 
pressure for expelling Jewish Communiscs. 
"Wars are generally caused by economic 
pressure," Jewish Speculator Baruch told a 
Senate Committee March 27, 1935. 

Was NRA a "huge monoply?" American 
credit and banking have been monopolized 
by the Jewish-Radical New Dealers. 

Are not U. S. farms overloaded with 

1 74 

Protocot Plans 

Vc shall raise wages, winch, however, 
will not bring any advantage to wotacers, 
tor at the same time we shaJ produceu 
rise in the prices for the necessities of life. 
— 6 . 

To give the Gentiles no time to think, 
their minds must be diverted * * thus 
all nations will take no note of their 
common foe.—4. 


We must compel governments to act as 
favored by our plans, secretly promoted 
through the great power of the press which, 
with "but few exceptions which may be 
disregarded, is already in our hands.—7, 

To put public opinion in our hands we 
must bring it to a state of bewilderment by- 
giving expression on all sides to so many 
contradictory opinions as to cause the 
Gentiles to’ lose rheir heads and make it 
impossible to know where they are in the 
resulting chaos.—5. 


The cost of living is rising faster than 
wages under the Jewish-Radical New Deal, 
due to food destruction, enormous con¬ 
fiscatory new taxation, experiment and 
doubling of national debt. 

Isn't the American majority, due- to diver¬ 
sions. its subverted press, and misleading 
propaganda, still blind to the deadly peril 
of the Internationalist menace: 


The American press, screen and radio, 
are Jewish-dominated through ownership, 
advertising subsidization and distribution 
channels control. 

This is a key-strategy of the protocols. 
Have we been bewildered by the Jewish- 
Radical New- Dealer flood of propaganda 
in the press, over the air and on the screens 
Deceive-Confuse-Collapse-Dictate — That is 
the outline of the Plan of Jewish Com¬ 
munistic Democracy to Enslave America. 

(Edmondson Bulletin March 27, 1940) 

The following is a significant extract from the Congressional Record of March l -i, 

■'(Hon Jacob Thorkelson of Montana) Mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent to 
address The House for one minute. On March 4, 1 spoke in New York on the rights ot 
the people as set forth in the Constitution of the U. S. (Ed. Note: He covered a lecture 
before a packed meeting of the Christian Mobilizes in New Yoik). 

"In the mail today I received a book entiled "ChoiceMs Mine " and appended to the 
book were these notices, WHICH ARE A THREAT ON MY LIFE: Thorkelson. Me- 
Williams’ dupes have learned not their lesson. Have you learned yours yet' Evidently 
not but it's in this story—if you want to know what its all about before you re called. 
Don't forget: This trip may end any second. Have you the courage to face your maker. 
Be prepared! Read "Choice Is Mine"—because the next time you may be one of those on 

ihe other side.' 

"Mr Speaker, the writer did not sign his name. We know, however, happenings of 
rl-w= nait- and messages of this sort should not be treated lightly, for it is significant that 
our S pdlaog Spur, moots ARE LAX IN THEIR OBLIGATED DUTIES. 

"In reading this book, one can raise no question AS TO ITS ORIGIN, and I say now 
that if the Department of Justice and other law-enforcement bodies do not Pf^ect their 
own citizens in the performance of their duties to this Republic, THE PEOPLE IHbM- 

When Congressman Thorkelson referred to other "happenings of the past, doubtless 
he had in mind the reported poisoning of the lace Pennsylvania Congressman Lours T. 
McFadden, who had been inserting in the Congressional Record great volumes of Jew- 
exposing records-as is Thorkelson; and when McFadden died the Jewish Senunel of 
Chicago (10-8-36) published his picture with a sub-caption OUT OF THE WAY. 

Whose way? 

I recall the shooting of former Senator Huey Long of Louisiana by Jewish Dr. Weiss 
ten days after he began to make overtures looking to a Jewish Problem conference with 
me The'late Senator Thomas D. Schall of Minnesota met with a mysterious fatal accident 
shortly after he wrote to me praising aggression in crusading for Americanism. 

While living in New York City the undersigned received many threats similar to 
those sent Congressman Thorkelson; but, notwithstanding Jewish Communist warnings, 

1 7 5 

"Lawless Mayor LaGuardia" cancelled my pistol permit after a Jew' had invaded my 
office with hostile intent—and then left hurriedly after seerng the gun on my desk, 
muttering Til gee you!" 

Under the circumstances, Congressman Thorkelson is fully justified in having these 
threats put in the record and declaring that the people must act to save The Republic. 


(A By-Request Brevity Question-Answer Analysis of March 26 , 1940 

by Edmondson) 

What is the variously called Jewish Threat, Jewish Peril, Jewish Plague. 
Jewish Problem? 

A destructive attempt to dominate non-Jew peoples by a super-organized 
international secret pow'er exercised economically and politically by Jewish 
Minority Solidarity, 

Why is it a peril for Americans? 

Because it attacks individual and national existences, to substitute therefore 
its anti-Gentile ideologies, including ”a thoroughly socialized democracy/’ Jewry 
refuses to assimilate, acting as a disintegrating solvent. 


Through its coercive monopoly-weapon of the gold money supply of the 

How did it get such control? 

By economic planning during many centuries, as indicated by biblical and 
secular records. 

What is the root cause of the movement? 

Materialistic deification worship of the Golden Calf for thousands of 
years; during which time Jews learned "all the secrets that lay hid” in money- 
manipulation, which made them "Lords of Money” and Lords of the Material¬ 
istic World. 

In view of the Chosen People Tradition, did religion have much to do 
with this activity? 

"Since you can’t "religionize” materialism—only the spirit—the answer 
must be "No!’’ Jews use religion and race as screens to hide their subversions, 

What is meant by the "Chosen People Myth?’’ 

Both Protestant and Catholic Christian documents agree thar Jews were 
once chosen by their God as a favored people, and then repudiated. 

Did race have anything to do with the matter? 

Only in the sense of planned intensification or an anci-assimilation in- 
breeding—to promote the Jewish Common Solidarity. 

Why does the Jewish Peril menace all American Life? 

Because its materialistic ideology is carried out through a Socialistic, Com¬ 
munistic, Atheistic leveling-down of peoples into the status of slaves. 

What is the alleged Anti-Semitic persecution to which the Jews constantly 

The term is a misleading blanket camouflage because the 10 to 15 million 
Arabs and Syrians also belong to the Semite Race, as well as the Jew's. 

What causes ami-Jewishness? 

The presence of Jews in perceptible numbers in any Gentile community, 
confesses their great Zionist Pounder-Leader Theodor Herzl in his book 'The 
Jewish State.” Where there are no Jews, "anti-Semitism” does not exist. 


What is the Jewish Problem IN SOLUTION.-' 

Politico-Economic, because of its monetary-tyranny domination. 

What is the remedy? 

Destruction of the international Jewish monetary monopoly-mechanism and 

How can that be done? 

By national governmental action. 

Through what method? 

Free press publicity which educationally produces corrective legislation. 

Can that be effected? 

Yes, through disfranchisement and deportation of Jews on the ground that 
the practice of their internationalist "Way of Life" constitutes a danger to the 
peace and safety of The Republic, under the Constitution. Jews have been ex¬ 
pelled from every civilized nation in the past because they became a politico- 
economic menace to the state, not on account of their religion, 

Where can they be humanely sent? 

To the healthful and little developed fertile Island of Madagascar off the 
southeast coast of Africa, and which wili hoid ail of them. 

(Published April 20, 1940, by Edmondson) 

THE PRESS: Let Militant American Patriots in small-group action, write and call 
upon newspaper and magazine publishers and editors repeatedly, in every town and city, 
and lawfully warn them against suppression of TRUTH in news and editorials and 
columnist propaganda, under penalty of withdrawal of Gentile subscriptions and advertis¬ 
ing; and of documentary exposures of evidence of treasonable publicity. Offending publica- 
ations should be boycotted in every lawful manner. Hold patriotic protest meetings. Send 
adopted resolutions to editors. 

For efficient action. Vigilante Patriotic Groups must make a special study of the 
Fundamentals of Traditional Americanism, starting from the fact that the United States 
is A Republic—not a Democracy. Deliver documented lectures. Give detailed factual 

IT WITH THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH, It is endowed with the Right to Create— 
not to Destroy good government. 

Jewish control of advertising, plus financial coercion, plus ownership, plus distribu¬ 
tion-direction—have subverted the news Freedom of The Press in the Ciries of the United 
States in violation of the Constitutional guarantee, to the extent that Truth is suppressed 
from the news and Propaganda subversive of The Spirit of Americanism prevails through¬ 
out the Nation. 

THE RADIO AND SCREEN: Similar lawful warnings should be given to managers 
of radio stations, movie theaters and picture producers. Hold specific protest assemblies, 

The Radio and Screen have developed highly effective channels of current news, 
education and subversive propaganda. Radio stations are under Federal license, and 
advertising Jews dominate the big broadcasting systems, as well as the moving picture 

Remember that publicity pressure by the Catholic League for Decency brought im¬ 
portant remedial action as to immoral screen pictures. Emulate such methods! 

EDUCATIONAL AUTHORITIES: Similar lawful warnings should be given to 
heads of universities, colleges and other "higher-education” professors who may be 
educated beyond their intellectual capacity to comprehend basic Americanism. 

Tell them that, in addition to Rights derived from the Constitution, they owe Duties 
to it; that American Freedom comes before Academic Freedom—The latter perishes if 
the former falls. 

Tell them that contributions from state authorities and others will be stopped by 
patriotic action unless their allegiance is first to the basic American ideologies that make 
it possible for them to enjoy Lite, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Deliver exposing 


RACIAL MINORITIES: Simitar tawful warning dmuld tx given iv representatives 
0 f the Jewish Minority, which refuses to assimilate into the single organism of Ameri¬ 
canism and demands by resolution that a chorougnly socialized democracy (communism) 
be substituted in place of the American Republic System Hole peaceful exposure as¬ 

Tel! lews that unless thev change the anti-American practice of their "way of life" 
from being a '"danger to the peace and safety' of The Republic, they will be deported by 
authority of a new constitutional amendment. Protest to legislators, demanding justice tor 

American patriots seek no violence-only exact justice. Legal advice in this, con¬ 
nection is impeiativc to avoid jew traps set by tricksters backed by unlimited iuaus. 
Document all charge*. 

CHURCH ADMINISTRATIONS. Similar lawful warnings should be given to church 
leadership because of an ami-American departure from Fundamental Moral Teachings and 
ecclesiastical invasion of Politico-Economic Fields, where they try to <fomniace_ wocnout 
having practical knowledge of affairs. Write letters to them and call meetings ot protest. 
Don't pussyfoot! 

Point out that a cardinal principle of Americanism is separation of Church and State. 
Religion and Politics; and that a sound solution of Economic, Financial and Monetary 
Problems requires special knowledge, which they do not possess. 

Tell them that preaching of Collectivist Socialism and Communistic Democracy is 
against Individual Traditional Americanism, and must be stopped; that the Right of 
Free Speech guaranteed by The Republic, does not confer upon them the privilege of 
destroying the Constitutional Government winch makes them secure in their individual 
right to the enjoyment of Life. Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. 


Rescue The Republic! 


(Edmondson Bulletin of April 23, 19-40) 

Kenneth A. Brown, of Gervais, Oregon, 31, unmarried, college graduate, 
scion of one of Oregon's oldest and respected families, for ten years operating 
large scale farming enterprises, has announced his candidacy for the Republican 
Congressional nomination in the First Oregon District; and in his circular an¬ 
nouncement of April 12, 1940, he submitted the following statement, which 
was suppressed by The Press of his state: 

1 In this campaign upon which I am entering, and which wiil be noteworthy 
for its forthright frankness, I shall, in discussing vital issues of the day, call a 
spade a spade, and, where necessary, A JEW A JEW. 

"The present European conflict is but an expression of the World Jewish 
Problem—the frantic effort to establish Jewish Hegemony throughout the 
world. The guiding political power in America reposes in the hands of these 

"Appreciating these facts, I view as the greatest threat to American well¬ 
being today the effort being made to draw us into this war—either in Europe 
or Asia. 


1 7 S 

"I have no affiliations or connections with any group whatsoever, and 
personally accept full responsibility for the statement herein contained, and for 
the statements which shall subsequently appear through my campaign." (signed) . 

In his supplementary circular ol April 12, Mr. Brown, who receives 
Edmondson reports, comments vigorously as follows: 

"Why was this statement denied recognition in Oregon newspapers? By this 
un-American act of suppression, Freedom of Speech is challenged. 

"The news was suppressed because it dared to TELL THE TRUTH. No 
casual statement is this—THIS IS NEWS. It constitutes a terrible indictment, 
which, by its very nature and content, demands recognition—refutation, if it 
be false! acclaim, if it be true. 

"Suppression is not the American way. This reveals a Conspiracy of 
Silence on part of The Press and the news agencies to prevent MY MESSAGE 

"Words of mine might lack conviction. BUT HERE YOU HAVE THE 
PROOF! Proof that news inimical to JEWISH design can be and is withheld 
from the American people. Who, then, controls our Press? To what low estate 
has the American Press descended?" 

This typical western American farm youth, with high courage, superior 
intelligence, grim determination and super-audacity, lays his honor, his fortune 
and his life on the altar of country in a fearless American anti-war defi to the 
greatest subversive politico-economic power ever confronting national patriotism. 

Can we do less, and live with ourselves? 



''Democracy" Washington Wilson Regime. 
Wilson Administration Jew-controlled. 

Wilson Chief Economic Advisor' Bernard 
M. Baruch, who admitted he then had 
more war-power than anyone. 

Wilson Banker-Advisor, Henry Morgen- 
thau, Sr., International Banker. 

Wilson Political-Advisor, Col. E. Mandel- 
House, Author of "Phihp Dru." 

Wilson Publicist, Walter Lippmann. 
Wilson-appointed Judicial Advisor U. S. 
Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, 
who proclaimed Jews to be a "national¬ 

Wilson "Bolsheviki Defender," Felix 
Frankfurter, denounced by Theo. Roose¬ 
velt as Red. 

Warcry: "Make the world safe for 

Look at the war set-ups at the top 
ask yourself whether or not power lies 
European Suicide War. 


"Democracy" Washington Roosevelt Re¬ 

Roosevelt Administration Jew-Controlled— 
Brooklyn Jewish Examiner admits (10- 
2 0-33) it appointed more Jews than any 

Roosevelt Chief Economic Advisor Bernard 
M. Baruch, told a Senate Committee 
( 3-27-35) that wars are now generally 
"caused by economic pressure;" favored 
U. S. force to keep European ideologies 
out of South America (St. Louis Post- 
Dispatch 11-1-38); called National 
Patriotism a "lot of nonsense" (Chicago 
Tribune 9-25-35). 

Roosevelt Secretary of Treasury, Henry 
Morgenthau, Jr., Dictator of Two Billion 
Equalization Fund. 

Roosevelt "Right Arm" Advisor Justice 
SamueL I. Rosenman. 

Roosevelt Publicist, Walter Lippmann. 

Roosevelt New Deal "Father," Louis D. 
Brandeis, of the U. S. Supreme Court, 
Zionist Leadership. 

Roosevelt Political Advisor, "Karl Marx 
Prof.” Felix Frankfurter, appointed to 
U. S. Supreme Court by Roosevelt. 

Warcry; "Make the world safe for 


of this bulletin of October 24, 1939, and 
in alien, hands to force America into the 

1 79 



entit/ed a A tide of J UIie 19 ^> Partly quoted below. 

nf ti ^ u E l i ’ 1 Trm, ? ph 0ver Horst WesscI?," Germans hold lies proof 
of the Jewish intention to launch another world war. ° 

"It has become patent that a Combination of Britain, France and Russia 
wall sooner or later bar the triumphant marcli of Hitler. 

"!n France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum. He may yet be the Moses 
wh 0 w H Had founder,ng La Belle out of the wilderness. Mal.m LNinoff" 
he high-pressure gentleman who sold President Roosevelr on the recognition of 
the Soviet Gove. * * * He ha * been solely responsible for the formulation M 

Cvr s hck e Ind £ ,Cy ' h Th ! L ^ llSh ] r ° f P rominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha. 
ftl As for War, he 

. Would 1C Linholy to suggest that these three nations bound by numerous 
1n \T ^ u nd m n a State ° f Virtaal althou S h undeclared alliance \vill stand 

shoulder to shoulder to ward off the strides of Hitler to the East? ’ 

"WHEN THE SMOKE OF BATTLE clears there may be presented a 
tableau the man who played God, the swastika ChrMus being lowered 
none too gently mro a hole in the ground, as the trio of non-Ar^ns intone 

in grand fma,e ,nt0 * "»«. 

F I F Tva Z Prt f‘ dem ° aV,d A - Brown of the American Hebrew told Robert 
Edward Edmondson m 1934: "We are going to bring a war on Germany.” 


(Edmondson Broadcast of May 24, 1940) 

Jcnn the Allies or Perish! 
says Jewish Columnist Lippmann 

„ , "N T fiiSamiC rff ' >n <>f whKh **• »„*!, may nor be sufficient 

Er d of . pec,ple <rorn findi "« themselves .solated end surrounded in a 

world ot victorious aggressor-states. d 


™ S ^bT D ONLY BY ™ RESrSTANcf OF TOe“s 

"Once outposts arc in the hands of victorious, unfriendly, aggressive and hunerv 

EbE whEhut'e”: '' a "° Wed th ' t,me “ ° UrSdra 




TI8 40 RAPIDLY AS P ° SSIBLE '"-^'- Lippman ,n N. Y. 

1 8 0 

Says Col. Charles A. Lindbergh 

"We arc in danger of war today, not because European people have attempted to 
interfere with the internal affairs of America, but because American people have attempted 
to interfere with the internal affairs of Europe. Let us turn nur eyes to our own nation. 
We cannot aid ethers until we have first placed our own country in a position of spiritual 
and material leadership and strength. 

A foreign power could not conquer us by dropping bombs in this country unless the 
bombing were accompanied by an invading army ; and an invading army requires thousands 
of small bombers and pursuit planes; ir would have little use for huge trans-Atlantic air¬ 
craft. The advantage lies with us, for great armies must still cross oceans by ship. 

"Out danger in America is an internal danger. We need not fear a foreign invasion 
unless American people bring it on through their awn meddling with affairs abroad. The 
course we have been following in recent months leads to neither strength nor friendship 
nor peace. It will leave us hated by victor and vanquished aiike. One side will claim we 
aided its enemies; the other, that we did not help enough. 

"Let us turn to America’s traditional role—that of building and guarding our own 
destiny, Above all, let us stop this HYSTERICAL CHATTER OF CALAMITY AND 
INVASION, If we desire peace, we need only stop asking for war. No one wishes to 
attack us, and no one is in a position to do so: 

"The only reason that we are in danger of becoming involved in this war is be¬ 
cause there are powerful elements in America who desire us to take pare. THEY REPRE¬ 
THESE ELEMENTS.'—Col. Charles A. Lindbergh, Philadelphia Inquirer 5-20-40. 

The inevitable first reaction to the above deadly parallel—The Question: WHO 
wants war? is answered! Under date of Oct. 3, 1936. the following was broadcast: In a 
pamphlet titled ''Twenty Years of Social Pioneering,” by the League of Industrial Dem¬ 
ocracy (Communistic), this appears: ''Walter Lippman organized the Harvard Socialist 



The following was published July 8, 1940: 

"Jews are the only cosmopolitan people. In this capacity they are ACTING 
as a SOLVENT of national differences."—From The London Jewish World 


UNITY implies solidarity. SOLVENT means an element that dissolves, 
disunites, disorganizes, separates. 

The nationally known rabbi. Dr. Solomon Goldman, of Chicago, Presi¬ 
dent of the Zionist Organization of America, made the following accusation— 
absolutely false so far as concerns the undersigned and his patriotic Jew-exposure 
associates—in theN. Y. Times of July 1, 1940: 

"In America, Anti-Semitism is the universal Fifth Column of Hitlerism. 

An "anti-Semite” is he who is against the Jew-Semite—not the Arab- 
Semite. Let us get that race-duplicity clear. Let us also make it plain that patriots 
who are anti-Jewish are not against Jews AS SUCH, but against what the Jew 
Semites are DOING against The Republic and National Patriotism. 

"HITLERISM” is the National Socialist Comprehensive Political Doctrine 
adopted in Germany for government of The Reich. According to the rabbi’s 
reverse-thinking, American vigilante patriots who are Anti-Jewish are therefore 
advocates of Nazism FOR AMERICA. His biased comprehension seems to be 
utterly incapable (?) of grasping the fact that the Jewish subversions in Ger¬ 
many which caused Hitler’s anti-Jewishness, repeated in America, were certain 
to create here similar anti-Jewish reactions WITHOUT IN ANY WAY AB¬ 

1 8 1 

Zionist Leader Hcrzl admits in his "Jewish State" that wherever Jews go 
in "perceptible numbers.” there also anti-Semitism invariably occurs. In other 
words, Jewish intervention of itself causes anti-Jewishness. 

Jews promote DISUNITY instead of National Unity, by refusing to assim¬ 
ilate and demanding special privilege, in violation of American political equality. 

The reader might ask himself at this point, whether or not cosmopolitan 
Jews, acting as a solvent, are promoting national disunity in the interest of 

"Jews are among the trusted leaders of all revolutionary parties” admitted 
Rabbi Judah L. Magnus, of New York and Palestine, in the Jewish Forum of 
February, 1919- "Disciples of Disunity?" 

Jewish Editor M. J. Olgin. quoted in the Congressional Record (6-25-34) : 
"There is only one way to abolish the capitalistic state and that is to smash it 
by force! THAT MEANS CIVIL WAR!” Promoting Civil War is not productive 
of National Unity. 

Whose solidarity and unity were supremely manifested in the 1934 N. Y. 
Siate gubernatorial election when the Democratic candidate was the Jew Lehman, 
the Republican nominee the Jew Moses, the Socialist aspirant the jew Solomon, 
and Communist candidate the Jew Amter? 

Instead of promoting the UNITY they preach, the record above suggests 
that Disciples of Disunity have been suicidally sowing an anti-racial hatred 
againsc themselves. 



(Edmondson Bulletin of July 22, 1940) 

Following is a review of the illuminating "contents" of a 1918 booklet entitled "Back 
to the Republic" by Atwood, in which he compaies "the process of democracy" with 
the principles of a republic, and from which publication was lifted bodily a substantial 
part of the U. S. Army Citizenship Training Manual of 1928, which has been suppressed 
by New Dealer Roosevelt, Disciple of Democracy and Disunity, because it officially an¬ 
nounces that "The Government of the U. S. is NOT a democracy, but a REPUBLIC." 

"The purpose of this book is to make clear the meanings of the words 'autocracy', 
democracy' and republic' It is a startling statement, but an indisputable fact, that in 
reviewing the centuries of history prior to • the founding of The Republic of the U. S. A., 
w-e find no country to which the historian can point and truthfully say: There was a 
government that worked well. Following the adoption of the Constitution . . . there began 
the first great era of progress guvernmentally that the world had ever known. 

"Gradually, however, w-e began to modify our national government through the 
appointment of boards and commissions, and the creation of various governmental 
agencies, making it impossible for the government to function in accord with the Plan of 
the Constitution. Demagogues and propagandists have kept up a constant campaign in 
various states for the initiative, referendum, recall, socialistic doctrines and anarchistic 

"The men who established our government made a very marked distinction between a 
'republic' and ’democracy,’ and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded 
a republic. 11 

Author Gertrude Atherton, in "The Conqueror," quotes Alexander Hamilton: 
"Democracy is Poison!" Author Atwood reports him as saying: "The political principles 
of the people of this country (The U. S. A.) would endure nothing but republican 

Atwood continues: "In an autocracy, authority is derived through heredity; in a 
democracy, authority is derived through mass-meetings, the initiative, the referendum, 
instructed delegates, or any other form of direct expression. In a republic, authority is 
derived through the election by the people of public officials to represent them. 

1 S 2 

I’litr .utiiuJc of juiociucy towarJ property is feudaiistic. The attitude of democracy 
toward property is communistic or socialistic. The attitude uf the republic toward property 
is that of individual ownership, resulting in thrift, respect for law, individual rights, and 
orderly, sensible economic procedure. 

"The attitude of autocracy toward law, is that the will of the royal ruler shall 
prevail; the attitude of democracy toward law is that the will of the majority shall prevail; 
the attitude of the republic toward law is the administration of justice in accord with 
fixed principles and established evidence- 

"There is no such thing as a representative democracy. The very essence of democracy 
is that the people speak direct. There is no such thing as a democratic republic. The very 
essence of a republic is that the people speak through representativs. There is no such 
thing as a democratic autocracy. Too little participation by the people, means autocracy: 
too much participation by the people means democracy, 

"The extreme or autocracy results in tyranny, oppression, reaction; the other extreme 
of democracy results in demagogtsm, discontent, anarchy and chaos The Golden Mean of 
a republic, strictly and literally adhered to, results in statesmanship, liberty, arbitration, 
justice and progress. The Constitution provides for absolutely strict representative govern¬ 
ment, and gives the people no voice in the solution of governmental problems saving that 
of electing representatives to work out the problems. It is a fundamental fact that the 
people generally know comparatively little about governmental problems." 

Author Atwood quotes from an address by Nicholas Murray Butler. President of 
New York's Columbia University, before the Commercial Club of St. Louis, Nov. 2 ~, 
iyu, published later under the title: "Why Should We Change Our Form of Govern¬ 
ment." in. which he said: 

"There is under way a definite and determined movement to change our representa¬ 
tive republic into a socialistic democracy," The Central Conference of American Rabbis, in 
a 1936 resolution, demanded that "a thoroughly socialized democracy" be substituted for 
our republican form of government (See N. Y. Times 9-13-36). 

Atwood defines "the initiative that phase of democracy which makes it possible 
for the mob, under the leadership of the demagogue, to enact legislation; the referendum 
is that phase of democracy which assumes that the minority should rescind impulsively at 
a special election the deliberate'action of the majority at a regular election; the judicial 
recall is that phase of democracy which makes it possible to rake a case from the court¬ 
room, where it may be decided in accordance with the law and the evidence, to the street 
corners, where the agitators may appeal to passion and prejudice. 

"Demagogues have substituted Personality for Principle, Preachment for Practice, 
Pretense for Performance, Agitation for Achievement. Experiment for Execution and 
Coercion tor the Constitution." 

(Open Letter to Columnist Walter Winchell, July 15, 1940) 

In your N. Y. Mirror of July 8, 1940, you give me some free advertising, 
and I hereby write my thanks for the publicity because it is already bearing good 
fruit for the Crusade against Jewish anti-Americanism even though apparently 
published with smear-malice aforethought. 

A respected western correspondent ironically writes: "We heard last Sun¬ 
day over the air waves kosher-America’s No. 1 mouthpiece, Walter Winchell. 
Mr. and Mrs. America were hysterically warned about poisonous propaganda 
emanating from the Pocono Mountains, around Stoddartsville, Penna. The 
hill-billy press must be becoming effective when a national hook-up is used to 
warn our innocent public about it. It must surely have attained significance. 
Congratulations on your prominence!" 

You report that I am much interested m stopping the firearms registration 
bill before Congress, which you say would "DISARM many who have no reason 
to carry guns." I’m glad you used that correct word "disarm," since it is omitted 
from the measure. 

There are several good reasons why I would not like to sec- the muonstitj- 
tional gun-registration measure pass, among which is the fact that, it enacted, it 

1 8 3 

would enable Kiev Jews in government control-positions to frame citizens 
md take away their rifles, pistols, etc., '-disarming" them, as you say, and leav¬ 
ing them defenseless when Jewish Communists are ready to try to seize The 
Republic by force. 

Said Communists don’t dare to act now. There are too many "White 
Terror" vigilantes just around the corner protected by the keep and bear arms 
right guaranteed by the Constitution. 

You say Attorney-General Jackson has urged the bill as an aid to national 
defense. What a farce: How would national defense be promoted by disarming 
nationals—citizens—of The Republic.'’ 

You smearinglv allege that "This man Edmondson carries on his campaign 
in Stoddartsville, Pa., BECAUSE in New York a few years ago he was indicted 
by a Grand Jury on charges brought by Mayor LaGuardia and others. You 
failed to tell the whole story. 

It was' a Grand JEWRY that indicted the defendant, for two-thirds of the 
personnel were Jews, headed bv a Jew foreman. You also neglected to mention 
the fact that the false charge of "libel of all persons of the Jewish Religion was 
unconditionally dismissed May 10, 1938, "in furtherance of justice.’ 

However for your information, primarily I came here for family health 
reasons—justified by subsequent recovery. Fudlely waking in New York City 
months after dismissal, ready to take on more Jews offering combat, I was very 
glad to come to an American Gentile community, preferring such environment to 
the New York Ghetto. 

"The dear old American Civil Liberties Union went to Edmondson’s de¬ 
fense and saved him," you falsely comment. Roger N. Baldwin, Director of the 
"dear old ACLU," wrote Sept. 18, 1936, to Judge N. W. Rogers of Tompkins 
Corners, N. Y., saying: 

"We have discussed very fully our attitude to the prosecution of Edmond¬ 
son We have conferred with his counsel, and looked up the law. When the 
indictment was first brought it was, in our judgment, clearly a case violative 
of the free speech guarantee, for, unlike ordinary criminal libel cases, it did not 
specify persons libeled. The indictment was later changed to specific com¬ 
plaints, and thus the defect was cured." The matter was thereupon dropped by 
the ACLU. 

Defense Counsel John S. Wise, Jr., wrote Judge Rogers Oct. 1, 1936 say- 
mo Baldwin had NOT conferred with him, as stated; and the religion indict¬ 
ment was NEVER CHANGED; which of course put Jewish Fellow-Traveler 
Baldwin in the Ananias Club. 

BUT, and here’s a big "but" because, becoming alarmed regarding its loose¬ 
ness, it then pleaded with the court for "dismissal of indictment because pro¬ 
secutions like this tend to restrict traditional freedom of speech and press.” 
So much for the "dear old ACLU.’ 

But, watch your step, Wincbell, particularly in venturing to say that 
"Edmondson is up to che same tricks which resulted in his indictment." I do 
plead guiltv, however, to such "tricks" as truthfully exposing, through well- 
documented power-publicity on a scale greater than ever before, how Jews arc 
trying to destroy The Republic with their poisonous Communistic Democracy. 

Now, any independent Gentile journalist would publish also this rebuttal, 
but whoever heard of Walter Winchell in the role of a straight-shooter? 

1 84 


"Jewish understanding does not look beyond today and tomorrow, operatin 
destructively and suicidallv in ail directions. The Jewish mode of thinking i 
inorganic, and is, for that reason, incapable of creative action. The Jew is un¬ 
able to conceive that the world dominion for which he is striving, would mean 
simultaneous world ruin."—From the book "The Riddle of the Jews’ Success, ' 
a revelation of Materialism in Action. 

Here is the record per Edmondson Bulletin of S-14-40) : 

Jews achieved complete politico-economic mastery of rich Russia, througli 
Trotsky, Kaganowitsch, Litvinoff, Zinoviev, Radek, Kamanev, Yaroslavsky et 
al. What happened?- 


Jews mastered Germany via Rathenau, Marx, Lassalle, Liebknecht, Eisner. 
Haase, Preuss, Ballin et al. What happened? 


Jews gained control of Spain through Rosenberg, Bela Kun, Azana, and a 
host of Soviet Jews. What happened? 

SPAIN WAS WRECKED! (Jew-freed by Gentile Franco, Spain is grad¬ 
ually recovering through National Patriotism). 

Jews moved into and dominated Poland, which they called "The Heart of 
the Jewish Diaspora." What happened? 

POLAND IS NO MORE! after being forced into war. 

Jews mastered France through the Rothschilds, Blum, Mandel, Dreyfus. 
Levy, Denain, Lazarus, et al., with their Secret Order of the Grand Orient. 
What happened? 


Jews gained control of Rumania through King Carol’s mistress Lupescu. 
What happened? 


Jews bored into and seized control of the wealth of the British Empire- 
through Barney Barnato's African gold and diamonds, Sassoon's Oriental opium, 
Disraeli’s Suez Canal grab, Lord Reading’s Indian-rule, Lord Melchett's nickel 
monopoly, the Samuels, Waley-Cohens, Israel Moses Sieffs, Hore-Beiishas and 
so on ad nauseum. What happens? 


Jews have seized the U. S. Economic Dynamo of New York and the 
Political Power Center of Washington, directing America’s destiny through 
Baruch, Brandeis, Morgenthau, Lehman, LaGuardia, Goldenweiser, Strauss, 
Sabath, Filene, Bullitt, Dickstein, Rosenman, Swope, Ezekiel, Margold, Hill¬ 
man, and thousands of others of the tribe in key-positions throughout the 
Roosevelt Jew Deal administration. What is happening? 


Zionist Leader Maurice Samuel, in his book "You Gentiles,” defiantly 
confesses: "We Jews are destroyers even in those instruments of destruction to 
which we turn for relief." 

What an admission—not only of Gross Incompetence, but utter lack of 
creative ability! Verily "Jewish thinking is inorganic, incapable of creative 
action, operating destructively AND SUICIDALLY in all directions!" 




The following is a reprint from The Wilkes-Barre (Pn.) Record of August IT 19-10: 

Complimentary to Boy Scout Camps in the Poconos. members; of the- summer colutiv 
a; Stoddartsville,, were guests on Friday night of Misses Lulie- ,ukI l.,iui';i Stub 
at their family homesteac, "The Maples," Robert Edwai-J Edmondscm, pub.ic relations 
counsel of New York anc Pennsylvania was speaker, and a patriotic Hag salute was 

Speaking on Save the Republic, Mr. Edmonsdnn said in pan. 

"You scouts know that we Americans live in a Republic, but many ■>; mar fellow- 
countrymen. misled by false internationalist propaganda, are calling die United States a 
democracy under the impression that democracy mear.s tnc same as repub; ic. ’lou should 
correct that idea. 

"If you will look at your dictionary you will see that democracy is the opposi'e 
extreme of autocracy, from which our forefathers who established this republic successfully- 
freed themselves by revolution, to set up, not a democracy, but a republic. 

"James Madison, one of the ablest of the framers of the United States Constitution, 
during the time the great document was in process of formation, made the following 
statement: "Democracies have ever been the scenes of turbulence and contention; have 
ever been incompatible with personal security or right of property.' 

"His compatriots agreed, and set up a constitutional republic, which is the golden 
mean mid-way between the extremes of autocracy and democracy. The despotism or the 
latter is often more ruthless than the tyranny of the former. The will of the majority 
rules a democracy, whereas in our republic, justice is administered by fixed principles of 
right which protect minorities as well as majorities. 

"You will not find the word democracy in either the Declaration of Independence, 
the United States Constitution, Washington's Farewell Address, or Lincoln's Gettysburg 
classic-appeal to prevent government of, by and for the people from perishing. And the 
U. S. War Department's Citizenship Training Manual of 1928 teaches American soldiers 
that 'The Government of the U. S. is not a democracy but a republic! 1 

"With the foregoing you should be able to convince any good American that we 
live in a republic: but if further evidence is needed. I refer again to the dictionary, which 
says that 'social democracy' was invented by the father of Communism, Karl Marx, and 
his fellow-travelers. 

"Article 4. Section 4, of the Constitution reads: 'The United States shall guarantee 
to every state in this Union a republican form of government.’ Hence we are a compound 
republic; and that is why the flag salute reads: I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the 
U. S. of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with 
liberty and justice for All.' 

"Usurpers have sought to destroy our protective system of checks-and-balances by a 
communizing process labeled democracy, In these days of peril we should be more on 
guard than ever to protect traditional Americanism from alien labels and foreign 
ideologies of ail kinds. The American model is unique and unlike other so-called re¬ 
publics, and it is the best government on earth. We should be prepared to defend it against 
all comers." 


The following was an Edmondson broadcast of September 17, 1940: 

After being taken for a Hemisphere Ride, the so-called legal lights of the 
American Bar Association convention in Philadelphia, were lectured by Jewish 
Prof. K. Lowenstein of Amherst College as to how "American democracy” 
should be saved from the fate of European democracies, through the adoption 
of "comprehensive Federal legislation," as outlined in an article printed in the 
N. Y. Times of Sept. 12, 1940, from which the following is taken: 

"(1) Sharpening of provisions against sedition, sabotage and espionage. 

"(2) Suspension and dissolution of ANTI-DEMOCRATIC parties, 
groups and associations, even in the camouflaged form of cultural and social 
activities. The 'dear and present danger' criterion of the U. S. Supreme Court 
should be modified in that ANTI-DEMOCRATIC tendencies, or the structure 
of a group, if authoritarian as to the election and control of its officials, should 
be- deemed sufficient for REPRESSIVE MEASURES. 

1 8 6 

"(5) Prohibition of militarization ot political parties or groups, including 
legislation against wearing of uniforms. 

PUBLIC EXPRESSION when used with malicious intent for disparaging 
DEMOCRATIC institutions, or for incitement to hatred and contempt of some 
classes of the population—Jews, bankers, freemasons, etc. Dissemination of-' 
racial discord is always the forerunner of fifth-column activities.” 

The foregoing recommendations of this Jewish leader to the American Bar 
Association Convention are tantamount to an argument for the repeal of the 
Bill of Rights, especially as regards Freedom of Speech and of The Press, with¬ 
out which free men cannot remain free. 


Open Letter, October 1, 1940, from Robert Edward Edmondson to— 

Henry Ford, Detroit; Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., Chairman General Motors 
Corpn.; M. J. Heinz, Chairman Heinz Pickle Co.; E. T. Weir, Prest. Weirton 
Steel Co.; John Henry Kirby of Texas; George M. Moffett, Prest. Corn Pro¬ 
ducts Co.; J. Howard Pew, Jr., Prest. Sun Oil Co.; A. Atwater Kent, Prest. 
Atwater-Kent Radio Co.; James F. Bell, Chairman General Mills Co.; Con¬ 
gressman John C. Schafer of Wisconsin; Senator Robert R. Reynolds of N. C.; 
Raymond Pitcairn, Philadelphia. 

Your names are smearingly mentioned as "American Merchants of Hate" 
in the mushroom publicity organs of the Jewish Internationale. See "Friday' 1 of 
Sept. 27, 1940. Don’t overlook "Fortune,” "Life," "Ken,” "Time” and others. 

The root inspiration of the "American Merchants of Hate" title is found in 
that insensate Hate with which the Champion Haters of History have been 
inciting America into an emotional debauch to throw this nation into war 
agamst the totalitarian states. 

The time is fast approaching when outraged patriots will inevitably hale 
Jewish character-assassination publications to court because monopolized publicity 
has put its false Nazist, Fascist and Fifth Column smear-terms within the 
jurisdiction of libel damage laws. For conviction on this legal the 
Penai Code of the State of New- York, wherein most of the offending magazines 
Jive and have their being. Section 1340 provides: 

"Any malicious publication . . . which exposes any living person to 
HATRED, CONTEMPT, ridicule or obloquy, or tends to cause any person to 
be shunned, or has a tendency to INJURE any person, is LIBEL.” 

The above protective phrases of the Law of Libel can now obviously be 
invoiced by yourselves and active Jew-exposure individuals also blacklisted—bv 
"Friday,” viz. Gen. George Van Horn Moseley, Gen. Robert M, Brookfield, 
Rev. Gerald B. Winrod, Rev, Charles E. Coughlin, Congressman Jacob Thorkel- 
son, James True, George Deatherage, Col. H. A. Jung and many others 
scandalously attacked. 

"Friday” says chat Deatherage returned from the 1937 World Anti-Jew 
Congress held in Europe—which I understand he did not attend—and de¬ 
livered "an important message to Robert Edward Edmondson, key-pamphleteer 
of the Anti-Semitic Fifth Column." Deatherage never delivered any such 
message to me. 


The article goes on to say that "American anti-Semities are inseparably 
linked with Nazi Germany"—which is untrue as regards my output. Since most 
of such publicity documentation came from British and French politico-economic 
sources, and is neither "racial" nor "religious’ 1 in character. 

Neither is the Edmondson Agency "backed by some of the most powerful 
and influential men in America'—I wish it were, since there is a limit at which 
patience, as well as tolerance, ceases to be a virtue. 

Men of Wealth: Do you want more concrete evidence of Jewish Treason 
To The Republic? Here is revolution and war-confession documentation— 

"The only way to induce the American President (Wilson) to come into 
the war was to secure the co-operation of American Zionists by promising them 
Palestine The Zionists carried out their part and helped to bring America into 
the World War.’’—S. Landman, Jewish War Propaganda Agent of Britain 
(See London Jewish Chronicle 2-7-36). 

"Our propaganda will aim at attaching the support of important American 
sections, such as the Jews. Our propagandists during the World War succeeded 
in embroiling the U, S. with Germany." From "Propaganda m the Next War 
book of 1939 by Sidney Rogerson, British subject. 

"What Jewish Idealism and Jewish Discontent so powerfully contributed 
to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities are tending to produce in other 
countries."—American Hebrew 9-10-20. 

"No agitators did more to bring in the German revolution of 1848 than 
the two Jews, Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne. It was a Jew, Leon Trotsky, 
who led the Red Army w'hich saved the Communist Cause in Russia. It was a 
Jew, Karl Liebknecht' aided by a Jewess, Rosa Luxemburg, who led the 
Spartacist Revolution in Germany. It was a Jew, Bela Kun, who set up the Red 
Regime in Hungary."—From the book "How Odd of God,” by Former Rabbi 
Lewis Browne. 

"Jews are to be found among the trusted leaders and routine workers of 
all revolutionary parties."—N. Y. Rabbi Judah L. Magnes, in Jewish Forum of 
February, 1919- 

"When we Jews sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat—officers of 
all revolutionary parties; when we rise, there arises also our terrible power of 
the purse. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one. It is a 
National Question, which can only be solved by making it a political world 
question, The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers. 
We naturally move to those places where we are not persecuted, and there our 
presence produces anti-Semitism."—From "The Jewish State by Theodor 
Herzl, regarded as one of the greatest Jews. 

"You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We have 
taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny and played havoc with them. 
We are at the bottom, not merely of your last Great War, but nearly all your 
wars. We have brought discord, confusion and frustration into your personal 
and public life—We are still doing it; we did it with the irresistible might of 
our spirit, with ideas AND PROPAGANDA."—From "The Real Case Against 
the Jews" by Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish author (January, 1928, Century 

"We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany."—President David A. 
Brown of the American Hebrew, predicted to Robert Edward Edmondson of 
New York in the presence of witnesses, during the summer of 1934. 

1 8 8 

There js a Jewish Conspiracy against all nations ... a double assault of 
Jewish revolution and Jewish finance.''—From La Vieille France, of June 15, 
1929, widely quoted in British publications. 

"We Jew's are destroyers, Jews will remain destroyers forever. Between 
Gentiles and Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf, It is abysmal. Nothing you 
can do will meet our demands."—From the book "You Gentiles," by Zionist 
Leader Maurice Samuel. 

"WARS ARE JEWS' HARVESTS," says Prof. Werner Sombart, in his 
"jews & Modern Capitalism" book. 

While the documented Jewish confession-record is practically endless, I 
rest my accusation-case here, since if you gentlemen are not converted to 
defense-action by the foregoing "samples," it would be a waste of time to try to 
move you to—RESCUE THE REPUBLIC! While its outer shell has rotted, its 
blinded core is sound and worthy. 

The Hour is Grave! And the Time of Decision is at hand! 


In an attempted, but futile justification of the indictment charges, the 
mass-case prosecution declared that Defendant Edmondson’s publications con¬ 
tained the following "offenses:" 

That President Roosevelt is a warmonger and a pawn of Jews and Com¬ 
munists and is draining dry the resources of the U. S. to save Communist 
Russia and China. 

That President Roosevelt is a Jew and is working with International 
Jewry against the interests of the people of the U. S. 

That public officials of the U. S. are controlled by Communists and 
International Jews. 

That acts of public officials are illegal, corrupt and traitorous, and in 
violation of the U. S. Constitution. 

That President Roosevelt forced the Axis powers to wage war on the U. S. 

That war is the result of a Jew-sponsored monetary scheme to assure world 
domination by International Jewry and Communists. 

Admitting that some of the foregoing allegations were true in substance, 
Defendant Edmondson states that his publications were all "addressed to the 
American People" to inform them of danger, with honest belief in the truth 
of the supporting matter published with the good motive of patriotic defense 
of the U. S. against enemy action; and he prepared as rebuttal "exhibits" the 
documented record below' with reasonable interpretations thereof. 

Following is an Edmondson Bulletin published February 12, 1940 

(1) A Third Term would be un-American, according to tradition and precedent.. 

(2) FDR has overloaded the Nation with unprecedented and inextinguishable 
National and State debt. 

(3) He has usurped the constitutional functions of the Legislative and Judicial 
Departments of Government. 

(4) His Hull regime has broken down U. S. foreign trade and by "economic sanc¬ 
tions" has antagonized friendly nations. 

(5) He has repudiated practically all platform pledges. 

1 89 

(6) He has subverted the American people with an enormous political bureaucracy. 

( 7 ) He has Communistically regimented and Fasdstically centralized political 

(8) He has been repeatedly unntrutral in connection with the war in Europe. 

(9) He. "recognized" the Soviet murder regime, and congratulated it on its 

(10) He has sociaiistically "packed" and Frankfurterized the U. S. Supreme Court. 

(11) He has kept unemployment at peak during seven long lean years, raised the 
cost of living to labor by crop destruction and wiped out working-capital by confiscatory 

(12) He has devalued our dollar, repudiated national contracts, and elevated alien 
international Morgenthau interests to supreme domination of the U. S. Treasury and the 
Federal Reserve Monetary System. 

(13) He has violated the cardinal American principle of separation of Church and 
State by calling for closer relationship between Religion and Government. 

(14) He has regimented the press and censored radio free speech, in violation of 
the American Bill of Rights. 

(15) In deliberate suppression of American MAJORITY RIGHTS and to per¬ 
petuate his regime, he has created a powerful partisan "relief" and office-holding 

(16) He has selected more jews to fill influential positions than any previous 
administration in American History," according to the Brooklyn Jewish Examiner of 
Oct. 20, 1933. 

(17) He has tried to convert The Republic into a rabbinical "thoroughly socialized 
democracy." which is communistic. 

(18) And in consideration of all these anti-American acts he has accepted three 
medals for anti-American "Distinguished Services to Jewry. 

"The strongest Third Term Roosevelt sentiment 1 found after a canvas of che Nation, 
was among the Jewish group."—Columnist Raymond Clapper in N. Y. World Telegram 
of February 2, 1940. 

The Tennessee Valiev Authority enterprise was approved by President Roosevelt, May 
IS. 1933, with David LiUenthal the Jewish Director, It has been pronounced by Socialist 
Presidential Candidate Norman Thomas as die most socialistic of New Deal projects. 

"The Rabbinical Assembly favors the general tendency of recently adopted SOCIAL 
legislation, and in particular approves the scope of the TVA. IT ENDORSES THE 
COURT."—Jewish "Day" May 11, 1931. 

"ROOSEVELT," a 1938 book by Emil Ludwig (Jew), friend and admirer of Franklin 
D. Roosevelt, says Roosevelt has been transforming the Republic of the U. S. A, into 
"a semi-socialist state." 

Roosevelt demanded that Congress pass the National Recovery Act. It did. Congress¬ 
man Louis T. McFadden, (Congressional Record of May 3, 1934) says NRA was che 
socialistic "Freedom and Planning" scheme (PEP) of Britain conceived by Israel Moses 
Sief, a Jewish merchant, and states that PEP was introduced to the New Deal by 
Boston Jewish Merchant Edward A. Filene, who financed it until the U. S. Government 
took it over. McFadden held PEP u> be directly opposed to the constitutional form of 
government, and said it was The Jewish Plan of The ’World State. 

"The underlying philosophy (socialistic) of the New Deal is the philosophy of 
justice Louis D. Branded of the U. S. Supreme Court" reported the N. Y. Times of 
June 28, 1934. 

F.D.R. "Next Communist President" 

"At the time of my visit to Russia the presidential campaign of 1932 was in full 
swing. In many places in Russia I saw . . . pictures of Roosevelt entitled 'The Next 
Communist President of the U. S.’ "—Carvech Wells, Fellow of the Royal Geographical 
Society, member American Geographical Society, member of Explorers Club of N. Y. 

"Communism is the Goal," is a statement made in the Harvard Class Book of 
April, 1935. bv Roger Baldwin, National Director of the Frankfurter American Civil 
Liberties Union, communist-aiding organization. He was outlining aims. The Penn, Dir¬ 
ector of the ACLU is quoted as having said that its program was adopted by the New 
Deal Party. 

"We challenge the present social system. We advocate SOCIALIZATION of basic 
enterprises. There is only ONE way in which the American people can escape Fascism and 

1 90 

Communism and that is by establishing a THOROUGHLY SOCIALIZED DEM¬ 
OCRACY.”—Resolution by the great Central Conference of American Rabbis, reported by 
N. Y. Times of Sept. 13. 1936. Roosevelt has continually praised the activities of this 
rabbi conference, ■which, in turn, has endorsed most of his important policies. 

William J. Goodman of N. Y. City, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations 
Committee against neutrality revision, according to the Brooklyn Tablet of May 13, 1938. 
He said: "We find ourselves, without any voice in the matter, lined up on the side of 
Communism. There CAN be no communion with Communism on the part of the 
American Republic.” 

JuLy 5, 1935, President Roosevelt wrote to the Chairman of a sub-committee of the 
House Ways & Means Committee relative to a socialistic pending bill: "I hope your 
committee will not permit doubts as to CONSTITUTIONALITY, however reasonable, to 
block the suggested legislation.” (See Congressional Record, Vol. 79, P. 14363) 

''Step by Step, we have moved from being a Republic toward becoming an un¬ 
limited Democracy,”—Editorially said the Saturday Evening Post of Aug. 24, 1940, in an 
analysis of democracy-promotion by the Roosevelt New Deal Administration. 

Prof. Felix Frankfurter, born in Austria, widely known as Harvard's "Karl Marx 
Professor,” (denounced in a letter of Dec. 19, 1917, as Bolshevistic, by President Theodore 
Roosevelt) who was the most prominent member of the Communistic-aiding American 
Civil Liberties Union, was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Jan. 5, 1939, as 
a member of the U. S. Supreme Court, Associate Justice. 

Roosevelt backed the Child Labor Admendmem to the Constitution, and supported 
Jewish Governor Lehman of N. Y. and Jewish Governor Horner of Illinois in their at¬ 
tempts in 1934-35 to have state legislatures endorse it. The Communist Daily Worker 
ardently advocated adoption. The amendment is "completely subversive of our form of 
government~-it is socialistic,” declared Former Senator James A. Reed of Missouri. 

"OUR GOVERNMENT IS A DEMOCRACY” declared President Roosevelt in his 
Message to the Nation June 24, 1938. In December, 1938, he proclaimed "We are not 
only the largest and most powerful democracy, but other democracies look to us for 
leadership, rhat world democracy may survive. (N. Y. Times, Dec. 6, 1938). 

"Our country is goin to be . . . THE ARSENAL OF DEMOCRACY” . . . From 
a speech by Roosevelt before the White House Correspondents Association at a banquet 
in Washington, at which he referred to the United States as "a democracy” seventeen 
time. (N.Y. American, 3-16-40.) 

The N, Y, World-Telegram Columnist Westbrook Pegler said Sept. 12, 1940: "Never 
was a people so gulled as Americans by the word 'democracy.' Democracy contains the 
process by which American freedom can be repealed utterly.” 

On July 24, 1942, Roosevelt's Attorney-General in the Dept, of Justice, ordered ar¬ 
rested for seditious conspiracy under the Alien Registration Act of 1940, 28 men and 
women who had been indicted July 21, 1942, by a Washington grand jury, for attacking 
and exposing Communism and Jewish anti-Americanism. 

"Democracy has failed, failed miserably; shown itself to be incompetent, fumbling, 
too slow, too ignorant, too paralyzed by its own politics, a tragic victim'of internal 
weakness."—Columnist Raymond Clapper, N. Y. World-Telegram June II, 1940. 

The following points were advocated by New Deal Jewish Prof. K. Lowenstein, of 
Amherst College, before the American Bar Assn., in Philadelphia Convention:—"Sharpen 
the provisions against sedition; suspend anti-democratic groups; prohibit militant political 
parties; CURB THE PRESS!"—N. Y. Times, Sept. 14, 1940. 

In "Zionism Sc World Politics," Jewish Author Horace Meyer Kallen, says: "The 
strongest authoritative voice of Internationalism is that of the Jew, Karl Marx (Com¬ 
munist); its most heroic practical defender, the Jew Ferdinand LaSalle (Socialist); its 
unsung root, the economic doctrine of the Jew, David Lasser." 

In December, 1940, "Opinion," Rabbi Wise’s monthly magazine, under a heading 
"Jews Will Defend Democracy," James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, Roose¬ 
velt partisan, writes as follows: "In one thing Hitler is right—WE JEWS ARE THE 

In 1937 Roosevelt proposed to enlarge the U. S. Supreme Court. Syndicate Writer 
Paul Mallon reported that the "packing plan" had been engineered by Roosevelt's "Right 
Arm" and State Paper Composer N. Y. Supreme Court Justice Samuel I. Rosenman. 

"Remove Army Officers’’ 

Prize-Winner Rabbi Victor Eppstein, in a contest on "The Best Way To Combat 
Anti-Semitism," published by "Opinion," Rabbi Wise's monthly magazine of April, 1937, 
made the following proposition: "American democracy must be SOCIALIZED. Energetic 


measures must be adopted by strengthening the organization of labor and by system¬ 
atically REMOVING from key positions in ARMY AND NATIONAL GUARD ALL 
CLASS ALLEGIANCE." Rabbi Wise has been a strong partisan of Roosevelt. 

Roosevelt has repeatedly endorsed the communistic CIO, which was organized by the 
Jews Sidney Hillman, David Dubinsky and Max Zantsky of N. Y. City. The N, Y, Times 
of August 14, 193S, primed this from Washington, D. C.: "John P. Frey, Vice President, 
American Federation Activities said today Communists hold many key positions in the 
CIO. He listed 280 alleged Communists as holding such positions. 

"In the fight against reaction the mobilizing of the Jewish people to defeat anti- 
Semitism is an INTEGRAL part. We have organized a series of mass meetings, all of 
which were held in synagogues with the active support of the rabbis."—From the "Party 
Organizer" of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in the USA, June, 1938, 
issue, New' Dealer partisan. 

"Jews who deny that many Jews are Communists are jockeying themselves into the 
position of citizens on tolerance. If, by taking full part in the forging of this united front 
(against Fascism), the Jews of America write themselves down as COMMUNISTS—So 
Be It!"—So wrote James Waterman Wise, son of Rabbi S. S. Wise, strong backer of 
Roosevelt, in the Communistic "New Masses" Magazine of October 29. 1935. 

"If the American Nation ever gets the idea that the Jewish race and Communism are 
synonymous, there is the possibility of a pogrom in the U. S. that will make those of the 
Czar's era look like a small parade."—James W. Gerard, formerly Ambassador from 
the U. S. to Germany, as reported in the N. Y. Times of October 4, 1934. 

The American Hebrew, F.D.R. partisan, Sept. 10. 1920. said: The Bolshevist Revolu¬ 
tion was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking and discontent. What Jewish Idealism 
and discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic 
qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote IN OTHER COUNTRIES." 

London Jewish Savant Dr. Oscar Levy, in his preface to "The World Significance 
of the Russian Revolution" by Put-Rivers, 1920, says: "Jewish elements provide the 
driving force for both Communism and Capitalism." 

British Author Hilaire Belloc in his 1923 book "The Jews" says: "The propaganda 
of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction, is in the hands of 
Jewish agents." 

"Social Democracy" or Communism, to use the Webster Dictionary definitions, was 
organized by the Jew Karl Marx and the Jew Ferdinand Lassalle, in 1848; reorganized 
in 1864; again in 1871 and put over in 1911-18 in Russia by Jewish revolutionaries. 

That socialism is Jewish is made plain by N. H. Bialik, celebrated in Jewry as its 
greatest poet, in an address at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, May 11, 1933, reproduced in 
a Christian Church publication "Lines of Communication," in July, 1933; the following 
description being employed by Bialik: "Judaism went forth into the great world. I once 
compared it to an army going to war—a movable state. It is they who in principle are the 

A booklet exposing Communism, entitled "America's Great Menace,” was circulated 
in New York City in 1934 by B. A. M. Schapiro, who styled himself "A Christian by 
Faith, a Jew by Race." In it he confessed: "I meet the communists in their hunting 
grounds in Union Square, N. Y. City. "How will you start the revolution here?" I ask 
them in their own language. "We Communists will work underground, and use the same 
methods that brought about the Russian Revolution." The time has come when patriotic 
Jews of America should feel the great responsibility for the evil deed (Communism) 
hatched and planned IN THE CAMP OF ISRAEL." 

"If the Jew wishes to survive he must identify himself with the historic movement 
of Communism.”—Michael Alper, in Rabbi S. S. Wise's magazine "Opinion,” Nov., 1934. 

N. Y. Jewish Mayor LaGuardia told delegates to the National Convention of the 
Independent Order of Abraham m N. Y. City, according to the N. Y. American of June 
8, 1937: "Many of the New Deal principles of government and economics were established 
thousands of years ago in Mosaic and Talmudic Law.” 

In the 1930 book "The Alien In Our Midst," by Charles Stewart Davison and 
Madison Grant, the former, a prominent New York lawyer, said: "We were instituted 
as a republic. Through steady increase of aliens we have dangerously verged toward mob- 
rule—democracy. The theory of representative government is NOT a democratic theory It 
is a republican theory. JT DENIES DEMOCRACY:” 

1 9 2 

In his 1918 book. "Back To The Republic,” Harry F, Atwood savs: "The attitude of 
democracy toward property is communistic or socialistic. There js no such thing as a 
democratic republic. The very essense of a republic is thar the people speak through 

The public press reported President Roosevelt as saying to delegates to the 1940 
National Democratic Convention in Chicago who asked for guidance: 'CLEAR IT WITH 
SIDNEY!”—Referring to Sidney Hillman, Jewish President of the Amalgamated Clothing 
Workers Union of New York City, notoriously "Red.’' 

T see no inconsistency between the Philosophy of Communism and Principles of 
Democratic Government."—Herbert Beniamin, Communist Leader of the Workers Alli¬ 
ance. Vol. i, Page 1;6. WPA Congressional Committee investigation. House of Repre¬ 
sentatives, /6th Congress, First Session. 


Disregarding Art. l, Sec. 8. Par. 5, endowing Congress with the sole power to create 
money "and regulate the value thereof,” President Roosevelt, on March 9. 1933, took tht 
United States off the gold standard, relieving the Federal Reserve Banking System of its 
obligation to pay out gold to United States Citizens BUT STILL PERMITTING INTER 


a monopoly of the yellow- metal. On June 9, 1933. the gold payment clause in public and 
private contracts was officially repudiated by the New Deal Administration, and with k 
went national honor. 

The Roosevelt Administration on Jan. 31, 19.34, in violation of Art. 1, Sec 8 Par 5 
devalued the United States dollar from par to 59.06c to "counter inflation,” which is still 
here. Later, a 2-billion dollar secret "Stabilization Fund” for manipulation of INTER¬ 
NATIONAL FINANCE was set up with the President and his Secretary of the Treasury 
as Jewish dictators. 

Washington Correspondent George Rothweli Brown wrote in the N. Y. American of 
Tune 28, 1935: "The whole New Deal crazy quilt seems to have a distinct pattern once the 
premise is accepted that astronomical expenditures have been made not for relief-public 

The Roosevelt New Deal regime raised the national debt of the United States from 
twenty five to over two hundred million dollars in ten years. High authorities declare it 
to be unpayable. 

Arthur KitSOn, independent British economist, who denounced the gold standard 
system, declared in the National Review of London, March, 1935, in an analysis of the 
Jewish International Banking Monopoly, "The sole aim of the international financiers is 
world-control by the creation of inextinguishable debt.” 

The Jew Paul M. Warburg, was "Father of the Federal Reserve Bank System” of the 
U. S. (See letter of Jan. 29, 1927, to N. Y. Post, by Jewish Prof. E. A. Seligman.) His 
son James P. Warburg, international banker, was one of the first members of the 
"Roosevelt Supreme Council” or Brain Trust. In this connection observe the following 
from the American Hebrew Weekly of Sept. 10, 1920: "The Tew evolved organized 
capitalism, with its working instrumentality, the banking system.”’ 

The following is from the Northampton, England, Daily Echo of March 19 1925- 
"Jews can destroy empires by means of finance. Jews are Internationa], Control of credits 
in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest 
danger the British Empire ever had to face.”—Statement bv Walter Crick British manu¬ 

(Edmondson met Mr. Crick in New York in the early days of the patriotic crusade 
Upon his request Mr. Crick sent for and obtained from England invaluable Jewish exposure 
data for U. S. publication, including rare books, documents and other papers.) 

Paul M. Warburg, born in Germany, practically controls the financial policy of the 

wilson Administration,” wrote British Ambassador Spring-Rice on Nov. 13 , 1914_ 

adding: "Since J. P. Morgan, Sr., died, Jewish bankers are supreme in the U. S.”' 

"There has not been an administration since our advent into the great World War 
in which Bernard M. Baruch (Jewish speculator) has nor been a chief political, economic 
and financial advisor—and every administration that listened to him has carried us 
deeper and deeper into financial chaos.”—Chairman Louis T, McFadden of the House 
Finance Committee, Congressional Record of June 2~>, 1934, 

Read the fohowing from 1933 October "Fortune.” the Jewish tycoon magazine 
Bernard M. Baruch is called into frequent conferences with the President. HE HAS 


FINANCED manv a Congressional campaign; and is sum-untied by .1 praetorian guard 
of senators. WHO HANG QN HIS EVERY WORD The rijiureot Baruch is sue ling 
into enormous proportions on the horizon of public life. He 15 THh MibitKl ilAl\ 
of Washington and Wall Street." 

If the foregoing record does not supply ample evidence of FDR >oci<ilist-coinmunist- 
democracy-mone'tary conspiracy, what c.oesl 


Gen. Hugh S, Johnson wrote in the Philadelphia Inquirer of June 18, 1940, solemnly 

"There is no longer any question that Mr. Roosevelt is exercising no effort whatever 
to keep us out of war. It may not be Em to say that it is his purpose to exert every 
effort within his supposedly limited powers to get us into war _Bii: at leas f sute _ 

ment is incontestable—EVERY ACT OF HRs IN THE PAbT THREE TEARS IS 

This follows the report of the Financial Post of Toronto, Canada, pubiisned in its 
issue of Jan. 27, 1940. after exhaustive investigation, and reading as follows; 

"The business professional and financial leaders of the U. S. are DESPERATELY 
OF ROOSEVELT and his New Deal associates." 

On Dec 10 1939 Roosevelt s Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy to Great Britain, 

made this statement, according to the 1940 World Almanac: "There is no reason, econ¬ 
omic financial or social, to justify the United States entering the war. This is NOT OUR 

"The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish Hegemony through¬ 
out the world."—Gen. George van Horn Most-ley, retired, U. S. Army, in the N. Y. 
Herald-Tribune of March 29, 1939. 

In a 1939 book entitled "Propaganda In The Next War, Sidney Rogerson, British 
citizen made the following statement: "OUR propaganda will aim at attaching the 
support of important sections, such as the jews. Our propaganda during the great war 
(World War I), succeeded in embroiling the U. S. with Germany. 

"American foreign policy is now more dangerous to world peace than any other 
factor," reported its European correspondent Feb. 2V 1939. to the Saturday Evening 
Post, warning that "more chan Hitler," European peoples fear the communist minorities 
in the U. S. 

The following is from Edmondson Bulletin of August 22, 1940: 

"America is in danger. The destruction of the British Navy would be the turning 
of our Atlantic Maginot Line. I am certain that if Great Britain is defeated, the attack 
from Germany will come."—U. S. Jewish Ambassador Bullitt to France, Phiia. 8-10-40. 

In 1940 President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Premier MacKenzie King of Canada 
•oncbided "A Pact for the joint defense of the U. S. and Canada," and since tne 
British Empire is at war and Canada is part of that Empire, then the Pact INVOLVES 

If the British fleet is going to consolidate with the American navy, HOW IS 
arc these 42,000,000 FDR regimented Americans going to fight? asked Edmondson. 

The Dilling "Red Network" says: "The Tewish Press exults over Bullitt's mother 
being Jewish" (The reason is probably found in this European statement: "According to 
Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is the bearer of heredity.") 

In the Philadephia Inquirer of Sept. 23. 1940, Columnist Paul Mallon writes: "Not 
all defense money is going for defenses. The appropriations apparently are being stretched 
to cover just about every phase of government activity under the sun, not the lease or 
which is the re-election of Roosevelt. National Defense' is only the new neon sign of the 
New Deal. It becomes plain that the socializing era is to proceed more expansively under 
the new defense billions, and in step with progress toward war." 

"American Jewry is engaged in two wars, one as part of a democratic government 
anJ the other as part of a race on which Germany has been waging war," said N. Y. 
Rabbi Abba Hillei Silver before a Texas audience, according to the Dallas Morning 
News, April 1. 1940. 

1 94 

A Canadian audience was told by Rabbi M. L. Ptrlzweig. of Britain: "The Work! 
Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years."—Toronto Evening of Feb. 26, 1940. Did F. D. R. accept the suggestive-implication? 

"We are at the bottom of nearly ail your wars. We did it solely with the irresistible 
might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda."—Marcus Eli Ravage. Jewish author, in 
Century Magazine of January-February, 1928. 

F. D. R. Advisor Henry Morgenthau mid a South Carolina audience Feb. 11, 1 9"y =.. 
that the U. S. is heading for another general war.—Portland Journal of Feb. 12, 1933. 

On The Way To War 

Senator D. Worth Clark of Idaho, on Feb. 24, J9-H, warned the Senate: "You 
American people are tin your way to war. You are moving there in a turbulent cataract of 
misinformation and heavily subsidized propaganda. Soon the Senate will make a declara¬ 
tion of war. It will not be called that. WE call it the Lend-Lease' Bill 1776," That bill 
was proposed by Roosevelt. 

"We Jews are going to BRING A WAR ON THE NAZIS," predicted President 
David A. Brown, of the American Hebrew, New Deal Advisor, to Defendant Edmondson, 
on May 25, 1934. ;n the presence of John T. Mills, Jr., an investment specialist of New 
York City. Brown attacked Edmondson for criticizing F. D. R. 

Was Brown’s prediction of war on Germany connected with the following statement 
by Rabbi S. S. Wise nf N. Y. City, quoted in the N. Y. American of May 18, 1933. 
namely: "I AM FOR WAR! We feel this is another of the great crises of Jewish Life." 
He was referring to the Hitler disfranchisement of Jews in Germany, 

John Haynes Holmes, pastor of the Community Church of New York, accused "the 
Roosevelt Administration of conspiring to break down the people’s resolve to peace." He 
said the myths used were that the nation was in danger of invasion; that Britain was 

fighting America's battle, and that this war, like the last, was for 'Democracy' _N. Y. 

Herald Tribune, March 10, 1941. 

The Christian Century Pulpit, November, 1941, editorially said: "Steadily, and with 
consummate skill, the- Washington Administration has pushed the nation to the brink of 

"The American people are being betrayed into the arms of their enemies by modern 
Judases," declared Senator Wheeler of Montana before an American First meeting ac 
Cincinnati. (N. Y. Herald-Tribune, April 4, 1941} denouncing Roosevelt foreign policies. 

In the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of August 18, 1940, Republican Presidential Candidate 
Willkie, in his acceptance speech, declared: "The President’s attacks on foreign powers 
have been dangerous. He has dabbled in inflammatory statements and manufactured panics. 
He has courted a war . . . which the country emphatically does not want." 

Roosevelt sent fifty American destroyers Sept. 5, 1940, to Britain for use in its war, 
and later arranged for "air bases" in British possessions. 

The N. Y. Times of June 21, 1940, announced that Roosevelt had put the defense- 
conscription regimentation of American youth in charge of the Socialist Sidney Hillman, 
foreign-born Jewish President of the Red Amalgamated Clothing Workers Union o: 
N. Y. City—which act caused Democratic Congressman Cox of Georgia to ejaculate 
"God Save The Republic!" 

The following is published in the N. Y. World-Telegram of Sept. 9, 1940, under the 
by-line of Journalist William Philip Simms, purporting to be THE PLAN to drag the 
United States into the war with Germany: 

"Peace or war for the U. S., in the view of shrewd diplomatic observers, hangs 
on the outcome of the Battle of Britain. Should the Nazis succeed in invading England, 
the government, headed by what H. G. Wells calls our Anglo-American Prime Ministei 
Winston Churchill.' will most certainly shift its seat to Canada. Churchill has already- 
said as much. 

"The possibility of this shift is said to be one of the main reasons why London so 
readily swapped naval and air bases in the Western Atlantic for 50 of our destroyers. It 
was certainly behind the British pledge not to surrender or scuttle their fleet in the event 
of defeat. 

The inevitable result of this, in the opinion of competent diplomatist*: WOULD BE 
bound by the 117-year old Monroe Doctrine to guard this hemisphere from foreign 
aggression, but now that it shares Atlantic naval and air bases with Britain, those bases 
will have to be defended. 


"Than all classes of British people now share this view is no secret. Some are too 
diplomatic to say so for publication, but others are less discreet. 

In 1941-2, Charles Michaelson, Jewish Director of Publicity for the Democratic 
National Committee, reportedly gave a complete picture of the New Deal Plan to enter 
the war. in circulars printed and issued from Washington during 1941-2. 

Observe the following significant quotation from the Chicago Jewisn Sentinel of 

DEFENSE OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF JUDAISM." Not for Christian Americanism-! 
For JEWISH survival! 

"... We did not go to war because we were attacked at Pearl Harbor . . . We 
were attacked at Pearl Harbor because WE HAD GONE TO W'AR WHEN WE MADE 
THE LEND-LEASE DECLARATION. That declaration was an affirmative act on our 
part AND A WARLIKE ACT."—N. Y. Times Publisher Arthur Hays Sulzburger (Jew), 
in 'Washington Times-Hc-rald. Feb. 1, 1944. 

If the foregoing "overt" record does not show Roosevelt warmongering at Jewish 
instigation, what does it imply? 


Seditious conspiracy case ''Prosecutor John Rogge disclosed that Robert 
Edward Edmondson, defendant, will be prosecuted for distributing documents 
describing President Roosevelt as a Jew, carrying the implication that he got the 
country into war to help fellow-Jews.” Prom the Washington Times-Herald, 
March' 30, 1943. 

Whereupon Defendant Edmondson prepared the below documented "overt 
evidence" as a court "exhibit." 

The following is from "The Revealc-r,” (10-15-36), Editor G. B. Winrod, 
of Wichita, Kansas, which published a Roosevelt family genealogical chart pre¬ 
pared by the Carnegie Institute of Washington, D, C, as reported by the Daily 
Citizen of Tucson, Arizona, The Times of St. Petersburg, Florida, and the Star 
of Washington, D. C. It was reproduced in an Oct. 20, 1936, Edmondson 
Bulletin Reprint— 

Famous Sons of Famous Fathers — The Roosevelts 

The chart lias come as a shocking revelation to millions of American 
Citizens, It convinces as to the President’s Jewish ancestry. 

From the viewpoint of eugenics, it explains his natural bent toward 
radicalism. It shows why he has given hundreds of so-called Liberals, Socialists 
and Communists powerful positions in the national Government. It proves 
unmistakably that the Roosevelt Administration offers a biological as well as a 
political problem. 

The New York Times of March l4> 1935, quotes the President as saying: 
"In the distant past my ancestors may have been Jews. All I know about the 
origin of the Roosevelt family is that they are apparently descended from Claes 
Martenszen van Roosevelt, who came from Holland.” 


Additional information regarding the nationality of the Roosevelt family, 
was given by Chase S. Osborn, early in 1934, at Sc. _ Petersburg, Florida. Mr. 
Osborn was formerly Governor of Michigan. The leading newspaper of the city 
(The Times) earned the following report after the interview: 

"Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for 
President Roosevelt and his policies. He referred to the Jewish ancestry' olHhe 
President, explaining how he is a descendant of the Rossocampo family expelled 
from Spain in 1620. Seeking safery in Germany, Holland anu other countries, 
members of the family, he said, changed their name to Roseberg, Rosenbaum, 
Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal. 

"The Rosenvdts in north Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming 
apostates with the first generation and others following suit until, in the fourth 
generation, a little storekeeper by the name of jacobus Roosevelt was the only 
one who remained true to HIS JEWISH FAITH. It is because of this Jewish 
ancestry, former Governor Osborn said, that President Roosevelt has the trend 
of economic safety (?) in his veins." 

The radical movement which is sweeping the world today, causing the 
foundations of organized society to crumble, is a Jewish movement. Whether 
it is the First Communist Manifesto, written by the Jew Karl Marx, in 1648— 
or a Moscow dictatorship, set up eighteen years ago; composed of 545 leaders, 
of -whom 44? were jews—or a Jewish banking concern in Wall Street depositing 
money to the credit of Lenin and Trotsky in a sister bank in Sweden—or a 
Communist regime in France, headed by the Jew, Leon Blum—or a Spanish 
revolution, precipitated by a Jew named Bela Kun, or a subversive Brain Trust 
carrying the nation toward the red abyss of Bolshevism ... the radical program 
is today, and always has been, primarily A JEWISH PROGRAM. 

Roosevelt inc-vitably draws upon his Semitic ancestry. It is, therefore, as 
natural for him to be a radical, as it is for others to be true Americans. This 
is why he can boast of flouting conventionalities, and publicly gloat over des¬ 
troying those traditions which arc fundamental to our national character. HE 
IS NOT ONE OF USi This may also explain why he has no hestitation in break¬ 
ing his promises (Kol Nidre Oath—Prayer Repudiation?) 

It is to be doubted if he, himself, understands the inner forces that surge 
through his being, driving him further and further toward the Left! It’s in his 
blood! Meanwhile, the resuli of 160 years' constructive effort on the part of 
Christian patriots threatens to be swept away. 

For this reason, one of his official acts after becoming President, was to 
invite Finkelstein, alias Litvinoff, to the White House for the purpose of 
establishing diplomatic relations with the Jewish dictatorship of Moscow. For 
this reason, he has appointed Jewish Ambassadors to such strategic diplomatic 
posts as Paris. Stockholm and Moscow. For this reason, Bernard Baruch has been 
called "the unofficial President of the United States.” 

For this reason, a super-cabinet, known as the "Brain Trust," an organiza¬ 
tion of appointees dominated by powerful Jewish intellects, has been set up to 
usurp constitutional powers of our duly elected lawmakers. 

We do not condemn Roosevelt for coming from Jewish stock. We con¬ 
demn him for being a leader in the international radical movement which is 
throwing Gentile governments into convulsions. 

If the Jew's were living as an independent nation in their homeland 
(Palestine) today, it wrnuld be a mistake for a Gentile to rule over them. 

In like manner, the Semitic mind is incapable of assimilating the Christian 
and American viewpoints sufficiently to risk placing the destiny of 120,000,000 
human beings in the hands of a few members of their race. 

(End of reprint). 

1 9 8 

Ancestry In Politics 

Liberation Magazine of Nov. 14, 1940, reprints the following October, 
editorial from the Macon, Ga., Telegraph: 

"A few days ago we commended editorially Edward J. Flynn, Chairman 
of the National Democratic Committee, for hts repudiation and denunciation of 
the pamphlet unknown persons had circulated about Mendel Willkie s German 
ancestry In the matter of racial lines Mr. Roosevelt might come into the picture 

on the basis of his ancestry. , 

”Ex Gov. Chase S. Osborn of Michigan—and Poulan, Ga.,—was quoted 
as having said that he inquired of President Roosevelt as to his nationality, and 
that MrT Roosevelt wrote in reply that his earliest ancestor of record was a 
Spanish Jew, who left that country under one of the inquisitions, and went to 
Holland as Rosefeld or a similar name; that the offspring eventually developed 
the name into Rosenfeldt and then Roosevelt. 

"Having seen something like the above in print, and it having been 
credited to Gov. Osborn and Mr. Roosevelt, I wrote to Gov. Osborn and asked 
him what he had learned conclusively as to Mr. Roosevelt's ancestry. Gov. 
Osborn wrote that President Roosevelt is a half Jew; his wife is A FULL 

JEWESS.’ ” , . r TT c 

In the 1938 "World Almanac" under the heading Biographies ot U. S. 
Presidents and Their Wives," page 237, appears this: "Franklin Delano Roose¬ 
velt was the son of James Roosevelt, a direct descendant of Claes Martenzen van 
ROSENVELT, who arrived in New Amsterdam in 1649 and married Jannetje 

The following is from "The House of Roosevelt" by Paul Haber, 1936 
edition, "Claes Rosenvelt entered the clothing business in New York, and was 
married in 1682. He accumulated a fortune. He then changed his name to 
Nicholas Rosenvelt. Of his four sons, Isaac died young. Nicholas married Sarah 

Solomons. . 

New York Jews having designed and struck off a medal with the head ot 
Roosevelt on one side and’the sixpoint Solomon Star, synagogue symbol of 
possession and world power, on the other, with a mystical so-called Good 
Luck" idiom in the center of the star, Edmondson and his associates investigated 
to ascertain the significance, if any, and report these implications: 

"Good Luck and Wisdom to Franklin D. Roosevelt, our Modern Moses, 
Leading Jewry in 'The Promised Land' (America) under the 'Seal of Solomon.' " 

Writing in the "Hakenkreuzbanner" of May 1-1, 1939, Prof. Dr. Johann 
von Leers of Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, publishes an exhaustive analysis of 
Roosevelt s ancestry. A new discovery is quoted to show that President Franklin 
Delano Roosevelt’s mother—Sarah Delano—is from a Jewish-blood family. 

Comments Dr. von Leers: "Schmalix (genealogist) writes: 'In the seventh 
generation we see the mother of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as being of Jewish 
descent. The Delanos are descendants of an Italian or Spanish Jewish family— 
Dilano, Dilan, Dillano. ’ 

"According to Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is 
the bearer of the heredity. That means: children of a full-blooded Jewess and 
a Christian are, according to Jewish Law, JEWS. 

"We can understand why Jewish associations call him the 'New Moses;' 
why he gets Jewish medals—highest orders of the Jewish people. For every 
Jew who is acquainted with the law, he is evidently one of them. 

With this Jewish Delano descent added to the other records herein and 
New York Jews on the East Side constantly referring to the President proudly as 
"Rosenvelt,” it would seem that Dr. von Leers is justified in exclaiming: 


"It being true that che Delanos are well-known Jews President Roosevelt is, 
from the standpoint of Jewish Heredity Law, AS GOOD A JE^fr AS BER¬ 

The Washington Star of Feb. 29, 1936 (Seen in Library of Congress) 
published a Roosevelt Family Tree, showing his descent from the Holland 

In an elaborate book entitled "Young America’s Story of Franklin D. 
Roosevelt, Man of Action," 1933 edition, by Jewish Authors Lowitz & 
Sadybeth (N. Y, Public Library), published by Doubleday, Doran & Co., N. Y. 
City, ROOSEVELT'S JEWISH ANCESTRY is indicated. On Page 3 the 
statement is made: 'In 1644 Claes Martensohn van Rosenvelt with his wife 
Janette, stowed their belongings in a westbound ship, and bid farewell to the 
little village in Zeeland, Holland. Rosevelt means field of roses.' ’ 

F.D.R. Reared by Baruch 

"When FDR was introducing Mme. Chiang Kai-sbeck to some of his 
ffiends he said: 'This is Bernard M. Baruch. Bernie s raised me for about 
thirty years.' Baruch countered: 'And don’t you think I ve done a pretty good 
job of it?’ "—From the Drew' Pearson column of the Washington Post ot 
March 26, 1943, Jewish Publisher Eugene Meyer, Jr. 

The Jewish Sentinel of Chicago, of Sept. 15, 1938, reported "Young Judea 
has inscribed in the 'HEBREW Children s Golden Book the name of President 
Roosevelt’s grandchild FDR 3rd. President Roosevelt's NAME has already been 
inscribed in the Golden Book." 

"All I know about the origin of the Roosevelt family in this country is 
that all branches bearing that name were apparently descended from Claes 
Martenssen van Roosevelt who came from Holland. In the distant past they may 
have been Jews."—Letter from President Franklin D. Roosevelt printed in the 
Detroit Jewish Chronicle, as reported in the N. Y. Times of March 15, 1935. 

"Many of the New Deal principles of government and economics were 
established thousands of years ago m Mosaic and Talmudic Law, Jewish Mayor 
LaGuardia told 150 delegates at the National Convention of B'nai B’rith in 
N, Y. City.—N. Y. American of June 8, 1937. 

"An appeal that Jews co-opcrate with President Roosevelt because his ideals 
are identical with those of the ancient Hebrew prophets, was made by Rabbi 
S. H. Goidenson in his sermon yesterday," said the Jewish Daily Bulletin of 
March 12, 1934. 

"A Kinship is to be found between the aims which he (President Roose- 
vdc) exemplifies and the purpose for which the B'nai B'rith carries on,"— 
quotation from Jewish Governor Horner-Levy of Illinois, published in the 
monthly magazine of B’nai B’rith, April, 1934, largest International Order 
of Jews in the world. 

"Roosevelt’s Supreme Council, ’ or Brain Trust, as ic was called, in¬ 
cluded U. S. Supreme Court Jewish Justice Louis D. Brandeis, "Father of the 
New Deal," contributor to the Communistic Commonwealth College of Mena, 
Ark.; Bernard M. Baruch, "Unofficial President," self-confessed Wall St., 
speculator and International Financier; U. S. Supreme Court Justice Felix 
Frankfurter, "Legal Master-Mind of the New Deal," Harvard’s so-called "Karl 
Marx ProfessorHenry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury; Judge 
Samuel I. Rosenman, "Roosevelt’s Right Arm," Founder and Head of the 
Brain Trust and writer of Roosevelt's State Papers; Gov. H. H. Lehman of 
New York; Sidney Hillman, Labor Advisor; James P. Warburg, son of Paul 
M. Warburg, "Father of the Federal Reserve System." (From Brooklyn Jewish 
Examiner of October 20, 1933). 


The following New York item was published under an Associated Press 
date line of May 8 1937; "President Roosevelt will receive the tenth award of 

American Newspaper Sydicate Writer Paul Mallon wrote Feb. 7, 1937: 

' The man behind the repacking process (of the U. S. Supreme Court) was 
Samuel I. Rosenman, N, Y, State Justice, little known but close friend of the 

’"The underlying philosophy of the New Deal is the philosophy of justice 
Dembitz Brandeis of the U. S. Supreme Court; the NRA is almost a composite 
of his dissenting opinions." (From Jewish-owned N, Y. Times of June 28, 

Gen. Hugh S. Johnson in the Chicago Tribune of June 28, 1934: ' During 
this whole intense experience (formation of the NRA, later held unconstitu¬ 
tional), i have been in constant touch with Judge Brandeis." 

"More than any other one person, Felix Frankfurter is the legal master-mind 
of the New Deal," say Simon & Schuster, Jewish publishers of their 1934 edition 
of the Roosevelt 'New Dealers,’ "Frankfurter men are established in key posts 
throughout the Administration." 

"Karl Marx" Prof. Frankfurter was referred to thus by Gen. Hugh John¬ 
son in the Saturday Evening Post of Oct. 26, 193 5: "He has more influence than 
any other single individual in the U. S.” 

The N. Y. Herald-Tribune reported: Max Bedacht of N. Y. City, repre¬ 
senting the Communist Party, ac the Ways A Means Committee hearing April 
2, 1936, strongly approved the Roosevelt Administration plan to tax undivided 
surpluses, saying "this type of levy has been contained in the platform of the 
Communist Party for many years." 

"The Bolshevist Revolution was LARGELY the outcome of Jewish thought 
and discontent; what Jewish idealism so powerfully contributed to accomplish 
in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind ARE TENDING TO 
PROMOTE IN OTHER COUNTRIES." The foregoing appeared in the 
American Hebrew of Sept. 10, 1920, and the following is from the London 
Jewish Chronicle of April 4, 1919: "The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many 
points CONSONANT with the finest Ideals of Judaism." 

Roosevelt was awarded the American Hebrew Medal for "Distinguished 
Services to Jewry."—Washington Times-Herald March 6, 1946. 

Judge Julian W. Mack, N. Y. City Jewish "legal light," in a 1933 book by 
Jewish Author Jessie Sampter, entitled "Modern Palestine" told a Zionist Con¬ 
ference: "Beyond question, NINE-TENTHS of the Jews of America are 

"In Democracy alone is the hope of the Jew,"—President Alfred M. Cohen 
of the International B’nai B’rith, in the N. Y. Herald-Tribune of May 9, 1938. 
And then President Roosevelt vociferated later: "We are not only, the largest 
and most powerful DEMOCRACY, but other democracies look to us for leader¬ 
ship." (N. Y. Times of Dec. 6, 1938). 

New York Rabbi David de Sola Pool, friend of Roosevelt, made the follow¬ 
ing harmonious comment in the N. Y. Times of Oct. 22, 1939: The United 
States has been built up into a GREAT RESERVOIR OF DEMOCRACY." 

Rabbi Israel M. Goldman wrote in the American Hebrew Weekly of Nov. 
3, 1939: "We as Jews are certain that Judaism (which is religion’) and 

20 1 

Democracy (which is politics’) are INSEPARABLE.” In the N. Y. Times of 
Dec. 24 1939, shortly thereafter, we read this from Roosevelt’s "peace letter to 

the Pope:”_"It is well that we encourage a closer association between those 

in religion and those in government.” American fundamentals require separation 
of Church and State. 

Roosevelt warned Congress in a 1942 Message "We must be particularly 
vigilant against racial discrimination,” referring to Hitler persecution of Jews. 
(Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle of Jan. l6, 1942). 

"Non-Jewish officials in the Government, acting under direction of the 
President, are trying to get various agencies to employ more Jews”—Readers 
Digest for September, 1942, article by Klipinger. 

End of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's ancestral record, carrying conviction 
into all except closed minds, that he was Jewish. 


"I wish to disclaim, on behalf of the Government, any intention of prose¬ 
cuting defendants because they criticized the President and the New Deal. They 
may criticize the President and the New Deal to their heart’s content. We desire 
ONLY to prosecute for statements which interfered with the WAR EFFORT.’’ 

The foregoing statement was made by Department of Justice Prosecutor 
Ewing in N. Y. Times, July 29, 1942. 

Compare that with this: "Mass-Case Prosecutor Rogge disclosed today that 
Defendant Edmondson will be prosecuted for distributing documents describing 
President Roosevelt as a Jew."—Washington Times-Herald, March 30, 1943. 
No U.S. law makes it a crime to call anybody a Jew-. Edmondson exercised his 
free speech right to "criticize the President to his heart’s content. 

Robert Edward Edmondson was charged by the seditious conspiracy prose- 
’cntion with interfering with the war effort and giving aid and comfort to 
enemies of the U. S. (Per 1944 indictment.) 

He stopped publication and retired from all publicity activity Nov. 30 , 
1940, more than a year before the U. S. entered war against the Axis Powers. 
Before indictment he was known to the prosecution as having done so because 
in February, 1943, in the presence of witnesses, Asst. Prosecutor Burns said 
to him: "We were sorry to learn that you had stopped publication Nov, 30, 
1940. because we hate to lose a defendant." 

In further specific support of the charge that the Roosevelt New Deal 
Administration criminally conspired to Cake away defendant Edmondson s con¬ 
stitutional rights, note that in February, 1943, the Department of Justice 
voluntarily returned to this defendant over 90 c /c of papers seized in his home 
without a search warrant, (as required by the U. S. Constitution), among which 
were 117 bulletin publications each bearing the 1942 signature endorsement 
of the seizing officer, which documents contained 1297 PRO-American-IN- 
TENT expressions, and many ANTI-Nazi statements. 

"The Pathfinder,” printed in Washington, carried in its July 24, 1944, 
issue, the following statement from Arthur Garfield Hays, Chief Counsel of 
the American Civil Liberties Unicn, being an extract from his denunciation 
therein of the mass-trial procedure: 

20 2 

"I am particularly opposed to a situation where, in time of war men arc 
tried because of statements made in time of peace. Those utterances may have 
meant quite different things in the setting of peace. Whatever the court may 
charge, ic is impossible for'a jury at the present time to fit those words into the 
background in which they were said.” • 

In Cramer vs. U. S., the U. S.^ Supreme Court ruled April 23, 1945: 
"Evidence relates statements by Cramer before the U. S. was at war with 
Germany. At the time they were uttered, however, they were not treasonable. 
To use pre-war expressions of opposition to entering a war to convict of treason 
during the war, is a dangerous procedure. ' 

In the document issued by President Roosevelt Sept. 9, 1939, 'Proclaiming 
the Neutrality of the United States in the War between Germany and England, 
I-'rance, Poland, etc,” was the following: 

"The treaties of the U. S. require that no person within the jurisdiction of 
the U. S. shall take part in said war but shall remain at peace with all of said 
belligerents;” warning that any citizen who may "misconduct ’ himself does so 
"at his peril.” 

Congress did not declare war on Germany until Dec. 11, 1941, after de¬ 
claring war on japan on Dec. 3, 1941, and the President did not theretofore 
''proclaim” that the U. S. was "at war,” although he asked for "war power" as 
below, but did not receive such authority. 

The N. Y. World-Telegram of Jan. 3, 1940, quoted Secretary of the Navy 
Edison as asking Congress "to vest in the President during the national 
emergency those powers which he has in time of war;’’ showing that the Nation 
was then "in time of peace;” not yet making any "war effort,” and was defin¬ 
itely still in a "national emergency" status, and "at peace." 

The line of free press demarcation between peace time and war time is 
dearly drawn in the Dec. 21, 1941, issue of the N. Y. Times, by the following 
statement of Washington Correspondent Arthur Krock: 

"Freedom of the press in the U. S., guaranteed in time of peace by the 
first article of the Bill of Rights but clearly incompatible with national security 
in time of war, officially ended Dec. 18, 1941, when the President signed the 
revived War Powers Act of 1917.” 

That the Roosevelt New Deal Administration promoted a plot against 
defendants in the seditious conspiracy case to cover up its Own treason is indi¬ 
cated by the following evidence, which it actually had in its possession prior to 

The 1942 United States State Dept, book entitled "National Socialism” 
admitted that "it was impossible to adduce any direct statements” in Nazi 
literature or speeches indicating that domination of the world was a Nazi aim— 
yet in the indictment against defendants it charged they had joined such a 
world wide conspiracy. 

The high-grade British magazine " 19 th Cencury & After" of September, 
1943, reproduced in the Congressional Record, stated that the Nazi aim was not 
world domination, but that Germany wanted to be a world, power like Britain. 

The 1945 report of U. S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Marshall said 
no evidence had been found of any "over-all strategy” by the German High 
Command, without which there could have been no worldwide Nazi con¬ 
spiracy, as alleged in the indictment. 

Defendant Edmondson is a stenographer. On Sept. 19. 1944, he reported 
the following testimony in the seditious conspiracy trial as given by Prosecution 
Witness Teller, on Ambassador Dodd's staff: 


■’You were in Germany during the time Ambassador Dodd was there'” 

"Yes. From 1924 to 1941." 

"While in Germany did you ever hear of a 'publicly announced program 
by Nazi leaders to overthrow the United States Government and put Nacional 
Socialism in its place?” ’ (Prosecution allegation) 


Prosecution Witnesses Gissibl and Luedtke likewise testified that they had 
never heard of such a conspiracy program. 

Under the heading "Sedition Case Framed by Pseudo G-Men,’’ the 
Washington Times-Herald of Feb. 26, 1944, published the following: 

"The powerful U. S. Department of Justice . . . under New Deal com¬ 
pulsion—allowed a particularly vicious amateur, Eugene Meyers, Jr. (Jew), 
Publisher of the Washington Post, to FRAME-UP a case against a group 
of alleged Nazi agents, whom the Post accused of seditious activities imperiling 
the morale of soldiers and sailors . . . 

"In framing Federal indictments against defendants one of Meyers’ re¬ 
porters acted as agent provocateur to try to entrap obscure pamphleteers and 
anti-semites into an 'overt act’ in the District of Columbia, so that they could 
be tried here in this Government dominated community. 

"In this capacity Meyers’ Reporter Dillard Stokes posed as fictitious 
Jefferson Breem, 3917 Penna. Ave., S. E.; and also as Adam Quigley, P, O. 
Box 219, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D. C. 

"The Post reporter, breathing a plausible degree of anti-Semitism, wrote 
to numerous agitators seeking samples of their outgivings. Five took the bait 
and found themselves indicted for the 'overt' act of causing to be delivered to 
the Washington Post Office copies of their propaganda. Working closely with 
E he Meyer sleuths was Justice Department Assistant Attorney General Maloney." 

The foregoing is confirmed on Page 29 of "The Sedition Case (1953) in 
Congressional documentation. 

Below is another piece of "overt evidence" indicating that the Roosevelt 
Administration conspired to victimize Defendant Edmondson. 

The indictment of Jan. 3. 1944, was challenged at trial by Defense Counsel 
Lindas, as reported in the shorthand testimony of proceedings on Page 9315. 
He pointed out that the law on which the seditious conspiracy charges are based 
was passed June 28, 1940. "If a statement by an alleged co-conspirator is to 
be used against anybody it must be after the conspiracy has been formed. 

"How can a conspiracy be formed to violate a law UNTIL THERE IS A 
LAW? Therefore, anything that he or any one else says is only hearsay as far 
as my client is concerned because there are no CO-CONSPIRATORS UNTIL 

"In Other words, if Mr. Jones says something that might show an intention 
on his part to violate something, as far as my client is concerned it is only 
hearsay UNTIL THE LAW GOES INTO EXISTENCE. Until there is a con¬ 
spiracy the act of one cannot bind the others. 

"Before June 28, 1940, no matter what these people said, or even if they 
had an organization and talked together it would not make it a conspiracy to 
violate that law because THERE WAS NO LAW. That is the reason I am object¬ 
ing to the introduction of these documents in evidence. 

"We have had 16 weeks of nothing but what somebody has said about 
Jews—nothing about appealing to the troops to be disloyal.” 

Motion was denied. 


The following was printed in the N. Y. News Aug. 14, 1947, reporting 
the dropping of the mass-case: 

"The mass-sedition trial, ordered by the late President Roosevelt, was part 
of 'the smear terror' so well analyzed by John T. Flynn, and it had a single- 
objective—To drive to cover all criticism of the Roosevelt intent to involve The 
Republic in Europe's wars. . . . The heart of White House strategy of terror was: 
We don't dare to indict and put on trial the big fellows who oppose us . . . 
but if we indict some small fry . . .then we can perhaps scare the big fellows into 
silence. , . . 

"Incidentally, this burlesque on American justice, fairplay and the Federal 
courts, has cost the U. S. Treasury between $1,000,000 and $1,500,000. 

"The surviving defendants now go free, CLEARED BY THE DEPART¬ 

"A few years ago there was a charge of criminal libel against Robert 
Edward Edmondson (unconditionally' dismissed May 10, 1938) based upon 
Anti-Semitic phamphlets which he was circulating. Emotionally, the prosecution 
PLEASED US (Jews). We failed to realize that it might be a mistake to make a 
martyr of him. On further consideration, Jewish groups felt that a trial of the 
case would have a pernicious effect. In support of a motion to dismiss the indict¬ 
ment, briefs were filed by the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish 
Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union, whose briefs argued that the 
protection of a free press and of religious Liberty -were more important than 
conviction of the defendant. So the trial was stopped. 

"But when Edmondson was again indicted (1942-4) in the seditious con¬ 
article written by Arthur Garfield Hays in the Jewish Post." (Hays was Chief 
counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.) 

Does it "carry implications’’ that "Roosevelt and his Jews" were con- 
spiratorially responsible for the two prosecutions? New Deal Jewish Mayor 
LaGuardia of New York, by letter of June 8, 1936, scarted the N. Y. prosecu¬ 
tion of Defendant Edmondson. 

The Washington Times-Herald of Nov. 23, 1946, commenting on the 
dismissal of the mass-indictments, printed: 

"The case was bred in malice, prosecuted in bate, and pursued in bigotry." 

The Chicago Tribune of Nov. 25, 1946, editorially declared that the case 
"was conceived dishonestly and conducted dishonestly. . . . The case w>as so 
flimsy that Government counsel delayed it as long as they could, continuing 
harassment of defendants.’’ 

The evidence of a Roosevelt frame-up to jail defendant Edmondson is 
doubly-damning in consideration of the U. S. Supreme Court's dictum regard¬ 
ing the duty of Government prosecutors, quoted below: 

"The United States Attorney is the representative, not of an ordinary party 
to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is 
as compelling as its obligation' to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, 
in a criminal prosecution, is not that ic shall win a case but that justice shall be 
done . . . Ana it is his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to pro¬ 
duce a wrongful conviction, as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about 
a just one." (Berger v. U. S„ 295 U. S. 78, 84, 79 L. ed. 1314, 55 S. Ct. 629.) 

2 0 5 

A Chicago Tribune editorial commented on Aug. 2, 1947, in more than 
a column of denunciation: 

"Five years and ten days after its inception, the infamous Washington 
mass-sedition case died. It was launched by the Roosevelt Regime in an attempt 
to silence all political dissent, and particularly all reference to the criminality 
of those in high office who steered the American people into an unwanted war. 

"Entrapment was employed to establish a showing that defendants were 
moving toward their purported goal with interlocking action. 

"The Messenger,” Los Angeles organ of B’nai B’rith, in its Dec. 15, 1944 , 
issue, published: 

"The uncooperative press was largely responsible for the non-success of 
the mass-sedition trial. SINCE THE ENTIRE REASON FOR THE TRIAL 
was to educate the public into the ways cf Nazism to link Anti-Semitism and 
other racisms with the Hitlerian movement, this lack of cooperation was A 
FUNDAMENTAL SETBACK. The Justice Department has provided a larger 
audience for the vicious mouthings of 'THE LUNATIC FRINGE . 

Does all this show that "Roosevelt and his Jews"—to employ a Dorothy 
Thompson label — were behind a criminal conspiracy to deprive defendant 
Edmondson of substantial Constitutional rights? 

Below is an eye-witness account of the court proceedings following a 
Roosevelt radio national broadcast early in October prior to introduction of 
"evidence" against mass-case Defendant Pelley. 

"President Roosevelt put the mass case directly into politics in a big way 
by his national broadcast linking the Pelley Silver Shirts with the Brown Shirts 
and Black Shirts of Europe. There is no doubt that failure to convict defendants 
has got ’under his hide.' 

''Pelley's Defense Lawyer William J. Powers rose and attacked the Presi¬ 
dent for 'trying to influence the jury against all defendants by his national 
broadcast.’ The court ordered him to proceed along 'different lines.’ Whereupon 
Mr. Powers angrily asked Is the President of the United States the only one 
who has a right to free speech to smear these helpless defendants over the air 
and in the newspapers? If so, then the people of this country should know it.' 
Prosecutor Rogge objected, was sustained and Mr. Powers sat down. 

"Defense Counsel Frey, who had often denounced the proceedings as 'New 
Deal political persecution,’ rose and demanded discontinuance of trial until 
after election. 

"Defense Attorney John Jackson, Jr., rose and declared heatedly that the 
President’s denunciation was an attack on everv defendant in the case, the first 
of any such attack by any President. He quoted U. S. Supreme Court decisions 
dismissing cases that had achieved political notoriety. 

"The Court then banned all oral argument, and reserved decision. (Later: 
Motions denied)’’ 

Court-Appointed Defense Counsel Frank H. Myers (later elevated to the 
Washington bench) filed May 1, 1946, a motion vigorously opposing additional 
delay requested by the prosecution for further search to try to get new evidence 
in Germany against defendants, in which he said: "To prolong this trial . , . 
would be a travesty on our democratic processes and only serve to bring our 
court in this jurisdiction into disrepute arising from this un-American and un¬ 
constitutional method of trial.” 

2 0 6 

Mr. Myers had previously spoken two and one-half hours declaring that, 
after listening to "evidence’’ of the prosecution for many weeks, he had come 
to the conclusion that "not any of the defendants are guilty as charged in the 

The history of American criminal procedure fails to reveal one instance 
where, as in this persecution, men were held in jail for years to give the prose¬ 
cutors an opportunity to build up a doubtful case. 

"The theory behind the trial was that if this conglomeration of unrelated 
persons, many of whom did not even know each other, could be convicted, a 
precedent would be established that the law-- could be used in this country as 
an instrument of political force and coercion. . . . The prosecution ended because 
the Government had NO CASE.” (Baltimore News-Post of Aug. 18, 1947.) 

Do Department of Justice Policies imperatively demand investigation? 
Note that W. j. Powers, of the Chicago Bar, wrote as follows to the Chicago 
Tribune in December, 1946: 

"If any organization has maintained a set program of contempt for civil 
liberties in this country, it is the Department of Justice.” 

After citing a number of flagrant cases in detail Mr. Powers dwelt on 
outstanding outrages in the so-called mass-sedition trial, saying: 

"In an attempt to discover what it was all about, the writings of various 
defendants were pooled and studied by defense-counsel. Some defendants had 
opposed entry into World War II— others had not; some were German- 
American Bund members—others were not; some were anti-jewish—others were 
not. . . . The only common denominator for ALL defendants was that they were 
more or less violently anti-communistic—YET THEY WERE ALL PROSE¬ 

And defendants were not even indicted under the 1917 "War Espionage 
Act” applicable to ' sedition,” but under the peace-time law of June 28, 1940, 
which does not apply to "sedition” but to "seditious conspiracy”—a British 
"seditious libel” judiciary title not in American Criminal Law, under which 
large "group libel'' in the public interest is not actionable. 


Careful investigation indicates that the principal agencies publicly pressing for 
retrial of what they miscall "the sedition case,” included the following Roosevelt 

champions: , 

WALTER WINCHELL, listed in Who's Who m American Jewry as a radio-broad¬ 
caster and columnist of N. Y. City. 

ADOLPH J. SABATH, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as Congressman 
from Illinois, born in Czechoslovakia. 

B'NAl B'RITH, International Jewish Secret Order. Henry Monsky, President, 

JEWISH SENTINEL of Chicago, J. I. Fishbem, Editor. 


JEWISH NATIONAL DAY of N. Y. City, Rabbi Schmelka Margoshes, Editor, born 
Galicia, Europe. 

JEWISH EXAMINER of Brooklyn, N. Y., Rabbi Louis D. Gross, Editor. 

'COUNTER-ATTACK," organ of "National Committee to Combat Anti-Semitism," 
L. E. Golditch, Executive Secretary, N. Y.City. 

' IN FACT," Editor George Seldes, listed in Who's Who in American Jewry as 
author, N. Y.-City. 

"DAILY WORKER" (U. S. Communist Party organ), Alan Max, Editor; Incor¬ 
porators: Alex Trachtenburg, Ray Seigartel, Isaac Schorr. Irving Franklin, N. Y. City. 

"PM” N. Y. City daily paper—"Uptown Edition of the Communist Daily Worker." 

"CIO. Organizers: Sidney Hillman, born Lithuania; David Dubinsky, born Poland; 
Max Zaritsky, bom Russia, heads of the three most prominent N. Y. City so-called Red 
clothing union monopolies. CIO was backed by the Communist-aiding Political Action Com¬ 
mittee with its 400 Jewish names among Communists as listed by the Congressional Com¬ 
mittee Report of March, 1944, in an investigation of the "CIO-PAC” political activities. 

"NEW MASSES," Communistic periodical, N. Y. City. 

2 0 7 

Dneaur j. Edgar Hoove; of the FBI. in his 1952 report, is quoted as saying: 
"We could not make a wmse mistake than to think there is less Communist activity now 
than there was when it was flaunted in our faces. . . . The party itself had to go under¬ 
ground. ... It continues to be one of the major threats to internal security.” 

Radio Broadcaster Fulton Lewis Jr. said in his syndicated column (2-11-52), that 
Congressman Dies in his nntr-communist exposures, quoted the late President Roosevelt 
as stating: There is nothing wrong with the Communists, Some of the best friends I 
have are Communists.” 


Can there now be any doubt that President Roosevelt had Robert Edward 
Edmondson, whom he knew had retired from all publicity a year before Pearl 
Harbor, put in the 1942-7 Washington mass-case under the impulsion o.f re¬ 
venge motives, both personal and political? The following speaks for itself. 

(1) After giving high praise to President Roosevelt following his in¬ 
auguration in the early part of 1933, but becoming patriotically alarmed by New 
Deal un-Americanism, Edmondson published Dec. 27, 1933, an open letter to 
the President asking him if the New Deal was trying to change the Republic- 
form of the U. S. Government into a communistic democracy. This letter was 
"answered” June 11, 1936, by a N. Y. City indictment charging Edmondson with 
"libel of all persons of the Jewish religion" by a Jewish-majority grand jury, 
under the Roosevelt lieutentancy of Jewish Mayor LaGuardia. 

(2) Edmondson broadcast under date of Oct. 20, 1936, a bulletin re¬ 
producing a previously published genealogical descent indicating that Roosevelt 
was of Jewish ancestry—supporting the chart with a long series of confirming 
documentation, not only genealogically but by association with Jews and his 
appointment of Jews to many positions in the national administration. 

(3) Forcing by damning exposures a court backdown May 10, 1938, of 
the N. Y. City libel charge, doubtless intensified the President's wrath. 

(4) Edmondson's continued publicity exposures of the Communistic nature 
of the New Deal and its politico-economic many subversions of traditional 
Americanism, intensified motivation. 

(5) Emphasizing Roosevelt's dishonorable repudiation of the dollar, 
government bond gold pledge, and other monetary subversions through an in¬ 
ternational banking cabal, which were creating "inextinguishable debt," raising 
the national debt to more than 200 billion dollars, added fuel to wrath. 

(6) Publicly uncovering Roosevelt’s persistent warmongering promises 
and actions indicating secret maneuvering toward war involvement, must have 
made him jittery. 

(7) Anger at the manner in which Edmondson and defense attorneys 
were obtaining from prosecution witnesses themselves a cumulative volume of 
evidence further unmasking New Deal subversions, increased hatred. 

The manifest prostitution of the Judicial and Executive Departments as 
plainly exposed in these Petition records, imposes upon the Senate Judiciary 
and House Un-American Activities Committees of The Congress the imperative 
high duty to exhaustively investigate and publicly unmask to fitting punishment 
identifiable sinister forces which have blackened the Honor of the Govern¬ 
ment of the United States by secretly "pressuring" its administrators to grossly 
oppress and shamelessly persecute loyal citizens for uncovering treason to The 
Republic in time of peril to the Nation. 


In the 1944 Roosevelt New Deal Communistic Mass-Persecution of Patriots 

at Washington, D. C. 

(From a Daily Diary) 

By Marian L. Edmondson, Defendant's Wife, Deceased 19 o2 

PREFATORY. These reports began June 25, 1944, with daily diary notes by 
Marian L. Edmondson, following approval of the jury which heard the case. 
The first jury was invalidated by prosecution technical error. Many defendants 
believed it ’’packed." The Communist Daily Worker Washington correspondent 
said when the first panel was rejected: "That looks bad." Court-appointed at¬ 
torneys told defendants they had been informed that all defendants were guilty, 
and their services wouldn't be required sixty days. The mistrial lasted over seven 
months, Within a short time defense counsel began to discover the innocence of 
defendants, and progressively became their champions to a degree and extent 
beyond parallel. Wich not only individual liberties at stake, but the very life of 
The Republic hanging in suspense, personal and patriotic emotions were stirred 
to the depths, and they are responsible for this unique and revelatory account of 
FDR’s court "Travesty on Justice." 


"Today the judge ruled that he would permit the prosecution to expand and 
develop its 'background' theory. That was done, going back over 20 years. But 
the ’evidence’ thus far entered seems absurd to many of us. Yet no one can tell 
what the jury will make of it. 

"Contrary to proper legal procedure, four defendants were absent as the 
prosecution’s 'case' was presented against them. Illness and deaths prevented 
attendance. My husband commented: 'This will probably be known later as a 
mass-murder case.’ One of the marshals of the court said to me: I don't like 
'em any better than you do,’ referring to Jews. 

"A defense attorney remarked: 'It now begins to look as though the prose¬ 
cution is determined to prolong this case indefinitely to punish the unpaid 
lawyers who have dared to challenge unfair and illegal tactics. Were we sup¬ 
posed to 'go along’ and let honest defense of clients go to hell? We just couldn't 
do that and live with ourselves afterward.’ 

"Every piece of ’evidence’ submitted by the prosecution has now been entered 
’provisionally’ or Tor the present’—apparently because of forceful objections and 
arguments presented by defense counsel and ’over-ruled.’ Prosecution witnesses 
have been reduced to explanations and excuses such as 'that is the way I under¬ 
stand it.’ 

"On Tuesday we all thought the judge was going to have some kind of a 
seizure, and I was frightened. For apparently no reason, as defense arguments 
were proceeding, the judge began to bang his gavel. His face, neck and scalp 
■ (he is bald) were suffused with blood—and we held our breath! 

"Later, while defense attorneys were cross-examining a witness, the judge 
intoned lifelessly: 'Objection over-ruled.' Then, realizing that the prosecution 
had made no objection, he quickly added: 'On motion of the court.' Prosecutor 
as well as judge? 

2 OS 

"A soldier was put on the stand to testify as to receiving a printed com¬ 
munication from one of the defendants—to establish jurisdiction in Washing¬ 
ton, D. C. He was the Providence journal correspondent here. On cross-exam¬ 
ination he admitted that it was not the only material he had received; that it was 
one of hundreds of various propaganda sheets his office received monthly; that 
he was not in military service at the time, and the United States was at peace. 
This soldier also admitted that the 'evidence' he had received did not undermine 
his morale' and that he did not know of any other man lh the armed services 
whose morale had suffered from such material. 

"At the close of Thursday's session one defense lawyer rose ; after the jury 
had-been dismissed, and demanded that all evidence so far admicted, be 
struck, since not a bit of it had sustained the indictment contention as to under¬ 
mining of the morale of the armed forces’ and was nothing but proof that some 
of the defendants were anti-Semitic.’ 

"The judge ruled: 'Motion denied.' 

A Tempo of Intimidation 

"It is evident now that the planned tempo of this trial was one of fear and 
intimidation, but it has been utterly frustrated by the courage of these American 
defense counsel. They have made the affair ridiculous, which is bad for the 

"Now comes a demand for impeachment of the judge. Perhaps nothing 
will come of it, but it is bad publicity for the prosecution. The actions of some 
defense attorneys has been so spectacular that the press had to give the proceed¬ 
ings publicity. Those explosions were 'news,' and it was a real triumph to break 
through this ban on justice. 

"We again held our breath when Edmondson Defense Attorney Frey, 
suddenly rose and said to the court: 'What kind of procedure is this anyway? I 
never heard anything like it. Can't we have some kind of orderly procedure 

"He was merely told he was out of order.’ 

"Another defense lawyer rose later and heatedly demanded: 'Are proper 
proceedings of this court to be reversed? There has never been aything like it. 
Matters which should be excluded are admitted, and vice versa.’ He was not 
reprimanded. He sits next to our attorney, who, in turn, is just in front of my 
husband. This lawyer, who stands very high in the Washington bar, talks a great 
deal to my husband. 

"Defendant Sanctuary is without a lawyer. His attorney was fined a second 
time—for ’obstructing justice’ because of delay in cross-examination. He had 
been trying to look over a mass of evidence submitted by the prosecution in order 
to frame more questions. Masses of evidence are thrown at the defense without 
proper time for investigation. Protests are over-ruled, Under the circumstances, 
defense attorneys have performed miracles. 

"One prominent defense attorney said to me: "I am intimidated by these 
fines for 'contempt' by the judge. I admit it. My firm is intimidated. And I know 
that there are other attorneys who feel the same way. We fear to take proper 
steps to protect our clients.’ 'Planned that way?' 

"If there is anything that gets me down, it will be this diabolical Washing¬ 
ton heat. A Turkish bath day and night! If it isn’t cruel and inhuman 'punish¬ 
ment' to force these defendants to suffer in the inferno of a Washington 
summer, I would like to know what it can be called. 

2 1 0 

Legal Error Condoned 

''Here is a sample of prosecution tactics. Defense Attorney Lindas arose and 
asked whether or not the whole piece of evidence, against which defence 
counsel were objecting, would be presented to the jury. The court assured him 
that only the article in question would be shown. The entire paper was given to 
the jury. 

"Directly after intermission and before the jury had been summoned back 
into the courtroom Attorney Lindas again rose and in a voice filled with're¬ 
sentment, said he had a stipulation with the prosecution not to show that 
particular exhibit for, in the column next to the article in question, was another 
which described arrest, conviction and sentencing of Lindas’ client for another 
offense. He argued with rising voice that the prosecution had broken its promise, 
and his client’s case had been jeopardized by the fact that the jury had seen 
proof of previous imprisonment. 

"Every one in the courtroom was silent as Lindas sat down, and the 
prosecution appeared stunned at such a legal error. The judge was dumfounded 
then announced that he would 'take the matter under advisement.' Lindas 
demanded dischage of the jury and declaration of 'mistrial.' 

"Next day the judge announced denial of Lindas’ motion on the ground 
that Lindas had not sufficiently informed the judge of the basis for the objection 
and motion. It was a very shabby performance and showed bias. Lindas took an 
exception. Other defense lawyers shook their heads deprecadngly. Assistant 
Prosecutor Bums rose and abjectly apologized for the incident, but the damage 
had been done. 

On the same day, Defense Attorney Ennis, read into the record U. S. 
Supreme Court citations to the effect that extraneous matter should not be inter¬ 
jected in cases—only such evidence as directly concerned charges made. He 
was objecting to the mass of purely political and irrelevant matter introduced 
by Rogge. Ennis heatedly declared that this was turning out to be a trial of anti- 
Semitism and politics. The judge over-ruled his motion. One news commentator 
said the judge denied motions which came too late and also those which came 
too early. Strong indications developed showing that the jury was becoming 
disgusted. Sarcastic smiles at times conveyed an ‘eyeful.’ 

"One day the prosecution entered 85 exhibits as 'evidence;’ with Witness 
Luedtke on the stand. Defense attorneys jumped to their feet and heatedly asked 
how it would be possible to inspect it when there was but one copy for all the 
22 defense attorneys. Then there was a ruckus! 'Do you think I’m going to give 
my case away' yelled Rogge when he was asked to permit inspection the day 
previous to introduction. 

"The 13th week of this travesty ended on July 13. The general impression 
now is that the judge himself is not satisfied with the progress made. He must 
know, from the reactions of the jury > that they are not impressed by the pro¬ 
secution presentment. And not One piece of so-called evidence shown to the 
jury is anything but ‘Anti-Semitic’ and Anti-Communist. Not one! There has 
been not one thing to link defendants to the charges of the indictment as to 
undermining the morale of the armed forces. 

“The ablest men of the defence counsel have been waiting to find out just 
what the prosecution had against us; and they are becoming more and more 
convinced chat defendants are innocent. Some of them even said the judge would 
be forced to deliver a directed verdict in favor of defendants, but we do not 
want a mistrial. We want to be cleared! One defence attorney told me a mistrial 

2 1 1 

i, desir-Lbie as there never would be another indictment like this one if it fails 
lo be Seined; bur I very earnestly told him that would not sort many of. us. 

”We have more reason than ever before to believe that all this tremendous 

of t h: P wotld fow, and ate losing money daily. The 7 ?"?."^^ 
without compensation. One lawyer told me he was losing S200C a month, hut 
they are noJ actually joyously fighting this battle, apparently because they feel 

rhe prosecution hasn t any case. 

"Here is a noteworthy incident: In the outer hall I overheard a correspond, 
ent for the Commumst Daily Worker talking to some defense lawyers^ He: re¬ 
marked- 'These defendants are certainly good sports. They are this trial 
with a smile, and seem to have a lot of fun each other. And then lawyers, 

t0 ° "I felt like asking him just how Ire thought we should act. I could have 
cold him we do not know how to act in a guilty manner because we are 
completely innocent of the charges. 

"But it was high praise coming from so foul a sheet as the Daily Worker, 
and evidently defendants' attitude made a deep impression on him. As a maher 
of fact the Daily Worker has lately been maintaining a thunderous silence as to 
Se^ Sal There^rs precious little nourishment in the proceedings from their 

point of view. 

Evidence Still Admitted ''Provisionally’' 

"My husband went to the courtroom early on the day heretofore, referred 
to to gel affairs in order for his attorney^and found a group examining^ 30 
bulletins of his whtch were to be offered. He asked one lawyer: Do you thmk 
they are too tough?' The reply came, 'Well, they're true, are they not? the 
answer was an unqualified Yes.' As a matter of fact Jewish confesses to be 
presented in documentation-form answer questions themselves. 

"On Thursday, Defense Attorney Lindas rose and vehemently objected to 
prosecution evidence on the ground that it was almost entirely on anti-Semitism. 
He is a big man and his voice rises to almost a shout when he becomes angry. 
He told tl5 court that what was being offered was raising a tide of raciapre¬ 
judice not only in the courtroom but in the District ot Columbia that Je^sh 
members of the Bar whom he had always considered friends were being Harmed 
bv the procedure of the prosecution, which was raising this prejudice—not 
defendants. He demanded a stop to it. The judge reiterated that all evidence 

wa S being admitted provisionally.’ was that ’ but [t WaS g °° d news t0 

those of us on trial, 

"The 15 th week of this strange Moscow un-American trial could well be 
oiled gala,’ permitting a play on the word. Before noon on Monday the court- 
mom Is swept by a gale of laughter-and another blew us out on Thursday 
The adjectives 'farcical' and 'fantastic’ are O.K. m them way, but the red word 
to be used here is just plain 'cockeyed.' For the trial is being conducted m 
reverse -—the way the Jews read their printing—Defendants and counsel are 
'in high' and the prosecution is 'down-under’ in the dumps. But the motion- 
denied’ droning goes monotonously on. 

2 12 

"Regarding Monday’s developments: Defense Counsel Bilbrey is white- 
haired, meager in frame and has a high sense of humor. He is an adept in cross- 
examination. He never rubs witness the wrong wav, and leads him up the garden 
path in a way joyous to see, He draws out the most damaging testimony without 
seeming to do so—and knows when to stop, which, I find, is something very- 
important indeed. He gave an outstanding performance Monday and left a 
prosecution witness dangling high in the air after proving his point, and did 
the defence enjoy a big laugh! 

'‘Following the foregoing, Assistant Prosecutor Burns started his ball roll¬ 
ing by offering as evidence about thirty of my husband's bulletins. The principal 
one was headed 'Roosevelt’s Jewish Ancestry,’ and when Burns objected to 
handing that to the jury as it 'would take too much timed Edmondson Defence 
Attorney Frey demanded the right to read it. Permission was granted—and 
it took half an hour. Once the bulletin reference was made to a medal, and Mr. 
Frey handed to the jury a famous medal with the six-pomt Jewish star on one 
side and likeness of Franklin D. Roosevelt on the other, with a Yiddish hierogly¬ 
phic of 'Good Luck' inside the star. 

"A defence lawyer near me leaned over and gleefully whispered: "Your 
attorney is getting away with murder. He hasn’t any right to do what he is doing,’ 
but that is what he did. 

Jews Headed Four N. Y. Political Tickets 

"Mr. Burns was reading one bulletin published by my husband 'with all the 
stops out’ and emphasis intended to impress the jury with the villainy of 
Defendant Edmondson, but he read one too many paragraphs—which we be¬ 
lieve he intended to omit. The paragraph referred to the N.Y. gubernatorial elec¬ 
tions of 1934, when the Jew Lehman headed the Democratic ticket; Moses the 
Republican; Solomon the Socialist and Israel Amter the Communist ticket. On 
the bulletin was the Edmondson comment: 'It sounds like the Old Testament— 
but it must never happen again, for 80 r ,‘r of the Gentile electorate of New York 
was practically 'disfranchised.' 

"Laughter literally deluged the courtroom—and the judge could do nothing 
to stop it. The jury was one broad grin. Burns snapped that it be shown in the 
record 'there was much laughter in the courtroom.' Defence Attorney Bilbrev 
lifted his hand, arose and with smiles wreathing his face, stated: 'I thought it 
was funny. I laughed.’ Defendant Jones put on the crowning touch by rising and 
saying: 'I want the record to show that Prosecutor Rogge didn’t laugh at all.’ 
Then came another gale of laughter, one defence lawyer near me exclaiming: 
'That was priceless!’ 

"No more of my husband’s bulletins were read that day, nor all the rest 
of the week. It was a sad anti-climax to the 'great work' of the prosecution. 
Edmondson's bulletins turned out to be dynamite! 

"Prosecution Witness Luedtke, former Secretary of the German-American 
Bund, was on the stand all week. Defence attorneys brought out his statement 
that there was no plot to Nazify the U.S. by any other means than propaganda 
designed to show the benefits of National Socialism. No force or violence! One 
attorney went over the 25 points of the Nazi Program in detail, and drew out 
the statement that it was not based on forceful aggression throughout the 

"Another defence lawyer took up my husband’s bulletins and asked Witness 
Luedtke if he still believed Jews and Communism were a menace to this 

2 1 3 

country, as stated therein. "Yes” he replied. Luedtkesaid Edmondson was known 
generally not to be against Jews as a race, religion or people, but simply be¬ 
cause of what Jewish Leaders were doing politically. He was very respectful of 
my husband’s work, which he admired. 

"My husband came out of that 'attack' of the prosecution with flags flying, 
and that boosted defence morale and standing a lot. Respect and affection are 
shown him by defence counsel, which makes us very happy. A lawyer of high 
social as well as professional standing voluntarily joined a warm session my 
husband was having with his own counsel for not bringing out certain points 
as per client’s directions. This ocher attorney advised: 'You do as Mr. Edmondson 
tells you. He has forgot more about the crucial facts of this case than most 
people ever knew.' You can imagine how I felt about that. 

Defense Counsel Fervor 

"There has developed a sort of evangelical fervor, patriotic and religious, 
among defense counsel. They reach higher ground every week. They are simply 
outdoing themselves. Even the most backward are becoming inspired. Tears are 
forgotten as the onward march against New Deal subversion, as pro\ed m this 
courtroom, becomes more and more evident. 

Defense Attorney Gallagher, in his inimitable style, quietly and master¬ 
fully—in an address exposing what the prosecution was trying to put over on 
the defendants—declared with indignation that defendants had bc-en brought 
into court under a 'hypothesis of guilt' before they had even faced a jury. Then 
he leaned toward the judge and said impressively: 'Your Honor, there is such 
a thing as a hypothesis of innocence.’ 

"The judge quickly said: I know that, Mr. Gallagher. 1 was certain you 
did' was Gallagher's quick comment: 'but i wanted to bring that matter to your 
Honor’s attention and have it placed in the record. I wouldn t be defending my 
clients as 1 am, did I believe them guilty of the charges in this indictment.' 

"I was so enthralled by the masterful elucidation of this noted professor of 
law that I can recall but a fraction of the powerful statements he made. It was 
forensic oratory with no bombast. You could see defense counsel in general were 
also deeply moved by Mr. Gallagher’s arguments. 

"There is one court-appointed lawyer here who has bec-n reluctant to take 
a very strong stand, fearing it might react against him professionally and 
socially; but he climbed on the band wagon this week because of improperly 
seized documents of his client he had been given to understand he would be 
permitted to inspect. 'I have been imposed upon' he vehemently declared, and 
then he opened a powerful attack on the jurisdiction of the court in this case. 
'Nothing has been introduced to place the scene of this alleged crime in 
Washington' he declared. Whereupon Prosecutor Rooge rose and asserted that 
the Government had proof of jurisdiction in the form of two letters sent to a 
Post Office Box here. Two letters sent to a Post Office Box! this lawyer 
scornfully ejaculated, 'Well, if that’s all Mr. Rogge has, he has no case.’ As he 
sat down near my husband he murmured to him 'There is no honor nor decency 
in this man Rogge.' And were we glad he at last realized that. 

"Another star-performer defense counsel then reviewed the whole pro¬ 
ceedings, stressing the hardships visited on defendants, many of whom had been 
impoverished and had to live in cramped and uncomfortable quarters in the 
terrible heat of Washington; that they had been forced here in violation of 
Constitutional guarantees, and that the prosecution had not established one point 

2 1 4 

to prove the indictment charges. The judge usually stops statements like that, but 
so many citations were introduced that he just couldn t stop this speaker. When 
he had finished, the lawyer in front of me caught him by the arm saying 'You 
brought tears to my eyes/ It was a dramatic moment, and raised the trial to a 
new high. It was the simplicity of sincerity that was moving. 

"All Out" For Defendants 

"Explanatory of how sincere the foregoing was, let me tell you of a 
meeting we had with this lawyer and his wife later. He said he wanted his wife 
to meet us and we went to a quiet place to talk. His wife told me how con¬ 
vinced her husband was of the utter innocence of defendants. He had been 
approached by Jewish members of the Washington Bar, who told him lie was 
doing himself 'great damage.' His wife said he told them that he didn't care if 
every Jew in Washington were told about his determination to give the defease 
all he had, for he believed in their innocence completely. 

"This is being written on the first day of the 17th week of the trial. In 
the last half hour excitement commenced, and defendants and counsel burst out 
of the courtroom like children from school, laughing, joking and slapping each 
other on the back. This is what happened. 

"Prosecutor Rogge began to read excerpts from Defendant Pelley's 
writings, in connection with the infamous 14 themes of the notorious Lasswell 
'Thought Parallelism' or guilt by association', which caused Pelley's conviction 
on sedition charges. 

"Defence counsel were on their feet repeatedly declaring that they had not 
been supplied with true copies of what Rogge was reading. Rogge became so 
fussed up chat he made errors which probably would not have occurred other¬ 
wise. And defence attorneys jumped on his back like a lot of terriers. Finally 
he dropped his book, and stormed. 'Defense Counsel are running a filibuster 
against me to cause the jury to lose the import of what I am reading,’ Edmond¬ 
son's Lawyer Frey jumped up, as did many others, but he got in the first word 
with 'If Mr. Rogge will read correctly there will be no interruptions; if he 
doesn’t do that we’ll keep on in the interest of our clients.’ So much error 
popped up that the whole courtroom, including the jury, were laughing. Even 
the judge smiled, and he didn't 'gavel 'em down' as in the past. Don’t ask me 
[why—he just didn't, The end result was that what was intended to be im¬ 
portantly impressive ended in a joke—and that was good for us. 

"Tuesday the prosecution continued a monotonous reading of the Pelley 
publications. Many, including jurymen, took naps. One of the most amusing 
details concerns two alternate jurymen in the front row who sit near me. One 
is small; the other big, 6 feet tall. After lunch, at times, the big fellow settled 
down for a good snooze, and the efforts of the little guy to keep him awake 
convulsed watchers. The little fellow in the middle of some testimony, sud¬ 
denly nudged the big one. It took frequent nudgings to keep the sleepy juryman 
from falling out of his chair. 

Conspiracy Rule Ignored 

"One of the ablest defence lawyers in the court room rose and protested 
'violently’ (to use his own term) against the foul blows the prosecution was 
dealing defendants, declaring it was not only hitting below the belt but was 
kicking defendants on the shins. Nothing happened. 

"On Tuesday our Defense Counsel Mr. Frey pointed out that the attorney 
for one defendant was absent and therefore defendant was not represented 

2 1 5 

properly. The judge ruled that since that defendant's name was noc mentioned in 
the current proceedings, it didn’t matter. 'But,' our attorney remonstrated. 'I 
remind your Honor again that this is a conspiracy trial and chat what affects 
one affects all.’ The judge said 'The ruling stands.’ 

"Thursday, Prosecutor Rogge handed a great pile of literature to the jury 
just to look at title pages and names of publishers. Instead of following the 
prosecutor's instructions to give the matter superficial inspection, they took two 
hours to look carefully through the whole pile. Rogge cast many anxious 
glances at the jurymen, and requested a shortening up of the time; but the jury 
went stolidlv on reading. The judge ruled that they could take all the time they 
needed. Evidently, he did not dare to do otherwise. 

"The ISth week of this inquisition ended abruptly today because of the 
death of an associate justice, a fine man and a just judge of whom we had heard 
much favorable comment. We were glad of the respite, for almost unendurable 
summer heat had left us exhausted. But, with it all, there has been no weakening 
on part of counsel or defendants. In fact, resolution to carry on seems to have 
been strengthened, for defense lawyers have risen to new' heights of righteous¬ 
ness. They are standing on the solid rock of our immortal Constitution, just as 
our enemies are on the shifting sands of deceit and dishonor. For those of us 
who revere the Constitution, it is a never-ending source of inspiration. Years 
ago my husband delivered an address in New York city before an audience of 
15-00 on "Americanism,’’ in -which he said: 'The enemies of our Republican 
form of Government will wreck themselves on the Rock of the Constitution.’ 
And, verily, that is now proving to be the case. The great men W'ho created that 
document dedicated to it their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. Can 
we do less? 

"The faces of ail in the court show- the devastating effects of this seem¬ 
ingly endless struggle, but morale continues high. We have been literally dive- 
bombed. subjected to heavy artillery fire, gassed, and "tanked;" but we have not 
yielded an inch. The defense attorneys are magnificent. Every day they seem to 
have found new power, and have forced the enemy back time and again. They 
have etched into the record the real objective of the opposition—the planned 
destruction of the fundamental law of the land and the imposition of dictator¬ 
ship by executive authority. 

"Monday opened with a recess for the jury owning to illness of one of 
its members. The day was taken up with the argument of Defence Counsel 
Gallagher, as co improper seizure of papers. This was something one reads 
about, but seldom hears. Another attorney told me: That is what is heard in the 
highest courts of the land, particularly the U. S. Supreme Court—and Mr. 
Gallagher is second to none in that respect.’ It was calm, measured, and 
logically based on Constitutional rights of defendants. The courtroom was so 
quiet one could have heard the drop of the traditional pin, yet this gifted man 
spoke for two hours. We all knew this superlative analysis would be 'over¬ 
ruled’—but it would be in the record. 

A "War Search” in Peace Time 

"To deny Mr. Gallagher’s points the judge had to follow the New Deal 
Communist Line' by putting the executive above Constitution, as has been so 
often done during the Roosevelt Administration. The newspapers, commenting 
on this event, said the judge had 'set up a new precedent.’ 

After Defense Counsel Gallagher had finished his argument and taken up 
and concluded another long period in masterly cross-examination of an FBI 

2 1 6 

man who had made a seizure ar Los Angles, our Defense Attorney Mr. Frey 
'finished him off' in a most unexpected manner. The FBI agent insisted that 
an executive or presidential warrant' authorized him to conduct the 'raid’ (as 
defense counsel insisted on terming it), because it was issued 'in war time.' 

'When was war declared?’ asked our counsel. 

" 'Dec. 8/ 

'But that was on japan, was it not?’ 

" 'Yes.' 

" 'But that didn't mean we were at war with Germany! This was an anti- 
German raid.’ 

" 'I considered we were at war with Germany’ replied witness. 

" "When did the U. S. declare war on Germany?’ 

" 'On Dec, 11th, 1941/ 

" 'Then, when you made this raid Congress had not yet declared war on 
Germany. Is that true?’ 

" 'That’s right.’ 

" ’Then you made this raid while we were technically at peace with Ger¬ 
many, did you not?’ 

” I suppose you can put it that way,’ was the reply. 

"But the judge ruled that because Japan was in alliance with the 'Axis’ the 
President had a right to INFER that we were at war with Germany on Dec. 8, 
the date of the war declaration against Japan. The court w'as asked: 'Doesn’t that 
bypass Congress and. give the executive the right to ’beat the gun?’ But the 
answer was 'the ruling of the court stands.’ 

"During cross-examination of this FBI witness by Defense Attorney 
Powers, the prosecutor kept interrupting until Mr. Powers asked him to let him 
do the examining: but the judge upheld Rogge so many times that Attorney 
Powers turned loose a savage attack on the way the trial was being conducted. 
The judge smashed his gavel and everyone jumped. Mr. Powers continued to 
speak w’ith the judge shouting 'the court has ruled.’ Whereupon Mr. Powers 
marched back to his seat declaring that 'no counsel could properly defend his 
client in this court.' We held our breath, realizing, from the way the judge 
looked at Mr. Powers, that a contempt charge v/as apparently being considered. 
But evidently the judge feared to take such action; and the incident passed with 
no more damage than the loss of considerable breath. 

"But another defense attorney rose and declared that the rulings of the 
judge were forcing defense lawyers inco a 'condition of involuntary servitude.’ 
Yet all that happened was that he was ordered to take his seat, and the jury w'as 
instructed to disregard the matter. We were mighty glad the jury heard it all. 

The "Wrong Man” Died 

"It was important to us to note that while the Los Angeles defendants did 
not consent to search, they did not ’obstruct,’ for there came citation after 
citation from the U. S. Supreme Court that ’submission is not consent.’ 

2 17 

"I am dizzy with this heat. If I should lose my sanity, as so many of our 
blessed boys in battle are doing, you will read of a demented woman standing 
on a street corner and yelling to the passing crowd, 'Sheep going to slaughter!’ 
Yet the conviction persists that there is an awakening in the making. 

"On August 26, 1944: "Heaven has been kind at last. Cooler weather, 
which will enable us to live through the rest of the summer. It took four days 
to cooi off the bedrooms where we exist. 

"Several amusing incidents occurred while we were milling around the 
courthouse before the court had proclaimed a recess on account of the death of 
Associate Justice Luhring. Our Attorney, Mr. Frey, met Defense Counsel Dilling 
just outside the door, and said to him: 'Do you believe we shall be dismissed for 
a recess on account of the death of Justice Luhring? He was an upright judge! 
Too bad he had to die!’ 

" 'Yes, the wrong man died!' Another lawyer who heard the remark, and 
■who has a powerful delivery, sympathetically exclaimed. 'If the right man dies 
I will take charge of the funeral and declaim a Marc Antony—'I come to bury 
Richer, not to praise him!’ Which uncovers the intense disgust of counsel. 

"But we feel this court battle may have to be fought to the bitter end 
without short cuts. Indeed, The Constitution itself is embattled in the court¬ 
room, and history is being made. Not only are defense counsel not disheartened, 
their resolution seems to have been strengthened. 

"The high spot of the 19th week of this trial monstrosity was an almost 
two-hour address by Senator Langer on the floor of the Senate. He had spent 
two days in the courtroom. He seemed to be in a sardonic mood, and gave close 
attention to proceedings. I did not go to the Senate because I do not wish to 
miss anything during the trial, When I read later his speech in the Congressional 
Record my indignation concerning the manner in which the trial was being 
handled was so red-hot that it is just as well I did not attend. 

"The week began by defendants and counsel trooping back to "school 1 ’ 
laughing and recounting recess developments. Defence counsel looked weary, 
as they had used the interim to try to catch up with their own business affairs’ 
working late into the nights. But their high morale was unimpaired, and they 
were ready for action again. We were startled when we saw the judge. He 
looked very ill indeed. His personal secretary, who was in court, looks like 
death. There were rumors that the judge had a heart attack. No verification. Our 
counsel greeted Rogge, and was irritably asked; 'Why didn’t you stay away for 
another two ■weeks?’ ’With my client’s publications coming up today?’ our 
attorney asked and said sharply. That isn’t the way I do business.’ 

Devotion to The Constitution 

"Material presented showed that my husband had sold, not given his 
publications to other defendants. No conspiracy there. Defence-Counsel John 
Jackson came to us at lunch and said: One of Mr. Edmondson’s publications 
is enough to clear him in the eyes of the jury and completely show's his in¬ 
nocence, for he stated that he had refused to use certain material in his pos¬ 
session as it slightly’ reflected against his country. Your attorney should 
emphasize that word ‘slightly,’ for it means that Defendant Edmondson would 
not lend himself to even a mild form of criticism of the U. S.—which is enough 
to prove that he so loved the form of Government of this country that he 
w'ould have no part in its detraction.’ It meant a lot to us, for Mr. Jackson is very 

2 1 8 

' The waving of a large swastika flag before the jury caused another out¬ 
burst of indignation by some defence counsel, who insisted that this act was 
only to try to arouse prejudice in the minds oi the jury. One lawyer declared 
that demonstration was an 'abuse of judicial discretion.' That brought im¬ 
mediate action from the court, who dismissed the jury and called on counsel to 
justify his allegation. He added ominously, 'there will be no fine this time.' 
The attorney spoke for several minutes, admitting afterward that jail stared him 
in the face;' but that he felt he had a right to make the charge in defense of his 
client, saying he didn't care whether his client was a German, a Japanese or a 
Hottentot. He had declared he had meant no contempt of any particular judge, 
and attention was directed to the fact that he used the words judicial discretion.' 
In his indignation he seemed to be reckless of his own safety. Tension went 
into high. The judge 'reserved decision.’ 

"Lace Thursday a witness against Jones and Noble went on the stand. On 
her lap were a pile of typewritten transcripts. She was noted to read whole 
paragraphs. That aroused defence anger, and protests were made. The judge- 
ruled she might ’refresh her memory.' 'But, Your Honor, she is more than re¬ 
freshing memory—she is reading from those transcripts.’ The judge said 'the 
ruling stands.' 

"One of the mildc-st of the defence lawyers became so angry that he made a 
motion that all her 'testimony’ be thrown ouc, and that she be admonished bv 
the court to refresh from memory. 'Over-ruled,' was all he got. This witness 
proved to be one of the most assured and positive witness the prosecution 
called. She refused to answer questions directly, and made a speech. I w.u 
watching the jury closely and found that they are laughing at her and not with 
her. Among other things she boasted of her especially trained memory,' and 
finally, as a test. Defence Counsel Powers submitted a report of the previous 
day, and asked her to repeat it. She repeated from memory, and gave a very 
different account. 'That’s all’ said Mr. Powers. 

"She told of a mock trial which impeached’ FDR, and upon questioning, 
admitted that it was not treasonable but in 'bad taste.’ Then she heatedly said 
that international bankers and Jews had been denounced at the meetings. 

Prosecution Witness Discredited 

"This prosecution witness was on the stand for most of five days. Defence 
Counsel St. George questioned her on Monday, and when he made little head¬ 
way Lawyer Ennis said: 'Why don't they let her go. She has stood every one of 
us on our heads, and even though we know she is not telling the truth, we can't 
pin her down,’ In the afternoon, Defendant Jones, one of those convicted by 
her testimony in California, began his cross-examination. He is not a lawyer, and 
others begged him not to question her, I reminded him that he stood high in 
favor with the jury, and not to jeopardize that standing. He replied he would 
be careful, So the show was on with our hearts in our mouths. But we didn't 
need to worry, 

Mr. Jones started, quietly. The whole courtroom was very quiet, and we 
were sitting on the edge of our chairs. Mr. Jones finally forced her to admit that 
he had denounced all 'isms’ but Americanism, and admitted reluctantly that she 
could say favorable things about him. 'But you didn’t put those favorable things 
in your written record, did you?' She was silent and the court upheld her. 'Do 
you hold Jews engaged in political or economic pursuits are protected by their 
religion?’ asked Mr. Jones. She hesitated and looked inquiringly at Prosecutor 
Rogge. He blocked an answer by objecting to the question as 'immaterial.' 

2 1 9 

Defense counsel became aroused by the tricky methods exposed, and one lawyer 
who had taken little part in protests voiced his resentment. The judge said 
'Counsel waived cross-examination.' This attorney snapped: 'What has that 
got to do with it—I have risen in the interest of justice.’ The decision was 

"Defendant lones' gallant efforts brought Defence Attorney Sc. George to 
his feet with the declaration: 'Mr. Jones has done more with this recalcitrant 
witness than any lawyer in the courtroom, and I strongly object co the treatment 
he is receiving from prosecution and court.’ Mr. Jones said 'That's all’ when he 
found he could net get out all the truth. There was no doubt the jury was with 

Defense Lawyer Powers questioned an FBI witness who was called Wed¬ 
nesday with regard to search, and asked him whether the accused had broken 
any Federal Law. The reply was that he was looking to see tf they 'intended to.’ 
Mr. Powers then said 'As a lawyer, yourself, don’t you know that there can be 
no search unless there is a charge that the law has been violated?’ The witness 
hesitated and then stated that he though: that was true. ’Then why did you do 
it?' The witness rc-plic-d: 'Because I was told to do so.' When he had finished, 
Mr. Powers warmly congratulated him for his co-operation, which must have 
impressed the jury in that it showed defense attorneys were interested only in 
bringing out the truth. It was a fine piece of strategy. 

New Deal Tries To "Quiet The News” 

"At adjournment time the judge suggested that defence counsel examine 
records Prosecutor Rogge had collected, so they could proceed the next morn- 
ling. One defence attorney rose and said he would consent to no such 
arrangement'; that time after adjournment was his to attend to his own neglected 
business, that he sat four days a week in court without compensation, and he 
was not willing to do more. Other lawyers joined in his protest, whereupon 
the judge plaintively commented: 'I hope one or two will be ready to go ahead 

"An important defence lawyer told us Thursday that Charles MichaeLson 
(jew) of White House and New Deal fame (?), called a conference of news¬ 
paper men during the long court recess and appealed to them not to print any 
more stuff about the trial. All of them in Washington had agreed except Re¬ 
porter Carter Brook Jones of the Washington Star. Mr. Jones is doing an 
excellent job. 

"The 21 st week of trial was begun with a prosecution witness who had 
been with the American Consulate in Stuttgart, Germany, beginning in 1924, 
who was asked to state w'hat he could recall of speeches made by Defendants 
Schwinn and Kunze at a meeting in Germany, which he had reported to his 
superiors. He remembered that they had denounced Communism and Jews; 
that no American had been attacked by name, so far as he could remember, 
except Congressman Schmelka Dickstein. Defendants, their counsel and the 
jury showed amused appreciation of that. The witness seemed to enjoy it too. 

" 'Do you believe the German Foreign Institute was organized on inter¬ 
national lines like the Comintern of the Communists?' The reply was 'No.' 
Defendant Jones asked 'Did you ever hear of a law being violated before it was 
passed?' There was a prompt and amused ’No.’ The jury apparently liked that. 
But the $64 questions were asked by Mr. Frey. Edmondson s attorney, at the 
close of the examination. Witness was shown a diary of Ambassador Dodd 


(from the U. S. to Germany) and asked to read a certain paragraph. Then: 
From that document you will note that Hitler ordered in 1935 the dissolution 
of all Nazi groups in foreign countries. Would you say anything to the con¬ 
trary? The answer was 'I know nothing to the contrary.' Then Mr. Prey con¬ 
tinued, monitored by ray husband: 

'Now, Mr. Teller, you were in Germany during the rise of the Nazi 
regime and during eight years of actual Hitler control of the country. Did 
you ever, in any way at any time, ever hear of any statement or any act which 
would lead you to believe chat the Hitler regime intended to make an attempt 
to overthrow the Government of the U. S. by force and establish a National 
Socialist form of government in this country? The answer was an unhesitating 
round and resonant 'NO.’ And that caused a real sensation, One of the ablest 
defence lawyers came over and whispered to Attorney Frey: 'You deserve a 
'Sieg Heil’ for that.’ And so ended another move designed to make us all 
traitors to the U. S. 


"Three defense attorneys who have been more or less spectators while the 
fight boiled up, have joined the ranks of vigorous defense, and they are rgal 
assets. They have been waiting for nearly five months to see for themselves just 
what the prosecution had to offer, and now, convinced that the set up is vicious, 
are going ‘all out’ for us. 

"Defense Counsel Myers for Defendant Hudson is putting new life into 
the defense, being an exceedingly able lawyer. In an extended address he told 
the court this week that, in his opinion, after long observation and study, he 
did not believe any defendant was guilty of the indictment charges; and that 
is a long way to go for a lawyer who has been as cautions as Mr. Myers. He 
boldly charged that the court was not being fair to defendants in admitting 
certain exhibits in evidence. He was very uncomplimentary to the court. When 
Prosecutor Rogge protested to the judge against the 'rough time’ the defense 
was giving him, Mr. Myers rose and declared: 'Mr. Rogge has not come into 
this court with dean hands, and has no legitimate complaint to make.’ 

"This new defense-vigor had given the 'regulars’ a breathing spell, and 
they deserve it. When a prosecution witness was asked to identify Mr. Myers’ 
client, he, the attorney, directed Defendant Hudson co stand up, saying he was 
proud to have him do so. 

"Mr. E. Hilton Jackson, dignified dean of the lawyers, excoriated Prose¬ 
cutor Rogge for giving out interviews to such communistic publications as ’PM’ 
and the 'New Masses’—which show- Rogge’s real affiliations. After Mr. jack- 
son had spoken denouncing Rogge’s policies, the judge reprimanded Rogge. 
While this reprimand was being delivered, defendants maintained an admirable 
restraint. The marshals of the court and our appointed attorneys often com¬ 
pliment us on good behavior, saying it makes things easier for them. 

"In another argument. Defense Lawyer Gallagher, specialist in Appellate 
and Supreme Court procedure, was interrupted by Rogge with ’Counsel is mis¬ 
quoting the record’—a gratuitous insult. Mr. Gallagher’s voice rose as he 
retorted 'I am quoting from the record, and in all my experience before the courts 
of the District of Columbia I have never had my honor impugned except by Mr. 

2 2 1 

Rogge. I don’t know how matters are handled m other jurisdictions, but we 
don’t do that way in this one. Mr. Gallagher said and sat like Homer s heroes. 
The judge is from another 'jurisdiction.' Some slap-down! 

'From what I have written you will be able to judge of the high character 
of defense counsel. They have to be very able men to, at a moment's notice, take 
up any and every challenge suddenly sprung on them. It makes me dizzy to 
follow maneuvers. They seem grimly determined to see that justice shall prevail, 
realizing that no country tails until its judiciary fails. Almost daily they declare 
that shall not happen it they can prevent it. There can be little doubt that the 

hue of the Nation is bound up in the persecution of this odd assortment of 

defendants, in view of the inescapable fact that day after day new assaults are 
made on the Constitution. 

"After lunch on. Wednesday a former member of the Germin-American 
Bund was put on the stand by the prosecution supposedly to show the connec¬ 
tion of that organization with Nazism. The witness was asked what that organ¬ 
ization's aims were. To fight Communism, defend German-American business¬ 
men against the Jew boycott, and try to spread facts about National Socialism, the surprising reply. Rogge asked the witness if he had ever been con- 

wued of any crime. Defense counsel were on their feet exclaiming over the 
point that Rogge was impcaching his own witness, and declared that they 
would take care of any criminal record. They did! From records furnished by 
the prosecution, defense counsel established the fact that he had served two 
rears for 'imperiling the morals of a minor female child’ and has served for 
indecent exposure’ in the Pennsylvania R. R. Station in N. Y. City. You can 
well imagine the sensation—and disgust. This is an example of the witnesses the 
pioscaition lias pul on the stand—FBI agents, stooges, criminals, ex-convicts, 
prejudiced witnesses, cowed Germans fearing concentration camps, etc. 

' The 23rd week of the trial indicated that even to the lay mind, this farce 
is degenerating: I try to keep notes of important happenings, but sometimes be¬ 
come so absorbed in this tragedy-comedy drama and even burlesque, that I often 
l aid an hour has passed without a line in my diary. Sitting up in front, it is 
fascinating to watch the faces of counsel, both sides. Mr. Gallagher has a habit 
of rubbing his hands and gleefully winking as he stops cross-examination when 
he lias made a telling point, and seems delighted when he has forced the court 
into an absurd ruling, as much so as if he lud been given favorable rulings. 
Defense Attorney Diliing made an objection one day this week and die judge 
said sustained.' Automatically Mr. Diliing replied 'Exception.' and then realized 
tlic court had upheld him. The whole court room began to laugh, 

"During examination of Defendant Stahrenburg, who had circulated some 
anti-war material about six months before Pearl Harbor, by Assistant Prosecutor 
Burns, we began to realize that Burns was breaking down. He made many mis¬ 
takes. blundering and finally turning on defense counsel white with anger, 
mouthing a word we could not hear; but instantly several defense lawyers were 
on their feet protesting that he had used very improper language, demanding 
an apology. Big Defendant Dennis heaved htmseif up and declared: ’Mr. Burns 
distinctly said ’bastard.' After lunch Rogge again took over. 

"Apropos of the open contempt defense counsel are showing, recalls a state¬ 
ment made by a friendly marshal of the court. I remarked on how defendants 
were wandering all over the court, even out into the hall, and how strict the 
marshals were at the beginning. ’You don’t know' what orders we got’ he said. 
'Hold these people down. Ge-r tough! So we thought we had a lot of gangsters 
lo deal with,’ It .speaks well for the conduct of defendants, for the marshals will 
nuw do anything for us within reason, 

2 2 2 

"We went into court Monday fairly walking on air. Judge Etcher had 
been soundly rebuked by the Appelate Court for his sentence of Defense Counsel 
Klein for alleged contempt. Its swift action was almost unprecedented. We 
asked one of the ablest lawyers in court if we were justified in regarding the 
decision portentous, and he replied: '1 know it is. The Washington Bar is 
seething with anger at the procedure in this court.' 

Roosevelt Smear Attacked 

"All day Monday Prosecution's Witness Winter sc heidt was on the stand, 
and admitted that Germany did not want war, but a peaceful understanding 
with France and England; that she had no design on the U. S.; was working for 
white supremacy. None of the statements by this prosecution witness helped 
the indictment charge of seditious conspiracy by defendants. 

"The next witness was a young soldier who had belonged to the Youth 
Movement of the German-American Bund. Under direct examination by the 
prosecution he said the Nazis expected all nations to accept their ideology by 
education. Then the fact was brought out that he had appeared in de-naturaliza¬ 
tion proceedings, and feared concentration camp. He had Our sympathy. From 
testimony of the prosecution’s own witnesses thus far, it is manifest that the 
motivation against us is for our anti-Communism exposures. 

"Defense Attorney Powers, for Defendant Pelley, began an attack On 
President Roosevelt for his current radio broadcast attack on Pelley s Silver 
Shirts, declaring he was trying to influence the jury in the seditious conspiracy- 
case The court ordered him to proceed along different lines. Is the President 
of the United States the only one who has the right of free speech to smear 
these helpless defendants over the air and in the newspapers/' Mr. Powers 
angrily demanded, adding 'If so, the people of this country should know it.’ 
The court upheld Prosecutor Rogge's objection. 

"Then Defense Lawyer John Jackson, Jr., rose and declared heatedly that 
the President’s denunciation of the 'Silver Shirts was an attack on every defend¬ 
ant in this cause. He ridiculed the attack, pointing out that defendants could 
not be faced with their accuser. He cited Supreme Court decisions dismissing 
cases because of such unfavorable newspaper publicity. The judge stopped all 
arguments by announcing he would hand down his decision later. 

"A prosecution witness by the name of Kempner was then put on the 
stand. He was a 'refugee professor’ from Germany. He claims to be an authority 
on political economy. It is almost impossible to understand his broken, curious 
^English. The prosecution built him into the status of an expert. Defendant 
Dennis started the cross-examiation and got Kempner so mad he couldn t speak 
in English. Another witness was put on the stand after recess, evidently to give 
Kempner time to recover composure. Later, the latter was again put on the 
stand, and testified how he had made translation ot Hitler's speeches for the 
U. S.' Government. Dennis’ examination made him incoherent again, and that 
ended Tuesday’s session. 

Prosecution Testimony by Aliens 

"The prosecution next put Herman Rauschning. another refugee from 
Germany, on the witness stand. Defendant Dennis has read and studied mo>i 
of his books on Nazism and political affairs, and he was qualified better than 
any one of the defense attorneys to examine this witness. He and Witness 

2 2 3 

Rauschning enjoyed five hours of academic discussion, the latter testifying that 
Hitler came to power by nomination of Hindenburg and election by the people, 
not by force. 

"Our attorneys tell us that admission of evidence- 'provisionally 1 is a courc 
confession of doubt that such evidence can be proved. And that sort of admission 
continues to be practiced on most of the evidence presented by the prosecution. 
The failure of the prosecution to show incarcerated defendants to be danger¬ 
ous criminals has turned the tide in their favor, and they are being treated more 
as human beings, instead of being brutally handled as before. The real cause 
of the transformation which has taken place, however, is Defendant Elizabeth 
Dilling, who has performed miracles. She has been to Congress about the bad 
treatment given them, has flayed authorities responsible, and has seen to- it that 
they had one decent meal daily. Now, all c-ight of them get all they can eat. 
One of them told me that he had a headache because he had eaten too much. 
'That blessed Elizabeth Dilling feeds us too well at times’ he explained. They 
love her—and should. 

"In the 25th week of the trial defense counsel took over the cross-examina¬ 
tion of Prosecution Witness Rauschning, and developed that his affiliations in 
this country were Jews. Greenburger & Spies were the two lawyers who spon¬ 
sored the entrance into the U. S. of Rauschning; Leon Lewis, of B’nai B'rith, 
with his assistant Joe Roos, came into the picture, as did Zukor, Koepel, and 
Selznick of the movies. Paramount Studios.had Rauschning supervise anti-Nazi 
pictures. Defendant Dilling asked 'Wouldn’t it have been more honorable for 
you to have stayed in Danzig and fought the Nazis? The reply ‘It is more 
healthy to live for a principle than to die for it,' caused a raucus laugh. Even the 
judge smiled. Under questioning by our attorney, Mr. Frey, Rauschning admitted 
that 'a man could be anti-Semitic and yet not be a Nazi.’ Mr. Frey then asked if 
he had ever read the Constitution, and whether the word 'Democracy' was con¬ 
tained in it. The witness admitted that 'Democracy’ was not mentioned; but he 
insisted that we had a democratic way of life. Prosecutor Rogge is having a hard 
tune proving that the government of the United States is a democracy-form. The 
1^28 U. S. Army Training manual says 'The Government of the U. S. is NOT 
a Democracy, but a Republic.' Mr. Frey got across a lot to the jury, and there 
was much smiling at my husband, who sat beside his attorney as mentor. Rogge 
couldn't object to everything, and the lid came off when Defense Counsel Dill¬ 
ing offered 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' for identification. The judge 
upheld objections. 

"The examination of the witness by Mr. Frey was interrupted by recess, 
and Defendant Dennis rushed over to my husband and tried to stop the Jewish 
exposure questions which opened up the real problem. Mr. Dennis was told 
that this subject was the reason we were all in court, and rebuttal was going to 
be pushed to the limit by Defendant Edmondson. 

"Something Smells Bad" 

"Prosecution Witness Kempner was back on the stand at the week-end, and 
when the microphone was put Before him to speak he answered one question 
through the high-geared machine: 'Stink.' Following the most hysterical laugh¬ 
ter, he explained 'It means something smells bad.’ Off we went again—and a 
lawyer behind me remarked 'I'll say it does!' One lawyer protested to the court 
(hat the witness should translate -words as he found them and not the way he 
felt Hitler meant them; but the judge 'over-ruled.' 

2 2 4 

Bv the end of the 26th week almost everyone seemed to be convinced, 
from the testimony, that Kempner and Rauschning were largely responsible for 
the language employed in both the indictment and bill of particulars The 
phraseology was almost identical. It is a terrible thing when two discredited 
refugee aliens can indict patriotic defendants in a document designed to deprive 
them of liberty and citizenship. 

’’Prosecutor Rogge has abandoned the 'Nazi Conspiracy' terms, substituting 
'Nazi Movement,’ supposed to include the world. But not one of the prosecu¬ 
tion witnesses have testified that there was, to employ the language ot the indict¬ 
ment, a 'publicly announced program to destroy democracy everywhere in the 
world and substitute a Nazi form of government in the V. S.' 

"Kempner testified that one proof of Hitler’s treason to the Weimar Repub¬ 
lic was that he ordered the military forces to have no dealings with Marxism or 
a democratic form of government—implying that democracy and 
are one and the same thing. Lawyer after lawyer rose and beseeched the court 
not to try the Nazi regime, saying Rogge had tried seven months to prove a 
world conspiracy, and had failed. 'We now ask the court to direct the prosecution 
to tie defendants into that conspiracy.’ The judge directed Rogge to procee . 
At one time the prosecutor jumped up and whined the defense is trying to 
attack the veracity of our witness.' A young attorney back of me immediately 
rose and said 'that is the object of cross-examinat.on.’ The voice of the judge 
was weak, and he looked badly, but he ordered over-rulings continually. 

"Dunne Defense Attorney Wm. J. Powers’ examination of Kempner he 
brought out the point the latter had been a judge in the Jewish section of Ber¬ 
lin- that out of the 3000 lawyers Kempner said were m Berlin, 200 were Jews 
He’asked the witness if he remembered a celebrated case in Berlin of * Jewish 
gentleman* throwing the hat and overcoat of an American attorney on the floor 
Of a restaurant; th£ when he got out of the hospital the ']tmsh gentleman 
sued the American lawyer, The witness did not recall that case. The American 
lawyer, Mr. Powers stated, was William J. Powers, then General Counsel tor 
General Motors Corp. in Berlin. 

"On Thursday Defense Counsel St. George elicited the point that Kempner 
was born in Poland. 'Was your mother Jewish?’ he asked. 'She was German, he 
replied. 'Was she German-Jewish?’ The reply 'She was German was repeated. 
And the jury began to laugh at the repetition. Kempner was asked it the tact 
that he was a Jew influenced his testimony. He answered No, without denying 
that he was Jewish. He looks and acts like a Jew. 

"The ’evidence’ of Rauschning was admitted 'provisionally over repeated 
objection by defense. At one point, when defense counsel was insisting that 
the prosecution had not proven the indictment charges, Prosecutor Rogge jumped 
to his feet and vehemently declared that the Government believed it had proven 
its case against certain defendants, and was merely awaiting further disclosures to 
see how many others could be tied into the conspiracy to undermine the morale 
of the armed forces. 

"A dozen defense attorneys rose, one saying: We accept Rogge s bluff. 
Let him take the case to the jury right now. We are willing.' But Rogge de¬ 
clared he had said only certain’ defendants, and intended to take his time as to 


"One amusing situation has arisen which may have repercussions later. 
Defendants and defense counsel and members of the jury congregate m a little 
cafe during lunch recess by the court. There they fraternize, sitting together, and 

2 2 5 

the place is a bedlam of laughter and talking. On strict orders I have stayed 
away from the jurors, but on Thursday one of them stopped and showed me a 
Roosevelt button he was wearing upside down, I laughingly remarked that that 
was a signal of distress. This Roosevelt Administration has had the country 
upside down for many years, so I am wearing the button in the proper way.’ 
One of the prosecutor's spies was seen in the cafe writing down names of jurors 
and defendants sitting together. It could cause a mistrial if the prosecution wants 
it chat way. 

"The 27th week of the 'Mess Trial' (new name) ended yesterday with 
the Jewish Refugee Kempner still on the witness stand. Incidentally, history will 
record that not one native-born witness has appeared against us; that the liberty, 
health, happiness and in some cases, the lives of 26 American patriots will de* 
pend on the judging, by the jury, of the alien 'evidence!' Not one scrap of real 
evidence has been thus far introduced in support of this prejudiced indictment. 

"When Defense Attorney Dilling was pressing the witness about his ex¬ 
alted biographies, Rogge intervened and declared the witness was 'too modest’ 
to have furnished much of the material. A derisive hoot went up, and the jury 
grinned. When one lawyer stressed the point that nothing the Kempner witness 
testified to had anything to do with the indictment charge that defendants had 
undermined the morale of the U. S. military forces, Rogge rose and angrily made 
the statement that the charge is disloyalty to a democratic form of government.’ 
Whereupon furore broke out, and one attorney shouted 'Mr. Rogge just isn't 
honest. That is the charge, and he knows it,’ He demanded that the indictment 
be read into the record. The judge denied the motion. He then demanded that 
the record show he took a strong exception to the court's gaveling. This is the 
first time he has reacted in that manner. He as hitherto been most meticulously 
careful in his court demeanor. One thing is sure, the defense is not jittery. The 
defense attorneys know they are on the solid rock of the Constitution. 

Court Conduct Boldly Challenged 

"On Tuesday Mr. Frey, our attorney, took over, and waked up the court¬ 
room, He had pages of questions, carefully prepared by my husband, which 
were all on the subject of Anti-Semitism and Communism. This time he stuck to 
the questions—and they were deadly. He had the courtroom in an uproar, and 
the defense counsel, with few exceptions, backed him. One of them muttering 
'Pour it on, Bert.’ Mr. Frey is popular with the jury, the defendants and their 
counsel. But I sat in a cold chill, for I never knew where his enthusiasm would 
lead him. When Rogge objected frequently, Mr. Frey heatedly ejaculated: 'Now, 
Your Honor, I have a right to ask those questions about the Jewish Problem. 
Defendants didn’t bring up that subject—the prosecution did. Mr. Rogge objects 
to my right to ask these questions and Your Honor sits up there and sustains 

"I groaned 'Lord, thats done it.' But the judge, who also seems to like Mr. 
Frey, Calmly said: 'Mr. Frey, do you wish co withdraw that remark about the 
court?' Mr. Frey explained that he really had not meant contempt of court, but 
that he was very tired of Rogge’s continual objections and of being over-ruled. 
The matter passed off that way, but the courtroom and the jury apparently 
thought Mr. Frey was going to be 'cracked down.' It seemed to us a narrow 
escape. We begged him to be more careful. To the question as to whether or 
not a patriotic American could be anti-Communist and anti-Semitic without 
being a Nazi, Witness Kempner replied 'Yes' before Rogge could object. 

"Then Prosecutor Rogge rose and declared in a rage that defendants used 

2 2 6 

the term 'patriotic' for -fascist.' There was a mighty protest to that, and he court 
'truck the remark from the record. Everybody's radiator boded over with plenty 
of steam. I suspicion Rogge knows he is losing. He blew up completely when 
Mr Frey, talking loudly and rapidly brought out rhe point that Rogge has sa 
on the same platform with Communist Leader EarlBrowder in a Red Front 
meeting in New York. ML Frey was closer to the jury than Rogge, and they 
heard it, and were laughing. 

'Defense attorney St. George rose and said that the subversive forces m 
this country were doing exactly what they were trying to convict us of doing 
I wish you could have seen the delighted grins and expressions of approval 
from defendants. Although the Jewish Question is the heart or this prosecution, 
the efforts made to suppress it cannot fad to be evaluated by the jury. 

"When a Catholic attorney asked Witness Kcmpner about freedom of re¬ 
ligion in the Reich and Russia, (he latter admitted that no religion was permitted 
m the Soviet; that there was in the Reich, but that priests and ministers were 
not free. 'Did not the Nazis profess Jesus Christ, Savior or Mankind, asked this 
lawyer, crossing himself and bowing at the words Jesus Christ. Twice he 
pressed the question, making the same gesture; and finally Kempner fa e blood- 
suffused, shouted: 'No. they said he was a Jew. The attorney .should- hen have 
asked: Did not the Jews themselves renounce and crucify Christ. But that point 
was lost. It was very moving, emotionally. 

A Wrong Search and Seizure Exposed 

"Kempner admitted that the Jewish Question was a world-wide problem: 
that it was purely political; that the trouble in Germany was first made b> 
riots and power-grabbing of Communists; and then control was brought about 

by the Nazis. 

"We were much pleased in the 28 th week of the battle, to find that de¬ 
fense attorneys, almost solidly anti-New Deal, were even more aggressive and 
pitched into the prosecution with renewed vigor, notwithstanding Roosevelt was 
re-elected. I was much intrigued also to find that members of the jury were just 
as friendly as ever, if not more so. The continual introduction mto the trial Oi 
Anti-Semitism and Anti-Communism has evidently had an enlightening effect. 

"On Monday the search and seizure of our papers on July 24 1942, in 
California, came up for hearing, and lasted until Thursday. Details of the arrest 
were thoroughly aired. The facts are: While I was saying 'goodnight to neigh¬ 
bors who had been enoying a cool evening ride with us in our car, I saw my 
husband walk back to another car parked in our roadway. I went to find ou 
what it was about, and my husband told me he was under arrest on a charge 0 
seditious conspiracy. The announcement shocked and stunned me so much that 
I turned and went into our home. I saw my husband put the car m the garage, 
and the men then came into the house, Deputy Marshall first, my husband sec¬ 
ond, the Other deputy last, the correct order after arrest. 

"I regained some composure by that time, and we talked for about 1 s 
minutes. Since it was too late to get bail, I was told where to bring it at Sacra¬ 
mento next day. Then the Deputy Marshal said: 'I shall have to search your 
quarters.' Since arrest had already been made there was no resistance. l-pon 
demand for correspondence files, my husband turned them over. They then 
returned to the living room from my husband s bedroom and, despite \chcnx-nt 
protests from me, literally stripped my personal desk. They took intimate letters 
among them one my mother wrote just before her death. 

"They started for the Sacramento jail about 10:30 P.M. The next dav, 
Saturday, J reached the marshal's office as soon as I could and posted $5000 
bail. We returned home. I was so ill that my physician kept me under opiates 
for three days. 

"In the courtroom the marshal testified that h,e did not make the arrest in 
the driveway, but in the house, which was a lie. He said he was ’invited’ into 
the house, another lie. He asserted that the car was not put away before enter¬ 
ing the house, but afterwards, He said he read the arrest warrant in the house, 
whereas there was no arrest-warrant nor search warrant. The truth is that he 
showed a telegram calling for the arrest. Both deputies admitted that they had 
no search warrant. The marshal said he had an arrest-warrant issued, returned 
July 24. We were able to prove in court that the arrest-warrant was produced 
a: removal hearings on Oct. 5, 1942, and that it was dated July 31. So, accord¬ 
ing to that statement, it was impossible for him to have served such arrest- 
warrant July 24. He used the telegram as authority for the search, according to 

his testimony. 


"The testimony was before the jury, and our attorney, Mr. Frey, exposed 
the marshal as a liar when his assistant deputy took the" stand. The assistant 
testified that the car had been garaged, as stated by me, before they had entered 
the house. When the marshal was returned to the witness stand, he changed 
his testimony, and said he 'thought' the car had been put away after entry. The 
effect on the jury and other defense attorneys was unmistakable. 

"The marshal explained his search of my desk on the ground that I told 
him my husband used the desk at times, when the truth was—and I testified to 
if—he was told that 1 alone used said desk. They both admitted that I protested 
strongly, and that my husband also protested. 

Arrest Deputy "Takes a Walk" 

One defense attorney asked the Marshal if he had a certified copy of the 
arrest warrant. He said 'No.' To be legal a warrant for search must be certified. 
He said the defendant 'just handed' to him all material taken from the latter's 
room. 'How- many pieces of material were taken?' he was asked. 'From two to 
three thousand,' he answered, The attorney paused and smiled. He counted the 
pieces taken. They numbered 18. He then added sarcastically that to get 18 
pieces out of two or three thousand was nothing short of amazing. 

"On Wednesday the assistant deputy was sitting outside the courtroom 
in the outer hall. When one of the court attendants told him how things were 
going, he grabbed his hat and left saying 'This is no place for me. I doiVt want 
to go back on that stand. And that was that! Decision was reserved. 

"During the defense arguments one attorney was ruled as 'out of order’ by 
the court, whereupon his voice in a shout declared: 'I have been practicing law 
in Washington for 35 years, to find that I don’t know anything about law.' The 
court said: 'Mr. Bilbrey, you are out of professional "bounds.’ Mr. Biibrey 
snapped: I don t know whether there are any professional bounds in this court. 
I am held not to know the difference between argument and objection, and I 
ask that 1 be dismissed from this case.’ The judge said ’Motion denied.’ Defence 
Counsel Powers, after bc-ing gaveied down, shouted: '1 object and protest 
agarnst this gaveling. There seems to be perjury in tins court, and something 
ought to be done about it.' Ail he got was ’Motion denied.' b 

2 2 8 

'‘Henry D. Allen was put on the witness stand by the prosecution. Mr. Allen 
testified about a meeting between Defendant Winrod and Bund Leader Kuhn 
with the idea of co-operation, but each wanted to do things their Own way, and 
the conference ended unpleasantly. So much for conspiracy. 

"The 29th week of the ordeal proved to be important and impressive. The 
dam broke. Informed defence attorneys directed the flood of damaging testimony 
to where it would do the most good. The violent objections of Rogge were 
swept away by the force of the torrent. liven the judge failed to sustain him at 
certain points. 

"There can now be no doubt in the minds of che jury that Communism is 
Jewish-directed and financed. Prosecution Witness Alien gave measured damn¬ 
ing testimony calmly and dearly, and when he broke down later and wept over 
his injured son, the stark truth burst out and the effect was overwhelming!. 

"Despite Prosecutor Rogge’s efforts, the testimony of Witness Allen was 
very favorable to the defendants. He said not one defendant, to his persona! 
knowledge, had any idea of destroying our republican form of government, but 
all were struggling to protect it. The battle was fascinating. Rogge lost! 

No "Seditious Conspiracy" Testimony 

"When -queried as to his experience in regard to co-operation among the 
defendants he visited, Witness Allen said 'there wasn't any.’ Outside of the 
fact that they were all exposing Jewish Communism, they agreed on nothing; 
everyone insisted on proceeding in his own way. Seditious conspiracyr 1 

"Almost two hours were taken in arguing against the admission of De¬ 
fendant Deatherage’s material, many defence counsel declaring that most of the 
matter was regarding the ages-old Jewish Question; but the judge finally ad¬ 
mitted it 'provisionally.’ 

"The prosecution had been trying to show' up Henry Hamilton Beamish, 
member of a prominent English family who was imprisoned under the in¬ 
famous 18-B Act of Great Britain, as a great villain; but the laugh is on Pro¬ 
secutor Rogge because Beamish was unconditionally released in July, 1943, 
with no stigma of crime. One defence counsel referred to Beamish as a patriot; 
so you can see we have sold them on our truthful reporting. 

"Defence Counsel Wm. j. Powers, who is a joy to us, rose one day and 
declared he did not join in the protest against the length of the trial, for he 
finds the Washington climate agreed with him, has opened a branch office 
here, has brought on a large part of his law library and is beginning to speak 
with a southern drawl. That is but one incident showing that many attorneys, 
though daily losing monc-y, have by no means lost their sense of humor. Mr. 
Powers is a walking dictionary on constitutional law—and he loses no oppor¬ 
tunity to 'throw chat book' at the prosecution. 

"Mr. Powers asked Witness Allen how much he was being paid to testify. 
Mr. Allen answered $4.50 per day. Mr. Powers remarked that that did not seem 
fair, for Witness Kempner said he got $25 a day plus expenses; but then he 
added meditatively 'Refugee Kempner came at a great sacrifice since he stated 
on the stand that his consultation fees were $75.’ 

"Prosecutor Rogge jumped to his feet and angrily protested, saying Mr. 
Powers was 'trying to make a hostile witness more hostile.’ At that Witness 

2 2 9 

Alien reijuesiL-J the court to grant him permission to make a statement, which 
was denied. Upon Mr. Powers’ insistence Mr. Allen was finally permitted to 
say that he was here to tell the truth, and that was what he had been doing; 
that he resented the prosecution's charge chat he was hostile. 

Courtroom Electrified by Witness 

"It was on Wednesday when Witness Allen electrified the courtroom. 
Defence counsel St. George asked the witness if he had ever been personally 
injured in riots precipitated on the West Coast during his anti-Connmunist 
meetings. He recounted a terrible beating to which he and his son had been 
subjected. He himself was in the hospital for a week. He said he knew his son 
was in the same hospital, but had not been informed as to the latter's injuries 
until his release. Then' he testified, 'I found out that besides being beaten into 
insensibility there had been a rupture of my son's ... 'at this point he broke 
down and'sobbed. Instantly a heart-rending cry of ‘O, Daddy' came from the 
other side of the courtroom, and his youngest daughter rushed over to him 
threw her arms around him, put her head down on his shoulder and wept with 
him. Then his wife and other daughter came to the witness chair. 

"We were all frozen in our seats, and there wasn't a dry eye in the jury, 
among defendants and defence attorneys. One of our counsel asked the judge 
for a recess to permit the witness to recover. This was granted, and we all left 
the room emotionally moved to the depths. Evidence of shock and pity was on 
the faces of jurors, as I looked at them with my own eyes swimming in tears. 

"The last three benches on the left side of the courtroom had been filled 
with Jews. When we returned to the courtroom after recess, no Jews were 
seen. They fear emotion because it develops violence at times. 

"Returned to the witness stand Mr. Allen stated that the left eyeball of 
his son had been gouged and ruptured so badly that it had to be removed and 
he is now wearing a glass eye. After trying to enlist for combat duty he was now 
helping to train flyers in a mid-west training camp, 

"Can vou imagine what a scene like that has done to the cause of the 
persecutors? Especially as Mr. Allen had been summoned as their own witness 
Later Defence Attorney Jackson Sr. said to me: 'Rogge is dead. He doesn't 
know it yet. All chat remains is to bury him and deliver the funeral oration, and 
I would like to do it.’ 

"Later, when we personally expressed sympathy and horror to Mrs. Allen, 
she told me that they expected more trouble because of what Mr. Allen had 
said on the stand. ‘But’ she said 'We are determined to go through with it.’ Mr. 
Allen goes back on the stand next Monday. One of the defence attorneys was 
talking with one of the jurors, and 'wondered' how the jury was ’taking' some 
of Allen’s testimony. 'What are YOU worrying about ? 1 the juror remarked. 'He's 
YOUR witness, isn’t he?’ How’s that? 

"Here is the 30th week of the Rogge prosecution. Contrary to proper pro¬ 
cedure, he is presenting much new material largely from testimony before two 
Grandjuries, given by Witness Allen; but thus far Mr. Allen has been able to 
justify himself. The most cautious and dignified defence lawyers are now show¬ 
ing their contempt of the court. The looks of disgust on their faces, shaking 
of hands between them, after adverse rulings by the judge, cannot fail to have 
an effect on the jury. 

2 3 0 

No Undermining of Soldier Monde 

"Mr. Allen testified without reservation that not one defendant he knew in 
the anti-Communist crusade ever had any idea of trying to corrupt the morale 
of the military forces; to the contrary, they wanted a strong army and navy to 
protect the United States from a communist take-over of the Nation. Mr. Allen 
also testified that the jew lawyer with the military commission who ejected 
him from his California home, told him that he was 'a Jew-baiter and a Nazi.' 

"Mr. Allen testified that Elizabeth Dilling’s 'Red Network’ had been used 
as a text book by the famous ’Red Squad' of Los Angeles which had done im¬ 
portant work in breaking up subversive Communist meetings until it was sup¬ 
pressed. Thousands rioted, he said, and the frenzied 'Jewish faces' screamed in 
a terrifying manner. He identified pictures of the worst disturbances. 

"Rogge objections sustained by the court were apparently so unfair and 
without legal basis that Defence Lawyer John Jackson, a meticulously correct 
attorney, moved for a mis-trial on the grounds that defendants were being 
denied due process of law. Other defence attorneys supported him. Defence 
Lawyer Powers declared 'the wholesale denial of due process rights is so gross 
that I join in Mr. Jackson's motion.' It was denied. 

"Our attorney, Mr. Frey, offered the Bible for identification, was opposed 
by Rogge, and was sustained by the court. Defence Attorney St. George called 
all defense counsel to leave the courtroom in protest against railroading oi 
defendants. One lawyer said 'the court can put us in jail for that.’ Mr. St. 
George declared that he was willing to go. to jail if he could protect these in¬ 
nocent defendants’ from being denied their constitutional rights! This reflects 
the righteous wrath of members of the Bar regarding the disgraceful procedure' 
in this 'mess trial.’ 

"Witness Allen ended his court ordeal on Monday, and emerged victor. 
Mr. Allen testified again that all defendants he knew worked separately except 
'for the good of the cause.’ Rogge would not permit him to say what that com¬ 
mon cause was. But the question was later answered on cross-examination. The 
repiy was 'to rid the United States of Jewish Communism.’ 

"Mr. Allen circumvented che prosecution when Rogge handed to him 
copies of his Dies Committee testimony and that before two Grand Juries, 
asking if it was true. Mr. Alien replied: 'I may have said chat then when I was 
under great pressure and duress. I had been threatened and intimidated. But 
what I am now testifying to is the truth and nothing but the truth. - 

Prosecutor Rogge Gets a Shock 

"Prosecutor Rogge would stand and stare at him, then turn away, and 
produce another document, with the same result. The witness repudiated much 
previous testimony. There was no doubt in the minds of many listeners that he 
was really telling the whole truth at this time. Evidently, Rogge could do 
nothing about it. He was completely baffled. He did not dare try to impeach 
Mr. Allen, who had so obviously won the sympathies of the jury. Mr. Allen 
told us later that he had seen his chance to ’right some wrongs,' and help the 
defense at the same time; that he decided to do so regardless of consequences. 

"On Monday the Deatherage exhibits were turned over to the jury. They 
took their time. Tuesday’s session was a weird one. Silence all day except for 
announced recesses. Defendants wandered in and out of the courtroom at will. 
On Wednesday the jury was still absorbed in the exhibits. The judge swiveled 

2 3 1 



around in his chair at times, held his arms over his head, from time to time 
mopping his face—yet it was too cool in the courtroom for many of us. In 
response to an inquiring gesture. I saw his personal secretary form her lips to 
the word 'sick.' But the judge stayed in the courtroom. Finally the jury 
concluded their exhaustive examination of the 'evidence • against Defendant 

The following speaks for itself: 


By Ellis 0. Jones, 1944 Mass-Case Defendant 
(Copyright, 1951) 

Mr Worm: 
The Court: 
Mr. Worm; 
The Court: 

Your Honor, there’s a question— 
Overruled 1 . 

May I offer a suggestion? 


If you don't be very quiet. 

It's contempt oc very nigh it 

For incitement unto not. 


Mr. Small: 
The Court: 
Mr. Small: 
The Court:- 

Now, Your Honor, my objection— 

Just a trifling correction— 


As to all you other sitters 

I will fine die first that tirters. 

For today I've got the jitters. 

Mr. Meek 
The Court 
Mr. Meek 
The Court 

Please the court, I’ve go; a notion— 

That I'd like to make a motion. 

If vou dare to sneeze or cough or 
Make an offer of a proffer, 

I will jail you as a scottc-r. 


Mr. Weak 
The Court 
Mr. Weak 
The Court 

Please Your Honor, may I mention— 

But Your Honor, our contention— 

At a sign of independence 

On behalf of the defendants 

I will summon the attendants. 

Mr. Fogg 
The Court 
Mr. Fogg 
The Court 

As to this new situation— 


May T hand you a citation? 


There’s a certain individual 

By the name of Fanny Biddle 

Says to grill you on the griddle 

Mr. Hazy 
The Court 
Mr. Hazy 
The Court 

Now this latest court decision— 

: Overruled! 

: Puts the whole case in derision. 

; Overruled 

Never mind. My ruling newish 

And mv whole demeanor 
Are because you're anti-Jewish. 

2 3 2 

Mr, Tyro: 
The Court: 
Mr. Tyro: 
The Court: 

Please the Court, I'd like a hearing— 

But this poini requires clearing. 

There is nothing to unravel. 

It you don': shut up your cavil, 
l will smack you with the gave!. 

Mr. Rogge: 
The Court: 
Mr. Rogge: 
The Court: 

Speaking for the prosecution— 
It's sustained, 

M’c believe the best solution— 

■ It's sustained. 

State your motion, Mr. Rogge. 
Be it sound or be it soggy. 

Be it clear or be it foggy, 

It's sustained. 


"At 10 A.M. on Thursday our Defence Counsel Mr. Frey telephoned us 
reporting the death of Chief Justice Either, and said we need not go to court. 
As though I would miss that session. The first comment by my husband was 
'God has taken a hand in this battle.’ As we stepped off the street car going to 
court we met one of the defence attorneys, who quoted 'De Alortuis ml nisi 
bonum.' We assured him that we did not need his warning. 'Well' he remarked, 
'We can shake hands about it anvwav.' 

"The court was opened by Justice Proctor in a very subdued atmosphere. 
The defendants had grim faces. Justice Proctor officially announced the death, 
and set the following Thursday. Dec. 7, for further action. When the short 
session ended, defendants and their counsel met immediately in a long strictly 
private conference. It was decided that the next move would be left to the 
prosecution; that the defence would take no action until after next Thursday's 
session of the court, 

"One thing seems certain, no other judge in the District of Columbia will 
take the case again. An outsider would have to be called, and he might be as 
bad, or umrse, than Judge Eicher. 

"New York's 'uptown edition of the communist Daily Worker.' PM, pub¬ 
lished a paragraph complimentary to defendants, to wit: 

" The air of the courtroom appeared one of sincere mourning for the late 
Chief Justice. If any of the defendants felt relief at the chance they would get 
a mis-trial, their faces didn't show it.' 

"Much credit is due these harrassed, weary and persecuted defendants to 
have a report made about them by such a notorious smear-sheet. That our con¬ 
duct was eminently correct is completely vindicated by this publication. Any 
'disorder' which may have occurred in the past was due to wild-man Rogge and 
his outrageous attempts to undermine the Constitution. 

"A friendly newspaperman told my husband of an 'off the record' inter¬ 
view he had just had with Rogge, who, he said, is 'mad as hell over Either'* 
death,' charging that the defence had ’killed the judged Rogge is reported as 
trying to impound the trial records, so defence counsel can't use them. He has 
declared the case is not going to be dropped. One defence attorney asked ;nv 
husband .if lie thought the case would be dropped. He replied not now. I know 
my Jews,’ The attorney commented 'I believe you are right.' 

2 3 3 

l 'We feel sort of dazed over this interposition of Providence. We had 
braced ourselves for continued resistance and fight. Now, the necessity for 
'forward march’ has been removed. We seem to be temporarily off balance. 

"One of the most prominent of our defence lawyers said to me: '1 just 
would not have believed if my best friend had told me of the preposterous 
things which happened at the mistrial. I could not have imagined how such 
judicial procedure could take place. But I saw and heard with my own eyes 
and ears this dreadful perversion of justice.’ He also told me of relays of 
Washington lawyers who had from time to time attended the Eicher court 
sessions, and were as convinced as he was. 

"The 32nd week of the Roosevelt Administration mass-persecution finally 
halted officially Dec. 7, 1944. Defendants and counsel sac in solemn silence 
awaiting the appearance of Justice Proctor in the courtroom at Washington, 
There was no exultation visible, for we had not achieved our objective of com¬ 
plete legal vindication. Nevertheless, all the plot-attacks against us thus far have 
been ’licked.’ Proceedings were conducted on strict lines. The marshal in charge 
announced that there was to be no whispering; doors were to be locked; no 
one could leave the room until the judge had delivered his pronouncements; no 
one was to stand up, and any demonstration would not be permitted. 

Court Declares "Mis-trial” 

"Justice Proctor used no voice amplifier, but the room was deathly still. 
And we heard his voice distinctly. He had no authority to dismiss the case, and 
was acting today in accord with a banc of justices who, last week, sat in 

"A transcript of what Justice Proctor said, taken by my husband in short¬ 
hand, is very interesting. I think it is the only shorthand report made of that 
address. Justice Proctor said trial could not continue unless all defendants agreed 
to do so under another judge, and that a roll call would then be taken to learn 
their decisions. In a way we felt sad when voice after voice recorded a firm 
’NO,’ for we all felt we were saying farewell to a jury that was with us heart 
and soul, and we did not know what the future held for us in that respect. 

"After almost every defendant had voted against continuance, Justice 
Proctor announced a mis-trial and discontinuance of the case. He then thanked 
and dismissed the jury, directing them to leave the courthouse immediately, 
asking them not to talk to anyone as to their opinions. Our counsel said that was 
an unusual procedure, for juries have a right to say all they wish after a case 
has been discontinued. They believed the judge had yielded to a request from 
the prosecution, which knew the jury would want to shake hands with us, and 
might have talked. As we left the courtroom a rumor spread that one juror had 
told a criminal court justice that the jury would have handed in a 'Not Guilty’ 
verdict for all defendants in fifteen minutes. I can believe that. 

"Justice Proctor delivered high praise of all defence counsel, saying they 
had upheld ’the highest traditions of the legal profession,’ and that the public 
owed them a great debt of gratitude. Note that these are the men whom Rogge 
accused of having 'killed the judge.’ We defendants were indeed happy to 
hear this laudation go into the record. But it would be almost impossible to 
recompense defence attorneys for their services and huge financial loss over the 
period of 7y 2 months of devotion to the Constitution. 

"This ending has been a body blow to the Department of 'Injustice/ 
What the prosecution will do in the future, is not known. This enemy of ours 

2 34 

IS endowed with 'imphuable hatred of all mankind,' to use the words ol His¬ 
torian Gibbon in ht.s ’Decline and ball of the Roman Empire. We are stdl held 
under bail. 

"It remains to be seen whether addenda will be written. While we did not 
win the official 'Not Guilty' for which we fought; still, a great victory has 
reallv been had by us--as well as a defeat for the Jew-Communist enemy al¬ 
most as great as that which my husband won in New 'iork, when Jews, afraid 
to face truth, retreated and begged the court by a roundabout amicus curaie 
petition to dismiss the group libel charges against him as without warrant in 
law,’ in furtherance- of justice,' in the public good’ and as 'a violation ot the 
free press guarantee of the U. S. Constitution'—which rock fell upon and broke 
flit back of the mass-case indictment in Washington, thanks to a magnificent 
defence by 'the immortal twenty’ lawyers who went ’all out' for justice." 

The following diary of January 21, 194% written at our California home, 
reported ending Washington incidentals overlooked previously: 

"The fine record we had all made with the correspondents of the great 
press services toward the end was a real reward, although they were not allowed 
to print the proceedings as they saw them; but they showed their sympathy and 

"Ann Hicks, of the United Press, asked me, after the mis-trial was de¬ 
clared: 'How do you feel about this, Mrs. Edmondson?’ 

"I replied that my husband and I were very sorry to have it end as it did, 
that we were well satisfied with the way things were going, and that every day 
was proving our innocence. 

"She gravely said she thought that that was the way we felt. 

"Dr. Frank Kingdon, himself a radical, who daily reported the trial on the 
air, was finally barred from mentioning it because, it was said, his reports were 
too favorable to defendants. 

''Our victorv—and it was a victory—was gained on the prosecution’s own 
time. The defence did not have to prove innocence by rebuttal. We were forced 
to accept the gage thrown down by the prosecution and we defeated him on his 
own battle ground. 

"When we started for Washington last March I told my husband that we 
would have to have miracles if we were not to be imprisoned.. We got miracles— 
for they were beyond human management. 

"Without vanity but with humility I make the statement that the defence 
lawyers learned to respect and defer to my husband's wise and relevant sug¬ 
gestions, and treated him with real affection. Defence attorneys Gallagher, 
Powers, Grant and St. George, rose personally to his defence, explaining that 
they were not speaking for their clients but "for Mr. Edmondson." Mr. Kelly, 
former Assistant Prosecuting Attorney for the District of Columbia, voluntarily 
pffered his services—'anything I can do for you, Mr. Edmondson, let me 
know.’ We sold our innocence—and our Cause—to these keen courageous men, 
all but three of whom were unpaid. 

"Mr. George E. Sullivan, prominent Washington attorney, counsel for the 
American Coalition of Patriotic Societies, had offered to appear as a character 
witness for my husband, as well as an authority on Jewish Communist sub¬ 
versions. He shook hands with us warmly, and said to me. I have heard the 

2 3 5 

finest reports of the dignified conduct and courage of you and your husband 
and of the highly intelligent manner in which he directed his defence. You both 
played a large part in maintaining the high morale of defendants and in con¬ 
vincing counsel of Mr. Edmondson’s innocence. I cannot express myself too 
strongly in this commendation.' That is something of which to be proud. 

"We met the enemy in New York City and Washington—and defeated 
him. He may try again! Maybe not!” 

The prosecution in the seditious conspiracy case indicated that defendant's thesis 
that "Communism is Jewish" is false. In rebuttal Defendant Edmondson prepared as 
below a double-column comparison court "exhibit" documented. 


Objectives and Strategy 
World Dictatorship Political- Economic 

"Father of Modern Communism" Karl 

Communism is International. 
Communism is anti-national. 

Communism wars on Fascism. "The es¬ 
sence of Fascism is Nationalism, while- that 
of Bolshevism is Internationalism."—"Ger¬ 
many and England" by N. H. Webster. 

Communism denounces anti-Semitism; 
Communist Russia has outlawed it. 

Communists are parasitic, unable to live 
outside well-to-do nations. 

Communism is a materialistic doctrine. 

Communism is ALIEN to national des¬ 

Communists are a noisy minority in all 

Communism srands for racial equality. 

Objective and Strategy 

World Dominion via "Chosen People" 

Karl Marx was son of a Jewish Rabbi. 
"Stranger Than Fiction," by Rabbi Lewis 
Browne, says "Jewish histones rarely men¬ 
tion the name of Karl Marx, though in his 
life and spirit he was far truer to the Mis¬ 
sion of Isrjel than most of those who arc 
forever talking of it. His book. "Capital" 
.is called the Bible of the Socialist move¬ 

Jewry is International. 

Jewish Internationalism is anti-nariona!. 
'Modern' Nationalism . . is our CHIEF 

ENEMY." — Race-Nation-Rehgion" by 
Rabbi Sol. B. Freehof. "Nationalism is a 
danger for the Jewish People." — Chicago 
Jewish Sentinel. Sep. 23. 1936. "Jews are 
tine only cosmopolitan people, and in this 
capacity are acting as a SOLVENT of 
H.tliorui differences" — London Jewish 
World, Feb. 9-16. 1883. 

jews continually attack Fascism. 

jews wage war continually on anti-Sem¬ 
itism everywhere. "Anti-Semitism is the 
antagonistic attitude produced in the non- 
Jew BY the Jewish group." — Jewish 
Scientist Albert Einstein. Collier s Weekly. 
Nov. 26. 1938. "Tire general causes of anti- 
Semitism have always resided in Israel 
itself." — Jewish Author Bernard Lazure. 
"The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews 
live in perceptible numbers ... it is a 
world political question."—Jewish Leader 
Theodor HerzI. 

History shows that Jews are notoriously 
parasitic, and unable to run a nation of 
their own. 

Jews are notorously materialistic. 

"The jew is the perpetual alien."—From 
Organized Anti-Semitism in the U. S.. by 
Donald Strong, 19dl. "Jews are everywhere 
to a large extent, ALIENS. 1 — "You Gen¬ 
tiles" by Maurice Samuel. 

Jews are a noisy minority in all nations. 

Jewish leaders constantly call for racial 

2 3 7 

Ci i in i'll ti ms ill promotes civil war by gen¬ 
era; 'trikes, mo and sabotage. 

Communism regiments the masses. 

Communists promote pacifism to get 

Communists refuse to amalgamate with 
other political parties, boring in to destroy 
them, as w itness the CIO Political Action 
Committee sabotage of Democratic' Party. 

Communist propaganda is worldwide. 

Communist avenues to political power 
lie through Dc-mncrucy and Socialism. 

Communistic avenue to economic power 
is via stare capitalism. 

'Ve jews are a; the bottom of nearly all 
your wars " — Rumanian Jew Marcus Hli 
Ravage in Century Magazine, Jan.-Feb.. 
1928. "The war now proposed is for the 
purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony 
throughout the world."—Gen. George van 
Horn Moseley, USA retired, N. Y. Herald- 
Tnbunc, Mur. 29. 1959. "Zionists helped 
to bring America into the war (World War 
No. i)"—London Jewish Chronicle, Fob. 

U 1956. "The 2nd' World War is being 
fmiuht iit defence of the fundamental of 
Judaism."—Chicago Jewish Sentinel, Oct. 

8. 1942. 

Jewry is the greatest regimented "soli¬ 
darity' 'in the world. 

Jews are notorious pacifists, in theory, 

"Assimilation is impossible." — From 
"Israel" by Jewish Author Ludwig Lewi- 
sohn. "We Jews are a distinct nationality." 
—From "Jewish Problem" by Jewish Jus¬ 
tice Louis D. Brandeis. Samuel L Rosen- 
man, "Roosevelt's Right Arm," was quoted 
in N. Y. Times Feb. 1, 193-6, as "sharply 
attacking assimilation of Jews" into the 
nations wherein they live. 

Jewish internationalism propaganda is 
worldwide. "The propaganda of Commu¬ 
nism throughout the world, in organization 
and direction, is in the hands of Jewish 
agents.” — From "The Jews" (1924) by 
Hiliare Belloc. 

Jewish "avenues to political power" are 
through promotion of democracy. Socialism 
and Communism. "There is only one way 
by which the American people can escape 
Communism and Fascism and that is by 
establishing A THOROUGHLY SOCIAL¬ 
IZED DEMOCRACY."—Central Confer¬ 
ence of American Rabbis, N. Y. Times, Sep. 
13, 19?6. "If the Jew wishes to survive he 
must identify himself with Communism," 
— Jewish Author Michael Alper in Rabbi 
Wise’s magazine "Opinion" of November, 
1934. "The undeniable problem of the Jew 
can only be solved in a Socialist society." 
Jewish Author Broady in the communistic 
"New Masses," May 12, 1936. "It is they 
(Jews) who are the creators of Democracy, 
Socialism and Communism."—Jewish Poet 
Bailik in "Lines of Communication" of 
Palestine, July, 1933. 

"Jew's made an art of lending money; 
they fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in 
money; they became Lords of Money and 
Lords of the World.”—From Jews & Mod¬ 
ern Capitalism by Werner Sombart. "By- 
bolding gold they (Jews) became masters 
of their masters."—From "Anti-Semitism" 
by Jewish Author Bernard Lazare. "The 
sole aim of these international (Jewish) 
financiers is world control through the cre¬ 
ation of inextinguishable debt." — British 
Economist Arthur Kitson, in "National Re¬ 
view" of London, March, 1925. "The Jew 

2 3 S 

evolved urbanized capitalism v. 1 c1 1 iin¬ 
strumentality the 'banking system."—Ameri¬ 
can Hebrew, Sep. 10, 1920. "Anti-Jewish 
discrimination in the countries surveyed 
by Dr. Lvovich. Officer of the International 
ORT, N. Y. Times, June 26, 1938. 

Communism rules by fear and terrorism. For the first time in U. S. history citizens 

feared their national New Deal administra¬ 
tion, commonly called "The Jew Deal." 

Communist attack-strategy is smear-as¬ 
sociation and "proof" by inference and im¬ 
putation, concealing subversive activities of 
itself by accusing the opposition of trying 
to accomplish what it itself is actually 

Communism is Bolshevism — Russia is 

Communist revolutionaries captured Hun¬ 
gary, Rumania, Czecho-Stovakia and almost 
won in Spain. 

Communism backs the New Deal in U.S. 
"The Communist movement in the U.S. is 
an alien conspiracy."—Dec. 29, 193d. re¬ 
port to Congress by American Coalition of 
Patriotic Societies. 

The policy of Jewish-owned and Jewish 
advertising-controlled publications follow 
the same "line." 

"The Ideals of Bolshevism are at many 
points consonant with the finest ideals of 
Judaism."—London Jewish Chronicle, Apr. 
4, 1919. "It was a Jew. Leon Trotsky, who 
led the Red Army which saved the Com¬ 
munist Cause in Russia." — From "How 
Odd Of God" by Rabbi Lewis Browne. In 
his 1918 book "Jews In Russia." Victor 
Marsden, London Correspondent in Russia, 
said of 545 Bolshevist officials 477 were 
Jews. "Bolshevisirh is organized and con¬ 
trolled by Jews."—Netherlands Minister to 
Russia, Sept. 6, 19LS, reproduced in British 
Govt. White Paper on Russia in 1919. 
"What Jewish Idealism so powerfully con¬ 
tributed to accomplish in Russia, the same 
historic qualities of the Jewish mind are 
tending to promote in OTHER COUN¬ 
TRIES."—American Hebrew, Sep. 10, 1920, 

Communist revolutionaries were led in 
Hungary and Spain by the Jew Bela Kuhn; 
and by the Jew Socialist Leon Blum in 
France, in Rumania by Jewish Anna Pauker. 

"The underlying philosophy of the New 
Deal is the philosophy of Justice Brandeis 
of the U. S. Supreme Court."—N.Y. Times, 
Tune 26, 1934. "More than any one person 
Felix Frankfurter is the Legal Mastermind 
of the New Deal."—From "The New Deal¬ 
ers" by Simon & Schuster. "The due process 
clauses ought to go" out of the Constitu¬ 
tion—From 1938-9 book "Law & Politics 
of Felix Frankfurter, now Justice of Su¬ 
preme Court. Those clauses constitute the 
cornerstone of American liberty. "The 
Roosevelt Administration has selected more 
Jews to fill influential positions than any 
previous administration in American his¬ 
tory."—Brooklyn Jewish Examiner, Oct. 20, 
1933, referring to Bernard M. Baruch as 
"Unofficial President." The World Al¬ 
manac 1934-44 refers to Franklin D. Roose¬ 
velt as a descendant of the Roosevelt-Sam- 
uels family of Holland. "The man behind 
the re-packing of the U, S. Supreme Court 
was' Samuel I. Rosenman, close friend of 
the President."—National Columnist Paul 
MaJlon. Feb. 7, 1937, "The Social Justice 

2 39 

The CIO Action Committee, 
.successor of the dissolved Communist Party 
in the LL S., is Communist led. according 
to the Mar.' 29, 1944, report of the Con¬ 
gressional Committee. 

The "Daily Worker' is the official organ 
of the Communist Party in the U. 5. The 
N. Y. Morning Freiheic is the largest Com¬ 
munist daily in theU. S. 

Communism is anti-Christ, being athe¬ 

Committee nf the Rabbinical Assembly en¬ 
dorses the President’s plan fur reorganiza¬ 
tion of the Supreme Court, and favors the 
general tendency nf recently adopted social¬ 
ist legislation, in particular the scope of die 
Tennessee Valley Authority.'N. Y. Jew. 
ish Day, May II, 1937, 

Four hundred of the names of CIO 
Political Action Committee key-men are 
Jewish. Sidney Hillman. Russian-born few, 
was chairman. 

The incorporators of the "Daily Worker” 
were all Jews, and the editor of the Frei- 
heit A a Jew. 

lewry is anti-Christ. 'Fundamentally, 
Judiasm is anti-Christian.”—London Jewish 
World, Mar. 15, 1923- "By the very fact of 
denying the divinity of Christ. Jews place 
themselves as enemies of the social order 
since this order is based on Christianity." 
—From "Anti-Semitism" by Jewish Author 
Bernard Laz 2 re. "We challenge the present 
social system."—Resolution of the Central 
Conference of American Rabbis, N. Y. 
Times. Sep. 13. 1936. The United Stares 
was Christian-established. Sc-e Constitution 
attestation and U. S. Supreme Court de¬ 

2 4 0 


Based on foreknowledge that he has been substantially qualified to answer 
by a twenty-year intensive study of 'Anti-Semitism, its origins and propaganda, 
this writer has been requested to publicize in questionnaire form his findings on 
the subject. This has been done in an analysis below for congressmen: 

What is "Anti-Semitism”? 

A publicity "smear'-word. 

Does ''anti” imply antagonism to the Arab, Syrian, Egyptian members of 
the Semite "race”? 

No, only to Jews. 

Then the term is misleading? 

It is, intentionally so. 

Could it be called deceitful? 

It is just that. 

What is the object? 

To conceal Jewish activities unfavorable to non-Jews. 

Is it employed only by Jews? 


Did ancient Palestine Jews use the appellation? 

No more than do present-day Arabs, who are of the Semite race. How can 
a Semite logically be called "anti-Semitic?” 

Then "Anci-Semitic" was not a Christian Bible term? 

I found no record of such a thing. Non-Jews were often referred to as 
"Gentiles,” or non-believers in Jewish faith. 

Do present-day Jews refer to their critics by terms other than "Anti- 

Yes, "members of the Lunatic Fringe,” "Nazis,” "Fascists,” "Red Baiters.” 

But the labels you refer to are Communistic. 

They are, many Jews are confessed members of the "Communist 

Isn’t International Communism anti-nationalist? 

Yes, so are "International Jews” of today. They refuse to assimilate into the 
nations wherein they live. 

Then "Anti-Semitic” may properly be termed "Patriotic”? 

National Patriotism is automatically "Anti-Semitic” as the latter word is 
today used. 

Then why do some Gentile commentators refer to ' the virus of Anti- 

Because they are misled. 

Where did present-day Communism originate? 

In Russia among Jews. 

Did Jews have anything to do with the Bolshevist Revolution that 
established the Communist Soviets? 

The Revolutionary Committee which directed the uprising that overthrew 
the Czar Autocracy was composed of 545, of which 447 were Jews. 

2 4 1 

Where did "Anti Semitism” first appear politically? 

When Czarist Russia made effective 1882 May Laws ghettoing Jews because 
they would not assimilate. 

Why does "International Jewry" now call Communist Russia "Anti- 
Semitic" ? 

Apparently because so-called "Zionist Jews" of the Bolshevist Revolution 
refused to assimilate. 

Then the Communist High Command is "purging" the "Zionist jews" 
because they refused to be assimilated into the Communist State— thereby- 
constituting a danger to safety? 

Apparently so. 

Where did Zionism originate? 

Among the Eastern Russia Jews. 

Are there many Zionist Jews? 

The American Jewish Congress history book "Unity In Dispersion" indi¬ 
cates that present day "western" World Jewry is a 9 *> r /c majority. A minority 
of about one million "Sephardim" is located mostly in Moslem countries. 
Eastern Europe Jews have called themselves Ashkenazim without giving the' 
name's genesis. They speak Yiddish, not Hebrew. They are contemptuous of 
Sephardim Jews. Zionist Past President Julian Mack says 9S% of American Jews 
are Zionists. 

What does "Ashkenazim" indicate? 

It describes descendants of an East European kingdom called "Khazars,” 
who were mass-converted to Judaism about 750 A.D., by Dispersed emigrants 
from Palestine. 

Then Zionists do not belong to the Semite races of the Middle East? 

Both Jewish and Christian authorities say they belong to the Asiatic Mon¬ 
golian race which settled in the Caucasus, home of the Khazars. 

Then Zionists apparently have no legitimate racial claim to a "home in 
Palestine" where they recently established the political state of "Israel"? 

It is so held by H. G. Wells in his "Outline Of History.” 

When did Communism appear on the European political field? 

In the early part of the Nineteenth Century, It apparently stemmed from 
"The Illuminatti," a band of ruthless men who organized in 1798 with the 
declared intent of destroying all governmentas and religions. 

Have Khazar Jews displayed any special antagonism to the Christian 

Some Christian quarters hold that Christianity is today being crucified on a 
cross of gold—repeating history that records the crucifixion of Individualism on 
the "Cross of Calvary” twenty centuries ago. 

Doesn't all this evidence point straight to a world conspiracy against all 

Cold logic answers affirmatively, 

Why is that fact suppressed? 

Because the "terrible power of the purse" destroys free speech and free 
press, and promotes treason among politicians trapped in a gigantic web of 

Out of more than twenty-five different "explanations" published regarding 
the "anti-Semitic" Russian "purge puzzle," many of them from Jewish sources 
as well as otherwise, not one has been lucid as to the implications of the 
momentous developments of 1953. 

2 4 2 


MALENKOV, George; Premier; ancestry Asiatic; born in Eastern Russia; 
"right-hand man'.’ of Kaganowitch in past Stalin purges. Acted as "political" 
commissar in Red Army. 

BERIA, Lavrenti; former name Berijev; Interior Minister with control of 
Soviet Secret Police; ancestry Jew 1 ; protege of Kaganowitch; in Beria lies the 
most important part of the Soviet machine according to Eugene Lyons, Jewish 
author who had a two-hour interview' with Stalin in the Thirties. In the San 
Francisco Examiner Lyons said the same old gang still controls the Kremlin. 
(3-13-53) ("Liquidated" later.) 

KAGANOWITCH, Lazarus; Vice-Premier; ancestry Jew; relatives key- 
posted throughout Soviet; sister was Stalin’s wife; Stalin's daughter recently 
married a Kaganowitch; Kaganowitch is the ablest man in the Politburo accord¬ 
ing to "Life" magazine 7-14-41. "Lazarus Kaganowitch is a great man. He will 
one day rule over the country of the Czars. His sister is Stalin's wife." From 
"The Moment," Russian Jew' publication 11-13-34. 

MOLOTOV, V. M., Foreign Minister; name changed from Scryabin; wife 
Jewess; born Eastern Russia, son of salesman; the name "Molotov" means 
"hammer" like pseudonym "Marcus Eli Ravage," author of "Real Case Against 
The Jew's." Molotov's "assistant" is the Jew Jacob Malik. 

VISHINSKY, Andrei; UN Soviet Delegate; "Jewish." 

All of above were from the Eastern European Khazar-Jew territory. 

IS MALENKOF "jew-surrounded?" 

In January, 1953, Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver told a Philadelphia Jewish 
audience to suspend judgment as to-whether or not Russian Jew-purges w’ere 
genuine "anti-Semitic" orders from the Kremlin. Did he have foreknowledge? 

The conclusion is inescapable. The Kremlin Jew-domination is NOT 
genuinely "Anti-Semitic." Which condition recalls the Communist protocol to 
the effect that when safety calls for such action progroms against Jews are 
instigated by the High Command "for the management of our lesser brethren” 
"Anti-Semitism" is diversive strategy to mask ulterior subversions. 

"Gothic Ripples," of March 12, 1953, Editor Arnold Leese, Guildford, Surrey, England, 
contains the important information that the new edition of the Soviet Encyclopedia proves 
that "there is no 'anti-Semitism' in official Russia. Volume 15—per London Jewish Chronicle 
of Feb. 13, 1953—reports what the Soviets have always maintained—that 'The Jewish 
Problem does not exist in the Soviet Union, where today Jews find the doors open to ail 
professions.' Whether of the Right or Left, those who speak of recent events behind the 
Iron Curtain as evidence of 'anti-Semitism 1 in the Soviets are either utterly misled by imperfect 
knowledge or are deliberately using the crisis to gain sympathy for the Jews. By 'imperfect 
knowledge' we mean ignorance of the basic fact that Bolshevism (Communism) is Jewish. 
What is happening in Russia may have a tremendous repercussion on world politics, for at last 
Bolshevik Jew fights Bolshevik Jew. This gives scope for o split Russia. If that happens the 
end of the cold war would be in sight." 

A Tel Aviv cable to the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 13, 1953, reported 
unofficial Jewish sources "expressed satisfaction that the incident (bombing) 
would definitely place Israel in the camp of western nations and MAKE HER 


Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler of Brooklyn said on Feb. 15, 1953, 
in the N. Y. Times that the Israel bombing incident opened opportunity for 
America to increase its financial and military aid ' to the Jewish State. 


The pattern of the "purge” strategy of the Jewish High Command was 
inadvertently exposed in a N.Y. hem published Jan. 2-4, 19Y3, in the San 
Francisco Examiner, which said: The American Jewish Committee charged 
today that Russia's vast anti-Semitic purge has driven into slave labor camps 
800,000 Jews.” 

The further statement was made that an American Jewish Committees 
"survey.” based on "contacts with underground sources, monitoring of Com¬ 
munist broadcasts, interviews with refugees, and State Department reports’ of 
1952, shows that the goal of the purges is the same as Hitler's, viz.: 

(1) To Mobilize anti-American hatred all over the world. 

(2) To cause “Anti-Semitic groups to isolate the U. S.” from Allies 
during a Stalin "hot” war against the free world. 

(3) It gives the information that purges of Jew's would be led by Jews 
in many cases so that the Communists can say there is no discrimination. 

The implied intent of the involved Jewish policy forecasts a sinister assault 
on U, S. publishers exposing the Jewish anti-Americanism of the New Deal, as 
indicated by the hint that "anti-Semitic groups" would be a Russian Fifth 
Column in the U. S. to isolate and weaken the latter and promote the success 
of a Soviet "shooting war.” 

The focus is that said "anti-Semitic" publishers would be guilty of treason 
to the U. S. in that they, by being "anti-Semitic,” help the Communists. 

Such invalidated "guilt by mere association" was precisely the completely- 
refuted accusation of the Communistic Roosevelt prosecution in the 1944 dis¬ 
missed mass-case, in which defendants were branded as co-conspirators with 
Hitler because they also were "anti-Semitic," like the Nazis. 

Former Zionist Organization President Solomon Goldman said in the N. Y. 
Times of July 1, 1940: "He who is an anti-Semite is a Hitlerite.” So you there 
have the Jewish inspiration of the foregoing direct from "the horse s mouth." 

Doesn't blundering false Jewish Leadership EVER learn? As shown in the 
two Edmondson cases cited in this Petition, Jews are evidently again "allowing 
their emotion" to guide them to defeat, a reluctant published confession from 
Jewish Chief Counsel Hays of the American Civil Liberties Union, following-the 
enforced backdowns in said cases. 

The typical alibi prediction in the final sentence of the above Exam¬ 
iner dispatch that "MANY Jews" will lead the "Jew purges,” carries the im¬ 
plication that many Jews are Communists, which has hitherto been denied by 
the "conservative" American Jewish Committee, although “radical" American 
Jewish Congress members have admitted it in writing. 

The “survey" sources of information listed by the American Jewish Com¬ 
mittee are obviously pro-Jewish, and as Jews will analyze and interpret such 
prejudiced data and propagandize it through advertising-controlled publications 
in the U. S., che general public can not recognize and isolate the bias. 

2 4 4 

National chauvinism is an extreme form of racial chauvinism. Hence 
Anti-Semitism is dangerous to the toiler. Therefore Communists, as internation¬ 
alists, cannot but be irreconcilable sworn enemies of anti-Semitism, which is 
severely suppressed in the USSR as profoundly inimical to the Soviet Union 
Anti-Semites arc- punished accordingpo the laws of the USSR by death.” 

The foregoing is a Stalin interview published Nov. 26 , 1937, by The N Y 
Morning Freiheit, largest Communist daily in the U. S.,’printed'in Yiddish 
purporting to be FUNDAMENTAL Soviet doctrine. 

It sec-ms that the following question answers itself: Would the.Rosen- 
bergs convicted of treason to the U, S, for sending our atom secrets to the Krem¬ 
lin Communist Leadership have taken such action if Communism were actually 
anti-Semitic’ and against all Jews? It is noteworthy that at the time of the Rosen¬ 
berg clemency plea to the White House, the latter’was picketed by Daily Worker 
Communist delegations. 

Clemency was officially denied the Rosenbergs when, on Feb. 11 , 1953 in 
a powerful elementary-justice patriotic-condemnation. President Eisenhower’re¬ 
fused to intervene. By which positive concrete action he definitely put Ameri¬ 
can interests before Jewish demands. A politically-minded President would have 
granted clemency. 

Will U. S. Communistic Zionist sources now call the President "Anti- 
Semitic because his action coincides with the Communist reported "anti- 
Semitic purge of Jews who confessed treason guilt to the Russian Government; 
and that therefore Mr. Eisenhower is a Communist following the anti-American 
Soviet Line ; that, moreover, because of such "enemy collaboration," he is a 
traitor to the Republic of the U, $.; and that, furthermore, he should undergo an 
alienist test to see whether or not he belongs to "The Lunatic Fringe?” 

I Sincerely hope that President Eisenhower may find time to read and 
digest this Petition (copy of which has been sent to him) because the docu¬ 
mentary-record should prevent him from becoming tangled in the most gigantic- 
labyrinth spider-web of deceit ever evolved. 


Rabbi Schmelka Margoshes, Editor of the N. Y. Jewish Day wrote Sep 
12, 1936. "We are a people nobody knows!" r 

Basil M. Henriques, a distinguished British Jew, admitted: "We are a 
peculiar people, and a peculiar people we shall remain!"—Zionist Record of 
South Africa, Apr. 29 , 1939 . 

Opposing assimilation. Rabbi S. S. Wise of N, Y., Theodor Herzl Austrian 
Founder of Zionism, and Chief Rabbi Herzl of England, declared "we are a 

In.die Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. IX, under "Nervous Diseases” this ap¬ 
pears; 'Physicians of large experience among Jews have stated that most of 
them are neurasthenic and hysterical.” 

As to dementia, it has been established in public and private clinics that 
the percentage of Jews is three times greater than Christians."—From "Tews 
and Judaism of Today” (1925), as published by "The Key To The Mystery." 

T Alexander Pilcz, world famous psychiatrist of Vienna, in "Wiener 

Klinsche Rundschau” (1910) Page 888 , made this statement: "Cases where 
acute psychoses lead to idiocy and lunacy are of particular frequency with the 
Jews. (From the Key to The Mystery). ' 


When attacking "anti-Semites’' Jewish writers concentrate on the bromidic 
smears "Lunatic Fringe/' "Crackpot/' "Filthy Jew-Baiters,” "Nazi-Fascist," 
calling for insanity tests. 

When this writer was summoned ro appear before N. Y. Jewish Mayor 
LaGuardia in the Jewish Religion group libel case, he was told that an alienist 
would be on hand to "give him the paranoic works." 

The same smear w'as proposed by jew' publications for "anti-Semitic ’ 
defendants in the notorious mass-conspiracy case later in Washington. 

(Incidentally, Robert Edward Edmondson is ready at any time to submit 
to a genuine sanity test by any reputable non-Jew alienist—after he has read 
this document.) 

Now, in the Communist purge-rrial of several years ago in Moscow, a large 
number of Jew's vociferously confessed gross treason guilt to the Soviet. 

Precisely the same thing occurred in Prague at the 1952 trial of Jewish 
Communists, where children w-ere reported in the press as gleefully accusing 
their parents of treason. 

A Jewish psychiatrist on January 16 , 1953, delivered a lecture on "Mass 
Paranoia" before a California Medical Society, according to reproduction by 
the Peninsula Herald of Monterey, Calif., the next day, from which the follow¬ 
ing extract is taken: 

"The major symptoms are a pre-occupation with suspicion, delusions of 
persecution, conspiratorial feelings; irrational accusations. In the mass, this 
becomes a persecution of minorities.” 

. . Our race has given the world a new prophet. He has two faces and 
bears two names. On the one side his name is Rothschild (Red Flag), leader of 
capitalists; on the other Karl Marx (Communist).—Jewish Editor Blumental 
in "Judisk Tidskrift," Sweden, 1929, Issue No. 57. 

"No other religion in the world has offered a spectacle as contradictory, 
as malicious as the Jewish prayer Kol Nidre used during Yom Kippur . . . 
Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the nations which 
have suffered them. Our major vice of old and of today is parasitism."— 
From "Jews Must Live," by Jewish Author Samuel Roth. 


Jewish Author Samuel in "You Gentiles" says "Jews are destroyers, even 
of those instruments of destruction to which they turn for relief.” 

That sounds "cockeyed," but "let’s look at the record.” 

JEWS "TURNED” TO RUSSIA and established Bolshevist Communism. 
Refusing to assimilate, do they now seek "to destroy" with an "Anti-Semitic” 
boomerang because they failed to get "relief?” 

Explaining "Anti-Semitic” purging was due to "Russian Jew-s’ refusal to 
become completely absorbed into the Communist State," Chancellor Simon 
Greenberg of the Jewish Theological Seminary of New York (quoted in the 
San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 19, 1952) added that the Soviets hoid Inter¬ 
national Judaism to be treason. As safety of The Republic requires assimilation 
into a single American organism, should the U. S. also regard such anti-assimi¬ 
lation attitude as treason? Maybe the answer is in the American electoral re¬ 
pudiation of the "Jew” Deal last November. 


And as Dr. Greenberg claims that the "seeds of Anti-Semitism" were in the 
19.17 Bolshevist Revolution, would it be impertinent to ask whether or not the 
intent thereby indicated unmasked a pre-conceived plot to dominate Russia? 

A Palestine special to the N. Y. Tunes of Feb. 14, 1933, quotes Israel’s 
Foreign Minister Sharett as saying the Soviet rupture of diplomatic relations 
was an attempt to destroy the sense of unity" among Jews longing for Zion. 
He admitted that the allegiance which Jews of the world have for the State of 
Israel "cuts right across Soviet conceptions." 

JEWS "TURNED TO" GERMANY "for relief." Later, these "Khazar 
converts to Judaism," refusing to assimilate, and frustrated from complete 
domination, betrayed that country to destruction by bringing a World War on 
Germany, for becoming militantly "anti-Semitic?" 

refugees; but, refusing assimilation, they moved to destroy its form of govern¬ 
ment with their socialistic New Deal. 


In the August, 1941, Atlantic Monthly, James Marshall, N. Y. prominent 
Jewish lawyer, admitted: "In every century the jew has been welcomed into and 
booted out of some land. ... It would be idle to deny chat Anti-Semitism exists 
in America, or that it is loose dynamite." 

Judging by its many failures Jewish leadership never learns, and obviously 
repudiates the ancient wisdom that to know the future man must be largely 
guided by past error. 

Doesn't the Jewish anti-assimilationist policy constitute— 

(1) Alien enemy invasion, with hostile intent toward existing forms of 
national organisms, whose safety, peace and welfare depend on complete absorp¬ 
tion of and disappearance into their culture of all ideologies? 

(2) Also indicate acquisition of American citizenship in such a manner as 
to supply de facto prima facie evidence of false pretenses amply adequate to 
justify prompt de-naturalization, disfranchisement and deportation of those who 
refuse to sink their peculiar antagonistic identities into genuine undivided 
allegiance to Americanism? 

Existing laws arc daily being invoked to de-naturalize citizens who ob¬ 
tained citizenship by making false statements in their application oaths. 

That the inherent anti-assimilation policy of Jewry is a specific danger to 
the peace and safety of The Republc, is not susceptible to challenge. 

To find the truth amid all this profound chaos the trained observer well- 
informed as to the Jewish Problem has little difficulty to trace the trail of the 
Jewish dream of supreme power, starting with analysis of the conception and 
perspective opened by the elucidations given below by highest authorities. 

Once that commanding-view position is fortified by comprehensive know¬ 
ledge of the past, the "Jewish Line," at times hidden with bi-laterals and di- 
versive movements, planned or accidental, the analyst is never confused more 
than temporarily, by incidental screens such as racial "Anti-Semitism,” Zionist 
Communism, Socialism, Marxism, phoney Liberalism, Internationalist, Paternal 
and other subversive auxiliaries, which are TOOLS dictated by the end-product 
aim of complete dominion. 



To get real light on the Russian purges it is vital to consult origins, and 
in "Secret Societies’’ bp Nesta H. Webster, famous British author, is found 
the following quotation: 

"The conception of jews as Chosen People who must eventually rule the 
woiid, forms the basis of Rabbinical Judaism and the Jewish Religion now- 
takes its stand on the TALMUD AND NOT THE BIBLE. 

Mrs. Webster adds that it is in the Jewish Cabala . . . that the dream of 
world dominion recurs with great persistence; the Zohar explaining that The 
Feast of the Tabernacles' is the period when they triumph over other peoples of 
the world. The hope of world dominion is not an idea attributed to Jews by 
'anti-Semices but a very real and essential part of their traditions. Let us not 
forget that Rabbinical Judaism is the declared implacable enemy of Christianity 
. Jews find in promoters of class-warfare their most valuable allies. 

An eminent Biblical theologian, Rev. Denis Fahey, in his Mystical Body of 
Christ," says the Talmud exposes the "terrible Jewish pride” in the corruption 
of "the Chosen People Mission’’ down into materialism, adding that from their 
condemnation by Jesus, Palestine 'Jews ceased to be the Chosen People. As 
Jewish power in the material order grows ,they fail prey to Marxian Pantheism. 

Going into the diplomatic field the reader will find world power con¬ 
firming evidence also In the secular realm as plainly indicated by Netherlands 
Minister Oudenryk’s code message from Russia to his government in Holland 
recommending immediate transmission to the British Government as an Empire 
with power to counter the threat. Oudendyk telegraphed from St. Petersburg 
in 1918 that, "Bolshevism is organized by Jews whose object is to destroy for 
their own ends the existing order of things —which is in harmony with the 
'"Tiluminatti” program to destroy all national governments” with the Fifth 
Column" of anti-assimilation. 

Referring to the long-established anti-assimilation policy of International 
Jewry, Editor Morrison of the powerful Protestant publication The Christian 
Century, in its issues of April 29 and May 13, 1936, editorially makes this 

"A Judaism which talks of its uniqueness and is unwilling to take 'pot 
luck’ with humanity by offering its treasures to the rest of mankind, cannot 
escape the SUSPICION that it is hoarding its treasures for a SELFISH 

That immediately poses these significant questions: 

Could said "suspicion" interpret that "selfish purpose" as "The Jewish 
COMMON PURPOSE" so often broadcast by B’nai B’rith publications— 
carrying the implication that "the common" objective of Jewry comprises the 
world dominion plot-pattern faithfully followed by the Jewish-Bolshevist over¬ 
powering of Russia, and in subsequent Communist subversions of national 

Will such "suspicion" also expose the underlying reason why Jews are 
"booted out of every country" where they were unsuspectingly welcomed, and 
because, failing to dominate, refusing assimilation, they have brought destruc¬ 
tion as heretofore categorically indicated, executing it with the double-meaning 
diversive cry "Anti-Semitic" persecution, to delude the rest of the world? 

From the "vantage point" gained through the reader’s conviction as-to the 
chief objective of world dominion, the fog of compounded confusion is pierced 
by the X-ray of that foreknowledge. 


BuL it must first be recognized thar cliversive activities merely represent 
"tools" of accomplishment, such as Communism, which Jews themselves do not 
want as their "Way of Life;" for their goal is ultimately individual. But, in 
order to achieve it they temporarily sink themselves into organized regimentation, 
convinced that such organization implacably operated, is the only method 
whereby a small minority can finally acquire eventual individual power over 
the common enemy. 

The widely propagandized paradox that the Jews cannot at the same time 
be the greatest capitalist assembly and the most numerous communistic collection 
is now being generally unmasked by eventualities. They in unison promote com- 
munization of Gentiles from above and below, in pursuit of a Jewish solidarity 
idealization of supreme power. 

The close inspector of developments will be convinced that Jews are not 
omnipotent, and that the dream of universal power is certain to end in universal 
ruin should it be realized. But completely exposed, evil generally turns 
against itself because the forces it invoked go into destructive reactionary- 

Personal initiative is the worst enemy of the subverters because it is the 
soul of real progress. 


Britain’s foremost Jewish Socialist H. J. Laski, Chairman of the British 
Labor Party, who lectured in America for the Collectivist way of life, according 
to Benj. de Casseres in the July 31, 1945, San Francisco Examiner, made the 
following prophecy: 

"If the ’ experiment (Socialistic New Deal) for which Roosevelt is re¬ 
sponsible were in any serious degree to break down, the first result of its break¬ 
down, because of the association with it of a number of eminent American 
Jews, would be the outbreak in the United States of Anti-Semitism more pro¬ 
found than anything Anglo-Saxon civilization has so far known."—(Quoted 
from Page 3, of the London "Fascist” of January, 1935, under the heading 
"Sovietism By Stealth," with the statement that Prof. Laski had enunciated it at 
the "8th Living Newspaper Meeting" held at the Anglo-Palestinian Club on 
Dec. 2, 1934.) 

These questions pose themselves: 

Does the November 4, 1952, overwhelming national election repudiation 
of said New Deal constitute said "breakdown” and reveal that "profound anti- 
Semitism,” considered in connection with the fact that most of the convicted 
defendants in the 1952-3 communist spy trials in American cities were Jews, 
contribute to such "anti-Semitism?” 

In an anti-lynching bill debate in March, 1937, Congressman Eugene Cox 
of Georgia said to Congressman Dickstein of New York: "If you insist upon an 
inquiry you are speeding the day when patriots will have to defend Jews against 
mass-intolerance, Mark my words! That day is coming.”—American Hebrew, 
Mar. 1937. 

The New Deal was openly called "The Jew Deal” in various parts of 
eastern United States. If the reader entertains doubt as to its Jewish character 
he will no longer be skeptical after reading the summarizing below of authentic 
documents quoted in this record in extenso, 

In the earlv Thirties it was broadcast that Bernard M. Baruch was known as 
"Unofficial President" in the absence of New Deal President Roosevelt; that 
Jewish U. S. Supreme Court Justice Brandeis was "Father of the New Deal;” 
chat U, S. Supreme Court Justice Frankfurter was the "Legal Master-Mind” 
who reportedly guided the White House Supreme Courc "packing” plan of the 
New Deal; that N. Y. Justice Samuel .I. Rosenman. was "Roosevelt’s Right 
Arm” and writer of his state documents: that the Jew Herbert Feis was "The 
Brains of the State Department;” that the Jew Lilienthal headed the "typically” 
Socialistic Tennesse Valley Authority; that James P. Warburg, son of the “Father 
of the Federal Reserve System” was a New Deal "braintrusterthat the Central 
Conference of American Rabbis called on Washington for "socialization of 
basic American enterprises;" that Prof. H. J. Laski and Israel Moses Sief were 
Roosevelt British Jew consultants; and fast, but not least, that President Franklin 
D. Roosevelt himself admitted Jewish ancestry, which was moreover promul¬ 
gated by a genealogy from the Washington Carnegie Institute. And that when 
FDR introduced Bernard M. Baruch to a White House visitor, saying that 
"Bernie” had monitored him for many years, Baruch added "And don't you 
think I made a good job of it?” 

In the light of the foregoing and the up-to-date quotation below from 
London "Truth” of January 23, 195 3, minds not dosed will be completely 


Referring to the "especially incongruous” Churchiil-Eisenhower meetings 
in N. Y. City at the private residence of Bernard M, Baruch after the Presi¬ 
dential election, the London Weekly’s writer, Douglas Reed, said; 

"From such statements as he (Baruch) occasionally makes, he appears to be 
in global affairs AN INTERNATIONALIST, in domestic ones, A SOCIALIST. 

"He has consistently recommended the REDUCTION OF NATIONAL 
SOVEREIGNTY in the greater field, and the IMPOSING OF CONTROLS 
in the American domestic one. 

"Thus he appears to be NOT A BELIEVER IN NATIONAL OR IN¬ 
DIVIDUAL LIBERTY, which is the root-principle of Conservative belief, but 
an OPPONENT thereof. 

"He has sometimes gone very far in recommending a SUPRA-NATIONAL 

Although emanating from quarters possibly not completely informed, that 
summary, in my opinion, is the most penetrative scholarly and dramatic evalua¬ 
tion of "the Elder Statesman" ever published at home or abroad. 

After careful review of the record herein regarding this Wall Street self- 
styled speculator, termed "Mystery Man” in politico-economic circles of the 
world capitals of Washington, New York and London, newsmen like the under¬ 
signed, with decades of experience in the world’s greatest financial center of 
New York, have been overwhelmed bv the dramatic spectacle presented of 
"one-man-power” of practically unbounded extent and degree—recalling 
Baruch’s admission before a U.S. Congressional Committee following World 
War One, that during the great conflict he had more power than any man. 

2 5 0 

Which probably operated to acquire for him in newspaper publicity the bom- 
basic titles of "Elder Statesman" and "Presidential Advisor," since he went to 
Paris with President Woodrow Wilson where the Versailles Treaty was ef¬ 
fected and which is said to have been a root-cause of World War Two.. 

Evidently the "global" deductions referred to in "Truth," were dictated by 
B&ruch’s continuously strong support of "UN," with whose creation Jewry had 
much to do; their spokesmen having boasted in the past that they had "created" 
the previously dissolved League of Nations. 

The "great persuasive power" of the Barnchian "suave personality’’ backed 
by huge wealth of baronial extent, created for him an enormous politico-econ¬ 
omic influence, in recognition of which his name heads the "Honor Roll" of 
"Who's Who in American Jewry." (See Postscript on Page 284). 

The "Truth" allusion to Baruch’s INTERNATIONALISM, interpreting it 
as "anti-national," recalls a statement published in the Chicago Tribune in the 
Twenties, wherein he was credited with calling "National Pride (Patriotism) 
a lot of nonsense." 

The late Pennsylvania Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of 
the House Banking Committee, told the House that "every administration which 
had. listened to Baruch's advice had sunk the nation "deeper and deeper into 
financial mire." 

As to Baruch’s origins, I have seen published statement by him saying 
that his father was a Polish Jew—which puts him in the Khazar "Eastern Russia 
Jew” category. 

I would like to entertain the hope, in concluding this analysis, that the 
masterly "Truth" summation supplies reasons why Baruch has not—yet—been 
"appointed" as "Elder Statesman" of the "Eisenhower Administration." 


The 1944 mass-case prosecution alleged that Edmondson "anti-Semitic" 
publicity was "Nazi propaganda; that there was no active or organized 'anti- 
Semitism' in the U. S. before Hitler came to power in 1953, so that American 
'anti-Semitism' was therefore Nazi-inspired and projected." 

Defendant Edmondson prepared in refutation a court exhibit containing the 

Benjamin Franklin was against the Jews as shown in "Benjamin Franklin’s 
Writings” by Smythe, in the N. Y. Public Library, wherein the following was 
written by Franklin to President Adams of the United States from France on 
Dec. 14, 1781: 

"By this time I fancy your Excellency is satisfied in supposing that J. 
Neufvilie is as much a Jew as any in Terusalem—since Jacob was not content 
with his percents but took the whole of his brother’s (Esau’s) birthright—and 
his posterity did the same by the Canaanites and cut their throats into the bar¬ 
gain. Which I do not think Neufvilie has the least inclination to do to us when 
he can get anything by our being alive." 

That "anti-semitism” was 152 years before Hitler became Chancellor of 
Germany in 1933. 

We now come to an Adams sequel, for the extracts below are from "Henry 
Adams and his Friends," 1947, by Harold Dean Cater, Houghton Mifflin Co., 
publishers, Boston, Mass. (Henry Adams is a descendant of John Adams). 

2 5 I 

A letter to John Hay from London, Oct. 4, 1895, from Henry Adams says: 
"The Jew Question is really the most serious of our problems. The Christians 
secretly encourage the anti-Semicic movement.’ 1 

Letter from same to same dated July 28. 1896: "Did you enjoy, as I did, 
that list of Jew names tailed after J. P. Morgan in the foreign exchange syndicate 
which has been formed to step in and try to save Morgan’s stocks from going 
to nothing? How the deuce do the Jews manage to make this chaos stand on 
end. The whole carcass is rotten with worms—socialist ■worms, anarchist 
w'orms, Jew worms." 

That was more than 35 years pre-Hitler. 

"Organized Anti-Semitism in the U. S.," by Donald Strong, published in 
1941 under the sponsorship of the "American Council on Public Affairs,” 
after saying on Page 14 "The Jew is the perpetual alien,” reports on Page 15 
"Anti-Semitism in its political form first appeared in the U. S. at the end of 
the world war (1918). The high point was reached in 1920-22 (11 years pre- 
Hitler.) Political anti-Semitism had been well-rooted in German culture for 
HALF A CENTURY when the Nazis appeared on the scene/ 

On Dec. 17, 1862, more than 70 years pre-Hitler, U. S. General Grant 
issued an order barring Jewish traders from Union Army camps, because they 
"violated every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Dept.” Could 
that have been "active anti-Semitism?” 

The Henry Ford anti-Jewish literature in 1920-22 was so strongly docu¬ 
mented, it created widespread active "anti-Semitism” throughout the United 
Slates long before the Nazis rose to power. (Recent developments include a 
confession that Ford’s secretary—not Henry Ford—wrote the "apology” Jews 
claim to have forced from Ford.) 

The case of Near vs. Minnesota, 283 U. S. Supreme Court 697 shows that 
’’virulent Anti-Semitism” existed in the U. S. in 1927, six years before the 
Nazis came to power. The owner of "The Saturday Press” of Minneapolis, in his 
Nov. 19, 1927, issue, charged city officials with corruption, and said: "Practical¬ 
ly every vendor of vile hooch, every owner of a moonshine still, every snake¬ 
faced gangster and embryonic yegg in the Twin Cities is a Jew.” 

"Concerning The Jews,” article by Mark Twain in the 1900 edition of 
"The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg,” reflects strong "Anti-Semitism” in 
the U. S. 33 years before Hitler came to power. Twain said: "The Jew is a 
money-getter;” he made it the end and aim of his life; he was at it in Rome; 
he has been at it ever since; his success has made the whole human race his 
enemy.”—(33 years before Hitler.) 

Rabbi Lee J. Levinger’s 1930-1 book "The History of the Jews in the 
U. S.” says: 

"After the world war (1914-18) all this anti-Semitism was brought to 
America. . . . Jews had been excluded from social clubs and fashionable resorts; 
Jewish businessmen were boycotted.” 

The book admits a "flood of Jews” came from Eastern Europe and 
Russia just after 1918—more than a decade before Hitler came to power in 

Did this "flood” cause "anti-Semitism?” Let Zionist Founder Theodor 
Herzl answer from his 1936 book "The Jewish State,” wherein he said "The 
Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible numbers.” 

2 5 2 

Many Jews lived in the U. S. in 1925, S years before Hitler became German 
Chancellor, viz: 3,500,000 of them. 

On Oct. 17, 1944, principal Prosecution Witness Rauschning in answering 
cross-examinations by mass-case defense counsel, admitted as follows at the 
mis-trial in Washington, D. C.: 

"Is a person who is sincerely anti-Semitic a Nazi?” 

"No. Anti-Semitism existed hundreds of years before Hitler.” 

"Without being a Nazi, do you stand with Americans who are against 

"Yes. A strong national spirit does not make an American patriot a 

(End of Court Exhibit.) 


'The Russian May, 1882 laws w-ere the most conspicuous monument 
achieved by modern Anti-Semitism, which then set its mark on the international 
relationships of the powers. The modern Jew with his Yiddish culture and 
rapacious traditions should not be confused with Bibical Jews, who were mainly 
a pastoral people. The International Jew of modern times is the bastardized pro¬ 
duct of a bastardized past. He does not worship the Bible, but the Talmud; he 
does not speak Hebrew, but Yiddish, He is not descended from Israel. This is 
vividly Illustrated by H. G. Wells in his 'Outline of History.' Therein it is 
stated that "the main part of the Jewry never was in ludea and had never come 
Out of Judea.” (From "Behind Communism, second 1952 edition, by Frank L. 

After the 1882 May Laws in Russia, "Anti-Semitism’ 1 was a term in¬ 
creasingly applied to Gentile criticisms or restrictions. These Jews adopted the 
slogan "No Assimilation.’’ Communism, with its "common purpose” of world 
dominion, and Zionism with its Palestine State of Israel abjective, were both 
rooted in Russia. 

History reports that the "King” of the Khazars (of Eastern Russia) adopted 
for his mixed-Mongol people what Texas Methodist University Prof. John 
beaty, author of an invaluable book "The Iron Curtain Over America,” rerms 
"a form of the Jewish Religion” about 741 A.D.—which government was 
destroyed and its territory confiscated by Slavs in the tenth century'. 

I am in full accord with the "purge” program advocated by Dr. Beaty, 
whom I never met, and of whom I had no knowledge during the 1933-1940 
crusade. He says the later antagonism between Khazars and Slavs was "not 
racial, but ideological.” 

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia reports "Khazar migration” to Russia, 
Poland and Europe. That Encyclopedia stares that from earliest Russian times 
its Government worked for complete exclusion of Jews. 

The genesis of the world conspiracy rests in rabbi manifestoes that "Jews 
are a people, one people,” with the intimation in prominent Jewish circles that 
Jews comprise an "International People” whose center is now in the Palestine 
State of Israel, founded by Zionist Jews. 

The world conspiracy picture reflects Communist beginnings in the seven¬ 
teenth century with the so-called IUuminarti, whose grandiloquent objective was 
proclaimed as abolition of national European governments and destruction of 

2 5 3 

Christian religious sects—which aim seems to have been inherited by Marxists. 

To grasp the widely ramifying implications of the term "Anti-Semitic” it 
is necessary to learn the aspirations and strategies of the dominant Khazar 
Ashkenazi clement of "International Jewry.” a people constantly refusing to be 
assimilated. These people have apparently usurped the title "Chosen People of 
God,” originally "vested” in the Semite jews of Palestine, according to Biblical 

Jewish Scientist Albert Einstein provided a KEY unlocking the mystery of 
"Anti-Semitism” when he proclaimed that ' The Jew remains a Jew” even when 
he changes faith, name or position in life. 

The term "Semite’ ’is only legitimately applied to members of the "Semite 
Race”—Egyptians, Syrians, Arabs, aside from the Palestine Jew of old. Descend¬ 
ants of the anciently Judaized Khazars of eastern Russia, being of Mongolian 
Asiatic races, could not logically hold themselves rightfully encitied to "a home” 
in Palestine, having never been there as a people. 

We now come to the core of a world plot for universal domination, not a 
racist, but evidently a theological affair, predominantly. 


On the face of the evidence, having acquired a mass-delusion of exalted 
future grandeur impregnated by centuries of inbreeding, rabbi inculcation and 
strict kosher training, these Mongol Jews have apparently arrogated to themselves 
the theory that as "Chosen of God” none of chem can do wrong; that their 
leadership is infallible, and they must therefore obey any order from the High 

And for Gentiles to critically analyze and unmask fantastic aims and there¬ 
by become "Anti-Semitic," is "lese maieste.” Wouldn’t that explain why their 
leadership, ignoring elementary justice, invariably rushes to the aid of the tribe 
everywhere, whether or not guilt has been confessed? 

Rabbis and other leaders are continually opposing assimilation into national 
entities. Assimilation would not only eliminate rabbi monopolies; it would 
destroy the ideal of the "common purpose” dream of world domination. It is 
interesting to note that Protestant Christian leaders are beginning to use the 
terms "Illusion,” "Myth” and "Nazi prototype” in alluding to this tribal state 
within a state and its anti-assimilation attitude. 

In a 1942 issue the Chicago Jewish Sentinel declared that "World War Two 
is being fought for the fundamentals of Judaism.” Not for Americanism! And 
when President Franklin D. Roosevelt publicly called for a descriptive title for 
said war, an "Australian Jewess” is reported to have cabled; "War For Sur¬ 
vival.” Of what, the "Jewish People”? 


Being neither a churchman nor a Biblical theologian, the writer makes no 
pretense of evaluating Fundamentalist or other strictly religious ethics, although 
modern developments seem to reflect a very dose relationship. But truth in¬ 
struments seek light. Note this; 

"PHARISAISM BECAME TALMUDISM; Talmudism became modem 
Rabbinism . . , But throughout these changes in name . . , the spirit of the 
ancient Pharisee SURVIVES UNALTERED. When the Jew studies the Talmud 
he is accurately repeating arguments used in the Palestinean academies.” See 


' The Pharisees; The Sociological Background of their Faith," 1946, The Jewish 
Publication Society of America; edited by Prof. Louis Finkelstcdn of the Jewish 
Theological Seminary of America. 

In a 12-column scientific analysis indicating that Christ was not a Jew, 
as Jews claim, appears the foregoing extract, published by "Common Sense," 
Anti-Communist newspaper of Union, N. J., February 1, 1953- 

‘'Anti-Semitism means Pharisaism! The Christian who knows this will be 
more understanding of the hatred borne for Christ by modern Pharisees. Christ’s 
excoriation of Pharisaism and all it stands for is unequalled for sheer liquid fire 
by any diatribe in history."—By Elizabeth Diliing in "The Defender" magazine, 
January 1953 issue. 

I know Elizabeth Diiling personally. She is the famous author of the "Red 
Network," and stands high not only in Communist exposure but on the Christ¬ 
ian Bible and the Jewish Talmud—which, incidentally says "The Modern lew' 
is the product of the Talmud." She is not alone in the thesis reached by years 
of exhaustive study, that The Dispersion blazes the trail down the centuries to 
today's Judaism as ancient Pharisaism carried into the Talmud (Jewish Bible) 
"declared complete 500 A. D."—which was in the period of the existence of the 
Kingdom of the Khazars who were mass-converted to Judaism. 

"More than, six centuries lie petrified in the Talmud,” the very life-breath 
of Jew's, their very soul, says H. Graetz in "History of the Jews,” 1893. Those 
six centuries were followed by the Khazar conversion to Judaism. As interpreted 
L-y the Pharisees? 

A Biblical student at this point would probably ask himself: Does this 
Khazar product "of the Talmud" mean that Khazars are "They of the Synagogue 
of Satan which say they are Jews but are not and do lie” repeatedly so alluded 
to in "Revelations?'' And is this "The Beast of Destruction" which Biblical 
prophecy predicted would come "Out of the North"? 

Acknowledging the accuracy of the fulfillment of prophesied general "tribu¬ 
lation” in today’s Communism, this secular writer suggests that the mass-circum¬ 
stantial evidence produced at least indicates WHO have been the champion 
trouble-makers down the ages. 

Apparently being confronted with what seems to be a religious crisis of 
the first magnitude, I have been impelled merely to open perspectives and leave 
the resolving process in the hands of religious theologists more competent to in¬ 
terpret mysterious prophesying. 

Yet the honest investigator cannot refrain from posing below an interroga¬ 
tion evolved by latest developments: 

Having been frustrated in their objectives by Christ’s Divine Denunciation, 
"unequaled for sheer liquid fire,” did Pharisaic ancient leaders migrate from 
Palestine north to Eastern Russia’s Caucasus, there find the Khazar descendants 
of Asia receptive and convert them to judaism as they saw it and as delineated in 
rhe Talmud which they are’reported as creating? 

I wouldn’t be qualified to judge that bit of theology, but I can envision the 
world-shaking secular possibilities should Christiandom broadcast an exposure 
of seemingly the greatest HOAX in history as to '’BIBLICAL Jews.” 

And it would appear to the lay mind that it is about rime for the Christian 
ministry to become militant Christian Soldiers, banishing "The fear of the Jews" 

2 5 5 

and boldly end "silence on the Jewish Problems," so despairingly deprecated 
by B. A. M. Shapiro ("By race a Jew, by Faith a Christian’") who published in 
his "America’s Great Menace” that Communism was "hatched in the Camp of 

"There is a certain community who really are not Jews, whose ancestors 
were Asiatic people who became converts to Judaism during the earlier centuries 
of the Christian Era. Most of these so-called Jews have rejected the Jewish Faith, 
so that they are not now Jews in any sense of the w'ord, neither by race nor 
religion.”—From "Israel 'Britain” by Rutherford, 1939, referring to the 

But, you say, this is all fantastically impossible. How' can so small a minority 
ever hope to gain domination over a world of more than two billion? 


I can only repeat "how”?, and then point out that if such a small minority 
group is frenziedly elevated by a paranoic delusion of grandeur into the brain¬ 
storm atmosphere of Lese Majeste, the idea may be fantastic but enthroned 
emotional energy has achieved wonders thus far. 

"World Jewry,” by "mastering all the secrets that lay hid in money,” and 
becoming "Lords of Money,” have made themselves masters of the economic 
world, with more than ample gold-power to subvert widely in politics and else- 
v'here; and results appear to indicate that Jewry is well on its way to achieve 
"The Jewish Common Purpose” dream, working secretly through the "terrible 
power of the purse” and press, and openly by communizing unsuspecting non- 
Jews into slavery. 

Vast destruction has been accomplished through two world wars apparently 
engineered by Jewish men who boast "We are at the bottom of nearly ail 
your wars. We still dominate you through the mighty power of our spirit, ideas 

What is to be concluded from the foregoing "confusion testimony?” 

This: The Russian "puzzling Anti-Semitic” wails constitute nothing 
more or less than a smokescreen diversion used to conceal continuing subversions 
elsewhere—in promotion of "The Jewish Common Purpose” of world politico- 
economic control—precisely the "Communist Line” deceit-strategy in other 

Evidently in support of the new aggressive anti-Soviet policy of the Eisen¬ 
hower Administration, below is extracted vital conclusions from a scholarly and 
convincing article by James Burnham in "This Week” section of the San Fran¬ 
cisco Chronicle of Feb, 8, 1953: 

After demonstrating that the Truman-Acheson ''containment” policy is a 
"formula for Soviet victory,” Mr. Burnham unequivocally declares that "If the 
Communists merely succeed in consolidating what they have already conquered, 
then their complete world victory is certain. There remains only a limited time 
during which it will continue to be possible to move” against the Soviets. 

I am fully in accord with that thesis. Is President Eisenhower? Intelligent 
counter-aggression in this respect could well develop into Liberation Step No. 
2, following the Nov. 4, 1952, U. S. national election repudiation of the New 
Deal, which was Step No. 1. 

2 5 6 

"Anti-Semitism" was judicially declared not to be a crime under American 
law, in a unanimous decision by the New Jersey State Supreme Court on Dec. 
5, 1941, reversing a lower court conviction, unconditionally holding unconsti¬ 
tutional the State Rafferty Act (which made a misdemeanor of any public utter¬ 
ance that tended to incite "hatred, abuse, violence or hostility against any 
group" regardless of race, color or creed), on the specific ground that it 
"violated ... the guarantees of the Federal Constitution in the matter of free¬ 
dom of speech." 

"Now, over two-thirds of the Jewish People of the world live in America” 
Dr. Cecil Roth, Oxford history teacher and world Jewish Leader, told Kansas 
City Jews in Temple B'nai B’rith, Jehuda, Mar. 18, 1952, as reported in the 
Kansas City Star of Mar. 29 , 1952.—From The Beacon Light Herald of Atas- 
cadera, Calif., of March, 1953. That Jewish estimate indicates that the total 
Jewish U. S. population is over 10,000,000 plus "cryptos." If the ancient Jewish 
custom of enumerating males only is still effective, the total could be 

The $64 question inevitably arises: 

Do we Americans want our laws, administration and judging done by 
members of a group of "peculiar people" who refuse to become genuine 
Americans by opposing assimilation, and who themselves , are apparently shot 
through with paranoia inculcated by centuries of inbreeding and morbid dwell¬ 
ing on a fanciful delusion of grandeur as well as a self-induced defence-persecu¬ 
tion by the Gentile world they label "the common enemy?” 


No collective Crime in the annals of history parallels the Jewish subversion 
of the American Republic. Never had there been so charitable a people! 

With limitless sympathy and tolerance unexcelled, America welcomed to 
its hospitality from every land the oppressed, the despairing, the victims of 
tyranny. Opening wide the Gates of Freedom with unequalled opportunity and 
boundless wealth beyond, The Republic generously offered asylum. 

And how did Jewish leadership requite? Jewish refugees—"wretched 
refuse from Europe’s teeming shore" (Emma Lazarus on the Statue of Liberty) 
were moved in—and their New Deal took over. 

Treacherously betraying American friendship benevolence, they, with 
incredible ingratitude, crowded us and our children out of the avenues of econ¬ 
omic reward. With financial intimidation, they subverted to their own ends the 
channels of inter-communication; with seditionist intent, rejecting assimilation 
into this American organism, they usurped the administration of our political 
system with its equal rights for all and special privileges for none—planning 
socialist-communist revolution and the destruction of our republic-form of 

Throughout Christian civilization, historical records show that Jews have 
been expelled from every great nation. Holding themselves superior and aloof, 
they have not only refused absorption into national organisms, but, in "fatuous 
effrontery," lusting for supreme power, they sought to tear down institutions 
and cultures they could not emulate, and substitute therefor the unworkable 
materialistic international ideology of leveling-down communism to the lowest 
possible common denominator. 

And that once true AMERICAN metropolis of New York is now mass- 
leveled under the rule of "UN" Communists, Jews and gold, with Gentile minds 
growing cold and cramped and sordid, commerce losing its invigorating soul, 
with the arts sinking into blatant vulgarity and hypocrisy governing courtesy! 

2 5 7 


"American publicity channel, MUST BE FREED FROM JEWISH AD¬ 
VERTISING AND OTHER INTIMIDATION,” declared Edmondson Bulletin 
to patriots on April 3= 1939; "political jews MUST WITHDRAW from dl 
key positions to permit restoration of American majority REPREoEN i A i I v h 
CONSTITUTIONAL Government in place of centralized invisible rule; 
MONOPOLIES of leadership of national and local political parties by Jewish 
key controls MUST BE ELIMINATED; Jewish Capital MUST RETIRE Uom 
its anti-social monopoly of screen, radio and other American NECESSI „ 
ENTERPRISES; Jewish professors and teachers MUST BF FUl UL i ur- 
mstitutions of learning; Jewish corruption of the Judiciary of America MUST 
BF OUSTED; Jewish promotion of Communistic propaganda against American 
liberties MUST CEASE; International Jewish financial domination of America's 
monetary system MUST BE DESTROYED, recognition of the Jewish Soviet 
Murder'Government MUST BE RECALLED because ot deliberately broken 
Communist propaganda pledges and slaughter of Christian millions. 

"American Jewry has been indicted and arraigned for POLITICAL, ECON¬ 
OMIC, SOCIAL anti-American activities. It has been charged with placing 
Jewish’interests OVER ALL in America, as 'a nation within a nation,’ with con¬ 
ducting a destructive economic program against American business; with finan¬ 
cial promotion of revolutionary internationalist Communism and undermining 
the very American institutions which welcomed and sheltered it from oppression , 
with crowding American talent out of the Avenues _ of Opportunity through 
ruthless economic power; with ADOPTING and fulfilling in America the dia¬ 
bolical anti-Gentile super-government .plans of- the so-called Protocols of the 
Elders of Zion, -whose AUTHORSHIP they deny without disproving the 
charge that Jews employ those plans. 

"Nothing but a general 'smear’ denial—wmch is NO ANSWER—has been 
entered against evidence, factual, documentary and circumstantial, including 
direct Jewish confessions of guilt. 

CAN it be other than 'Guilty? And in view of the 'No answer,' with boastful 
collateral 'defi/ CAN the sentence of punishment be otherwise than PUNITIVE? 

"The struggle converges on our country, which has been seized through 
secret controls of the Press, Politics and Economics. Here is the LAST STAND 
of the foe. All national doors are dosed to mass-immigration. 

"If we fail, through FALSE FEAR and selfishness, to circumvent this 
diabolical plot, SUPREME SACRIFICES ARE INEVITABLE. America is 
now in "FULL CRISIS!" And I cannot impress it upon you too earnestly—"IT 

Precisely six months later World War TWO began, into which greatest 
conflict, "being fought for the fundamentals of JUDAISM"—not Americanism 
_the Roosevelt Jew Dealers forced the United States in 1941. 


What is a practical solution of the pressing World Jewish Problem, with 
simple Justice 'for Gentile and Jew? The following proposals have been made: 

(1) Kill the Jews—which is unthinkable. 

(2) STERILIZATION of Jews—which is out of the question. 

(3) DEPORTATION, on the ground that American citizenships have 
been acquired under false pretenses, which kind of expulsion has been operat¬ 
ing under law in the U. S. effectively for sometime past. But we are considering 

2 5 8 

here the case of Jews who entered the U. S, citizenship not to become loyal 
citizens of The Republic, but who came with the aggressive hostile invasion 
ideology of an active anti-assimilation intent to destroy”our form of government 
and dominate. Could such a contention be legally proved through overt acts 
committed by all individual jews? Could there be a "dean sweep," which 
would be absolutely necessary to achieve real results? 1 doubt it! 

power to discriminate and decide WHO shall vote in state and national elections. 
Even if successful, whicn is doubtrul, the U. S. Supreme Court might rule 
that such a law violated the U. S. National Constitution. In any case, the 
terrible power of the purse" would still be exerted to subvert if Jews were al¬ 
lowed to remain as aliens. 

successful in alloting "5 c /;' of the total population to individual Jews in var¬ 
ious professions and businesses, where activities now are conducted in many 
cases under Gentile names?' What would prevent Jewish wealth from overcom¬ 
ing this and other similar discriminatory action? 

(6) NATIONAL DISFRANCHISEMENT, by Constitutional amend¬ 
ment, requiring Jewish deportation automatically. How could such a decree be 
enforced en masse and still be in harmony with individual justice; especially 
since this writer knows of numerous instances were some individual Jews have 
exhibited strenuous opposition to the New Deal treasonable leadership but who 
are fearful of "liquidation’’ if they do not obey the "High Command." 

(/) SEGREGATION of all Jews. How can crypto (secret) Jews be 
uncovered to effective action? If put in ghettos such restrictions would not avert 
subversion via the money channel, of which International Jewry is master. In 
the past Rothchild loans enslaved widely and are still in operation. 

Made A WORLD POLITICAL affair with genuine international co¬ 
operation by Jew' as well as Gentile, segregation could be effective But exper- 
tence has taught that the present Jewish High Command misleading Jewry 
wDch has been rabbi-inculcated ro regard that false leadership as infallible 
wou d not give up without a world-shaking revolution, with Communism ready 
to take over in the chaos resulting. / 

■ t n ,° 0f ^ er wa y 0ut - ? * th»nk there is; but it involves a definite chance 

in Jewish leadership, and not through new prophets as some Christian clergy 
suggest; for, judging from the historic record, Hebrew prophets got nowhere 
even when they correctly foreshadowed later realized tribulations, including 
ordeals which present-day Jews are meeting in the Communist Soviet cold war 
Anti-Semitic purging. 

"The Free World" now proposes to take the initiative away from Moscow 
by promoting aggressive counter-revolution among satellite states, the entrenched 
Iron Curtain first defense-line of Russia’s Communist Government. 

Why not strike first at the CAUSE of the Communism as represented by 
the overwhelming domination of Jews m the Bolshevist Revolution m 1917-18? 

Who would be THE Leader to take the Jews out of such "captivity?" 

Preliminary to that, however, and doing first things first, let’s look back 
into contemporary history a little way and note the following from the late 
Iheodor Herz., apparently revered by Jewish masses throughout the world, 
what is the record of that "non-conformist rabbi" who passed away in 1904 
but who, after death, was memorialized in 1929 in a symposium of prominent 

2 5 9 

Jewish names: and whose "Jewish State, an Attempt at a Modern Solution of 
the Jewish Question," written in 1895, was published in 19by the Central 
Office of the Zionist World Organization in London for Jewish circulation, with 
a foreword by Israel Cohen saying: 

"One of his oldest friends to whom Herzl submitted the manuscript, re¬ 
turned it with deepest alarm; he feared Herzl was out of his mind, and begged 
him not to publish it. He also advised him to show the manuscript to Dr. Max 
Nordau, famous as a psychiatrist. The result was that Nordau not only vindi¬ 
cated the sanity of Herzl, but declared himself ready to assist him . . . Herzl’s 
enthusiasm and courage grew. His ideas, while evoking sympathy in some 
quarters, provoked the bitterest opposition in others ... He convened the First 
Zionist Congress in Basle in 1897. 

Herzl’s "Jewish State" contains this unprecedented Jewish "anti-Semitic” 
confession: "The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews live in perceptible 
numbers. Where it does not exist, it is carried by Jews in their migrations. Our 
presence produces persecution. The Jewish Question is no more a social than a 
religious one. It is a national question which can only be solved by making it 
a political WORLD Question.” 

To this writer, the foregoing paragraph is die best brief description of 
"anti-Semitism” ever published. ’ 

Herzl elucidates with rare clarity the complex aspects of "Anti-Semitism.” 
Said he in "The Jewish State”: 

"l believe I understand anti-Semitism. I consider it from a Jewish stand¬ 
point, without fear or hatred. I can see what elements there are in it of vulgar 
sport, of common trade, jealousy and inherited prejudice, of religious intoler¬ 
ance, of pretended self-defense. It sometimes takes these forms and others; but it 
is a world political question, 

"It is useless for the Jews to be loyal patriots (of the nations in which they 
now live). Assimilation means not only in dress, habits, customs and language, 
but also comprises identity of feeling and manner. Such assimilation could only 
be effected, by inter-marriage; but the need for mixed marriage would have to 
be felt by the majority; recognition by law would not suffice. 

"The Jews are a BOURGEOIS PEOPLE. If the power they now possess 
creates indignation among anti-Semites, what outbreaks would not occur with an 
increase of power? Hence, the first step toward absorption will never be taken, 
because it would involve the subjection of the majority to a hitherto scorned 
minority possessing neither military nor administrative power of its own. 

"Where Jews now feel comfortable, it will probably be violently disputed 
by them. The longer anti-Semitism lies in abeyance, the more fiercely will it 
break put. 

"Because I have drawn this conclusion with complete indifference to every¬ 
thing but the quest of truth, I shall probably be opposed by Jews who are in 
easy circumstances. They can safely be ignored, for the concerns of the poor and 
oppressed are of greater importance than theirs. It is true that in countries where 
we live in perceptible numbers the positions of Jewish lawyers, doctors, teachers, 
employees, daily becomes intolerable. The nations in whose midst Jews live' 
are all, either covertly or openly, anti-Semitic. 

"We have attained pre-eminence in finance because mediaeval conditions 
(ghetto) drove us to it. Being on the stock exchange, we are exposed afresh to 
contempt. Educated Jews are now fast becoming socialists. We stand in the most 
exposed positions in the camps of socialists and capitalists. 



"Modern anti-Semitism is not to be classed with the religious persecution 
of former times. The very impossibility of getting at the Jews embitters hatred 
of them. Anti-Semitism is bound to increase because the causes of its growth 
cannot be removed. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, sub¬ 
ordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and when we rise, there rises also 
our terrible power of the purse. The oppression we endure does not improve us, 
for we are not one whit better than ordinary people,’’ 

(No "Chosen People" racket in that,) 

In the Herzl Memorial, Clemenceau, the great Frenchman, called Herzl a 
rare genius who fought for high destiny against his own people. But he won 
their post mortem crown of immortality! 

Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, Zionist leader, was selected to deliver the open¬ 
ing prayer at the January presidential inauguration. During the Communist 
picketing of the White House for Rosenberg clemency. Rabbi Silver added his 
clemency plea, without avail. He told Californians on arrival in San Francisco 
Feb. 23 (reported the San Francisco Examiner of Feb. 24, 1953), his version 
of the Soviet ''anti-Semitism," saying it stemmed from political leanings of the 
State of Israel toward the western free world contingent; adding that he would 
like to see more American business investing in Israel’s activities, which would 
benefit the Israeli. Which would seem also to indicate that even Jewish Com¬ 
munists in Russia could not forget their Jewish anti-assimilation tradition of 
"domination or downfall." 

On Page 254 of the Herzl Memorial of 1929 appears an article by Rabbi 
Abba Hillel Silver entitled "Herzl and Jewish Messianism: Nationalism as a 
Means to a Greater Goal." In it Rabbi Silver says: 

"The Jewish Messianic hope was born not in helplessness but in power. It 
sprang into being when the RACE awakened to a realization of the unique and 
amazing career which destiny had carved out for it . . . This dogma was INTER¬ 
NATIONAL in character because Jewish Nationalism was then a fact, not a 
problem; a people can be international in outlook only when its own National 
Life is secure ... It was missionary in spirit ... It concerned Palestine only as 
the pou sto ("where we stand"), FROM WHICH VANTAGE POINT 
ISRAEL COULD MOVE 1 HE WORI.D \” Toward world domination? 

Upon Rabbi Abba has apparently fallen the Jewish Leadership mantle of 
the late Rabbi Stephen Wise, President of the American Jewish Congress— 
with this difference: Rabbi Stephen’s public platform appearance was character¬ 
ized by belligerent bellows for "Mutual Tolerance;" with open war on. "Anti- 
Semitism;" punctuated by occasional wails "I have been betrayed!”—as when 
he was served with a subpoena by the defense in the Edmondson Jewish Religion 
group libel case. Not so Rabbi Abba, who enters the scene unobstrusively with 
rubber-sole-like subtlety. Which recalls the ancient warning: "The words of 
his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart.” (Psalm 15:21.) 

I have no knowledge that individuals named herein who seem to be un- 
American, are not true to THEIR convictions; but as a loyal citizen I have no 
alternative but to do MY DUTY to The Republic by placing my beliefs before 
fellow-countrymen for their information and judgment. 

Careful reading of this Herzl book of exceptionally independent thinking on 
a very high plane, the auchor of which won the Jewish accolade of '’immor¬ 
tality” from tribal friend and foe, shows that while the Herzl Jewish Political 

2 6 1 

State Plan first mentioned Palestine because of religious associations involved, 
lie also referred to Argentine, Uganda and other locations, but said specifically: 
"WE SHALL TAKE WHAT IS GIVEN US.” On Page 26 he adds: "Let 
sovereignty be granted to us over a portion of the globe large enough to satisfy 
the rightful requirements of a nation—the rest we will manage for ourselves.” 

"He then elaborates in detail his plan, which he proposes to have carried 
out by two Jewish agencies, one to do preparatory work, the other to see to "the 
realization of business interests of departing Jews" from the lands wherein they 
have been resident. 

The plan envisions that "The departure of the Jews will necessarily be 
gradual, continuous, and cover many decades. The poorest will go first to culti¬ 
vate the soil. , . . The Governments scourged by Anti-Semitism will be keenly 
interested in assisting us to obtain the sovereignty we want. 

"The departure of Jews will involve no economic disturbances; in fact, the 
countries they abandon will revive to a new period of prosperity. There will be 
migration of Christian citizens into positions evacuated by Jews. 

"Should the powers declare themselves willing to admit our sovereignty over 
a neutral piece of land, then the Jews will enter into negotiations for possession 
. . . We could offer possessors of the promised land enormous advantages, take 
upon ourselves part of the public debt, etc.” 

"The new Jewish State must be properly founded, with due regard for our 
future HONORABLE position in the world. Therefore every obligation in che 
old countries must be SCRUPULOUSLY FULFILLED. We shall not wait for 
reciprocity. We shall act purely for the sake of our own HONOR, 

"Social dissatisfaction would be appeased during the years which the emi¬ 
gration of the Jews would occupy, and set it at rest during the whole transition 
period . . . 

"I think a democratic monarchy and an aristocratic republic" said Herzl, 
"are the finest forms of a state, because in them the form of the state and the 
principle of government are opposed, and they thus preserve a true balance of 
power ... A democracy without a sovereign’s useful counterpoise is extreme in 
appreciation and condemnation . . . produces professional politicians. NATIONS 
prone ... to be swayed by vigorous ranting. It is impossible to formulate a wise 
international or internal policy in a popular assembly . . . Politics must shape 
in the upper strata and work downward.” 

James Madison, "Father of the U. S. Constitution” published: "A Dem¬ 
ocracy is incompatible with personal security and the right of private property.” 


Herzl not only appears to be in accord with Madison but categorically 
against the following by the Central Conference of American Rabbis printed in 
the N. Y. Times of Sep. 13, 1936: "There is only one way in which the Ameri¬ 
can people can escape Fascism and Communism, and that is by establishing A 
Dictionary describes "Social Democracy” as like Communism of Russia. 

Amazingly, Herzl directly challenges, in the following striking words, 
the ballyhooed ideal of the U. S. National Conference of Jews and Christians 
to promote "more tolerance,” already beyond the limit: 


2 62 

VORTS, The famous British Author, Nesta H. Webster, endorses the latter 
when she emphasizes that without "ANTI” the opposition loses that essential to 
victory, dynamic power, declaring that simply to be "pro” is not enough. 

Herzl called for a 14-hour workday in the new state with two 7-hour 
shifts,, to get maximum production without sweatshop methods. 

Jews who might prefer assimilation and refuse to migrate, but who may 
try to carry on subversions, can easily be taken care of by a new press that 
will be free to expose wrong-doing in all quarters. 

I leave it to any intelligent mind, Non-Jew or Jew, as to whether 
or not the foregoing principles enunciated by Herzl are sound as such, 

Where would Jews go now? Millions are already in over-crowded Palestine- 
Israel (which is surrounded by other over-populated and unproductive states) 
unable even to feed itself; and it is compelled to make continual financial aid 
appeals to the United States; also asking military assistance to protect it from 
surrounding enemies whose steadily expanding hostility is due to Jewish aggres¬ 
sion in the establishment and promoting of "Israel.” 

If massive migration takes place to "Israel” from Russia under Communist 
anti-Semitism” what can be done to avert starvation? RE-SHIPMENT TO THF 

Where, then? TO MADAGASCAR, a fertile island as large as California 
off the southeast coast of South Africa, not far from Palestine. 

How could Madagascar be made available? France once offered it to Jews 
for colonization, and at a riduclously kw price, considering Jewry’s bilKons. 
And France would welcome the money to pay oppressive national debts, 

The outstanding feature of this Herzl plan is its implied brand of "FALSE” 
with which it labels the present Jewish Leadership, which has materialistically 
perverted the British peace pledge of a religious "Homeland” for Jews "longing 
for a return to Zion.” & 6 

Under the heading "False Leadership,” on Aug. 1, 1934, Robert Edward 
Edmondson wrote the following open letter to Rabbi Stephen S. Wise Zionist 
leader in New York: 

Amazed by the astounding anti-American implications conveyed in your 
rerenl Pres.denhal call for an American-Jewish Parliament. I am addressing you 
as below m plain language: 6 1 

Your Parliamentary summons declares: "We.are on the threshold of a battle 
for the preservation of our existence. The time has come when the Jews of 
America must acknowledge themselves and act as a people, not only where 
European Jewry is concerned, but where they themselves are concerned.” 

Why so_ preposterous a cal) to Jews to "battle for the preservation of exis¬ 
tence here in tolerant America, with their own leaders, Bernard M Baruch 

-TWr • f he D Bro , okl >; n ^aminer (Oct. 20, 1933), the high title of 

"Founder^ f IN Un,ted St “ es; Judge Samuel !■ Rosenman 

NewDeah- B “' ^ ^ 

r w An /^°n g m br D 0ad: - ° u S ht not J ewish Leadership be satisfied with having 
captured All the Russians with the Communist Council of 565, of which, 


according to U. S. Congressional Records, 469' were Jews; to say nothing of 
dominating the British Regime by Socialistic "fronts;” and holding international 
banking control through the Rothschild "Hidden Hand"—to quote the "Red” 
Protocols, whose executed plans overcame Russia and whose prophecies were 
fulfilled in the New Deal legislation already enacted by an amazingly subserv¬ 
ient Washington Congress? 

Why this constant preachment of combat against racial prejudice and a sum¬ 
mons for "economic re-orientation of Jews based On trends, opportunities and 
reeds—to maintain unity"? Does this imply further welding of the Jews into "a 
nation within a nation' 1 ? 

Americans are beginning to ask: Is this Jewish Parliament called for the 
purpose of staging another of those periodic wailing-walls notorious in history 
as "sounding-boards" for outcries of "persecution." 

Before it is too late, might it not be wise for this leadership to sincerely 
direct the tremendous Jewish energy, talents, perseverance, determination and 
willingness to work, into patriotic American constructive channels, instead of 
nursing an increasingly dangerous antagonism that has come to be universally 
denounced and branded as Jewishness." 


To unmask the proven fallacy of the "religious association” appeal for 
Palestine acquisition, propagandized throughout the world by false Jewish 
Leadership for "moving in and taking over," it is but necessary to "think 
materialistically" and learn that the Dead Sea mineral wealch of several trillion 
dollars was probably the real underlying profit motive of the gentlemen in the 
Middle East "pile.” 

And that is not all. Note the strong socialistic and communistic elements 
now in Israel, where many communities are reported living "in communism"; 
and then recall Herzl’s ANTI-Democracy-Communism principles proposed for 
his new Jewish political state. 

On Page 70 of his state outline he says: 

"I incline toward the aristocratic republic. INDIVIDUAL ENTERPRISE 
MUST NEVER BE CHECKED," which approves the American individualism 
INDIVIDUAL. Private property, which is the economic basis of independence, 
shall be developed freely. The people is the personal, land the impersonal 
groundwork of a state, and the personal basis is the more important of the two.” 

Herzl must have been reading American history when he wrote on Page 
71, "Shall we end by having a theocracy? No! We shall keep our priests within 
the confines of their temples. THEY MUST NOT INTERFERE IN THE 

Memorial testimonials to Herzl from both opponents and proponents in 
Jewry contain the following: 

"The laurels of Immortality" were wrested (by Herzl) in the hour of 
death from seeming failure."—Chaim Weismann, first President of the Jewish 
State in Palestine. He was not a pro-Herzl Zionist. 

"The nobiest soul in Judah is not dust," wrote Jewish Poet Israel Zangwill 
after Herzl’s death, in a glowing poetic tribute. 


"The entire Jewish people must mourn the loss of this lofty personality. 
Among his Jewish contemporaries not one approached him. His championing of 
justice, honor and freedom brought him public approval. The power behind 
him was moral. The Zionist idea existed before Herzl. To us East European 
Jews he was a brother."—Nahum Sokoloff, who said Jews created the League 
of Nations after a 25 year .struggle. 

"The stony soil, the lack of humus, the dearth of fauna and the scanty 
flora seemed to me insurmountable obstacles to any (Jewish) colonization of 
Palestine. Consideration of climate, physical nature and racial psychology result¬ 
ed in a definitely negative conclusion in my mind. Like Zangwill, I preferred 
colonization on a large scale in Argentine, in Texas, or Uganda. Palestine meant 
nothing co the great financier de Hirsch, for it w'as impossible to grow grain 
there. But I, non-Zionist . . . pay homage to Zionist Leader Herzl (in a mem¬ 
orial address).—Ludwig Stc-in, German Professor of Philosophy. 

"The announcement of Theodor Herzl’s sudden death in 1904, in the 
throes of the Uganda plan, found English Zionists in a state of turmoil and 
disorganization. The Jewish Colonial Trust had been launched in 1899 as the 
financial instrument of the Zionist Organization."—Paul Goodman. 

" ’The return to Zion’ must be preceded by the return to Judaism," said 
Herzl, from whose diaries the following features are taken: 

He does not say Palestine or any other specific place—merely "over there." 

"I want to do everything openly and clearly, within absolutely legal limits" 
Herzl told the Grand Duke of Baden. 

Herzl quotes the Sultan of Turkey as saying regarding Palestine: "The 
Turkish Empire (in which then was Palestine) does not belong to me, but to 
the Turkish People. Let the Jews keep their billions." 

"The Jews who are comfortable are my enemies. Thus I begin to have the 
right to be the greatest anti-Semite of all."—Herzl. 

Describing his first visit to Palestine on an expedition "by command’' of 
the Kaiser, Herzl wrote in his dairy: "Poverty, desolation and fearful heat." He 
quotes the Kaiser as saying the land "needs water, much wacer, above every¬ 
thing else, water!” (Scarce in Palestine). 

On Dec. 29, 1899, Herzl wrote: "Yesterday I had a talk with Oscar Straus, 
American Ambassador to Turkey. He considers Palestine unattainable for us, 
as the Greek and Roman Catholic Church would not permit it." 

In his "Jewish State,” first written in 1895, (published in England 1936), 
Herzl, who died in 1904, said on Page 30: "Shall we choose Palestine or 
Argentina? WE SHALL TAKE WHAT IS GIVEN US, selected by Jewish 
public opinion." 

In 1936 on February 7, the London Jewish Chronicle printed a letter from 
S. Landman, former Jewish Propaganda Agent of the British Government, 
saying: "The only way to induce the American President (Woodrow Wilson) 
to come into the World War (1914-18) was t